为什么人格心理学在可信度革命中扮演了巨大的角色?

Olivia E Atherton, Joanne M Chung, Kelci Harris, Julia M Rohrer, David M Condon, Felix Cheung, Simine Vazire, Richard E Lucas, M Brent Donnellan, Daniel K Mroczek, Christopher J Soto, Stephen Antonoplis, Rodica Ioana Damian, David C Funder, Sanjay Srivastava, R Chris Fraley, Hayley Jach, Brent W Roberts, Luke D Smillie, Jessie Sun, Jennifer L Tackett, Sara J Weston, K Paige Harden, Katherine S Corker
{"title":"为什么人格心理学在可信度革命中扮演了巨大的角色?","authors":"Olivia E Atherton,&nbsp;Joanne M Chung,&nbsp;Kelci Harris,&nbsp;Julia M Rohrer,&nbsp;David M Condon,&nbsp;Felix Cheung,&nbsp;Simine Vazire,&nbsp;Richard E Lucas,&nbsp;M Brent Donnellan,&nbsp;Daniel K Mroczek,&nbsp;Christopher J Soto,&nbsp;Stephen Antonoplis,&nbsp;Rodica Ioana Damian,&nbsp;David C Funder,&nbsp;Sanjay Srivastava,&nbsp;R Chris Fraley,&nbsp;Hayley Jach,&nbsp;Brent W Roberts,&nbsp;Luke D Smillie,&nbsp;Jessie Sun,&nbsp;Jennifer L Tackett,&nbsp;Sara J Weston,&nbsp;K Paige Harden,&nbsp;Katherine S Corker","doi":"10.5964/ps.6001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Personality is not the most popular subfield of psychology. But, in one way or another, personality psychologists have played an outsized role in the ongoing \"credibility revolution\" in psychology. Not only have individual personality psychologists taken on visible roles in the movement, but our field's practices and norms have now become models for other fields to emulate (or, for those who share Baumeister's (2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.003) skeptical view of the consequences of increasing rigor, a model for what to avoid). In this article we discuss some unique features of our field that may have placed us in an ideal position to be leaders in this movement. We do so from a subjective perspective, describing our impressions and opinions about possible explanations for personality psychology's disproportionate role in the credibility revolution. We also discuss some ways in which personality psychology remains less-than-optimal, and how we can address these flaws.</p>","PeriodicalId":74421,"journal":{"name":"Personality science","volume":"2 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9008744/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Has Personality Psychology Played an Outsized Role in the Credibility Revolution?\",\"authors\":\"Olivia E Atherton,&nbsp;Joanne M Chung,&nbsp;Kelci Harris,&nbsp;Julia M Rohrer,&nbsp;David M Condon,&nbsp;Felix Cheung,&nbsp;Simine Vazire,&nbsp;Richard E Lucas,&nbsp;M Brent Donnellan,&nbsp;Daniel K Mroczek,&nbsp;Christopher J Soto,&nbsp;Stephen Antonoplis,&nbsp;Rodica Ioana Damian,&nbsp;David C Funder,&nbsp;Sanjay Srivastava,&nbsp;R Chris Fraley,&nbsp;Hayley Jach,&nbsp;Brent W Roberts,&nbsp;Luke D Smillie,&nbsp;Jessie Sun,&nbsp;Jennifer L Tackett,&nbsp;Sara J Weston,&nbsp;K Paige Harden,&nbsp;Katherine S Corker\",\"doi\":\"10.5964/ps.6001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Personality is not the most popular subfield of psychology. But, in one way or another, personality psychologists have played an outsized role in the ongoing \\\"credibility revolution\\\" in psychology. Not only have individual personality psychologists taken on visible roles in the movement, but our field's practices and norms have now become models for other fields to emulate (or, for those who share Baumeister's (2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.003) skeptical view of the consequences of increasing rigor, a model for what to avoid). In this article we discuss some unique features of our field that may have placed us in an ideal position to be leaders in this movement. We do so from a subjective perspective, describing our impressions and opinions about possible explanations for personality psychology's disproportionate role in the credibility revolution. We also discuss some ways in which personality psychology remains less-than-optimal, and how we can address these flaws.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality science\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9008744/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.6001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.6001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人格并不是心理学中最受欢迎的分支领域。但是,无论如何,人格心理学家在正在进行的心理学“可信度革命”中发挥了巨大的作用。不仅个体人格心理学家在这一运动中扮演了明显的角色,而且我们这个领域的实践和规范现在已经成为其他领域效仿的榜样(或者,对于那些同意鲍迈斯特(2016,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.003)对日益严格的后果持怀疑态度的人来说,这是一个应该避免的榜样)。在这篇文章中,我们将讨论我们领域的一些独特特征,这些特征可能使我们处于成为这场运动领导者的理想位置。我们从主观的角度来描述我们对人格心理学在可信度革命中不成比例的作用的可能解释的印象和观点。我们还讨论了人格心理学仍然不够理想的一些方面,以及我们如何解决这些缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Has Personality Psychology Played an Outsized Role in the Credibility Revolution?

Personality is not the most popular subfield of psychology. But, in one way or another, personality psychologists have played an outsized role in the ongoing "credibility revolution" in psychology. Not only have individual personality psychologists taken on visible roles in the movement, but our field's practices and norms have now become models for other fields to emulate (or, for those who share Baumeister's (2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.003) skeptical view of the consequences of increasing rigor, a model for what to avoid). In this article we discuss some unique features of our field that may have placed us in an ideal position to be leaders in this movement. We do so from a subjective perspective, describing our impressions and opinions about possible explanations for personality psychology's disproportionate role in the credibility revolution. We also discuss some ways in which personality psychology remains less-than-optimal, and how we can address these flaws.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信