Baseline cohort data from HARMONY, a cluster randomised controlled trial of culturally safe domestic violence management in general practice.

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Angela J Taft, Felicity Young, Kelsey L Hegarty, Jane Yelland, Danielle Mazza, Douglas Boyle, Richard Norman, Claudia García-Moreno, Cattram Nguyen, Xia Li, Bijaya Pokharel, Molly Allen Leap, Gene Feder
{"title":"Baseline cohort data from HARMONY, a cluster randomised controlled trial of culturally safe domestic violence management in general practice.","authors":"Angela J Taft, Felicity Young, Kelsey L Hegarty, Jane Yelland, Danielle Mazza, Douglas Boyle, Richard Norman, Claudia García-Moreno, Cattram Nguyen, Xia Li, Bijaya Pokharel, Molly Allen Leap, Gene Feder","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02890-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Domestic violence and abuse (DVA) is a globally prevalent, health damaging problem. In high income countries, migrant /refugee populations from low/middle income countries often consist of young families. DVA is more prevalent, and barriers to disclosure greater among migrant/refugee than native-born families. Consequently, general practice (GP) patient populations are increasingly diverse, but evidence for culturally safe and effective GP management is minimal. The HARMONY study tested a culturally safe DVA intervention to improve GP identification and referral among South Asian families.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>HARMONY was a pragmatic cluster RCT in 19 GP clinics in two regions of Melbourne, Australia. Eligible practices required ≥ 1 South Asian GP; used one of two common software programs; and agreed to have GrHanite™ software on practice computers. This analysis investigated baseline DVA and ethnicity identification in routine electronic GP data. Deidentified aggregated data for female patients aged ≥ 18 with DVA identification, referral, and South Asian ethnicity data were extracted from medical records. Chi Square for comparison of proportions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four clinics were recruited and randomised, but five dropped out due to Covid. Fifty-two percent (50/96) of 19 clinics' staff were South Asian. While 46.7% of female patients (21,220/45,438) were aged 26-45 years, 17.6% (7,874/45,438) were South Asian. There were more South Asian patients in Comparison 20.6% (4,193/20,312) than Intervention 14.7% (3,681/25,126) clinics. South Asian women had less access to Medicare (83% vs 97%) and pensions (13% vs 22%). At baseline, clinicians recorded 0.58% (265/45,438) DVA-affected women. Notably, they identified fewer South Asian (0.38%) (28/7,874) than non-South Asian women experiencing DVA (0.63%) (237/37,564),-0.28% (0.12%-0.43%), p = 0.004. No referrals were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DVA was notably under-identified in these patient populations, but worse among South-Asian female patients. While almost one in six of HARMONY's female population were South Asian, fewer than four in 1000 South Asian women were identified as experiencing DVA. Greater effort to regularly train and to support GP clinics to better identify DVA is vital but even more important in diverse communities to provide culturally safe DVA identification, care and documentation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ACTRN12618001845224 on 13/11/2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12302802/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02890-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Domestic violence and abuse (DVA) is a globally prevalent, health damaging problem. In high income countries, migrant /refugee populations from low/middle income countries often consist of young families. DVA is more prevalent, and barriers to disclosure greater among migrant/refugee than native-born families. Consequently, general practice (GP) patient populations are increasingly diverse, but evidence for culturally safe and effective GP management is minimal. The HARMONY study tested a culturally safe DVA intervention to improve GP identification and referral among South Asian families.

Methods: HARMONY was a pragmatic cluster RCT in 19 GP clinics in two regions of Melbourne, Australia. Eligible practices required ≥ 1 South Asian GP; used one of two common software programs; and agreed to have GrHanite™ software on practice computers. This analysis investigated baseline DVA and ethnicity identification in routine electronic GP data. Deidentified aggregated data for female patients aged ≥ 18 with DVA identification, referral, and South Asian ethnicity data were extracted from medical records. Chi Square for comparison of proportions.

Results: Twenty-four clinics were recruited and randomised, but five dropped out due to Covid. Fifty-two percent (50/96) of 19 clinics' staff were South Asian. While 46.7% of female patients (21,220/45,438) were aged 26-45 years, 17.6% (7,874/45,438) were South Asian. There were more South Asian patients in Comparison 20.6% (4,193/20,312) than Intervention 14.7% (3,681/25,126) clinics. South Asian women had less access to Medicare (83% vs 97%) and pensions (13% vs 22%). At baseline, clinicians recorded 0.58% (265/45,438) DVA-affected women. Notably, they identified fewer South Asian (0.38%) (28/7,874) than non-South Asian women experiencing DVA (0.63%) (237/37,564),-0.28% (0.12%-0.43%), p = 0.004. No referrals were identified.

Conclusion: DVA was notably under-identified in these patient populations, but worse among South-Asian female patients. While almost one in six of HARMONY's female population were South Asian, fewer than four in 1000 South Asian women were identified as experiencing DVA. Greater effort to regularly train and to support GP clinics to better identify DVA is vital but even more important in diverse communities to provide culturally safe DVA identification, care and documentation.

Trial registration: ACTRN12618001845224 on 13/11/2018.

来自HARMONY的基线队列数据,HARMONY是一项一般实践中文化安全家庭暴力管理的随机对照试验。
背景:家庭暴力和虐待(DVA)是全球普遍存在的危害健康的问题。在高收入国家,来自低收入/中等收入国家的移民/难民人口往往由年轻家庭组成。DVA在移民/难民中比在本土出生的家庭中更为普遍,对信息披露的障碍也更大。因此,全科医生(GP)患者群体日益多样化,但文化上安全和有效的全科医生管理的证据是最小的。HARMONY研究测试了一种文化上安全的DVA干预,以提高全科医生在南亚家庭中的识别和转诊。方法:HARMONY是一项实用的集群随机对照试验,在澳大利亚墨尔本两个地区的19个GP诊所进行。合格执业要求≥1名南亚全科医生;使用两种常用软件中的一种;并同意在练习电脑上使用GrHanite™软件。本分析调查了常规电子GP数据中的基线DVA和种族识别。从医疗记录中提取年龄≥18岁的DVA识别、转诊和南亚族裔女性患者的未识别汇总数据。x平方分布用于比例比较。结果:随机招募了24家诊所,但有5家因Covid而退出。19个诊所的工作人员中52%(50/96)是南亚人。46.7%的女性患者(21,220/45,438)年龄在26-45岁之间,17.6%(7,874/45,438)为南亚人。南亚患者在对照组(20.6%)(4193 / 20312)多于干预组(14.7%)(3681 / 25126)。南亚妇女获得医疗保险(83%对97%)和养老金(13%对22%)的机会较少。在基线时,临床医生记录了0.58%(265/45,438)的dva患者。值得注意的是,他们发现南亚女性(0.38%)(28/7,874)比非南亚女性(0.63%)(237/37,564),-0.28% (0.12%-0.43%),p = 0.004。没有确定转诊。结论:DVA在这些患者群体中明显被低估,但在南亚女性患者中更严重。虽然HARMONY的女性人口中几乎有六分之一是南亚人,但每1000名南亚女性中只有不到四人被确定患有DVA。更大的努力定期培训和支持全科医生诊所更好地识别DVA是至关重要的,但更重要的是在不同的社区提供文化上安全的DVA识别、护理和文件。试验注册:13/11/2018 ACTRN12618001845224。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信