BMC primary care最新文献

{"title":"Addressing depression and comorbid health conditions through solution-focused brief therapy in an integrated care setting: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Zach W Cooper, Orion Mowbray, Mohammed K Ali, Leslie C M Johnson","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02561-8","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12875-024-02561-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Co-occurring physical and mental health conditions are common, but effective and sustainable interventions are needed for primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our paper analyzes the effectiveness of a Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) intervention for treating depression and co-occurring health conditions in primary care. We hypothesized that individuals receiving the SFBT intervention would have statistically significant reductions in depressive and anxiety symptoms, systolic blood pressure (SBP), hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), and body mass index (BMI) when compared to those in the control group. Additionally, we hypothesized that the SFBT group would have increased well-being scores compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized clinical trial was conducted at a rural federally qualified health center. Eligible participants scored ≥ 10 on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and met criteria for co-occurring health conditions (hypertension, obesity, diabetes) evidenced by chart review. SFBT participants (n = 40) received three SFBT interventions over three weeks in addition to treatment as usual (TAU). The control group (n = 40) received TAU over three weeks. Measures included depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7), well-being (Human Flourishing Index), and SFBT scores, along with physical health outcomes (blood pressure, body mass index, and hemoglobin A1c).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 80 consented participants, 69 completed all measures and were included in the final analysis. 80% identified as female and the mean age was 38.1 years (SD = 14.5). Most participants were white (72%) followed by Hispanic (15%) and Black (13%). When compared to TAU, SFBT intervention participants had significantly greater reductions in depression (baseline: M = 18.17, SD = 3.97, outcome: M = 9.71, SD = 3.71) and anxiety (baseline: M = 14.69, SD = 4.9, outcome: M = 8.43, SD = 3.79). SFBT intervention participants also had significantly increased well-being scores (baseline: M = 58.37, SD = 16.36, outcome: M = 73.43, SD = 14.70) when compared to TAU. Changes in BMI and blood pressure were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SFBT intervention demonstrated efficacy in reducing depressive and anxiety symptoms and increasing well-being but did not affect cardio-metabolic parameters over a short period of intervention.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was pre-registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05838222 on 4/20/2023. *M = Mean, SD = Standard deviation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342549/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142047639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"General practitioners' assessment and management of chronic kidney disease in older patients- a mixed methods study.","authors":"Michelle Guppy, Esther Joy Bowles, Paul Glasziou, Jenny Doust","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02559-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12875-024-02559-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is commonly managed in general practice, with established guidelines for diagnosis and management. CKD is more prevalent in the older population, and is associated with lifestyle diseases as well as social deprivation. Older patients also commonly experience multimorbidity. Current CKD guidelines do not take age into account, with the same diagnostic and management recommendations for patients regardless of their age. We sought to investigate general practitioners' (GPs') approach to older patients with CKD, and whether their assessment and management differed from guideline recommendations. We explored the reasons for variation from guideline recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a mixed methods study of Australian GPs. An online anonymous survey about the use of CKD guidelines, and assessment and management of CKD was sent to 9500 GPs. Four hundred and sixty-nine (5%) of GPs responded, and the survey was completed by 399 GPs. Subsequently, 27 GPs were interviewed in detail about their diagnostic and management approach to older patients with declining kidney function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the survey, 48% of GPs who responded found the CKD guidelines useful for diagnosis and management. Four themes arose from our interviews: age-related decline in kidney function; whole person care; patient-centred care; and process of care that highlighted the importance of continuity of care. GPs recognised that older patients have an inherently high risk of lower kidney function. The GPs reported management of that higher risk focused on managing the whole person (not just a single disease focus) and being patient-centred. Patient-centred care expressed the importance of quality of life, shared decision making and being symptom focused. There was also a recognition that there is a difference between a sudden decline in kidney function and a stable but low kidney function and GPs would manage these situations differently.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GPs apply guidelines in the management of CKD in older patients using a patient-centred and whole person approach to care. Older patients have a high prevalence of multimorbidity, which GPs carefully considered when applying existing CKD-specific guidelines. Future iterations of CKD Guidelines need to give due consideration to multimorbidity in older patients that can adversely impact on kidney function in addition to the expected age-related functional decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334340/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142010043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Implementing primary care behavioral health in Swedish primary care - study protocol for a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster trial.","authors":"Hanna Israelsson Larsen, Kristin Thomas, Lise Bergman Nordgren, Erica Skagius Ruiz, Kocher Koshnaw, Per Nilsen","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02515-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12875-024-02515-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mental health problems represent a large and growing public health concern. Primary care handles most of the patients with mental health problems, but there are many barriers to detection and treatment in this setting, causing under-recognition and under-treatment of patients. The service delivery model Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) shows promise to manage mental health problems in primary care, but more research is needed regarding its effects on multiple levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This project investigates the effectiveness and implementation of a large-scale implementation of PCBH in Region Östergötland, Sweden. The aim is to generate new knowledge concerning the impact of a real-world implementation and use of PCBH in routine primary care. A Pragmatic Stepped-Wedge Cluster Trial will be used: 24 PCBH primary care centres in one region will be compared with 48 standard care centres in three other regions. The model will be implemented sequentially at the PCBH centres according to a staggered timetable. Results will be investigated at patient, staff and organization levels and various forms of data will be collected: (1) local and national registry data; (2) questionnaire data; (3) interview data; and (4) document data.