Algorithmic sovereignty and democratic resilience: rethinking AI governance in the age of generative AI

Wael Badawy
{"title":"Algorithmic sovereignty and democratic resilience: rethinking AI governance in the age of generative AI","authors":"Wael Badawy","doi":"10.1007/s43681-025-00739-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>\n The rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is challenging governance paradigms, raising concerns about public trust, disinformation, and democratic resilience. While these technologies offer unprecedented efficiency and innovation, they also risk amplifying bias, eroding transparency, and centralizing power within proprietary platforms. This paper reframes algorithmic sovereignty as the democratic capacity to regulate and audit AI systems, ensuring they align with ethical, civic, and institutional norms. Using a mixed-methods approach—content analysis, expert interviews, and comparative policy review—we explore how regulatory frameworks in the EU, China, the U.S., and other regions address these challenges. By clarifying the scope of algorithmic governance and integrating counterarguments around disinformation and AI misuse, we develop a multilayered framework for human-centered AI oversight. We also examine geopolitical tensions shaping global digital sovereignty and propose actionable strategies to strengthen trust and civic participation. Figures highlight regional governance effectiveness, trust dynamics, and regulatory orientations. We conclude that algorithmic sovereignty must evolve as an interdisciplinary and participatory governance goal that reinforces democracy rather than undermining it.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 5","pages":"4855 - 4862"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-025-00739-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is challenging governance paradigms, raising concerns about public trust, disinformation, and democratic resilience. While these technologies offer unprecedented efficiency and innovation, they also risk amplifying bias, eroding transparency, and centralizing power within proprietary platforms. This paper reframes algorithmic sovereignty as the democratic capacity to regulate and audit AI systems, ensuring they align with ethical, civic, and institutional norms. Using a mixed-methods approach—content analysis, expert interviews, and comparative policy review—we explore how regulatory frameworks in the EU, China, the U.S., and other regions address these challenges. By clarifying the scope of algorithmic governance and integrating counterarguments around disinformation and AI misuse, we develop a multilayered framework for human-centered AI oversight. We also examine geopolitical tensions shaping global digital sovereignty and propose actionable strategies to strengthen trust and civic participation. Figures highlight regional governance effectiveness, trust dynamics, and regulatory orientations. We conclude that algorithmic sovereignty must evolve as an interdisciplinary and participatory governance goal that reinforces democracy rather than undermining it.

算法主权和民主弹性:在生成式人工智能时代重新思考人工智能治理
生成式人工智能(AI)的兴起正在挑战治理范式,引发了对公众信任、虚假信息和民主弹性的担忧。虽然这些技术提供了前所未有的效率和创新,但它们也有放大偏见、侵蚀透明度和在专有平台内集中权力的风险。本文将算法主权重新定义为规范和审计人工智能系统的民主能力,确保它们符合道德、公民和制度规范。我们采用内容分析、专家访谈和比较政策回顾的混合方法,探讨了欧盟、中国、美国和其他地区的监管框架如何应对这些挑战。通过澄清算法治理的范围,并整合围绕虚假信息和人工智能滥用的反驳意见,我们为以人为中心的人工智能监督开发了一个多层框架。我们还研究了影响全球数字主权的地缘政治紧张局势,并提出了加强信任和公民参与的可行策略。数据突出了区域治理有效性、信任动态和监管方向。我们的结论是,算法主权必须发展成为一个跨学科和参与性的治理目标,加强民主,而不是破坏民主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信