Advances in Therapy最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Long-Term Transfusion Independence with Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent-Naive, Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in the COMMANDS Trial. 长期输血不依赖Luspatercept与促红细胞生成素- α在红细胞生成素-刺激剂初始,低风险骨髓增生异常综合征的COMMANDS试验。
IF 3.4 3区 医学
Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-16 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03208-5
Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Valeria Santini, Amer M Zeidan, Rami S Komrokji, Veronika Pozharskaya, Shelonitda Rose, Karen Keeperman, Yinzhi Lai, Sameer Kalsekar, Barkha Aggarwal, Dimana Miteva, David Valcárcel, Pierre Fenaux, Jake Shortt, Matteo Giovanni Della Porta, Uwe Platzbecker
{"title":"Long-Term Transfusion Independence with Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent-Naive, Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in the COMMANDS Trial.","authors":"Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Valeria Santini, Amer M Zeidan, Rami S Komrokji, Veronika Pozharskaya, Shelonitda Rose, Karen Keeperman, Yinzhi Lai, Sameer Kalsekar, Barkha Aggarwal, Dimana Miteva, David Valcárcel, Pierre Fenaux, Jake Shortt, Matteo Giovanni Della Porta, Uwe Platzbecker","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03208-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03208-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The efficacy of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) for transfusion-dependent (TD) anemia in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS) is limited. Luspatercept achieved significantly greater rates of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (TI) versus epoetin alfa (an ESA) in the phase 3 COMMANDS trial. This analysis assessed long-term RBC-TI, cumulative response, and safety with luspatercept in COMMANDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible patients aged ≥ 18 years, with ESA-naive, RBC TD LR-MDS were randomized 1:1 to receive luspatercept (1.0 mg/kg, titration to 1.75 mg/kg permitted) or epoetin alfa (450 IU/kg, titration to 1050 IU/kg). Disease assessment was carried out at week 24 (day 169) and every 24 weeks thereafter. Treatment continued until disease progression, lack of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At data cutoff (September 22, 2023; median follow-up: luspatercept 21.4 months, epoetin alfa 20.3 months), a greater proportion of patients treated with luspatercept (n = 182) versus epoetin alfa (n = 181) achieved a longest single RBC-TI period ≥ 1 year (44.5% vs. 27.6%; P = 0.0003) and ≥ 1.5 years (30.2% vs. 13.8%; P < 0.0001). Higher rates of RBC-TI ≥ 1.5 years with luspatercept over epoetin alfa were consistent across all prespecified subgroups, including patients with ring sideroblast-negative status and low baseline serum erythropoietin. Longer cumulative RBC-TI response [sum of all durations of RBC-TI for ≥ 12 weeks; week 1 to end of treatment (95% CI)] was observed with luspatercept [154.7 weeks (118.4-NR)] versus epoetin alfa [91.1 weeks (73.1-123.9)]. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events, including asthenia and hypertension, generally decreased over time in both arms. Progression rates to high-risk MDS and acute myeloid leukemia were similarly low (< 5%) in both treatment arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data demonstrated sustained, durable clinical benefit across subgroups and support luspatercept as the treatment of choice for anemia in patients with LR-MDS who are TD and ESA-naive.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03682536.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"3576-3589"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182481/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144075359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of Real-World Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients with Chronic Refractory Gout in the United States. 美国慢性难治性痛风患者的现实世界治疗模式和医疗资源利用评估
IF 3.4 3区 医学
Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-08 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03189-5
Nana Kragh, Andrew Worsfold, Abiola Oladapo, Emily Gao, Sakshi Sethi, Elyse Swallow
{"title":"Evaluation of Real-World Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients with Chronic Refractory Gout in the United States.","authors":"Nana Kragh, Andrew Worsfold, Abiola Oladapo, Emily Gao, Sakshi Sethi, Elyse Swallow","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03189-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03189-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic refractory gout (CRG) is characterized by frequent flares and failure to achieve and/or maintain serum urate levels < 6.0 mg/dL with conventional urate-lowering therapies. This study evaluated the clinical profile, treatment patterns, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) of patients with CRG in the United States (US) to provide updated information on treatment strategies and burdens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed data for patients with CRG (≥ 3 flares within 18 months or a pegloticase prescription following gout diagnosis) between June 2011 and May 2020 in the IQVIA PharMetrics<sup>®</sup> Plus database linked with IQVIA Ambulatory Electronic Medical Records-US. Demographic, clinical, and disease characteristics, gout-related medications, and HRU were described for patients with serum urate