Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery最新文献

{"title":"Revision ACL reconstruction in pediatric and adolescent patients yields low rates of graft failure and good functional scores, but low rates of return to sport: A systematic review.","authors":"Nikolaos K Paschos, Kristen Reikersdorfer, Christopher Jayne, Colleen McGauley, Jon Brodeur, Giovanna Medina, Mark Cote","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate outcomes following revision ACL reconstruction in pediatric and adolescent patients in terms of graft failure rate and functional patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, Ovid, and PubMed databases was performed for all original clinical studies that reported outcomes of pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction. Non-English studies and studies not reporting both graft failure rates and an additional outcome measure were excluded. We evaluated patient demographics, injury mechanisms, surgical technique characteristics, concomitant injuries, failure rates, patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), complications, and return to sports rates. Risk of bias (ROB) was assessed with the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies with a total of 239 knees in 234 patients were included. Failure of the revision ACLR ranged from 9% to 21%. Return to previous level of activity ranged between 27% and 68%. PROMs were variable, with good Lysholm score (range 84.5 to 93.7), moderate Tegner activity score (range 5.5 to 9), and good IKDC scores (range 79.9 to 80.0). Allograft was used in 48% of revisions, followed by bone patellar tendon bone (BPTB) autograft in 34%, and hamstrings (HS) autograft in 14%. Meniscus injury and cartilage injury was present in 53.1% to 92.5% and 5.5% to 59.4% of knees, respectively. Gwet's AC1 coefficient was 0.89, indicating a high degree of interrater reliability. The average MINOR score was 6 and heterogeneity was low (I²=9%). The included studies did not present with sufficient detail to disaggregate clinical outcomes by patient sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Revision ACLR yields a graft failure ranging from 9 to 20%. Revision patients experience good PROMs but low rates of return to pre-injury level of sport. Further, revision ACLR was associated with high rates of intraarticular damage and relatively low rates of meniscal repair at the time of second surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV, systematic review of level IV evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142115164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"ChatGPT, Bard, and Bing Chat are large language processing models that answered OITE questions with a similar accuracy to first-year orthopaedic surgery residents.","authors":"Gage A Guerra, Hayden L Hofmann, Jonathan L Le, Alexander M Wong, Amir Fathi, Cory K Mayfield, Frank A Petrigliano, Joseph N Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess ChatGPT, Bard, and BingChat's ability to generate accurate orthopaedic diagnosis or corresponding treatments by comparing their performance on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) to orthopaedic trainees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>OITE question sets from 2021 and 2022 were compiled to form a large set of 420 questions. ChatGPT (GPT3.5), Bard, and BingChat were instructed to select one of the provided responses to each question. The accuracy of composite questions was recorded and comparatively analyzed to human cohorts including medical students and orthopaedic residents, stratified by post-graduate year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT correctly answered 46.3% of composite questions whereas BingChat correctly answered 52.4% and Bard correctly answered 51.4% of questions on the OITE. Upon excluding image-associated questions, ChatGPT, BingChat, and Bard's overall accuracies improved to 49.1%, 53.5%, and 56.8%, respectively. Medical students and orthopaedic residents (PGY1-5) correctly answered 30.8%, 53.1%, 60.4%, 66.6%, 70.0%, and 71.9%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT, Bard, and BingChat are AI models that answered OITE questions with an accuracy similar to that of first-year orthopaedic surgery residents. ChatGPT, Bard, and BingChat achieved this result without using images or other supplementary media that human test takers are provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142115125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparable Pain Levels and Functional Outcomes With and Without the Use of Dermal Allograft Augmentation in Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair.","authors":"Nicolas J Nadeau, Ryan S Marder, Sydney M Fasulo, Sean M Richards, Matthew J Kraeutler, Anthony J Scillia","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To retrospectively compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing endoscopic gluteal tendon repair with and without the use of dermal allograft augmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of prospectively collected data, single-surgeon cohort study was performed on all patients undergoing endoscopic gluteus medius repair (GMR) and gluteus medius repair with augmentation (GMR-A) between April 2017 and April 2022. Dermal allograft augmentation was utilized in cases