{"title":"上帝与现象学","authors":"J. Schrijvers","doi":"10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1 Jean-Yves Lacoste, La phenomenalite de Dieu. Neuf etudes, Paris, Seuil, 2008. A French version of this review appeared in Revue Philosophique de Louvain 107 (2009). 2 J.-Y. Lacoste, Experience and the Absolute. Disputed Questions on the Humanity of Man, transl. by. M. Raftery-Skehan, New York, Fordham University Press, 2004, p. 197n. 17 and p. 101 for the rejection of the so-called ‘philosophy of religion’, and p. 203n. 4, p. 92 and p. 141 for the distance taken from theological knowledge, but see already p. 1, “the supposed border between these two kinds of knowledge [i.e. philosophy and theology] tends to disappear in the present work”. 3 Lacoste, Presence et Parousie, Geneve, Ad Solem, 2006, p. 194, and the article ‘Philosophie, theologie et verite. Remarques frontalieres’, pp. 85-116. Also La phenomenalite de Dieu, p. 10. For an analysis of these works, up to Presence et Parousie, see Transversalites 110 (2009) 171-222. Contributions are from Jean-Luc Marion, Jerome de Gramont and Emmanuel Falque. NOTE","PeriodicalId":80655,"journal":{"name":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","volume":"71 1","pages":"85 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046949","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GOD AND/IN PHENOMENOLOGY\",\"authors\":\"J. Schrijvers\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1 Jean-Yves Lacoste, La phenomenalite de Dieu. Neuf etudes, Paris, Seuil, 2008. A French version of this review appeared in Revue Philosophique de Louvain 107 (2009). 2 J.-Y. Lacoste, Experience and the Absolute. Disputed Questions on the Humanity of Man, transl. by. M. Raftery-Skehan, New York, Fordham University Press, 2004, p. 197n. 17 and p. 101 for the rejection of the so-called ‘philosophy of religion’, and p. 203n. 4, p. 92 and p. 141 for the distance taken from theological knowledge, but see already p. 1, “the supposed border between these two kinds of knowledge [i.e. philosophy and theology] tends to disappear in the present work”. 3 Lacoste, Presence et Parousie, Geneve, Ad Solem, 2006, p. 194, and the article ‘Philosophie, theologie et verite. Remarques frontalieres’, pp. 85-116. Also La phenomenalite de Dieu, p. 10. For an analysis of these works, up to Presence et Parousie, see Transversalites 110 (2009) 171-222. Contributions are from Jean-Luc Marion, Jerome de Gramont and Emmanuel Falque. NOTE\",\"PeriodicalId\":80655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"85 - 93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046949\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1让-伊夫·拉科斯特，《神的现象》。新练习曲，巴黎，Seuil, 2008。这篇评论的法语版本出现在鲁汶哲学评论107(2009)上。2 J.-Y。《经验与绝对》。《关于人的人性的争议问题》译。通过。M. raaftery - skehan，纽约，福特汉姆大学出版社，2004年，第197页。第17页和第101页拒绝所谓的“宗教哲学”，第203n页。第4页，第92页和第141页，关于与神学知识的距离，但已经看到第1页，“这两种知识(即哲学和神学)之间的假定边界在目前的工作中趋于消失”。3 Lacoste, Presence and Parousie，日内瓦，Ad Solem, 2006, p. 194，和文章“哲学，神学与真理”。《frontalieres评论》第85-116页。又见《上帝的现象》，第10页。关于这些作品的分析，直到《存在与Parousie》，见《横向》110(2009)171-222。Jean-Luc Marion, Jerome de Gramont和Emmanuel Falque都有贡献。请注意
1 Jean-Yves Lacoste, La phenomenalite de Dieu. Neuf etudes, Paris, Seuil, 2008. A French version of this review appeared in Revue Philosophique de Louvain 107 (2009). 2 J.-Y. Lacoste, Experience and the Absolute. Disputed Questions on the Humanity of Man, transl. by. M. Raftery-Skehan, New York, Fordham University Press, 2004, p. 197n. 17 and p. 101 for the rejection of the so-called ‘philosophy of religion’, and p. 203n. 4, p. 92 and p. 141 for the distance taken from theological knowledge, but see already p. 1, “the supposed border between these two kinds of knowledge [i.e. philosophy and theology] tends to disappear in the present work”. 3 Lacoste, Presence et Parousie, Geneve, Ad Solem, 2006, p. 194, and the article ‘Philosophie, theologie et verite. Remarques frontalieres’, pp. 85-116. Also La phenomenalite de Dieu, p. 10. For an analysis of these works, up to Presence et Parousie, see Transversalites 110 (2009) 171-222. Contributions are from Jean-Luc Marion, Jerome de Gramont and Emmanuel Falque. NOTE
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
