American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society最新文献_第4页

Allergic contact cheilitis in the United Kingdom: a retrospective study. 英国的过敏性接触性唇炎:一项回顾性研究。

American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society Pub Date : 2003-06-01

Roland M Strauss, David I Orton

{"title":"Allergic contact cheilitis in the United Kingdom: a retrospective study.","authors":"Roland M Strauss, David I Orton","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"Background: To date, only a few cohorts of patients with allergic cheilitis have been described, most of them from Australia and Asia.Objective: To establish the prevalence of cheilitis in a UK specialist contact dermatitis clinic and to identify the most common allergens.Method: We analyzed our patch-test database in a tertiary referral center in the United Kingdom, retrospectively. All patients presenting with cheilitis over a 19-year period (1982 to 2001) were included.Results: Data were available from a total of 146 patients. A positive allergic patch-test reaction was thought to be relevant in 15% of the patients (n = 22) and to be of possible relevance in 6.8% (n = 10). Of the 22 patients with relevant allergic results, 95% (n = 21) were women. The most common allergens included fragrance mix (mainly cinnamaldehyde, oak moss, and isoeugenol) in 41% of patients, shellac in 18%, colophony in 18%, and Myroxylon pereirae in 14%. For half of the patients, the allergen was believed to stem from lipsticks or lip products. Eighteen percent of patients with allergic cheilitis reacted to only their own products.Conclusions: Patients should be tested to extended lipstick/cosmetic vehicle series in addition to standard series. As a significant percentage of patients react to their own products only, a thorough clinical history and testing to patients' own products are important.","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":"14 2","pages":"75-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24185330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Sensitization to palladium chloride: a 10-year evaluation. 氯化钯致敏性:10年评价。

American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society Pub Date : 2003-06-01

Francesca Larese Filon, Daniele Uderzo, Emma Bagnato

{"title":"Sensitization to palladium chloride: a 10-year evaluation.","authors":"Francesca Larese Filon, Daniele Uderzo, Emma Bagnato","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Palladium is increasingly used in industry, jewelry, and dentistry and is becoming more common since the European directive restricting the use of nickel in all products placed in direct and prolonged contact with the skin.Objective: The role of palladium sensitization is still unclear, and the aim of our study is to evaluate the trend of sensitization in a contact dermatitis clinic population during a 10-year period.Methods: We report our experience with 4,446 patients (3,077 female, 1,369 male; mean age, 40.1 +/-13.7 years) with suspected contact dermatitis patch-tested during the period of 1991 to 2000.Results: A positive patch-test result to palladium chloride 1% was indicated in 236 patients (5.3%), with a higher percentage in females (6.7%) than in males (2.3%), and the sensitization to this metal has increased over the specified period, to a maximum in the year 2000 (9.7%). In the majority of cases, subjects were polysensitized (92.8%), but 7.2% of subjects were patch-test positive only to palladium. Of palladium-sensitized patients, 40.5% complained of hand dermatitis, 47.4% complained of body dermatitis, and 1.7% complained of burning mouth syndrome. Palladium sensitization is significantly related to female sex (OR = 3.08; 95% CI, 2.07-4.61) and to sensitization to other metals, with a maximum for nickel sulfate (OR = 32.9; 95% CI, 21.3-51.5).Conclusion: Sensitization to palladium is increasing by the year, reaching high values, but its role in reducing sensitization and symptoms is still unclear because of the frequent cosensitization with nickel and the low number of monosensitized patients with relevant sensitizations. We need to follow palladium sensitization in future years to verify an increase of sensitization due to the increasing use of this metal.","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":"14 2","pages":"78-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24185331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Eyelid dermatitis: an evaluation of 447 patients. 眼睑皮炎:447例患者的评价。

American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society Pub Date : 2003-06-01 DOI: 10.1097/01206501-200306000-00004

F. Ayala, G. Fabbrocini, R. Bacchilega, E. Berardesca, S. Caraffini, M. Corazza, M. L. Flori, S. Francalanci, M. Guarrera, P. Lisi, B. Santucci, D. Schena, F. Suppa, R. Valsecchi, C. Vincenzi, N. Balato

