Foot & ankle specialist最新文献

{"title":"Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes for First Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis Using an Intramedullary Nail for Hallux Valgus Deformity A Consecutive Case Series.","authors":"Connor C Ott, Ayush D Shah, Kayla J Seiffert, Rebecca Stone McGaver, Paul M Cammack, Scott M Holthusen, Jeffrey D Seybold, John C Tanner, William M Engasser","doi":"10.1177/19386400241301822","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400241301822","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>First tarsometatarsal (TMT) arthrodesis is one of the most common procedures performed each year for the correction of hallux valgus deformity, and nonunion rates for first TMT arthrodesis are commonly reported to be between 4% and 15%. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an intramedullary nail system in patients requiring first TMT arthrodesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An ambispective, multisurgeon, consecutive case series was conducted, in which retrospective and prospective collection of patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) and radiologic data were conducted. Patients who underwent first TMT arthrodesis from July 2019 to July 2022 for hallux valgus deformity with an intramedullary nail system and had adequate records for a minimum of 3 months postoperation (±4 weeks) were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy patients were included in the final analysis, with a median prospective PROM follow-up of 1.6 years. There was an overall union rate of 91.4% (64/70 patients). Nine patients required secondary procedures: 4 hardware removals and 5 nonunion revisions. Collected PROMs and radiologic data showed significant improved from preoperative to prospective follow-up (P < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>First TMT arthrodesis using an intramedullary nail system result in nonunion rates and PROMs comparable to other techniques currently being used.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong><i>Level IV: Retrospective Case Series</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"19386400241301822"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142840504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Survey of Utilization of Weightbearing Computed Tomography Within AOFAS Membership.","authors":"Sudheer C Reddy, Cesar de Cesar Netto","doi":"10.1177/19386400241297605","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400241297605","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) has been increasingly employed to evaluate and treat patients with varied pathologies such as progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD), posttraumatic deformity, hallux valgus, ankle arthritis, Charcot arthropathy, lisfranc, and syndesmosis injuries. However, little is known regarding its overall availability to foot and ankle providers and how it is being used in clinical practice. The goal of this study is to assess the utilization of WBCT among AOFAS members, identify the indications for use in clinical practice and potential barriers for implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was emailed to AOFAS members inquiring about the use WBCT in clinical practice. Practice and demographic information were also collected. A total of 220 responses were collected over a 2-month period. Respondents were queried with respect to the availability of WBCT in practice, indications for use, frequency of use, ownership of the scanner, and barriers to implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>58% of respondents did not have access to WBCT. Most respondents were in practice 10 years or more (69%). Single-specialty private practice was the most common practice type (39%). Of those with access to WBCT, 5 or fewer scans were ordered per week (57% of respondents). Evaluation of hindfoot/ankle deformity was the most common indication (69% of respondents) with it being used as a preoperative evaluation tool approximately 25% of the time (57% of respondents). Radiology department owned WBCT in most institutions (34%). 75% of respondents with WBCT use it postoperatively less than 25% of the time. Of those without WBCT, 94% stated they would like to have it with cost being the most significant barrier to implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most respondents surveyed did not have access to WBCT, with cost being the greatest barrier. However, 94% of those without it would like to have access to it. For those with access, it is used 5 or fewer times per week with evaluation of hindfoot/ankle deformity being the most common indication.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV (Observational Study).</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"19386400241297605"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142824963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Distal Fibula Fractures-Intramedullary Fixation Versus Plating: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials.","authors":"Vikash Raj, Sitanshu Barik, Richa","doi":"10.1177/19386400221118470","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19386400221118470","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the present study is to compare the functional scores and complications of intramedullary fixation versus plate osteosynthesis of distal fibular fractures in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses format from MEDLINE, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane databases. The included articles were assessed according to the risk of bias assessment tool by Cochrane collaboration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5 randomized control trials were included for quantitative review. Random sequence generation and allocation concealment of the study subjects were the strengths of all the included studies. There was high heterogeneity among the included studies (I² > 75%). There was no significant difference between the Olerud-Molander scores in both the groups but the trend favored the intramedullary nailing of distal fibula (mean difference of 3.