levels ≥ 6.0 mg/dL at baseline and in the subset with elevated levels (≥ 2 measurements ≥ 6.0 mg/dL) during the 12-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 969 patients with CRG, 157 had elevated serum urate levels ≥ 6.0 mg/dL during follow-up. All patients had a high comorbidity burden. Most patients in the overall population (57.5%) and in the subset with elevated serum urate during follow-up (73.2%) did not have evidence of achieving serum urate level < 6.0 mg/dL at any point during follow-up, despite use of gout-related medications including allopurinol. Patients in the overall population and the elevated serum urate subset had high use of steroids (77.0% and 79.6%, respectively) and nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs (59.3% and 59.9%) to manage gout flares. Additionally, patients had high rates of gout-related HRU, including inpatient admissions [5.7% (overall) and 6.4% (subset)], emergency room visits (12.7% and 15.3%), and outpatient visits (96.8% and 100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the use of urate-lowering medications, patients with CRG had elevated serum urate levels and high HRU, underscoring the need for better treatment and management strategies for CRG to prevent gout flares and minimize long-term damage.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"3173-3185"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182517/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144059000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Guideline-Recommended Disease-Modifying Therapies for Patients with Cardiorenal Disease: A Call-to-Action Narrative Review. 指南推荐的心血管疾病患者的疾病改善疗法:一项呼吁行动的叙事回顾。
IF 3.4 3区 医学
Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-28 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03228-1
Christoph Wanner, Ming-Hui Zhao, Alpesh N Amin, Luca De Nicola, Andrew J Sauer, Alaster M Allum, Unai Aranda, You-Seon Nam, Javed Butler
{"title":"Guideline-Recommended Disease-Modifying Therapies for Patients with Cardiorenal Disease: A Call-to-Action Narrative Review.","authors":"Christoph Wanner, Ming-Hui Zhao, Alpesh N Amin, Luca De Nicola, Andrew J Sauer, Alaster M Allum, Unai Aranda, You-Seon Nam, Javed Butler","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03228-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03228-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Substantial gaps exist between recommendations for guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its use in real-world clinical practice. This includes suboptimal dosing of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), low uptake of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) for CKD, and low uptake and/or transient use of potassium binders to manage RASi-induced hyperkalemia. Suboptimal RASi therapy deprives patients of the full cardiorenal benefits associated with RASi, and increases the risk of cardiorenal adverse events and mortality. Hyperkalemia can be managed and optimal RASi dosing can be continued by using novel potassium binders, such as sodium zirconium cyclosilicate or patiromer. Similarly, low uptake of SGLT2i might be associated with the concern of an accelerated decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate and, therefore, disease progression when initiating SGLT2i. Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated that adding SGLT2i to RASi therapy can improve clinical outcomes and prolong patient survival in CKD. The recently published Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2024 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of CKD extends the recommendation of SGLT2i to individuals with CKD without diabetes, reinforces the cardiorenal benefits of optimized RASi, recommends the addition of newer drug classes in suitable patients with CKD, and notes the use of novel potassium binders to manage hyperkalemia and enable optimal use of GDMT. In doing so, the guideline targets achievement of the \"quadruple aim\" of GDMT in CKD, i.e., enabling optimal use of RASi and SGLT2i in most patients, along with nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in diabetic kidney disease. This manuscript constitutes a call to action to raise awareness of the growing clinical and economic burdens of CKD and to promote a united approach to the early detection and optimal treatment of CKD through stricter adherence to GDMT.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"3141-3157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182529/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144155490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk Factors Associated with Suboptimal Real-World Outcomes in Patients with EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Front-Line Recommended Therapy. 接受一线推荐治疗的egfr突变非小细胞肺癌患者的亚理想现实预后相关危险因素
IF 3.4 3区 医学
Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-29 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03234-3
Alexander I Spira, Tao Ran, Iris Lin, Cindy Chen, Andy He, Neel Belani, Shawn Du
