Mental Health Experiences and Challenges Among Individuals with Myasthenia Gravis: Insights from Patient-Centered, Qualitative Analyses.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Rachelle D Rodriguez, Ashley E L Anderson, Kelly G Gwathmey, Caroline R Brethenoux, Lisa M Shea, Raghav Govindarajan, Nizar Souayah, Wesley D Peters, Louis A Jackson, Zia U Choudhry
{"title":"Mental Health Experiences and Challenges Among Individuals with Myasthenia Gravis: Insights from Patient-Centered, Qualitative Analyses.","authors":"Rachelle D Rodriguez, Ashley E L Anderson, Kelly G Gwathmey, Caroline R Brethenoux, Lisa M Shea, Raghav Govindarajan, Nizar Souayah, Wesley D Peters, Louis A Jackson, Zia U Choudhry","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03399-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Historically, anxiety and depression rates have been higher among individuals with myasthenia gravis (MG) than the general population, and self-reported sentiments and experiences of mental health impairment may be more common than formal diagnoses. Patient-centered research can provide insight into self-described anxiety and depressive symptoms and stressors experienced by those with MG in the United States (US) and improve understanding of the current prevalence of anxiety and depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Insights were collected from three sources. First, a literature review of quantitative and/or real-world studies of anxiety/depression among individuals with gMG in the US. Second, a secondary, qualitative analysis of the transcripts from focus groups conducted with 12 individuals with self-reported generalized MG. Third, analysis of thousands of online conversations between people with self-reported ocular or generalized MG using search, data extraction, and artificial intelligence-powered algorithms. No statistical analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature review identified three studies (precluding a meta-analysis): prevalence estimates for depression were 19% (diagnosed), 31% (receiving antidepressants), and 75% (self-reported sentiments), and for anxiety were 17%, 19% (both diagnosed), and 82% (self-reported sentiments). Unique stressors and triggers were identified, classified into four categories: experience of symptoms/uncontrolled symptoms; burden of medical care; daily life functioning, responsibilities, and aspirations; and social support needs. The relative prominence of each stressor and its induced emotion varied by stage in the disease journey: fear and anxiety were discussed more frequently prior to MG diagnosis, whereas hopelessness and depression became more prominent later, during ongoing disease monitoring and management. Patients felt that stress worsened symptoms in a positive feedback loop.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This qualitative, hypothesis-generating study found that individuals with MG in the US were more likely to report experiencing anxiety and depression than the general population due, at least in part, to their MG-specific disease journey and the uncontrolled symptoms experienced.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03399-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Historically, anxiety and depression rates have been higher among individuals with myasthenia gravis (MG) than the general population, and self-reported sentiments and experiences of mental health impairment may be more common than formal diagnoses. Patient-centered research can provide insight into self-described anxiety and depressive symptoms and stressors experienced by those with MG in the United States (US) and improve understanding of the current prevalence of anxiety and depression.

Methods: Insights were collected from three sources. First, a literature review of quantitative and/or real-world studies of anxiety/depression among individuals with gMG in the US. Second, a secondary, qualitative analysis of the transcripts from focus groups conducted with 12 individuals with self-reported generalized MG. Third, analysis of thousands of online conversations between people with self-reported ocular or generalized MG using search, data extraction, and artificial intelligence-powered algorithms. No statistical analyses were performed.

Results: The literature review identified three studies (precluding a meta-analysis): prevalence estimates for depression were 19% (diagnosed), 31% (receiving antidepressants), and 75% (self-reported sentiments), and for anxiety were 17%, 19% (both diagnosed), and 82% (self-reported sentiments). Unique stressors and triggers were identified, classified into four categories: experience of symptoms/uncontrolled symptoms; burden of medical care; daily life functioning, responsibilities, and aspirations; and social support needs. The relative prominence of each stressor and its induced emotion varied by stage in the disease journey: fear and anxiety were discussed more frequently prior to MG diagnosis, whereas hopelessness and depression became more prominent later, during ongoing disease monitoring and management. Patients felt that stress worsened symptoms in a positive feedback loop.

Conclusion: This qualitative, hypothesis-generating study found that individuals with MG in the US were more likely to report experiencing anxiety and depression than the general population due, at least in part, to their MG-specific disease journey and the uncontrolled symptoms experienced.

重症肌无力患者的心理健康经历和挑战:来自以患者为中心的定性分析的见解。
从历史上看,重症肌无力(MG)患者的焦虑和抑郁率高于一般人群,自我报告的心理健康损害的情绪和经历可能比正式诊断更常见。以患者为中心的研究可以深入了解美国MG患者自我描述的焦虑和抑郁症状以及所经历的压力源,并提高对当前焦虑和抑郁患病率的理解。方法:从三个方面收集见解。首先,对美国gMG患者焦虑/抑郁的定量和/或现实世界研究的文献综述。其次,对12名自我报告的广泛性MG患者进行焦点小组的记录进行二次定性分析。第三,使用搜索、数据提取和人工智能驱动的算法,对自述患有眼性或广义性MG的人之间的数千次在线对话进行分析。未进行统计学分析。结果:文献回顾确定了三项研究(排除了荟萃分析):抑郁症的患病率估计为19%(诊断)、31%(接受抗抑郁药)和75%(自我报告的情绪),焦虑的患病率估计为17%、19%(诊断)和82%(自我报告的情绪)。确定了独特的应激源和触发因素,并将其分为四类:症状经历/不受控制的症状;医疗负担;日常生活功能、责任和愿望;以及社会支持需求。每个压力源及其诱发情绪的相对重要性在疾病发展的不同阶段有所不同:恐惧和焦虑在MG诊断之前被讨论得更频繁,而绝望和抑郁在随后的疾病监测和管理过程中变得更突出。患者认为压力在一个正反馈循环中恶化了症状。结论:这项定性的、产生假设的研究发现,在美国,MG患者比一般人群更有可能报告焦虑和抑郁,至少部分原因是他们的MG特异性疾病历程和所经历的不受控制的症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信