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] of 8.90). Complications were significantly lesser in the intramedullary group across the studies (odds ratio 0.26, 95% CI of 0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intramedullary nailing of fibula with the use of modern locking fibular nails is an alternative to fibular plating for unstable distal fibular fractures in properly selected cases. There remains the need for standardizing the method of operative treatment of distal fibular fractures which can be done by a well-planned large-scale prospective study design.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"621-631"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40417957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correlation Between Statin Use and Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism Incidence in Patients With Ankle Fracture: A Machine Learning Approach.","authors":"Nour Nassour, Bardiya Akhbari, Noopur Ranganathan, Ahmed Tawakol, Rachel P Rosovsky, Daniel Guss, Christopher W DiGiovanni, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani","doi":"10.1177/19386400231207692","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19386400231207692","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying factors that correlate with the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has the potential to improve VTE prevention and positively influence decision-making regarding prophylaxis. In this study, we aimed to investigate the correlation between statin consumption and the incidence of VTE in patients who sustained an ankle fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, case-controlled study, cases were those who developed VTE and controls were those who had no VTE, and the ratio was 1:4. Patients' demographics, history of hyperlipidemia, and reported statins use were obtained. A random forest classifier (RFC) model was used to predict whether statin consumers were at risk of VTE after ankle fracture regardless of VTE prophylaxis administration based on statin consumption, body mass index (BMI), age, and biological sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1175 patients with ankle fractures, 238 had confirmed VTE (case group), and 937 had no symptomatic VTE (control group; ratio 1:4). Fifty (21%) cases and 407 (43%) controls were on a statin. Statin users had a significantly lower incidence of VTE after ankle fracture, odds ratio (OR) = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.25, 0.49, P < .001. Our model showed an area under the receiving operator curve (AUROC) of 78%, a sensitivity of 73%, and a specificity of 83% in predicting the risk of VTE. The importance of the predictors of VTE, other than the use of statins (model importance = 0.1), were age (model importance of 0.72), BMI (model importance of 0.24), and biological sex (model importance of 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Statins were significantly associated with a lower rate of VTE in our population of patients who sustained an ankle fracture.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong><i>3</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"604-612"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71415724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Effect of Fibular Malrotation on Tibiotalar Joint Contact Mechanics in a Weber B Ankle Fracture Model.","authors":"Alfonso E Ayala, Ansab Khwaja, Brianna C Goodison, Simeon L Smith, Samuel Y Kim, Jared T Irwin, L Daniel Latt","doi":"10.1177/19386400221127835","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19386400221127835","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In minimally displaced Weber B ankle fractures, the distal fibular fracture fragment can be externally rotated. This malrotation is difficult to detect on radiographs and, when left malreduced through nonoperative treatment, may contribute to altered joint mechanics, predisposing to posttraumatic osteoarthritis. This study evaluates the effects of fibular malrotation on tibiotalar joint contact mechanics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six cadaveric ankles were tested using a materials testing system (MTS) machine. A tibiotalar joint sensor recorded contact area and pressure. Samples were tested in the intact, neutrally rotated, and malrotated state. Each trial applied a 686N axial load and a 147N Achilles tendon load in neutral position, 15° dorsiflexion, and 15° plantarflexion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the comparison of malrotated to intact ankles, peak contact pressure was found to be significantly greater at neutral flexion (intact 5.56 MPa ± 1.39, malrotated 7.21 MPa ± 1.07, P = .03), not significantly different in dorsiflexion, and significantly decreased in plantarflexion (intact 11.2 MPa ± 3.04, malrotated 9.01 MPa ± 1.84, P = .01). Significant differences in contact area were not found between conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that fibular malrotation contributes to significant alterations in tibiotalar joint contact pressures, which may contribute to the development of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. When malrotation of the fibula is suspected on plain radiographs, a computer tomography (CT) scan should be obtained to evaluate its extent and further consideration should be given to surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong>Level V: Bench testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"577-584"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33494971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Management