{"title":"Risk Factors Associated with Suboptimal Real-World Outcomes in Patients with EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Front-Line Recommended Therapy.","authors":"Alexander I Spira, Tao Ran, Iris Lin, Cindy Chen, Andy He, Neel Belani, Shawn Du","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03234-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03234-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Osimertinib, a recommended front-line (1L) treatment option for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations [exon 19 deletion (ex19del)/exon 21 L858R substitution (L858R)], demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) compared with other EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the FLAURA trial. However, most patients developed secondary resistance, and subpopulations experienced disparate outcomes. This retrospective, observational study aimed to describe real-world treatment outcomes along with patient clinical characteristics associated with different clinical outcomes among patients with EGFR-mutated (ex19del/L858R) NSCLC who received osimertinib as 1L therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study of patient clinical and genomic data from a de-identified, US-based, nationwide NSCLC clinico-genomic database evaluated OS, time-to-next-treatment (TTNT), and time-to-discontinuation (TTD) among patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who received 1L osimertinib monotherapy and identified patient characteristics associated with differences in clinical outcomes as related to real-world 1L osimertinib use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 703 identified patients, mean age was 69 years, 67% of patients were female, and 53% were White. Median OS was 29.8 months, TTNT was 17.6 months, and TTD was 15.9 months. A large majority of the overall population had risk factors associated with suboptimal real-world outcomes (97% for OS, 95% for TTNT, and 87% for TTD), even among patients with ECOG PS scores of 0-1. Key individual risk factors identified included metastases of the liver, bone, and central nervous system; ECOG PS scores ≥ 2; and TP53, CDK-4, and EGFR L858R mutations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More than 90% of the assessed real-world patients with EGFR-mutated (ex19del/L858R) NSCLC who received 1L osimertinib had risk factors associated with suboptimal outcomes, highlighting the urgent unmet need for new treatments and emphasizing the importance of administering the most effective therapy in the 1L setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"3547-3561"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182453/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144172359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Efficacy of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel Versus Standard-of-Care Treatments for Patients with Previously Treated Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. 西他tagene autoeucel与标准治疗对既往治疗过的复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的比较疗效:一项匹配调整的间接比较
IF 3.4 3区 医学
Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-12 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03205-8
Noemi Puig, Joris Diels, Suzy van Sanden, João Mendes, Heather Burnett, Allie Cichewicz, Seina Lee, Teresa Hernando, Jordan M Schecter, Nikoletta Lendvai, Nitin Patel, José María Sanchez-Pina, Serena Rocchi, Roberto Mina, Paolo Corradini, Michele Cavo, Jesús San Miguel, Leyla Shune, Abdullah M Khan, Surbhi Sidana, Xavier Leleu, Salomon Manier, Brea Lipe, Katja Weisel, Joaquin Martinez-Lopez
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel Versus Standard-of-Care Treatments for Patients with Previously Treated Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.","authors":"Noemi Puig, Joris Diels, Suzy van Sanden, João Mendes, Heather Burnett, Allie Cichewicz, Seina Lee, Teresa Hernando, Jordan M Schecter, Nikoletta Lendvai, Nitin Patel, José María Sanchez-Pina, Serena Rocchi, Roberto Mina, Paolo Corradini, Michele Cavo, Jesús San Miguel, Leyla Shune, Abdullah M Khan, Surbhi Sidana, Xavier Leleu, Salomon Manier, Brea Lipe, Katja Weisel, Joaquin Martinez-Lopez","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03205-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03205-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Matching adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) were performed to compare the efficacy of cilta-cel versus elotuzumab + pomalidomide + dexamethasone (EloPd), isatuximab + carfilzomib + dexamethasone (IsaKd), isatuximab + pomalidomide + dexamethasone (IsaPd), and selinexor + bortezomib + dexamethasone (SVd) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have received at least one prior therapy and are lenalidomide-refractory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Unanchored MAICs were performed using individual patient-level data (IPD) for all apheresed patients randomized to the cilta-cel arm of CARTITUDE-4 (n = 208) and published arm-level data for EloPd from ELOQUENT-3 (n = 60), IsaKd from IKEMA (lenalidomide-refractory subgroup, n = 57), IsaPd from ICARIA-MM (n = 154), and SVd from BOSTON (lenalidomide-refractory subgroup, n = 53). Eligibility criteria from each comparator trial were applied to the cilta-cel arm IPD, and further imbalances in patient characteristics were adjusted by weighting the cilta-cel patient data to match the reported baseline characteristics of the comparator trials. Comparative efficacy was estimated for overall response rate, very good partial response or better (≥ VGPR) rate, complete response or better (≥ CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjustment, cilta-cel patients were significantly more likely to achieve an overall response versus EloPd, IsaPd, and SVd, and were significantly more likely to achieve ≥ VGPR and ≥ CR versus all comparators. Cilta-cel patients also had significant reductions in the risk of disease progression or death (PFS) versus all comparators: 64% versus EloPd, 49% versus IsaKd, 69% versus IsaPd, and 62% versus SVd. Similarly, cilta-cel patients had significant improvements in OS for all feasible comparisons: 52% versus EloPd, 58% versus IsaPd, and 60% versus SVd.