根据健康风险对人群进行分层:通过共识技术确定患者的关键健康风险因素。

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Carolina Castagna, Andrew Huff, Aaron Douglas, Matteo Garofano, Massimo Fabi, Richard Hass, Vittorio Maio
{"title":"根据健康风险对人群进行分层:通过共识技术确定患者的关键健康风险因素。","authors":"Carolina Castagna, Andrew Huff, Aaron Douglas, Matteo Garofano, Massimo Fabi, Richard Hass, Vittorio Maio","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02923-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk stratification is a population health management approach that classifies patients according to their health risks and projected care needs. This strategy is especially valuable in primary care, where timely interventions for high-risk individuals can lead to better health outcomes, reduced healthcare expenditures, and a more sustainable healthcare system. The goal of this study was to establish expert consensus on the clinical and sociodemographic patient factors that should be incorporated into a primary care risk stratification tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary expert panel of 24 healthcare professionals, including primary care providers (PCPs), specialists, and allied health professionals, was convened in June 2024 by Local Health Authority of Parma, Italy. Using the Nominal Group Technique, the panel was asked to define 'health risk' and identify contributing factors based on clinical and social relevance and data availability in patients' PCP electronic medical records. A modified Delphi process, following ACCORD guidelines for consensus-based methods, was conducted in three rounds (July-October 2024) to derive numerical weights for the factors. Survey questions rated the perceived importance of factors using a Likert scale (1 = no importance to 9 = critical importance). Consensus, defined as ≥ 75% agreement among panelists, set each factor's weight to the median importance rating.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health risk was defined as \"the likelihood of a progressive deterioration of an individual's health status due to medical and/or psychosocial-welfare conditions that could lead to hospitalization or death within a year.\" A total of 31 clinical and social factors were identified, and consensus about importance was achieved for all factors. Higher-weighted factors included advanced age, excessive polypharmacy, cancer, cognitive impairment, and social-psychological distress, followed by clinical conditions such as renal failure, stroke, and heart failure, and previous hospitalizations and emergency room visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The tool provides a robust framework for population health risk stratification in primary care, aligning with Italy's healthcare reform goals. Future phases will validate the tool's predictive performance using patient-level PCP data and assess its implications for policy and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"229"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12275309/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stratifying the population based on health risk: identification of patient key health risk factors through consensus techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Carolina Castagna, Andrew Huff, Aaron Douglas, Matteo Garofano, Massimo Fabi, Richard Hass, Vittorio Maio\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12875-025-02923-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk stratification is a population health management approach that classifies patients according to their health risks and projected care needs. This strategy is especially valuable in primary care, where timely interventions for high-risk individuals can lead to better health outcomes, reduced healthcare expenditures, and a more sustainable healthcare system. The goal of this study was to establish expert consensus on the clinical and sociodemographic patient factors that should be incorporated into a primary care risk stratification tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary expert panel of 24 healthcare professionals, including primary care providers (PCPs), specialists, and allied health professionals, was convened in June 2024 by Local Health Authority of Parma, Italy. Using the Nominal Group Technique, the panel was asked to define 'health risk' and identify contributing factors based on clinical and social relevance and data availability in patients' PCP electronic medical records. A modified Delphi process, following ACCORD guidelines for consensus-based methods, was conducted in three rounds (July-October 2024) to derive numerical weights for the factors. Survey questions rated the perceived importance of factors using a Likert scale (1 = no importance to 9 = critical importance). Consensus, defined as ≥ 75% agreement among panelists, set each factor's weight to the median importance rating.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health risk was defined as \\\"the likelihood of a progressive deterioration of an individual's health status due to medical and/or psychosocial-welfare conditions that could lead to hospitalization or death within a year.\\\" A total of 31 clinical and social factors were identified, and consensus about importance was achieved for all factors. Higher-weighted factors included advanced age, excessive polypharmacy, cancer, cognitive impairment, and social-psychological distress, followed by clinical conditions such as renal failure, stroke, and heart failure, and previous hospitalizations and emergency room visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The tool provides a robust framework for population health risk stratification in primary care, aligning with Italy's healthcare reform goals. Future phases will validate the tool's predictive performance using patient-level PCP data and assess its implications for policy and practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC primary care\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12275309/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02923-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02923-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:风险分层是一种人口健康管理方法,根据患者的健康风险和预计的护理需求对患者进行分类。这一战略在初级保健中特别有价值,在初级保健中,对高危人群的及时干预可以带来更好的健康结果,减少卫生保健支出,并建立更可持续的卫生保健系统。本研究的目的是建立专家对临床和社会人口学患者因素的共识,这些因素应纳入初级保健风险分层工具。方法:意大利帕尔马地方卫生当局于2024年6月召集了一个由24名卫生保健专业人员组成的多学科专家小组,包括初级保健提供者(pcp)、专家和联合卫生专业人员。使用名义组技术,小组被要求定义“健康风险”,并根据临床和社会相关性以及患者PCP电子病历中的数据可用性确定影响因素。遵循ACCORD基于共识方法的指导方针,经过修改的德尔菲过程进行了三轮(2024年7月至10月),以获得因子的数值权重。调查问题使用李克特量表对因素的感知重要性进行评级(1 =不重要到9 =至关重要)。共识,定义为小组成员之间≥75%的共识,将每个因素的权重设置为重要性评级的中位数。结果:健康风险被定义为“由于医疗和/或心理社会福利状况导致个人健康状况逐渐恶化的可能性,并可能导致住院治疗或在一年内死亡。”共确定了31个临床和社会因素,并对所有因素的重要性达成了共识。权重较高的因素包括高龄、过度使用多种药物、癌症、认知障碍和社会心理困扰,其次是临床状况,如肾衰竭、中风和心力衰竭,以及以前的住院和急诊室就诊情况。结论:该工具为初级保健中的人口健康风险分层提供了一个强有力的框架,与意大利的医疗改革目标保持一致。未来阶段将使用患者层面的PCP数据验证该工具的预测性能,并评估其对政策和实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Stratifying the population based on health risk: identification of patient key health risk factors through consensus techniques.

