{"title":"48周低剂量Dienogest治疗子宫内膜异位症相关痛经患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机、开放标签、平行组试验","authors":"Kyoko Kikuno, Ryuta Asada, Takuma Ishihara, Ken-Ichirou Morishige, Kenro Chikazawa, Tatsuro Furui, Masanori Isobe","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03397-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dienogest (DNG) is widely used to manage endometriosis-associated pain; however, long-term data comparing low and standard doses are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 48-week DNG treatment (1 mg/day vs. 2 mg/day) in patients with endometriosis-related dysmenorrhea (composite score).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, open-label, parallel-group, trial, 88 patients with endometriosis were enrolled, all of whom had at least one ovarian endometriotic cyst confirmed by imaging. Other phenotypes of endometriosis, such as deep infiltrating or peritoneal lesions, were not systematically assessed and may have been present. Patients were randomized to receive either 1-mg/day or 2-mg/day DNG. The primary endpoint was the change in menstrual pain measured using a visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints included changes in the dysmenorrhea score, ovarian endometrioma volume, serum estradiol levels, bone mineral density (BMD), and menopausal symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in menstrual pain (VAS). The mean VAS scores decreased by 44.63 and 54.19 mm in the 1-mg and 2-mg groups, respectively. However, the between-group difference (- 9.57 mm; 95% confidence interval: - 22.7 to 3.56) was not above the predefined non-inferiority margin of - 15 mm; thus, non-inferiority of the 1-mg dose could not be confirmed. Improvements in dysmenorrhea scores and endometrioma volume were also observed in both groups, although greater effects were noted in the 2-mg group than in the 1-mg group. Serum estradiol suppression was comparable between the groups, whereas BMD loss was less pronounced in the 1-mg group than in the 2-mg group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study did not demonstrate statistical non-inferiority of 1-mg/day DNG treatment over 2-mg/day DNG treatment for pain relief. These results suggest that the 2-mg/day dose may offer more robust analgesic effects, particularly during the early treatment phase. However, 1-mg/day DNG still showed meaningful symptom improvement with fewer adverse events than 2-mg/day DNG, supporting its potential use in selected patients requiring long-term therapy. Trial Registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, trial registration number: jRCTs041210016.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of 48-Week Low-Dose Dienogest Treatment in Patients with Endometriosis-Associated Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Kyoko Kikuno, Ryuta Asada, Takuma Ishihara, Ken-Ichirou Morishige, Kenro Chikazawa, Tatsuro Furui, Masanori Isobe\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12325-025-03397-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dienogest (DNG) is widely used to manage endometriosis-associated pain; however, long-term data comparing low and standard doses are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 48-week DNG treatment (1 mg/day vs. 2 mg/day) in patients with endometriosis-related dysmenorrhea (composite score).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, open-label, parallel-group, trial, 88 patients with endometriosis were enrolled, all of whom had at least one ovarian endometriotic cyst confirmed by imaging. Other phenotypes of endometriosis, such as deep infiltrating or peritoneal lesions, were not systematically assessed and may have been present. Patients were randomized to receive either 1-mg/day or 2-mg/day DNG. The primary endpoint was the change in menstrual pain measured using a visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints included changes in the dysmenorrhea score, ovarian endometrioma volume, serum estradiol levels, bone mineral density (BMD), and menopausal symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in menstrual pain (VAS). The mean VAS scores decreased by 44.63 and 54.19 mm in the 1-mg and 2-mg groups, respectively. However, the between-group difference (- 9.57 mm; 95% confidence interval: - 22.7 to 3.56) was not above the predefined non-inferiority margin of - 15 mm; thus, non-inferiority of the 1-mg dose could not be confirmed. Improvements in dysmenorrhea scores and endometrioma volume were also observed in both groups, although greater effects were noted in the 2-mg group than in the 1-mg group. Serum estradiol suppression was comparable between the groups, whereas BMD loss was less pronounced in the 1-mg group than in the 2-mg group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study did not demonstrate statistical non-inferiority of 1-mg/day DNG treatment over 2-mg/day DNG treatment for pain relief. These results suggest that the 2-mg/day dose may offer more robust analgesic effects, particularly during the early treatment phase. However, 1-mg/day DNG still showed meaningful symptom improvement with fewer adverse events than 2-mg/day DNG, supporting its potential use in selected patients requiring long-term therapy. Trial Registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, trial registration number: jRCTs041210016.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03397-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03397-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and Safety of 48-Week Low-Dose Dienogest Treatment in Patients with Endometriosis-Associated Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Trial.
Introduction: Dienogest (DNG) is widely used to manage endometriosis-associated pain; however, long-term data comparing low and standard doses are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 48-week DNG treatment (1 mg/day vs. 2 mg/day) in patients with endometriosis-related dysmenorrhea (composite score).
Methods: In this randomized, open-label, parallel-group, trial, 88 patients with endometriosis were enrolled, all of whom had at least one ovarian endometriotic cyst confirmed by imaging. Other phenotypes of endometriosis, such as deep infiltrating or peritoneal lesions, were not systematically assessed and may have been present. Patients were randomized to receive either 1-mg/day or 2-mg/day DNG. The primary endpoint was the change in menstrual pain measured using a visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints included changes in the dysmenorrhea score, ovarian endometrioma volume, serum estradiol levels, bone mineral density (BMD), and menopausal symptoms.
Results: Both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in menstrual pain (VAS). The mean VAS scores decreased by 44.63 and 54.19 mm in the 1-mg and 2-mg groups, respectively. However, the between-group difference (- 9.57 mm; 95% confidence interval: - 22.7 to 3.56) was not above the predefined non-inferiority margin of - 15 mm; thus, non-inferiority of the 1-mg dose could not be confirmed. Improvements in dysmenorrhea scores and endometrioma volume were also observed in both groups, although greater effects were noted in the 2-mg group than in the 1-mg group. Serum estradiol suppression was comparable between the groups, whereas BMD loss was less pronounced in the 1-mg group than in the 2-mg group.
Conclusions: This study did not demonstrate statistical non-inferiority of 1-mg/day DNG treatment over 2-mg/day DNG treatment for pain relief. These results suggest that the 2-mg/day dose may offer more robust analgesic effects, particularly during the early treatment phase. However, 1-mg/day DNG still showed meaningful symptom improvement with fewer adverse events than 2-mg/day DNG, supporting its potential use in selected patients requiring long-term therapy. Trial Registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, trial registration number: jRCTs041210016.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.