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cilta-cel patients demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits over EloPd, IsaKd, IsaPd, and SVd for response and survival outcomes, highlighting its superiority over alternative treatment options for patients with RRMM who have received at least one prior therapy and are refractory to lenalidomide.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"3223-3239"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182486/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143959516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness and Safety of Tezepelumab in a Diverse Population of US Patients with Severe Asthma: Initial Results of the PASSAGE Study. Tezepelumab在美国不同人群重度哮喘患者中的有效性和安全性:PASSAGE研究的初步结果
IF 3.4 3区 医学
Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-19 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03231-6
Njira L Lugogo, Praveen Akuthota, Kaharu Sumino, Sameer K Mathur, Autumn F Burnette, Andrew W Lindsley, Jean-Pierre Llanos, Claudio Marchese, Christopher S Ambrose, Benjamin Emmanuel
{"title":"Effectiveness and Safety of Tezepelumab in a Diverse Population of US Patients with Severe Asthma: Initial Results of the PASSAGE Study.","authors":"Njira L Lugogo, Praveen Akuthota, Kaharu Sumino, Sameer K Mathur, Autumn F Burnette, Andrew W Lindsley, Jean-Pierre Llanos, Claudio Marchese, Christopher S Ambrose, Benjamin Emmanuel","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03231-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03231-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical trials for severe uncontrolled asthma (SUA) often underrepresent or exclude key patient populations. The phase 4 PASSAGE study assesses the effectiveness and safety of tezepelumab in a diverse, real-world US population of patients with SUA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PASSAGE is an ongoing, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study of patients (≥ 12 years) with SUA. The study enrolled participants across asthma phenotypes, based on blood eosinophil counts (BECs) (≥/< 300 cells/µL) and perennial aeroallergen sensitization, and underrepresented subgroups (Black/African Americans, adolescents, participants with comorbid mild to moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and smokers [≥ 10 pack-years]). Participants receive tezepelumab 210 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. This interim analysis assessed annualized asthma exacerbation rates (AAERs) in the 12-month baseline period (before starting tezepelumab) and the treatment period, and changes from baseline to week 24 in pre-bronchodilator (BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV<sub>1</sub>), Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) score and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 208 participants in this analysis, 41% had BEC ≥ 300 cells/µL, 56% had confirmed allergy, 17% were Black/African American, 5% were adolescents, 13% had comorbid COPD, and 23% were smokers. The AAER decreased by 76% (95% CI (confidence interval): 69, 81) from baseline to the treatment period; comparable reductions were observed across asthma phenotypes and underrepresented subgroups. The least squares mean change from baseline to week 24 in pre-BD FEV<sub>1</sub> was 0.11 L (95% CI: 0.06, 0.17) overall and 0.19 L (95% CI: 0.12, 0.25) among participants with baseline pre-BD FEV<sub>1</sub> ≤ 80% predicted. Clinically meaningful improvements from baseline to week 24 were observed for ACQ-6 score and HRQoL outcomes. No new safety signals were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PASSAGE study of US patients with SUA treated with tezepelumab demonstrates substantial reductions in AAERs across asthma phenotypes and underrepresented subgroups, with clinically meaningful improvements in lung function, asthma control and HRQoL.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05329194.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"3334-3353"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182456/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144092501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Osilodrostat Versus Metyrapone for the Treatment of Cushing's Syndrome. 奥西洛司他与美吡酮治疗库欣综合征的匹配校正间接比较。
IF 3.4 3区 医学
Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-29 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03229-0
Conor Hickey, Beatrice Gueron, Fabian Schmidt, Emma Tyas, Grzegorz Binowski, Rosario Pivonello