Stratifying the population based on health risk: identification of patient key health risk factors through consensus techniques.

Background: Risk stratification is a population health management approach that classifies patients according to their health risks and projected care needs. This strategy is especially valuable in primary care, where timely interventions for high-risk individuals can lead to better health outcomes, reduced healthcare expenditures, and a more sustainable healthcare system. The goal of this study was to establish expert consensus on the clinical and sociodemographic patient factors that should be incorporated into a primary care risk stratification tool.

Methods: A multidisciplinary expert panel of 24 healthcare professionals, including primary care providers (PCPs), specialists, and allied health professionals, was convened in June 2024 by Local Health Authority of Parma, Italy. Using the Nominal Group Technique, the panel was asked to define 'health risk' and identify contributing factors based on clinical and social relevance and data availability in patients' PCP electronic medical records. A modified Delphi process, following ACCORD guidelines for consensus-based methods, was conducted in three rounds (July-October 2024) to derive numerical weights for the factors. Survey questions rated the perceived importance of factors using a Likert scale (1 = no importance to 9 = critical importance). Consensus, defined as ≥ 75% agreement among panelists, set each factor's weight to the median importance rating.

Results: Health risk was defined as "the likelihood of a progressive deterioration of an individual's health status due to medical and/or psychosocial-welfare conditions that could lead to hospitalization or death within a year." A total of 31 clinical and social factors were identified, and consensus about importance was achieved for all factors. Higher-weighted factors included advanced age, excessive polypharmacy, cancer, cognitive impairment, and social-psychological distress, followed by clinical conditions such as renal failure, stroke, and heart failure, and previous hospitalizations and emergency room visits.

Conclusions: The tool provides a robust framework for population health risk stratification in primary care, aligning with Italy's healthcare reform goals. Future phases will validate the tool's predictive performance using patient-level PCP data and assess its implications for policy and practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信