我们需要警惕我们的工人吗?使用计算机视觉进行工作场所监控的伦理问题

Rinu Ann Sebastian, Kris Ehinger, Tim Miller
{"title":"我们需要警惕我们的工人吗?使用计算机视觉进行工作场所监控的伦理问题","authors":"Rinu Ann Sebastian,&nbsp;Kris Ehinger,&nbsp;Tim Miller","doi":"10.1007/s43681-025-00726-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we critically examine the relevant ethical concerns of using computer vision-based surveillance in workplaces and propose an intent—and priority-based ethical framework for such systems. With the growing capabilities of computer vision technologies, its application in monitoring workplaces brings forth significant concerns. Organisations increasingly leverage computer vision for workplace surveillance to improve productivity, safety, and security. Unlike electronic surveillance techniques that monitor workers’ wire or electronic communication, computer vision-based workplace surveillance (CVWS) captures highly detailed visual and personal information about workers, including body language, emotional state, and actions. This makes CVWS potentially more intrusive than traditional electronic surveillance, raising a more comprehensive range of ethical considerations. However, this topic has received minimal attention in the current literature. Our proposed framework combines the intention for deploying surveillance with the moral notions of privacy, data security, fairness, transparency, explainability, autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, dignity, and reliability to morally scrutinise CVWS systems. The paper proposes a second framework that aims to establish accountability among key stakeholders of the CVWS system. Further, we discuss two critical questions to consider when evaluating the necessity for CVWS systems in a work environment. In practice, this work will serve as a groundwork for stakeholders such as technical developers, employers, and regulatory and advocacy teams to make ethical design decisions during the developmental, operational, and maintenance stages of CVWS systems and devise proactive strategies to minimise potential harm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 4","pages":"3557 - 3577"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-025-00726-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do we need watchful eyes on our workers? Ethics of using computer vision for workplace surveillance\",\"authors\":\"Rinu Ann Sebastian,&nbsp;Kris Ehinger,&nbsp;Tim Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43681-025-00726-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper, we critically examine the relevant ethical concerns of using computer vision-based surveillance in workplaces and propose an intent—and priority-based ethical framework for such systems. With the growing capabilities of computer vision technologies, its application in monitoring workplaces brings forth significant concerns. Organisations increasingly leverage computer vision for workplace surveillance to improve productivity, safety, and security. Unlike electronic surveillance techniques that monitor workers’ wire or electronic communication, computer vision-based workplace surveillance (CVWS) captures highly detailed visual and personal information about workers, including body language, emotional state, and actions. This makes CVWS potentially more intrusive than traditional electronic surveillance, raising a more comprehensive range of ethical considerations. However, this topic has received minimal attention in the current literature. Our proposed framework combines the intention for deploying surveillance with the moral notions of privacy, data security, fairness, transparency, explainability, autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, dignity, and reliability to morally scrutinise CVWS systems. The paper proposes a second framework that aims to establish accountability among key stakeholders of the CVWS system. Further, we discuss two critical questions to consider when evaluating the necessity for CVWS systems in a work environment. In practice, this work will serve as a groundwork for stakeholders such as technical developers, employers, and regulatory and advocacy teams to make ethical design decisions during the developmental, operational, and maintenance stages of CVWS systems and devise proactive strategies to minimise potential harm.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AI and ethics\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"3557 - 3577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-025-00726-4.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AI and ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-025-00726-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-025-00726-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们批判性地研究了在工作场所使用基于计算机视觉的监控的相关伦理问题,并为此类系统提出了基于意图和优先级的伦理框架。随着计算机视觉技术的不断发展,其在工作场所监控中的应用引起了人们的广泛关注。组织越来越多地利用计算机视觉进行工作场所监控,以提高生产力、安全性和安全性。与监控工人有线或电子通信的电子监控技术不同,基于计算机视觉的工作场所监控(CVWS)捕获有关工人的非常详细的视觉和个人信息,包括肢体语言、情绪状态和行为。这使得CVWS可能比传统的电子监视更具侵入性,引发了更全面的道德考虑。然而,在目前的文献中,这个话题受到的关注很少。我们提出的框架将部署监视的意图与隐私、数据安全、公平、透明、可解释性、自主性、慈善、无害、尊严和可靠性等道德概念相结合,以对CVWS系统进行道德审查。本文提出了第二个框架,旨在建立CVWS系统的关键利益相关者之间的问责制。此外,我们讨论了在工作环境中评估CVWS系统的必要性时要考虑的两个关键问题。在实践中,这项工作将作为利益相关者(如技术开发人员、雇主、监管和倡导团队)在CVWS系统的开发、操作和维护阶段做出道德设计决策的基础,并制定积极的策略,以尽量减少潜在的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do we need watchful eyes on our workers? Ethics of using computer vision for workplace surveillance

In this paper, we critically examine the relevant ethical concerns of using computer vision-based surveillance in workplaces and propose an intent—and priority-based ethical framework for such systems. With the growing capabilities of computer vision technologies, its application in monitoring workplaces brings forth significant concerns. Organisations increasingly leverage computer vision for workplace surveillance to improve productivity, safety, and security. Unlike electronic surveillance techniques that monitor workers’ wire or electronic communication, computer vision-based workplace surveillance (CVWS) captures highly detailed visual and personal information about workers, including body language, emotional state, and actions. This makes CVWS potentially more intrusive than traditional electronic surveillance, raising a more comprehensive range of ethical considerations. However, this topic has received minimal attention in the current literature. Our proposed framework combines the intention for deploying surveillance with the moral notions of privacy, data security, fairness, transparency, explainability, autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, dignity, and reliability to morally scrutinise CVWS systems. The paper proposes a second framework that aims to establish accountability among key stakeholders of the CVWS system. Further, we discuss two critical questions to consider when evaluating the necessity for CVWS systems in a work environment. In practice, this work will serve as a groundwork for stakeholders such as technical developers, employers, and regulatory and advocacy teams to make ethical design decisions during the developmental, operational, and maintenance stages of CVWS systems and devise proactive strategies to minimise potential harm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信