{"title":"Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Osilodrostat Versus Metyrapone for the Treatment of Cushing's Syndrome.","authors":"Conor Hickey, Beatrice Gueron, Fabian Schmidt, Emma Tyas, Grzegorz Binowski, Rosario Pivonello","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03229-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03229-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cushing's syndrome (CS) is a rare, chronic condition caused by prolonged exposure to elevated levels of circulating cortisol, and characterized by high morbidity and mortality. The primary treatment option for CS is surgery; however, medical therapy may be useful when surgery is unsuitable, refused, or has not been curative, or a rapid control of hypercortisolism is required. While osilodrostat and metyrapone are two treatments for controlling cortisol levels, they have not been compared directly in a clinical trial. This study evaluated the comparative efficacy and tolerability of osilodrostat versus metyrapone for the treatment of CS using indirect treatment comparison methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison was used to synthesize relative treatment effects by reweighting patient-level data from two clinical trials for osilodrostat to published aggregate data for metyrapone. Efficacy endpoints included complete response (CR), defined as mean urinary free cortisol ≤ 1.0 × the upper limit of normal, at Weeks 12, 24, and 36. Tolerability endpoints included all-cause treatment discontinuation and treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy (LoE) or adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The base case analysis demonstrated that osilodrostat provides increased odds of CR versus metyrapone at Week 12 [odds ratio (OR) 2.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29, 5.88], Week 24 (OR 3.28; 95% CI 1.58, 6.84) and Week 36 (OR 10.50; 95% CI 1.84, 59.96), implying a greater proportion of patients experience normalized cortisol levels at these time-points. Although the base case analysis showed that the odds of all-cause discontinuation and discontinuation due to LoE or AEs were numerically lower for osilodrostat, the evidence was insufficient to show a statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These analyses show that osilodrostat increases the odds of achieving CR at Weeks 12, 24, and 36 versus metyrapone, demonstrating that osilodrostat is a more efficacious treatment option for normalizing cortisol levels in CS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"3472-3485"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144172316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Role of Omics Techniques in Diabetic Wound Healing: Recent Insights into the Application of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing, Bulk RNA Sequencing, Spatial Transcriptomics, and Proteomics. 组学技术在糖尿病伤口愈合中的作用:单细胞RNA测序、大量RNA测序、空间转录组学和蛋白质组学应用的最新见解。
IF 3.4 3区 医学
Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-17 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03212-9
Eleftheria-Angeliki Valsami, Guangyu Chu, Ming Guan, Jessica Gilman, Georgios Theocharidis, Aristidis Veves
{"title":"The Role of Omics Techniques in Diabetic Wound Healing: Recent Insights into the Application of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing, Bulk RNA Sequencing, Spatial Transcriptomics, and Proteomics.","authors":"Eleftheria-Angeliki Valsami, Guangyu Chu, Ming Guan, Jessica Gilman, Georgios Theocharidis, Aristidis Veves","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03212-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03212-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a devastating complication of diabetes mellitus (DM) that affect millions of people worldwide every year. They have a long-term impact on patients' quality of life and pose a significant challenge for both patients and clinicians, alongside negative economic implications on affected individuals. The current therapeutic approaches are costly and, in many cases, ineffective, highlighting the urgent need to develop novel, affordable, more efficient, and personalized treatments. Recent advances in high-throughput omics technologies, including proteomics, bulk RNA sequencing (bulk RNA-seq), single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), and spatial transcriptomics in both preclinical animal and human clinical studies, have enhanced our understanding of the molecular function and mechanisms of DFUs, thereby offering potential for targeted therapies. Additionally, these technologies provide valuable insights behind the mechanism of action of novel wound dressings and treatments. In this review, we outline the latest application of omics technologies in DFU preclinical animal and human clinical research on diabetic wound healing, and spotlight recent findings.A graphical abstract is available with this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"3089-3110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182495/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144085641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mobility and Quality of Life in Children with Paediatric-Onset Hypophosphatasia Treated with Asfotase Alfa: Results from UK Managed Access Agreement. 用Asfotase Alfa治疗儿科发病磷酸酶减少症儿童的活动能力和生活质量:来自英国管理准入协议的结果
IF 3.4 3区 医学
Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-29 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03225-4
Raja Padidela, Nick Bishop, Paul Arundel, Shona Fang, Alexandros Zygouras, M Zulf Mughal, Nick Shaw, Vrinda Saraff