of Open Ankle Fractures in Elderly Patients With a Fibula Nail is a Safe and Reliable Technique.","authors":"Abdulrahman Odeh, James Archer, Basil Budair, Alastair Marsh, Paul Fenton","doi":"10.1177/19386400221099660","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19386400221099660","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ankle fractures are becoming more common in the elderly and their management is frequently challenging. There is increasing evidence of good outcomes following fibula nail fixation in the management of ankle fractures. The use of a fibula nail in open fractures comes with potential advantages such as minimal soft tissue dissection, early rehabilitation, and decreased wound complications. We aimed to assess their use in the management of open ankle fractures in the elderly.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of patients aged 60 years or older with an open ankle fracture treated with a fibular nail at a major trauma center was conducted. All patients were managed with joint Orthopaedic and Plastic Surgical input to determine their optimal management. Functional outcome scores, postoperative complications, and re-operation rates were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients were identified with a mean age of 76 years. Patient-reported outcomes (Olerud and Molander Score) were calculated in 73% of patients. Our results demonstrated excellent outcome scores (>91) in 1 patient, good outcome scores (61-90) in 7 patients, and fair outcome scores (31-60) in 3 patients. There were no postoperative complications or re-operations within our study group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This article is the largest series presenting the outcomes of fibula nails in the management of open ankle fractures in elderly patients. We conclude that it can be used as a treatment option to safely manage open ankle fractures in the elderly. It provides a stable fixation, early weight-bearing, low risk of postoperative complications while maintaining good patient-reported functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong><i>Level 4</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"561-566"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40410272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Association Between Pronation External Rotation IV Fracture Pattern and Regional Bone Density.","authors":"Dominick Casciato, Daniel T DeGenova, Zachary Hill, Jia Bao Lin, Tucker Peabody, Nolan Schmitz, Benjamin Taylor","doi":"10.1177/19386400231173163","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19386400231173163","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Throughout the musculoskeletal system, fracture patterns and subsequent healing rely partly on bone density. In the foot and ankle, bone density has been shown to play a role in supination and external rotation fracture patterns. Adding to previous research, this investigation examines the association between bone density and trimalleolar versus trimalleolar equivalent fracture patterns following pronation and external rotation injuries using computed tomography (CT)-derived Hounsfield units (HU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted among patients without a history of fracture or osteoporosis who sustained a PER IV fracture. Demographic data were collected. Fractures were separated between PER IV equivalent and fracture groups. CT-derived HU was assessed at the distal tibia and fibula. Density was compared between PER IV equivalent and fracture groups and among posterior malleolar fracture patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five patients met the selection criteria, with 17 comprising the equivalent group and 58 in the fracture group. There were 38 type 1, 9 type 2, and 11 type 3 posterior malleolus fractures. The ankle bone density of the PER fracture equivalent group (331.98 ± 65.71HU) was greater than the PER fracture group (281.61 ± 76.99HU; <i>P</i> = .008). A statistically significant difference in tibial bone densities among equivalent and all PER fracture types (<i>P</i> = .01) with the equivalent group (331.98 ± 65.71HU) maintaining a greater tibial bone density than the type 2 posterior malleolus fracture group (252.35 ± 57.33HU; <i>P</i> = .009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher bone density was associated with PER IV equivalent fractures; however, there was no density difference among posterior malleolus fracture types. When presented with PER IV fractures, consider fixation that addresses a lower bone density.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"598-603"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9530943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Unstable Rotational Ankle Fractures Treated With Anatomic Mortise Repair and Direct Posterior Malleolus Fixation.","authors":"Connor P Littlefield, Jack H Drake, Kenneth A Egol","doi":"10.1177/19386400221110087","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19386400221110087","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction:</i> The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient outcomes following a standardized algorithmic approach to ankle mortise stabilization, following rotational fracture, utilizing direct repair of the posterior malleolus in the prone position. <i>Methods</i>: Eighty consecutive patients with unstable rotational ankle fractures that involved the posterior malleolus were analyzed. All underwent direct repair of the posterior malleolus regardless of size through a posterolateral approach. Electronic records were retrospectively reviewed for demographic information, initial injury and operation details, healing status, and complications. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were obtained to assess the initial injury and healing was determined both by radiographic and clinical progress at follow-up visits. <i>Results</i>: Average posterior malleolus fragment width was 8.1 ± 3.7 mm (range = 2.1-19.9 mm) and percentage of the articular surface was 23.6% (range = 7.1%-56.7%) on the lateral radiograph. Overall, 80/80 (100%) patients healed their ankle fractures by a mean 2.9 ± 1.1 months. Only 1 (1.3%) patient required transsyndesmotic fixation following posterior malleolus repair. Mean range of ankle motion was as follows: dorsiflexion 20° ± 10°, plantarflexion 34° ± 10°, inversion 8° ± 4°, and eversion 7° ± 4°. Seventy-nine patients (98.8%) had an anatomic mortise reduction. Nine patients (11.3%) had a superficial wound complication, 3 patients (3.8%) had dysesthesia in the sural nerve distribution, and 1 patient (1.3%) lost reduction of the medial malleolus. <i>Conclusion</i>: Patients who undergo direct repair of the posterior malleolus in the prone position can expect a high rate of healing with superficial wound breakdown being the biggest problem, which was associated with an ankle fracture dislocation. Posterior malleolus fixation may obviate the need of transsyndesmotic stabilization.<b>Levels of Evidence</b>: Retrospective Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"567-576"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40610470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Defining Operative Indications in Lisfranc Injuries: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Christian Pearsall, Emily Arciero, Puneet Gupta, Henrik Bäcker, Direk Tantigate, David P Trofa, J Turner Vosseller","doi":"10.1177/19386400231175376","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19386400231175376","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this review was to determine operative indications for Lisfranc injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review using a MEDLINE literature search was performed using the index \"Lisfranc Injury\" from 1980 onward using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines where applicable. Inclusion criteria were all clinical studies reporting on the management of Lisfranc injuries obtained via the search index, including case reports, review articles, cohort studies, and randomized trials. Non-English-language articles, inaccessible articles, those not relevant to the management of Lisfranc injuries (biomechanical, cadaveric, and technique articles), and those that did not explicitly state operative indications (vague or absent indications) were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After identifying 737 studies, the full text of 391 studies was reviewed, and 58 reports providing explicit operative indications were included in the final analysis. Fifty-one (81.1%) studies provided diastasis cutoffs varying ≥2 mm (35/58; 60.4%), ≥<i>1 mm (13; 22.4%), and</i> ≥3 mm (3; 5.2%); the diastasis location was most commonly unspecified (31/58; 53.5%) or varied between combinations of metatarsal, tarsal, cuboid, and cuneiform bones (20/58; 27.6%). Specific imaging criteria for surgery included an avulsion fracture or fleck sign (3/58; 5.2%), arch height loss (3/58; 5.2%), and a tear on magnetic resonance imaging (5; 8.6%). The 11 (19%) studies defining operative indications in terms of classification schemes used the Nunley and Vertullo (8/58; 13.8%), Myerson (2; 3.5%), and Buehren (1; 1.7%) systems. Twenty-one (36.2%) studies provided multiple operative indications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most common Lisfranc operative indications among the limited reporting studies varied from a 1- to 3-mm diastasis across several locations. It is imperative for operative indications to be reported with an increased frequency and in a homogenous fashion to guide the clinical management of these subtle injuries.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong>Level IV; systematic Review.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"632-638"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9951425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Wait Time for Surgery Following Injury Affects Functional Outcomes and Complications After an Ankle Fracture: A Propensity Score-Matched Multicenter Study, the TRON Study.","authors":"Takayuki Sugino, Yasuhiko Takegami, Kosuke Bando, Toshifumi Sato, Tomoki Fujita, Yoshiharu Oka, Shiro Imagama","doi":"10.1177/19386400231164211","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19386400231164211","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study aimed to evaluate the hypothesis that a 1-week extension of the waiting period to perform surgery for ankle fracture might affect postoperative results and complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used our multicenter database named TRON (Trauma Research Group of Nagoya). In all, 779 patients who underwent surgery for ankle fracture, who had no comorbidities were eligible. After exclusion, we analyzed 596 patients. We divided the patients into 2 groups according to whether they were operated on within 7 days after the injury with propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operative time of the delayed operation group (DO group) was significantly longer than that of the early operation group (EO group) (115.87 ± 56.59 vs 85.93 ± 34.58 minutes; P < .001). The rate of infection in the DO group was significantly higher than that of the EO group (16 patients [6.5%] vs 4 patients [1.6%]; P = .016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Waiting for more than a week to perform ankle surgery may lead to longer operative times and increased infection rates.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"592-597"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9675380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}