3D-Printed Total Talus Replacement After Free Vascularized Medial Femoral Condyle Osteocutaneous Flap for Avascular Necrosis of the Talus Leads to Poor Clinical Outcomes: A Case Series.

Foot & ankle specialist Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-08 DOI:10.1177/19386400221138640
Naji S Madi, Aman Chopra, Amanda N Fletcher, Suhail Mithani, Selene G Parekh
{"title":"3D-Printed Total Talus Replacement After Free Vascularized Medial Femoral Condyle Osteocutaneous Flap for Avascular Necrosis of the Talus Leads to Poor Clinical Outcomes: A Case Series.","authors":"Naji S Madi, Aman Chopra, Amanda N Fletcher, Suhail Mithani, Selene G Parekh","doi":"10.1177/19386400221138640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionAvascular necrosis (AVN) of the talus is 1 of the most difficult foot and ankle pathologies to diagnose and manage. The purpose of this study was to report on the functional outcomes of 3D-printed total talus replacement (TTR) in 2 patients with talar AVN who both underwent a failed revascularization.MethodsThis is a case series of 2 patients with TTR after a failed revascularization and a comparison group of 25 patients with primary TTR. Clinical and functional outcomes are used to compare both groups.ResultsPatient 1 had a postrevascularization Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score of 9. Imaging showed failure of the medial femoral condyle to incorporate with talar fragmentation. Patient underwent TTR at 5 months postoperatively. At 2 years postoperatively, the patient underwent a cavovarus foot reconstruction; however, patient continued to suffer from ankle pain (VAS 6) and ultimately underwent below knee amputation at 3 years after the TTR. Patient 2 initially underwent a core decompression for a talar bone infarct followed by revascularization procedure at 6 months postoperatively due to persistent pain and bony infarcts. At 18 months postrevascularization, the patient had a VAS pain score of 9 and progression of the AVN. She underwent a TTR. At 1-year follow-up, the VAS pain score was 8. Both patients had an ankle plantarflexion of 30° at their last TTR follow-up. The comparison group consisted of 25 patients who underwent 3D-printed TTR with mean postoperative VAS score and ankle plantarflexion of 3.7° and 41.8°.ConclusionPatients 1 and 2 demonstrated reduced plantarflexion and ankle motion after TTR relative to the comparison group which improved in both physical assessments. The first patient needed a below knee amputation for persistent pain. Patient 2 showed less improvement in all the foot and ankle outcome scores as compared with the primary TTR group.Level of Evidence:Level V: Retrospective case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"341-351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400221138640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionAvascular necrosis (AVN) of the talus is 1 of the most difficult foot and ankle pathologies to diagnose and manage. The purpose of this study was to report on the functional outcomes of 3D-printed total talus replacement (TTR) in 2 patients with talar AVN who both underwent a failed revascularization.MethodsThis is a case series of 2 patients with TTR after a failed revascularization and a comparison group of 25 patients with primary TTR. Clinical and functional outcomes are used to compare both groups.ResultsPatient 1 had a postrevascularization Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score of 9. Imaging showed failure of the medial femoral condyle to incorporate with talar fragmentation. Patient underwent TTR at 5 months postoperatively. At 2 years postoperatively, the patient underwent a cavovarus foot reconstruction; however, patient continued to suffer from ankle pain (VAS 6) and ultimately underwent below knee amputation at 3 years after the TTR. Patient 2 initially underwent a core decompression for a talar bone infarct followed by revascularization procedure at 6 months postoperatively due to persistent pain and bony infarcts. At 18 months postrevascularization, the patient had a VAS pain score of 9 and progression of the AVN. She underwent a TTR. At 1-year follow-up, the VAS pain score was 8. Both patients had an ankle plantarflexion of 30° at their last TTR follow-up. The comparison group consisted of 25 patients who underwent 3D-printed TTR with mean postoperative VAS score and ankle plantarflexion of 3.7° and 41.8°.ConclusionPatients 1 and 2 demonstrated reduced plantarflexion and ankle motion after TTR relative to the comparison group which improved in both physical assessments. The first patient needed a below knee amputation for persistent pain. Patient 2 showed less improvement in all the foot and ankle outcome scores as compared with the primary TTR group.Level of Evidence:Level V: Retrospective case series.

游离血管化股骨髁内侧骨皮瓣治疗距骨无血管性坏死后,3D打印全距骨置换术临床疗效不佳:病例系列。
简介:距骨血管坏死(AVN)是最难诊断和处理的足踝病变之一。本研究的目的是报告 3D-打印全距骨置换术(TTR)对 2 名均接受血管重建失败的距骨无血管坏死患者的功能效果:这是一项病例系列研究,涉及 2 名接受血管再通失败后接受 TTR 的患者,以及 25 名接受原发性 TTR 的对比组患者。两组患者的临床和功能结果进行了比较:影像学检查显示股骨内侧髁融合失败,并伴有距骨碎裂。患者在术后5个月接受了TTR手术。术后2年,患者接受了腔隙性足部重建术;然而,患者的踝关节仍然疼痛(VAS评分6分),最终在TTR术后3年接受了膝下截肢手术。患者 2 最初因距骨梗塞接受了核心减压术,术后 6 个月因持续疼痛和骨梗塞接受了血管重建术。血管再通术后 18 个月,患者的 VAS 疼痛评分为 9 分,且 AVN 有所进展。她接受了 TTR 治疗。在最后一次 TTR 随访时,两名患者的踝关节跖屈度均为 30°。对比组包括 25 名接受 3D 打印 TTR 的患者,术后 VAS 评分和踝关节跖屈度的平均值分别为 3.7°和 41.8°:结论:与对比组相比,1号和2号患者在TTR术后跖屈度和踝关节活动度均有所下降,而对比组在两项体能评估中均有所改善。第一位患者因持续疼痛需要进行膝下截肢手术。与主要TTR组相比,第二名患者的所有足踝结果评分均改善较少:证据等级:V 级:回顾性病例系列
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信