{"title":"Mobility and Quality of Life in Children with Paediatric-Onset Hypophosphatasia Treated with Asfotase Alfa: Results from UK Managed Access Agreement.","authors":"Raja Padidela, Nick Bishop, Paul Arundel, Shona Fang, Alexandros Zygouras, M Zulf Mughal, Nick Shaw, Vrinda Saraff","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03225-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03225-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is a rare, inherited metabolic bone disease with a high degree of morbidity and mortality in children. Asfotase alfa is an enzyme replacement therapy for HPP reimbursed in the UK since 2017 under a Managed Access Agreement (MAA). This analysis assessed the effectiveness and safety of asfotase alfa in children < 18 years of age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MAA was a prospective, longitudinal data collection in children with paediatric-onset HPP. Effectiveness outcomes were evaluated in children who were treated with asfotase alfa for ≥ 6 months. Data were collected on respiratory support, growth, mobility, motor development, analgesic use, quality of life, and safety at enrolment and throughout the 5-year MAA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four children enrolled in the MAA and 20 were included in the analysis. Twelve children had received asfotase alfa before enrolment through a clinical trial or compassionate use program. From baseline to month 60, the median (minimum, maximum) change in height and weight Z-scores were 0.20 (- 0.9, 1.2; n = 6) and - 0.5 (- 1.9, 1.5; n = 6), respectively. The median (minimum, maximum) percent of predicted distance walked in the 6-Minute Walk Test increased by 3.8% (- 8.6, 4.3; n = 5) at month 3 and was sustained through follow-up. Median (minimum, maximum) child- and parent-reported Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory scores were 59.2 (15.2, 91.3; n = 11) and 53.4 (16.3, 100.0; n = 18) at baseline and increased by 21.7 (5.4, 37.0; n = 3) and 16.3 (9.8, 45.7; n = 4) at month 60, respectively. Treatment-naïve children had a greater clinical response than treatment-experienced participants, who maintained their status. No deaths occurred in the study. The most common adverse events were injection site reactions, reported in 8/24 participants (33.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis confirmed the clinical benefit of asfotase alfa in children with HPP. Asfotase alfa was well tolerated, with no new safety signals identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"3528-3546"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182503/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144172317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2024: A Summary of Key Clinical Trials. 临床心脏病学进展2024:关键临床试验综述
IF 3.4 3区 医学
Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-19 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03220-9
Patrick Savage, Michael Campbell, Meadhbh Hogg, Daniel McElhatton, Ian Menown
{"title":"Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2024: A Summary of Key Clinical Trials.","authors":"Patrick Savage, Michael Campbell, Meadhbh Hogg, Daniel McElhatton, Ian Menown","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03220-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03220-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2024, numerous key clinical trials in the field of clinical cardiology have been published or presented at major international conferences. This review seeks to collate and summarise these trials and reflect on their clinical context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors evaluated all clinical trials presented at major cardiology conferences during 2024 with a focus on clinical trials which would influence and/or change current clinical practice. We reviewed clinical trials presented at all major international conferences including the American College of Cardiology (ACC), European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EuroPCR), European Society of Cardiology (ESC), Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT), American Heart Association (AHA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI), TVT-The Heart Summit (TVT) and Cardiovascular Research Technologies (CRT). Trials considered to have highest impact and/or broad relevance across the field of clinical cardiology, with a high likelihood to change or impact upon clinical practice were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 90 key cardiology clinical trials were identified across the spectrum of clinical cardiology. Important updates in percutaneous coronary intervention were reviewed including new ESC guidance and several key trials in the field of coronary physiology (FAVOR III), drug-coated balloons (REGCAGE-FREE, AGENT-IDE), shock, and acute coronary syndromes (SENIOR-RITA, DanGer-Shock). Structural trials included major updates in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) from EARLY-TAVR, TAVR-UNLOAD and NOTION 3, as well as seminal trials in tricuspid (TRISCEND II) and mitral intervention (MATTERHORN). Key updates in preventative cardiology included new data in lipoprotein (a) pharmacotherapy, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol reduction and hypertension management (BPROAD, BedMed, KRAKEN), as well as several key trials in heart failure (SUMMIT, FINEARTS) hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (SEQUOIA-HCM) and cardiac amyloid (HELIOS-B).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The review presents a concise summary of the key clinical cardiology trials published or presented during the past year and should be of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of cardiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"3111-3140"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182473/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144092457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信