埃及人工智能战略的道德使用和发展:确定差距和建议

Wael Badawy
{"title":"埃及人工智能战略的道德使用和发展:确定差距和建议","authors":"Wael Badawy","doi":"10.1007/s43681-025-00729-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Egypt’s 2024 national strategy on the ethical use and development of artificial intelligence (AI) represents a significant milestone in aligning technological advancement with international human rights and responsible innovation principles. While the strategy articulates commendable ethical pillars—such as transparency, privacy, and accountability—it remains largely aspirational in nature, with limited provisions for enforcement, sector-specific guidance, or public engagement. This paper presents a structured qualitative policy analysis of the strategy, identifying twelve key governance gaps through a comparative review method grounded in international frameworks (e.g., UNESCO, EU AI Act, Canada’s Directive on Automated Decision-Making) and regional strategies from the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and South Africa. Additionally, an embedded case study from Egypt’s healthcare sector highlights the practical implications of these policy shortcomings. Key gaps include the absence of legal mandates, exclusion of informal sector needs, limited data sovereignty, and a lack of gender-responsive AI auditing. To address these challenges, the study proposes actionable reforms including the establishment of an independent AI ethics regulator, the adoption of sector-specific ethical toolkits, and the integration of AI ethics into Egypt’s Vision 2030 and national education system. This research offers one of the first academic assessments of Egypt’s AI ethics framework and contributes to a growing body of literature on responsible AI governance in the Global South.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 4","pages":"3579 - 3591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ethical use and development of artificial intelligence (AI) strategy in Egypt: identifying gaps and recommendations\",\"authors\":\"Wael Badawy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43681-025-00729-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Egypt’s 2024 national strategy on the ethical use and development of artificial intelligence (AI) represents a significant milestone in aligning technological advancement with international human rights and responsible innovation principles. While the strategy articulates commendable ethical pillars—such as transparency, privacy, and accountability—it remains largely aspirational in nature, with limited provisions for enforcement, sector-specific guidance, or public engagement. This paper presents a structured qualitative policy analysis of the strategy, identifying twelve key governance gaps through a comparative review method grounded in international frameworks (e.g., UNESCO, EU AI Act, Canada’s Directive on Automated Decision-Making) and regional strategies from the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and South Africa. Additionally, an embedded case study from Egypt’s healthcare sector highlights the practical implications of these policy shortcomings. Key gaps include the absence of legal mandates, exclusion of informal sector needs, limited data sovereignty, and a lack of gender-responsive AI auditing. To address these challenges, the study proposes actionable reforms including the establishment of an independent AI ethics regulator, the adoption of sector-specific ethical toolkits, and the integration of AI ethics into Egypt’s Vision 2030 and national education system. This research offers one of the first academic assessments of Egypt’s AI ethics framework and contributes to a growing body of literature on responsible AI governance in the Global South.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AI and ethics\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"3579 - 3591\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AI and ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-025-00729-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-025-00729-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

埃及关于人工智能的道德使用和发展的2024年国家战略是将技术进步与国际人权和负责任的创新原则相结合的一个重要里程碑。虽然该战略阐明了值得赞扬的道德支柱,如透明度、隐私和问责制,但它在本质上仍主要是一种愿望,在执法、特定部门指导或公众参与方面的规定有限。本文对该战略进行了结构化的定性政策分析,通过基于国际框架(如联合国教科文组织、欧盟人工智能法案、加拿大关于自动决策的指令)和阿联酋、沙特阿拉伯和南非的区域战略的比较审查方法,确定了12个关键的治理差距。此外,埃及医疗保健部门的嵌入式案例研究强调了这些政策缺陷的实际影响。主要差距包括缺乏法律授权、排除非正规部门需求、数据主权有限以及缺乏性别敏感的人工智能审计。为了应对这些挑战,该研究提出了可行的改革措施,包括建立独立的人工智能伦理监管机构,采用针对特定行业的伦理工具包,以及将人工智能伦理纳入埃及的《2030年愿景》和国家教育体系。这项研究提供了对埃及人工智能伦理框架的首批学术评估之一,并为越来越多关于全球南方负责任的人工智能治理的文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The ethical use and development of artificial intelligence (AI) strategy in Egypt: identifying gaps and recommendations

Egypt’s 2024 national strategy on the ethical use and development of artificial intelligence (AI) represents a significant milestone in aligning technological advancement with international human rights and responsible innovation principles. While the strategy articulates commendable ethical pillars—such as transparency, privacy, and accountability—it remains largely aspirational in nature, with limited provisions for enforcement, sector-specific guidance, or public engagement. This paper presents a structured qualitative policy analysis of the strategy, identifying twelve key governance gaps through a comparative review method grounded in international frameworks (e.g., UNESCO, EU AI Act, Canada’s Directive on Automated Decision-Making) and regional strategies from the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and South Africa. Additionally, an embedded case study from Egypt’s healthcare sector highlights the practical implications of these policy shortcomings. Key gaps include the absence of legal mandates, exclusion of informal sector needs, limited data sovereignty, and a lack of gender-responsive AI auditing. To address these challenges, the study proposes actionable reforms including the establishment of an independent AI ethics regulator, the adoption of sector-specific ethical toolkits, and the integration of AI ethics into Egypt’s Vision 2030 and national education system. This research offers one of the first academic assessments of Egypt’s AI ethics framework and contributes to a growing body of literature on responsible AI governance in the Global South.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信