{"title":"Eyelid dermatitis: an evaluation of 447 patients.","authors":"F. Ayala, G. Fabbrocini, R. Bacchilega, E. Berardesca, S. Caraffini, M. Corazza, M. L. Flori, S. Francalanci, M. Guarrera, P. Lisi, B. Santucci, D. Schena, F. Suppa, R. Valsecchi, C. Vincenzi, N. Balato","doi":"10.1097/01206501-200306000-00004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01206501-200306000-00004","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000Eyelids can be affected by various types of dermatitis that are often difficult to diagnose.\u0000\u0000\u0000OBJECTIVE\u0000The aim of the study was to establish some guidelines for a correct diagnosis.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000A total of 447 patients treated at 12 research units for eczema or other inflammatory dermatitis located on the eyelids were invited to complete a questionnaire. When necessary, patch tests with haptens of the standard series from Gruppo Italiano di Ricerca sulle Dermatiti da Contatto e Ambientali della Società Italiana di Dermatologia e Venereologia (SIDEV-GIRDCA) were performed.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Of the subjects studied, 50.2 % were diagnosed with allergic contact dermatitis (ACD); 20.9% were affected by irritant contact dermatitis (ICD), 13.5% by atopic dermatitis, 6.3% by seborrheic dermatitis, 6.5% by aspecific xerotic dermatitis, and 2.3% by psoriasis. Approximately 91% of all subjects reported an absence of familial atopy. A significant statistical association between diagnosis type and a personal history of atopy was evident (p <.000001, chi-square test). The results of gradual logistic regression models showed four-eyelid involvement as the main risk factor for ACD (odds ratio [OR] = 3.0; 95% CI, 1.1-8.1); with ICD, the main risk factor was the onset of symptoms at between 2 and 6 months (OR = 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.0), whereas for atopic dermatitis, the main risk factors were the onset of symptoms later than 6 months and a personal history of atopy (OR = 4.9 and 3.6, respectively).\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000Results suggest that many characteristics of the patients examined can be used for the differential diagnosis of palpebral eczematous dermatitis.","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":"31 1","pages":"69-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81421789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 54

Barrier creams: fact or fiction. 护肤霜:事实还是虚构。

American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society Pub Date : 2003-06-01 DOI: 10.1097/01206501-200306000-00011

B. Lushniak, C. G. Toby Mathias, James S. Taylor

引用次数: 8

Label dermatitis. 标签皮炎。

American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society Pub Date : 2003-06-01

Niels K Veien

引用次数: 0

Allergic contact cheilitis in the United Kingdom: a retrospective study. 英国的过敏性接触性唇炎:一项回顾性研究。

American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society Pub Date : 2003-06-01 DOI: 10.1097/01206501-200306000-00005

R. Strauss, D. Orton

{"title":"Allergic contact cheilitis in the United Kingdom: a retrospective study.","authors":"R. Strauss, D. Orton","doi":"10.1097/01206501-200306000-00005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01206501-200306000-00005","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000To date, only a few cohorts of patients with allergic cheilitis have been described, most of them from Australia and Asia.\u0000\u0000\u0000OBJECTIVE\u0000To establish the prevalence of cheilitis in a UK specialist contact dermatitis clinic and to identify the most common allergens.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHOD\u0000We analyzed our patch-test database in a tertiary referral center in the United Kingdom, retrospectively. All patients presenting with cheilitis over a 19-year period (1982 to 2001) were included.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Data were available from a total of 146 patients. A positive allergic patch-test reaction was thought to be relevant in 15% of the patients (n = 22) and to be of possible relevance in 6.8% (n = 10). Of the 22 patients with relevant allergic results, 95% (n = 21) were women. The most common allergens included fragrance mix (mainly cinnamaldehyde, oak moss, and isoeugenol) in 41% of patients, shellac in 18%, colophony in 18%, and Myroxylon pereirae in 14%. For half of the patients, the allergen was believed to stem from lipsticks or lip products. Eighteen percent of patients with allergic cheilitis reacted to only their own products.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSIONS\u0000Patients should be tested to extended lipstick/cosmetic vehicle series in addition to standard series. As a significant percentage of patients react to their own products only, a thorough clinical history and testing to patients' own products are important.","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":"5 1","pages":"75-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78404112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 35