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This project investigates the effectiveness and implementation of PCBH in routine primary care. The project could result in improved mental health care for the included patients and contribute to the general good for a wider population who have mental health problems. The project's study design will make it possible to assess many important effects of the PCBH service delivery model at different levels, providing evidence of the effectiveness (or not) of the PCBH model under routine conditions in primary care. The project has the potential to generate clinically meaningful results that can provide a basis for decisions concerning further implementation and use of the model and thus for future development of mental health care provision in primary care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05633940, date of registration: 2021-04-21.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334537/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142010044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Risk factors of undiagnosed and uncontrolled hypertension in primary care patients with hypertension: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Emmanuel Adediran, Robert Owens, Elena Gardner, Andrew Curtin, John Stuligross, Danielle Forbes, Jing Wang, Dominik Ose","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02511-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12875-024-02511-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension is a common heart condition in the United States (US) and severely impacts racial and ethnic minority populations. While the understanding of hypertension has grown considerably, there remain gaps in US healthcare research. Specifically, there is a lack of focus on undiagnosed and uncontrolled hypertension in primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present study investigates factors associated with undiagnosed and uncontrolled hypertension in primary care patients with hypertension. The study also examines whether Black/African Americans are at higher odds of undiagnosed and uncontrolled hypertension compared to White patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted using electronic health records (EHR) data from the University of Utah primary care health system. The study included for analysis 24,915 patients with hypertension who had a primary care visit from January 2020 to December 2020. Multivariate logistic regression assessed the odds of undiagnosed and uncontrolled hypertension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 24,915 patients with hypertension, 28.6% (n = 7,124) were undiagnosed and 37.4% (n = 9,319) were uncontrolled. Factors associated with higher odds of undiagnosed hypertension included age 18-44 (2.05 [1.90-2.21]), Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (1.13 [1.03-1.23]),  Medicaid (1.43 [1.29-1.58]) or self-pay  (1.32 [1.13-1.53]) insurance, CCI 1-2 (1.79 [1.67-1.92]), and LDL-c ≥ 190 mg/dl (3.05 [1.41-6.59]). For uncontrolled hypertension, risk factors included age 65+ (1.11 [1.08-1.34]), male (1.24 [1.17-1.31]), Native-Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (1.32 [1.05-1.62])  or Black/African American race (1.24 [1.11-1.57]) , and self-pay insurance (1.11 [1.03-1.22]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest that undiagnosed and uncontrolled hypertension is prevalent in primary care. Critical risk factors for undiagnosed hypertension include younger age, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, very high LDL-c, low comorbidity scores, and self-pay or medicaid insurance. For uncontrolled hypertension, geriatric populations, males, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders, and Black/African Americans, continue to experience greater burdens than their counterparts. Substantial efforts are needed to strengthen hypertension diagnosis and to develop tailored hypertension management programs in primary care, focusing on these populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334361/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142010045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to using a clinical decision support tool for the management of osteoarthritis pain in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a qualitative study.","authors":"Mai Mohsen, Angelina Abbaticchio, Tracy Zhang, S Vanita Jassal, Marisa Battistella","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02564-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12875-024-02564-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While osteoarthritis is a significant issue within the hemodialysis population and contributes to reduced quality of life, pain related to osteoarthritis is poorly managed by healthcare professionals (HCPs) in hemodialysis settings due to the absence of clinical guidance applicable to this population. The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of HCPs on the barriers and facilitators to using a clinical decision support tool for osteoarthritis pain management in the hemodialysis setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive study was conducted. Purposeful and snowball sampling techniques were used to recruit hemodialysis clinicians from academic and community settings across multiple Canadian provinces. One-to-one interviews were conducted with clinicians using a semi-structured, open ended interview guide informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework, a behavior change framework. A general inductive approach was applied to identify the main themes of barriers and facilitators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 interviews were completed with 3 nephrologists, 2 nurse practitioners and 6 pharmacists. Findings revealed 6 main barriers and facilitators related to the use of the clinical decision support tool. Alignment of the tool with practice roles emerged as a key barrier and facilitator. Other barriers included challenges related to the dialysis environment, varying levels of clinician comfort with pain medications, and limited applicability of the tool due to patient factors. An important facilitator was the intrinsic motivation among clinicians to use the tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most participants across the included hemodialysis settings expressed satisfaction with the clinical decision support tool and acknowledged its overall potential for improving osteoarthritis pain management among patients on hemodialysis. Future implementation of the tool may be limited by existing roles and practices at different institutions. Increased