AI and ethics最新文献_第4页

Navigating the informativeness-compression trade-off in XAI 在XAI中导航信息性-压缩权衡

AI and ethics Pub Date : 2025-05-20 DOI: 10.1007/s43681-025-00733-5

Ninell Oldenburg, Anders Søgaard

引用次数: 0

A standard reporting system for the environmental impact of machine learning 机器学习对环境影响的标准报告系统

AI and ethics Pub Date : 2025-05-19 DOI: 10.1007/s43681-025-00738-0

Kshemaahna Nagi

引用次数: 0

On bullshit, large language models, and the need to curb your enthusiasm 关于废话，大型语言模型，以及需要抑制你的热情

AI and ethics Pub Date : 2025-05-14 DOI: 10.1007/s43681-025-00743-3

Daniel W. Tigard

引用次数: 0

Human biases and remedies in AI safety and alignment contexts 人工智能安全性和一致性背景下的人类偏见和补救措施

AI and ethics Pub Date : 2025-05-14 DOI: 10.1007/s43681-025-00698-5

Zoé Roy-Stang, Jim Davies

引用次数: 0

Good governance of public sector AI: a combined value framework for good order and a good society 公共部门人工智能的良好治理：良好秩序与良好社会的综合价值框架

AI and ethics Pub Date : 2025-05-14 DOI: 10.1007/s43681-025-00751-3

Jana Mišić, Rinie van Est, Linda Kool

{"title":"Good governance of public sector AI: a combined value framework for good order and a good society","authors":"Jana Mišić, Rinie van Est, Linda Kool","doi":"10.1007/s43681-025-00751-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43681-025-00751-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Good governance of AI-supported public services means that they should function in a democratic and rule-of-law manner (“good order”) and consider the just treatment and wellbeing of citizens (“good society”). To gain insight into relevant “good order” and “good society” values, this study uses AI ethics and public administration literature to develop a comprehensive value framework for the good governance of public sector AI. We identify values pivotal to the AI-public sector nexus through a dual-phase analysis. First, we identify seven core values: five “good order” core values (responsiveness, effectiveness, procedural justice, resilience, and counterbalance) and two “good society” core values (wellbeing, social justice). Subsequently, delving into 33 studies spanning AI ethics and public administration, we identify operational values related to the core values. The operational values provide further interpretation of the core values and operationalize them. This second round in our research also shows that the seven core values found during the first round indeed account for value considerations encountered by scholars so far. In this way, we arrive at a robust value framework for the good governance of AI use in the public sector. The framework is not a one-size-fits-all recipe for public sector AI but a guide for policymakers to consider both democratic and ethical values. It can address gaps in both research fields, analyze moral dilemmas in AI policy tools like public-private partnerships, and aid policymakers in blending abstract values with contextual decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 5","pages":"4875 - 4889"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-025-00751-3.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145121906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Algorithmic sovereignty and democratic resilience: rethinking AI governance in the age of generative AI 算法主权和民主弹性：在生成式人工智能时代重新思考人工智能治理

AI and ethics Pub Date : 2025-05-13 DOI: 10.1007/s43681-025-00739-z

Wael Badawy

{"title":"Algorithmic sovereignty and democratic resilience: rethinking AI governance in the age of generative AI","authors":"Wael Badawy","doi":"10.1007/s43681-025-00739-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43681-025-00739-z","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>\u0000 The rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is challenging governance paradigms, raising concerns about public trust, disinformation, and democratic resilience. While these technologies offer unprecedented efficiency and innovation, they also risk amplifying bias, eroding transparency, and centralizing power within proprietary platforms. This paper reframes algorithmic sovereignty as the democratic capacity to regulate and audit AI systems, ensuring they align with ethical, civic, and institutional norms. Using a mixed-methods approach—content analysis, expert interviews, and comparative policy review—we explore how regulatory frameworks in the EU, China, the U.S., and other regions address these challenges. By clarifying the scope of algorithmic governance and integrating counterarguments around disinformation and AI misuse, we develop a multilayered framework for human-centered AI oversight. We also examine geopolitical tensions shaping global digital sovereignty and propose actionable strategies to strengthen trust and civic participation. Figures highlight regional governance effectiveness, trust dynamics, and regulatory orientations. We conclude that algorithmic sovereignty must evolve as an interdisciplinary and participatory governance goal that reinforces democracy rather than undermining it.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 5","pages":"4855 - 4862"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145121867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The ethical use and development of artificial intelligence (AI) strategy in Egypt: identifying gaps and recommendations 埃及人工智能战略的道德使用和发展：确定差距和建议

