英国的过敏性接触性唇炎:一项回顾性研究。

R. Strauss, D. Orton
{"title":"英国的过敏性接触性唇炎:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"R. Strauss, D. Orton","doi":"10.1097/01206501-200306000-00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nTo date, only a few cohorts of patients with allergic cheilitis have been described, most of them from Australia and Asia.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nTo establish the prevalence of cheilitis in a UK specialist contact dermatitis clinic and to identify the most common allergens.\n\n\nMETHOD\nWe analyzed our patch-test database in a tertiary referral center in the United Kingdom, retrospectively. All patients presenting with cheilitis over a 19-year period (1982 to 2001) were included.\n\n\nRESULTS\nData were available from a total of 146 patients. A positive allergic patch-test reaction was thought to be relevant in 15% of the patients (n = 22) and to be of possible relevance in 6.8% (n = 10). Of the 22 patients with relevant allergic results, 95% (n = 21) were women. The most common allergens included fragrance mix (mainly cinnamaldehyde, oak moss, and isoeugenol) in 41% of patients, shellac in 18%, colophony in 18%, and Myroxylon pereirae in 14%. For half of the patients, the allergen was believed to stem from lipsticks or lip products. Eighteen percent of patients with allergic cheilitis reacted to only their own products.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nPatients should be tested to extended lipstick/cosmetic vehicle series in addition to standard series. As a significant percentage of patients react to their own products only, a thorough clinical history and testing to patients' own products are important.","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":"5 1","pages":"75-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allergic contact cheilitis in the United Kingdom: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"R. Strauss, D. Orton\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01206501-200306000-00005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nTo date, only a few cohorts of patients with allergic cheilitis have been described, most of them from Australia and Asia.\\n\\n\\nOBJECTIVE\\nTo establish the prevalence of cheilitis in a UK specialist contact dermatitis clinic and to identify the most common allergens.\\n\\n\\nMETHOD\\nWe analyzed our patch-test database in a tertiary referral center in the United Kingdom, retrospectively. All patients presenting with cheilitis over a 19-year period (1982 to 2001) were included.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nData were available from a total of 146 patients. A positive allergic patch-test reaction was thought to be relevant in 15% of the patients (n = 22) and to be of possible relevance in 6.8% (n = 10). Of the 22 patients with relevant allergic results, 95% (n = 21) were women. The most common allergens included fragrance mix (mainly cinnamaldehyde, oak moss, and isoeugenol) in 41% of patients, shellac in 18%, colophony in 18%, and Myroxylon pereirae in 14%. For half of the patients, the allergen was believed to stem from lipsticks or lip products. Eighteen percent of patients with allergic cheilitis reacted to only their own products.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nPatients should be tested to extended lipstick/cosmetic vehicle series in addition to standard series. As a significant percentage of patients react to their own products only, a thorough clinical history and testing to patients' own products are important.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"75-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01206501-200306000-00005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01206501-200306000-00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

摘要

背景:迄今为止,只有少数过敏性肠炎患者的队列被报道,其中大多数来自澳大利亚和亚洲。目的了解英国一家接触性皮炎专科诊所的口唇炎患病率,并确定最常见的过敏原。方法回顾性分析英国某三级转诊中心的贴片测试数据库。所有在19年期间(1982年至2001年)出现口唇炎的患者均被纳入研究。结果共获得146例患者的数据。15%的患者(n = 22)认为过敏贴试反应阳性,6.8%的患者(n = 10)认为可能相关。在22例有相关过敏结果的患者中,95% (n = 21)为女性。最常见的过敏原包括香水混合物(主要是肉桂醛、橡树苔和异丁香酚)(41%)、虫胶(18%)、树脂(18%)和紫杉(14%)。对于一半的患者来说,过敏原被认为来自口红或唇部产品。18%的过敏性唇炎患者只对自己的产品有反应。结论除标准系列外,还应对患者进行口红/化妆品载体系列的检测。由于很大比例的患者只对自己的产品有反应,因此全面的临床病史和对患者自己的产品进行测试非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Allergic contact cheilitis in the United Kingdom: a retrospective study.
BACKGROUND To date, only a few cohorts of patients with allergic cheilitis have been described, most of them from Australia and Asia. OBJECTIVE To establish the prevalence of cheilitis in a UK specialist contact dermatitis clinic and to identify the most common allergens. METHOD We analyzed our patch-test database in a tertiary referral center in the United Kingdom, retrospectively. All patients presenting with cheilitis over a 19-year period (1982 to 2001) were included. RESULTS Data were available from a total of 146 patients. A positive allergic patch-test reaction was thought to be relevant in 15% of the patients (n = 22) and to be of possible relevance in 6.8% (n = 10). Of the 22 patients with relevant allergic results, 95% (n = 21) were women. The most common allergens included fragrance mix (mainly cinnamaldehyde, oak moss, and isoeugenol) in 41% of patients, shellac in 18%, colophony in 18%, and Myroxylon pereirae in 14%. For half of the patients, the allergen was believed to stem from lipsticks or lip products. Eighteen percent of patients with allergic cheilitis reacted to only their own products. CONCLUSIONS Patients should be tested to extended lipstick/cosmetic vehicle series in addition to standard series. As a significant percentage of patients react to their own products only, a thorough clinical history and testing to patients' own products are important.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信