collaboration among hemodialysis and primary care teams may promote uptake of the tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331684/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142006019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Patient reported measures of continuity of care and health outcomes: a systematic review.","authors":"Patrick Burch, Alex Walter, Stuart Stewart, Peter Bower","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02545-8","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12875-024-02545-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a considerable amount of research showing an association between continuity of care and improved health outcomes. However, the methods used in most studies examine only the pattern of interactions between patients and clinicians through administrative measures of continuity. The patient experience of continuity can also be measured by using patient reported experience measures. Unlike administrative measures, these can allow elements of continuity such as the presence of information or how joined up care is between providers to be measured. Patient experienced continuity is a marker of healthcare quality in its own right. However, it is unclear if, like administrative measures, patient reported continuity is also linked to positive health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cohort and interventional studies that examined the relationship between patient reported continuity of care and a health outcome were eligible for inclusion. Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched in April 2021. Citation searching of published continuity measures was also performed. QUIP and Cochrane risk of bias tools were used to assess study quality. A box-score method was used for study synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen studies were eligible for inclusion. 15 studies measured continuity using a validated, multifactorial questionnaire or the continuity/co-ordination subscale of another instrument. Two studies placed patients into discrete groups of continuity based on pre-defined questions, one used a bespoke questionnaire, one calculated an administrative measure of continuity using patient reported data. Outcome measures examined were quality of life (n = 11), self-reported health status (n = 8), emergency department use or hospitalisation (n = 7), indicators of function or wellbeing (n = 6), mortality (n = 4) and physiological measures (n = 2). Analysis was limited by the relatively small number of hetrogenous studies. The majority of studies showed a link between at least one measure of continuity and one health outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Whilst there is emerging evidence of a link between patient reported continuity and several outcomes, the evidence is not as strong as that for administrative measures of continuity. This may be because administrative measures record something different to patient reported measures, or that studies using patient reported measures are smaller and less able to detect smaller effects. Future research should use larger sample sizes to clarify if a link does exist and what the potential mechanisms underlying such a link could be. When measuring continuity, researchers and health system administrators should carefully consider what type of continuity measure is most appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331683/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142006020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A long way from Frome: improving connections between patients, local services and communities to reduce emergency admissions.","authors":"Kathleen Withers, Karen Pardy, Lynne Topham, Rachel Lee, Amir Ghanghro, Hazel Cryer, Huw Williams","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02557-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12875-024-02557-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low socio-economic status can lead to poor patient outcomes, exacerbated by lack of integration between health and social care and there is a demand for developing new models of working.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To improve connections between patients, local services and their communities to reduce unscheduled admissions.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A primary care cluster with areas of high deprivation, consisting of 11 general practices serving over 74,000 people.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A multi-disciplinary team with representatives from healthcare, local council and the third sector was formed to provide support for people with complex or social needs. A discharge liaison hub contacted patients following hospital discharge offering support, while cluster pharmacists led medicine reviews. Wellbeing Connectors were commissioned to act as a link to local wellbeing and social resources. Advance Care Planning was implemented to support personalised decision making.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unscheduled admissions in the over 75 age group decreased following the changes, equating to over 800 avoided monthly referrals to assessment units for the cluster. Over 2,500 patients have been reviewed by the MDT since its inception with referrals to social prescribing groups, physiotherapy and mental health teams; these patients are 20% less likely to contact their GP after their case is discussed. An improved sense of wellbeing was reported by 80% of patients supported by wellbeing connectors. Staff feel better able to meet patient needs and reported an increased joy in working.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improved integration between health, social care and third sector has led to a reduction in admissions, improved patient wellbeing and has improved job satisfaction amongst staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11330060/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141997006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Development of quality indicators for hypertension, extractable from the electronic health record of the general practitioner: a rand-modified Delphi method.","authors":"Katrien Danhieux, Marieke Hollevoet, Sien Lismont, Pieter Taveirne, Lotte Van Vaerenbergh, Bert Vaes, Steve Van den Bulck","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02543-w","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12875-024-02543-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension, a chronic medical condition affecting millions of people worldwide, is a leading cause of cardiovascular diseases. A multidisciplinary approach is needed to reduce the burden of the disease, with general practitioners playing a vital role. Therefore, it is crucial that GPs provide high-quality care that is standardized and based on the most recent European guidelines. Quality indicators (QIs) can be used to assess the performance, outcomes, or processes of healthcare delivery and are critical in helping healthcare professionals identify areas of improvement and measure progress towards achieving desired health outcomes. However, QIs to evaluate the care of patients with hypertension in general practice have been studied to a limited extent. The aim of our study is to define quality indicators for hypertension in general practice that are extractable from the electronic health record (EHR) and can be used to evaluate and improve the quality of care for hypertensive patients in the general practice setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a Rand-modified Delphi procedure. We extracted recommendations from European guidelines and assembled them into an online questionnaire. An initial scoring based on the SMART principle and extractability from the EHR was performed by panel members, these results were analyzed using a Median Likert score, prioritization and degree of consensus. A consensus meeting was set up in which all the recommendations were discussed, followed by a final validation round.