Efficacy and Safety of 48-Week Low-Dose Dienogest Treatment in Patients with Endometriosis-Associated Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Trial.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Kyoko Kikuno, Ryuta Asada, Takuma Ishihara, Ken-Ichirou Morishige, Kenro Chikazawa, Tatsuro Furui, Masanori Isobe
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of 48-Week Low-Dose Dienogest Treatment in Patients with Endometriosis-Associated Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Trial.","authors":"Kyoko Kikuno, Ryuta Asada, Takuma Ishihara, Ken-Ichirou Morishige, Kenro Chikazawa, Tatsuro Furui, Masanori Isobe","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03397-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dienogest (DNG) is widely used to manage endometriosis-associated pain; however, long-term data comparing low and standard doses are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 48-week DNG treatment (1 mg/day vs. 2 mg/day) in patients with endometriosis-related dysmenorrhea (composite score).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, open-label, parallel-group, trial, 88 patients with endometriosis were enrolled, all of whom had at least one ovarian endometriotic cyst confirmed by imaging. Other phenotypes of endometriosis, such as deep infiltrating or peritoneal lesions, were not systematically assessed and may have been present. Patients were randomized to receive either 1-mg/day or 2-mg/day DNG. The primary endpoint was the change in menstrual pain measured using a visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints included changes in the dysmenorrhea score, ovarian endometrioma volume, serum estradiol levels, bone mineral density (BMD), and menopausal symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in menstrual pain (VAS). The mean VAS scores decreased by 44.63 and 54.19 mm in the 1-mg and 2-mg groups, respectively. However, the between-group difference (- 9.57 mm; 95% confidence interval: - 22.7 to 3.56) was not above the predefined non-inferiority margin of - 15 mm; thus, non-inferiority of the 1-mg dose could not be confirmed. Improvements in dysmenorrhea scores and endometrioma volume were also observed in both groups, although greater effects were noted in the 2-mg group than in the 1-mg group. Serum estradiol suppression was comparable between the groups, whereas BMD loss was less pronounced in the 1-mg group than in the 2-mg group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study did not demonstrate statistical non-inferiority of 1-mg/day DNG treatment over 2-mg/day DNG treatment for pain relief. These results suggest that the 2-mg/day dose may offer more robust analgesic effects, particularly during the early treatment phase. However, 1-mg/day DNG still showed meaningful symptom improvement with fewer adverse events than 2-mg/day DNG, supporting its potential use in selected patients requiring long-term therapy. Trial Registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, trial registration number: jRCTs041210016.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03397-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dienogest (DNG) is widely used to manage endometriosis-associated pain; however, long-term data comparing low and standard doses are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 48-week DNG treatment (1 mg/day vs. 2 mg/day) in patients with endometriosis-related dysmenorrhea (composite score).

Methods: In this randomized, open-label, parallel-group, trial, 88 patients with endometriosis were enrolled, all of whom had at least one ovarian endometriotic cyst confirmed by imaging. Other phenotypes of endometriosis, such as deep infiltrating or peritoneal lesions, were not systematically assessed and may have been present. Patients were randomized to receive either 1-mg/day or 2-mg/day DNG. The primary endpoint was the change in menstrual pain measured using a visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints included changes in the dysmenorrhea score, ovarian endometrioma volume, serum estradiol levels, bone mineral density (BMD), and menopausal symptoms.

Results: Both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in menstrual pain (VAS). The mean VAS scores decreased by 44.63 and 54.19 mm in the 1-mg and 2-mg groups, respectively. However, the between-group difference (- 9.57 mm; 95% confidence interval: - 22.7 to 3.56) was not above the predefined non-inferiority margin of - 15 mm; thus, non-inferiority of the 1-mg dose could not be confirmed. Improvements in dysmenorrhea scores and endometrioma volume were also observed in both groups, although greater effects were noted in the 2-mg group than in the 1-mg group. Serum estradiol suppression was comparable between the groups, whereas BMD loss was less pronounced in the 1-mg group than in the 2-mg group.

Conclusions: This study did not demonstrate statistical non-inferiority of 1-mg/day DNG treatment over 2-mg/day DNG treatment for pain relief. These results suggest that the 2-mg/day dose may offer more robust analgesic effects, particularly during the early treatment phase. However, 1-mg/day DNG still showed meaningful symptom improvement with fewer adverse events than 2-mg/day DNG, supporting its potential use in selected patients requiring long-term therapy. Trial Registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, trial registration number: jRCTs041210016.

48周低剂量Dienogest治疗子宫内膜异位症相关痛经患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机、开放标签、平行组试验
Dienogest (DNG)被广泛用于治疗子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛;然而,比较低剂量和标准剂量的长期数据有限。因此,本研究旨在评估48周DNG治疗(1mg /天vs. 2mg /天)对子宫内膜异位症相关痛经患者的疗效和安全性(综合评分)。方法:在这项随机、开放标签、平行组的试验中,88例子宫内膜异位症患者入组,所有患者均至少有一个卵巢子宫内膜异位症囊肿。其他表型的子宫内膜异位症,如深浸润或腹膜病变,没有系统的评估,可能已经存在。患者随机接受1毫克/天或2毫克/天的DNG治疗。主要终点是使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量月经疼痛的变化。次要终点包括痛经评分、卵巢子宫内膜瘤体积、血清雌二醇水平、骨密度(BMD)和更年期症状的变化。结果:两组患者经期疼痛(VAS)均明显减轻。1 mg和2 mg组VAS平均评分分别下降44.63 和54.19 mm。然而,组间差异(- 9.57 mm; 95%置信区间:- 22.7至3.56)未超过预定的- 15 mm的非劣效性界限;因此,不能证实1mg剂量的非劣效性。两组患者的痛经评分和子宫内膜瘤体积均有改善,但2毫克组的效果明显高于1毫克组。血清雌二醇抑制在两组之间具有可比性,而BMD损失在1 mg组比2 mg组更不明显。结论:该研究没有证明1 mg/天DNG治疗比2 mg/天DNG治疗在缓解疼痛方面具有统计学上的非劣效性。这些结果表明,2毫克/天的剂量可能提供更强大的镇痛效果,特别是在早期治疗阶段。然而,与2 mg/d DNG相比,1 mg/d DNG仍然显示出有意义的症状改善,不良事件较少,支持其在需要长期治疗的特定患者中的潜在应用。日本临床试验注册中心,试验注册号:jRCTs041210016。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信