AI and ethics Pub Date : 2025-05-09 DOI: 10.1007/s43681-025-00729-1

Wael Badawy

{"title":"The ethical use and development of artificial intelligence (AI) strategy in Egypt: identifying gaps and recommendations","authors":"Wael Badawy","doi":"10.1007/s43681-025-00729-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43681-025-00729-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Egypt’s 2024 national strategy on the ethical use and development of artificial intelligence (AI) represents a significant milestone in aligning technological advancement with international human rights and responsible innovation principles. While the strategy articulates commendable ethical pillars—such as transparency, privacy, and accountability—it remains largely aspirational in nature, with limited provisions for enforcement, sector-specific guidance, or public engagement. This paper presents a structured qualitative policy analysis of the strategy, identifying twelve key governance gaps through a comparative review method grounded in international frameworks (e.g., UNESCO, EU AI Act, Canada’s Directive on Automated Decision-Making) and regional strategies from the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and South Africa. Additionally, an embedded case study from Egypt’s healthcare sector highlights the practical implications of these policy shortcomings. Key gaps include the absence of legal mandates, exclusion of informal sector needs, limited data sovereignty, and a lack of gender-responsive AI auditing. To address these challenges, the study proposes actionable reforms including the establishment of an independent AI ethics regulator, the adoption of sector-specific ethical toolkits, and the integration of AI ethics into Egypt’s Vision 2030 and national education system. This research offers one of the first academic assessments of Egypt’s AI ethics framework and contributes to a growing body of literature on responsible AI governance in the Global South.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 4","pages":"3579 - 3591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145163367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

ChatGPT-based posthumous memories of a terminally ill patient: metabioethics and generative AI at the service of palliative medicine 基于chatgpt的绝症患者死后记忆：为姑息医学服务的代谢伦理学和生成人工智能

AI and ethics Pub Date : 2025-04-26 DOI: 10.1007/s43681-025-00737-1

Antonio Araújo

引用次数: 0

Do we need watchful eyes on our workers? Ethics of using computer vision for workplace surveillance 我们需要警惕我们的工人吗？使用计算机视觉进行工作场所监控的伦理问题

AI and ethics Pub Date : 2025-04-23 DOI: 10.1007/s43681-025-00726-4

Rinu Ann Sebastian, Kris Ehinger, Tim Miller

{"title":"Do we need watchful eyes on our workers? Ethics of using computer vision for workplace surveillance","authors":"Rinu Ann Sebastian, Kris Ehinger, Tim Miller","doi":"10.1007/s43681-025-00726-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43681-025-00726-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we critically examine the relevant ethical concerns of using computer vision-based surveillance in workplaces and propose an intent—and priority-based ethical framework for such systems. With the growing capabilities of computer vision technologies, its application in monitoring workplaces brings forth significant concerns. Organisations increasingly leverage computer vision for workplace surveillance to improve productivity, safety, and security. Unlike electronic surveillance techniques that monitor workers’ wire or electronic communication, computer vision-based workplace surveillance (CVWS) captures highly detailed visual and personal information about workers, including body language, emotional state, and actions. This makes CVWS potentially more intrusive than traditional electronic surveillance, raising a more comprehensive range of ethical considerations. However, this topic has received minimal attention in the current literature. Our proposed framework combines the intention for deploying surveillance with the moral notions of privacy, data security, fairness, transparency, explainability, autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, dignity, and reliability to morally scrutinise CVWS systems. The paper proposes a second framework that aims to establish accountability among key stakeholders of the CVWS system. Further, we discuss two critical questions to consider when evaluating the necessity for CVWS systems in a work environment. In practice, this work will serve as a groundwork for stakeholders such as technical developers, employers, and regulatory and advocacy teams to make ethical design decisions during the developmental, operational, and maintenance stages of CVWS systems and devise proactive strategies to minimise potential harm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 4","pages":"3557 - 3577"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-025-00726-4.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145167934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

“Code of ethical practice” for sharing and access to personal data for AI-/ ML-based technologies in rare diseases genetic NBS research project: a collaborative construction in a European IMI project 罕见病遗传NBS研究项目中基于AI / ml技术的个人数据共享和访问的“道德行为准则”：欧洲IMI项目的合作建设

AI and ethics Pub Date : 2025-04-22 DOI: 10.1007/s43681-025-00727-3

Sylvia Martin, Aneta Piperkova, Jana Zschüntzsch, Edith Gross Sky, Joern Schenk, Daniel Theisen, Gergana Kyosovska-Peshtenska, Mats Hansson

{"title":"“Code of ethical practice” for sharing and access to personal data for AI-/ ML-based technologies in rare diseases genetic NBS research project: a collaborative construction in a European IMI project","authors":"Sylvia Martin, Aneta Piperkova, Jana Zschüntzsch, Edith Gross Sky, Joern Schenk, Daniel Theisen, Gergana Kyosovska-Peshtenska, Mats Hansson","doi":"10.1007/s43681-025-00727-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43681-025-00727-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The early diagnosis of rare diseases (RDs) is crucial for timely intervention and effective management. The Screen4Care project seeks to accelerate this process by combining newborn screening with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine-learning (ML) tools. The Screen4Care interdisciplinary approach aims to reduce the lengthy diagnostic journey for individuals with RDs and improve their quality of life. A Code of Ethical Practice (CoEP) was developed to ensure the ethical handling of personal data in AI/ML-based screening. This CoEP outlines standards for how Screen4Care partner organizations can share and access patient data while minimizing the risk of misuse. Developed through the combined efforts of expert groups, European teams, advisory bodies, and patient organizations, the CoEP ensures a secure framework for data handling. This establishes a robust set of ethical principles, ensuring that data collection and sharing are conducted in a safe and responsible manner. This framework supports innovative AI/ML solutions, optimizing the diagnosis, treatment, and management of RDs, while safeguarding the interests of individuals and their families.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 5","pages":"4843 - 4853"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-025-00727-3.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145122267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0