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study extracted 115 recommendations. After analysis of the online questionnaire round and a consensus meeting round, 37 recommendations were accepted and 75 were excluded. Of these 37 recommendations, 9 were slightly modified and 4 were combined into 2 recommendations, resulting in a list of 35 recommendations. All recommendations of the final set were translated to QIs, made up of 7 QIs on screening, 6 QIs on diagnosis, 11 QIs on treatment, 5 QIs on outcome and 6 QIs on follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study resulted in a set of 35 QIs for hypertension in general practice. These QIs, tailored to the Belgian EHR, provide a robust foundation for automated audit and feedback and could substantially benefit other countries if adapted to their systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11325807/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141989688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Missing topics for a newly established general practice curriculum for medical students in Hesse - a qualitative study.","authors":"Bibiane Kronemann, Elisabeth Joson-Teichert, Matthias Michiels-Corsten, Stefan Bösner, Jana Groth","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02533-y","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12875-024-02533-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To address the declining numbers of general practitioners (GPs) in rural areas and a lack of medical students pursuing a career in primary care, a general practice-based curriculum coupled with additional university admissions for students has been established at three universities in Hesse, Germany. This study aims to analyze potential topics which students striving to become a GP will benefit from. Teaching such topics will prepare them for their chosen career and working in rural areas. We aimed to explore the views of both specialists and GPs on chief topics and necessary skills in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In our study we used semi-structured interviews with outpatient specialists and specialists in clinical practice and semi-structured group interviews with GPs in training. The topic guide addressed contents of the curriculum for medical students with an extracurricular focus (addressing additional topics) on primary care. Data analysis was carried out using qualitative content analysis according to Mayring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPs in training and specialists agreed on the importance of knowledge in the fields of medical history, physical examination, communication as well as common diseases in primary care. Essential competences mentioned were: inducing medical treatment, decision-making and triage, conducting structured conversations, having patient knowledge (hard skills) as well as an interest in continuous learning, empathy, personal commitment, listening and down-to-earthness (soft skills). Case reports, symptom-based learning, practical training, lessons with simulated patients and the integration of role models were regarded as useful teaching methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>General practice-based curriculums should not only focus on the transfer of knowledge. Equally important is the training of soft and hard skills to prepare future GPs for their work in primary care. Special teaching methods as well as practical training should be the heart of a newly established curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11325750/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141989689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Closing the gap in access to child mental health care: provider feedback from the Wisconsin Child Psychiatry Consultation Program.","authors":"Lora Daskalska, Michelle Broaddus, Staci Young","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02538-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12875-024-02538-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mental illnesses are common among children and negatively impact wellbeing during childhood as well as later in life. However, many children with these conditions are not able to access needed mental health care. The Wisconsin Child Psychiatry Consultation Program (WI CPCP) was created to reduce gaps in access to care by providing primary care providers with referral resources, access to behavioral health consultations, and training on mental health topics.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was 1) to assess the effectiveness of the WI CPCP in Milwaukee County, providing specific insights into provider's ability to care for child mental health, and 2) identify challenges Milwaukee PCPs faced in providing mental health care to child patients and contextualize these challenges in a conceptual framework of access to health care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional mixed-methods secondary data analysis was conducted using data collected from online baseline and nine-month follow-up surveys completed by providers participating in the program practicing in Milwaukee County from 2014 to 2022. Provider confidence and skill in providing mental health care was analyzed quantitatively using Two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) tests (baseline vs. follow-up survey responses) and descriptive statistics (follow-up survey only). Provider challenges to providing mental health care were analyzed qualitatively using a thematic analysis research approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from quantitative analyses showed that provider confidence and skill in treating childhood anxiety and depression improved from baseline to follow-up. Results from qualitative analyses were categorized by factors within and beyond the scope of WI CPCP. Within the scope of WI CPCP, providers reported a lack of knowledge of referral options and a lack of training in mental health care as well as a lack of knowledge in assessing and treating mental disorders. Still, many barriers to mental healthcare access persist that are beyond the scope of WI CPCP, such as long wait times and a lack of insurance coverage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study supports the effectiveness of the program to improve access to care for children. However, there is a need for additional solutions such as better reimbursement for mental health professionals and expanded insurance coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323596/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141984062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}