不同类型手部皮炎的特应性、镍敏感性、职业和临床模式。

Sofia Magina, Maria Antónia Barros, José Alberto Ferreira, José Mesquita-Guimarães
{"title":"不同类型手部皮炎的特应性、镍敏感性、职业和临床模式。","authors":"Sofia Magina,&nbsp;Maria Antónia Barros,&nbsp;José Alberto Ferreira,&nbsp;José Mesquita-Guimarães","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The etiologic diagnosis of hand dermatitis (HD) is often difficult. Knowledge of the relationship between atopy and nickel sensitivity as risk factors for HD is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare irritant contact dermatitis, allergic contact dermatitis, and dyshidrotic eczema relative to personal atopy, patch-testing results, occupation, and clinical patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From patients referred for patch testing, 714 consecutive individuals with HD were retrospectively studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Half of the patients had eczema confined to the palms. The dorsal pattern was more prevalent in atopic patients, compared to nonatopic patients. Irritant contact dermatitis was the most frequent diagnosis (55.3%), followed by allergic contact dermatitis (24.4%) and dyshidrotic eczema (20.3%). Among housewives, health workers, and mechanics, irritants were of much greater importance than allergens whereas among hairdressers and bricklayers, the opposite was found. The prevalence of personal atopy did not differ significantly between different types of HD. Nickel sensitivity was much less frequent in irritant contact dermatitis than in allergic contact dermatitis or dyshidrotic eczema. The distribution of clinical patterns was similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that different etiologic diagnoses of HD cannot be distinguished by clinical pattern, prevalence of personal atopy, or nickel-sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":"14 2","pages":"63-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atopy, nickel sensitivity, occupation, and clinical patterns in different types of hand dermatitis.\",\"authors\":\"Sofia Magina,&nbsp;Maria Antónia Barros,&nbsp;José Alberto Ferreira,&nbsp;José Mesquita-Guimarães\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The etiologic diagnosis of hand dermatitis (HD) is often difficult. Knowledge of the relationship between atopy and nickel sensitivity as risk factors for HD is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare irritant contact dermatitis, allergic contact dermatitis, and dyshidrotic eczema relative to personal atopy, patch-testing results, occupation, and clinical patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From patients referred for patch testing, 714 consecutive individuals with HD were retrospectively studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Half of the patients had eczema confined to the palms. The dorsal pattern was more prevalent in atopic patients, compared to nonatopic patients. Irritant contact dermatitis was the most frequent diagnosis (55.3%), followed by allergic contact dermatitis (24.4%) and dyshidrotic eczema (20.3%). Among housewives, health workers, and mechanics, irritants were of much greater importance than allergens whereas among hairdressers and bricklayers, the opposite was found. The prevalence of personal atopy did not differ significantly between different types of HD. Nickel sensitivity was much less frequent in irritant contact dermatitis than in allergic contact dermatitis or dyshidrotic eczema. The distribution of clinical patterns was similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that different etiologic diagnoses of HD cannot be distinguished by clinical pattern, prevalence of personal atopy, or nickel-sensitivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"63-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手部皮炎(HD)的病因诊断通常是困难的。对特异性和镍敏感性作为HD危险因素之间关系的了解是有限的。目的:比较刺激性接触性皮炎、过敏性接触性皮炎和汗湿性湿疹与个人特应性、斑贴试验结果、职业和临床模式的关系。方法:对714例连续HD患者进行回顾性研究。结果:半数患者湿疹局限于手掌。与非特应性患者相比,背侧型在特应性患者中更为普遍。最常见的诊断是刺激性接触性皮炎(55.3%),其次是过敏性接触性皮炎(24.4%)和湿性湿疹(20.3%)。在家庭主妇、卫生工作者和机械师中,刺激物比过敏原更重要,而在美发师和瓦匠中,情况正好相反。不同类型HD的个体特异性患病率无显著差异。镍敏感性在刺激性接触性皮炎中比在过敏性接触性皮炎或湿性湿疹中少得多。临床分布相似。结论:本研究提示HD的不同病因诊断不能通过临床类型、个人特应性患病率或镍敏感性来区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Atopy, nickel sensitivity, occupation, and clinical patterns in different types of hand dermatitis.

Background: The etiologic diagnosis of hand dermatitis (HD) is often difficult. Knowledge of the relationship between atopy and nickel sensitivity as risk factors for HD is limited.

Objective: To compare irritant contact dermatitis, allergic contact dermatitis, and dyshidrotic eczema relative to personal atopy, patch-testing results, occupation, and clinical patterns.

Methods: From patients referred for patch testing, 714 consecutive individuals with HD were retrospectively studied.

Results: Half of the patients had eczema confined to the palms. The dorsal pattern was more prevalent in atopic patients, compared to nonatopic patients. Irritant contact dermatitis was the most frequent diagnosis (55.3%), followed by allergic contact dermatitis (24.4%) and dyshidrotic eczema (20.3%). Among housewives, health workers, and mechanics, irritants were of much greater importance than allergens whereas among hairdressers and bricklayers, the opposite was found. The prevalence of personal atopy did not differ significantly between different types of HD. Nickel sensitivity was much less frequent in irritant contact dermatitis than in allergic contact dermatitis or dyshidrotic eczema. The distribution of clinical patterns was similar.

Conclusion: This study suggests that different etiologic diagnoses of HD cannot be distinguished by clinical pattern, prevalence of personal atopy, or nickel-sensitivity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信