North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000. 北美接触性皮炎小组1998年至2000年的斑贴试验结果。

American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society Pub Date : 2003-06-01

James G Marks, Donald V Belsito, Vincent A DeLeo, Joseph F Fowler, Anthony F Fransway, Howard I Maibach, C G Toby Mathias, Melanie D Pratt, Robert L Rietschel, Elizabeth F Sherertz, Frances J Storrs, James S Taylor

{"title":"North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000.","authors":"James G Marks, Donald V Belsito, Vincent A DeLeo, Joseph F Fowler, Anthony F Fransway, Howard I Maibach, C G Toby Mathias, Melanie D Pratt, Robert L Rietschel, Elizabeth F Sherertz, Frances J Storrs, James S Taylor","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patch testing is the most worthwhile diagnostic tool for the evaluation of patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis.Objective: This study reports patch-testing results from July 1, 1998, to December 31, 2000, by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group.Methods: Patients were tested with the same screening series of allergens, using a standardized patch-testing technique. The data from these patients were recorded on a standard computer entry form and analyzed.Results: Fifty allergens were tested on over 5,800 patients. Amidoamine, benzophenone-3, and iodopropynyl butylcarbamate were the new allergens. The top 10 allergens in frequency of positive reactions were identical to those of our 1996-to 1998-study period. The incidence of allergic nickel reactions continues to go up, leading all the test substances by 16.2%.Conclusion: Our findings reinforce the need for a more comprehensive group of diagnostic allergens than is found in the T.R.U.E. TEST, which is sold in the United States.","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":"14 2","pages":"59-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24184813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Atopy, nickel sensitivity, occupation, and clinical patterns in different types of hand dermatitis. 不同类型手部皮炎的特应性、镍敏感性、职业和临床模式。

American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society Pub Date : 2003-06-01

Sofia Magina, Maria Antónia Barros, José Alberto Ferreira, José Mesquita-Guimarães

{"title":"Atopy, nickel sensitivity, occupation, and clinical patterns in different types of hand dermatitis.","authors":"Sofia Magina, Maria Antónia Barros, José Alberto Ferreira, José Mesquita-Guimarães","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The etiologic diagnosis of hand dermatitis (HD) is often difficult. Knowledge of the relationship between atopy and nickel sensitivity as risk factors for HD is limited.Objective: To compare irritant contact dermatitis, allergic contact dermatitis, and dyshidrotic eczema relative to personal atopy, patch-testing results, occupation, and clinical patterns.Methods: From patients referred for patch testing, 714 consecutive individuals with HD were retrospectively studied.Results: Half of the patients had eczema confined to the palms. The dorsal pattern was more prevalent in atopic patients, compared to nonatopic patients. Irritant contact dermatitis was the most frequent diagnosis (55.3%), followed by allergic contact dermatitis (24.4%) and dyshidrotic eczema (20.3%). Among housewives, health workers, and mechanics, irritants were of much greater importance than allergens whereas among hairdressers and bricklayers, the opposite was found. The prevalence of personal atopy did not differ significantly between different types of HD. Nickel sensitivity was much less frequent in irritant contact dermatitis than in allergic contact dermatitis or dyshidrotic eczema. The distribution of clinical patterns was similar.Conclusion: This study suggests that different etiologic diagnoses of HD cannot be distinguished by clinical pattern, prevalence of personal atopy, or nickel-sensitivity.","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":"14 2","pages":"63-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24185328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Considerations for testing irritancy, allergy, and photoreactivity in fragrance safety evaluations. 香料安全评价中测试刺激性、过敏性和光反应性的考虑。

American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society Pub Date : 2003-06-01 DOI: 10.1097/01206501-200306000-00012

J. Hanifin, A. M. Api, D. Bickers

引用次数: 3

Generalized eczematous contact dermatitis from cocobolo wood. 黄檀引起的全身湿疹性接触性皮炎。

American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society Pub Date : 2003-06-01

Anna D Guanche, Steven Prawer

引用次数: 0