Personality science最新文献_第6页

Self and identity in personality psychology 人格心理学中的自我与同一性

Personality science Pub Date : 2021-06-18 DOI: 10.5964/ps.6035

D. McAdams, Kali Trzesniewski, J. Lilgendahl, V. Benet‐Martínez, R. Robins

引用次数: 10

Personality trait stability and change 人格特质的稳定与变化

Personality science Pub Date : 2021-06-18 DOI: 10.5964/ps.6009

W. Bleidorn, C. Hopwood, M. Back, Jaap J. A. Denissen, M. Hennecke, P. Hill, M. Jokela, C. Kandler, Richard E. Lucas, Maike Luhmann, U. Orth, B. Roberts, J. Wagner, C. Wrzus, Johannes Zimmermann

引用次数: 42

The Judgment of Personality: An Overview of Current Empirical Research Findings 人格判断：当前实证研究综述

Personality science Pub Date : 2021-02-14 DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/8t63v

Tera D. Letzring, N. A. Murphy, J. Allik, A. Beer, Johannes Zimmermann, Daniel Leising

引用次数: 4

Geographic Variation in Personality is Associated With Fertility Across the United States. 个性的地理差异与美国各地的生育率有关

Personality science Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-16 DOI: 10.5964/ps.7275

Eleanor J Junkins, Joseph E Potter, Peter J Rentfrow, Samuel D Gosling, Jeff Potter, K Paige Harden, Elliot M Tucker-Drob, Jaime Derringer, Daniel A Briley

{"title":"Geographic Variation in Personality is Associated With Fertility Across the United States.","authors":"Eleanor J Junkins, Joseph E Potter, Peter J Rentfrow, Samuel D Gosling, Jeff Potter, K Paige Harden, Elliot M Tucker-Drob, Jaime Derringer, Daniel A Briley","doi":"10.5964/ps.7275","DOIUrl":"10.5964/ps.7275","url":null,"abstract":"Levels of fertility and the shape of the age-specific fertility schedule vary substantially across U.S. regions with some states having peak fertility relatively early and others relatively late. Structural institutions or economic factors partly explain these heterogeneous patterns, but regional differences in personality might also contribute to regional differences in fertility. Here, we evaluated whether variation in extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience measured at the U.S. state-level was associated with the level, timing, and context of fertility across states above and beyond sociodemographics, voting behavior, and religiosity. Generally, states with higher levels of agreeableness and conscientiousness had more traditional fertility patterns, and states with higher levels of neuroticism and openness had more nontraditional fertility patterns, even after controlling for established correlates of fertility (r ~ |.50|). Personality is an overlooked correlate that can be leveraged to understand the existence and persistence of fertility differentials.","PeriodicalId":74421,"journal":{"name":"Personality science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11364352/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45480793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Why Has Personality Psychology Played an Outsized Role in the Credibility Revolution? 为什么人格心理学在可信度革命中扮演了巨大的角色?

Personality science Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.5964/ps.6001

Olivia E Atherton, Joanne M Chung, Kelci Harris, Julia M Rohrer, David M Condon, Felix Cheung, Simine Vazire, Richard E Lucas, M Brent Donnellan, Daniel K Mroczek, Christopher J Soto, Stephen Antonoplis, Rodica Ioana Damian, David C Funder, Sanjay Srivastava, R Chris Fraley, Hayley Jach, Brent W Roberts, Luke D Smillie, Jessie Sun, Jennifer L Tackett, Sara J Weston, K Paige Harden, Katherine S Corker

{"title":"Why Has Personality Psychology Played an Outsized Role in the Credibility Revolution?","authors":"Olivia E Atherton, Joanne M Chung, Kelci Harris, Julia M Rohrer, David M Condon, Felix Cheung, Simine Vazire, Richard E Lucas, M Brent Donnellan, Daniel K Mroczek, Christopher J Soto, Stephen Antonoplis, Rodica Ioana Damian, David C Funder, Sanjay Srivastava, R Chris Fraley, Hayley Jach, Brent W Roberts, Luke D Smillie, Jessie Sun, Jennifer L Tackett, Sara J Weston, K Paige Harden, Katherine S Corker","doi":"10.5964/ps.6001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.6001","url":null,"abstract":"Personality is not the most popular subfield of psychology. But, in one way or another, personality psychologists have played an outsized role in the ongoing \"credibility revolution\" in psychology. Not only have individual personality psychologists taken on visible roles in the movement, but our field's practices and norms have now become models for other fields to emulate (or, for those who share Baumeister's (2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.003) skeptical view of the consequences of increasing rigor, a model for what to avoid). In this article we discuss some unique features of our field that may have placed us in an ideal position to be leaders in this movement. We do so from a subjective perspective, describing our impressions and opinions about possible explanations for personality psychology's disproportionate role in the credibility revolution. We also discuss some ways in which personality psychology remains less-than-optimal, and how we can address these flaws.","PeriodicalId":74421,"journal":{"name":"Personality science","volume":"2 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9008744/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9644986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Personality science: United in diversity. Inaugural editorial for the new journal "Personality Science" 人格科学:多样性中的统一。新期刊《人格科学》的创刊号社论

Personality science Pub Date : 2020-11-27 DOI: 10.5964/ps.5297

J. Rauthmann

引用次数: 3

Ten steps toward a better personality science - how quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation 迈向更好的人格科学的十个步骤-如何在研究评估中获得更多的质量奖励

Personality science Pub Date : 2020-05-31 DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/5zvmh

D. Leising, Isabel Thielmann, A. Glöckner, Anne Gärtner, Felix D. Schönbrodt

{"title":"Ten steps toward a better personality science - how quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation","authors":"D. Leising, Isabel Thielmann, A. Glöckner, Anne Gärtner, Felix D. Schönbrodt","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/5zvmh","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5zvmh","url":null,"abstract":"In February 2020, the Personality and Diagnostics Chapter (DPPD) of the German Psychological Society (DGPs) tasked this group of authors with outlining what should be considered “good personality science”, as a positive vision of how to improve the credibility of research in the field. We argue in favor of working toward greater consensus about (1) shared, important research goals, (2) standardized use of terminology, (3) standardized measurement practices, (4) standardized ways of pre-processing and analyzing data, and (5) shared views of the current state of theory and knowledge. All of these should help streamline the field considerably. We also argue in favor of (6) theory formalization, (7) pre-registration requirements for any confirmatory claims, (8) valuing replication attempts more (e.g., by reserving a quota of journal space for them), (9) planning for informative (e.g., well-powered) studies, and (10) making data, code, and materials open to the public by default. The current, quantity-based incentive structures in academia clearly stand in the way of implementing many of these practices, resulting in a research literature with sometimes questionable utility and/or integrity. As a solution, we propose a quality-based reward scheme that explicitly weights published research by its good science merits. Adoption of such a reward scheme may incur a significant decline in overall publication numbers, hopefully resulting in (a) an improved signal-to-noise ratio in the literature, and (b) more efficient allocation of resources (e.g., time) by researchers, who would be enabled to read more of what is being published, and to review each other’s work more carefully. Scientists need to be increasingly rewarded for doing good work, not just lots of work.","PeriodicalId":74421,"journal":{"name":"Personality science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42005068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7