where intraoperative gluteus tissue quality was poor. An electronic survey of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) was completed at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. PROMs included a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain; University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Scale; modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS); Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS); and a Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). The proportion of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for each PROM were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four patients were reached for follow-up (26 GMR, 38 GMR-A). No differences were found between the groups in terms of demographics. There was a significantly longer time to follow-up in the GMR group (39.4±26.9 vs 24.2±11.7 months, p=0.003). There were no differences between the GMR and GMR-A groups in terms of postoperative PROMs including VAS (3.3±2.6 vs 3.3±2.8, p=0.99), UCLA (5.8±2.1 vs 5.1±2.0, p=0.17), mHHS (70.1±18.1 vs 68.9±17.8, p=0.80), HOS-SSS (67.7±28.9 vs 62.5±30.2, p=0.50), and SANE (71.7±27.9 vs 71.3±22.8, p=0.95). A significantly greater proportion of patients in the GMR group achieved a PASS for UCLA (64% vs. 34%, p=0.02). One patient each in the GMR (3.8%) and GMR-A (2.6%) groups underwent revision gluteus medius repair with dermal allograft augmentation at the final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates comparable clinical outcomes with and without the use of dermal allograft augmentation in endoscopic gluteus medius repairs.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III, retrospective comparative series.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142115126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"High Survival Rate and Satisfaction at more than 11 years of follow-up of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Impact of Preoperative Functional Scores, Osteoarthritis, and Chondrolabral Junction Damage on Failure Long-Term 72.6% Survival in Hip Arthroscopy.","authors":"Filippo Randelli, Manuel Giovanni Mazzoleni, Alessandro Bezza, Andrea Di Loreto, Mohamed Mourad Elhiny, Mohamed Elshafie, Alberto Fioruzzi","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the study was to investigate the survival and durability of clinical improvements following hip arthoscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) at a minimum of 10-year follow-up. The primary objective was to determine the long-term survival, defined as: lack of conversion to total hip replacement (THR) or subsequent hip joint preservation surgery (HJPS). The secondary objective was to determine which preoperative factors were predictive of failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from patients who underwent HA for FAIS between March 2003 and May 2012 were collected and retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent evaluation at a minimum 10-year follow-up, assessed according to hip outcome score - activities of daily living (HOS-ADL) and sport-specific subscale (HOS-SSS), and non-arthritic hip score (NAHS) were included. Satisfaction ratings were collected. Statistical analysis assessed within-group differences and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>95 patients with an average follow-up of 11.8 years were included. Mean age was 39.5 ± 11.0 years. Overall THR conversion rate was 24.2%, with a mean time of 3.4 ± 3.2 years. 3.2% required HJPS revision at a mean 3.2 ± 3 years. Survivorship was 72.6% at ten years. 28 patients (73.6% and 75.6%) achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for HOS-ADL and HOS-SSS, while 33 (84.6%) for NAHS. Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) was achieved by 42 (61.7%), 43 (65.1%) and 44 (64.7%) patients respectively. Comparative analysis between patients who preserved their hip and those who underwent HJPS revision or THR highlighted that Tönnis ≥ 2, chondrolabral junction damage, and lower preoperative scores are associated with failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HA for FAIS demonstrated durable results, with an accepatable THR conversion rate and sustained clinical benefits. 91.3% of the patients who preserved their hip were satisfied. Tönnis 2, MRA signs of chondrolabral junction damage and lower preoperative functional status are strongly associated with failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142115141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"No Clinical Advantage of Harvesting a Patellar Bone Block Compared to All Soft Tissue Graft in Primary Quadriceps Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.","authors":"Armin Runer, Amit Meena, Lena Jucho, Guido Wierer, Robert Csapo, Elisabeth Abermann, Mirco Herbort, Christian Hoser, Christian Fink","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare patient-reported outcomes measurements (PROMs) and subsequent surgical interventions in patients treated with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using either quadriceps tendon autograft with a patellar bone block (bQT) or soft tissue only (sQT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All ACLRs performed between 01.2010 and 03.2022 were prospectively followed for 24 months and retrospectively evaluated. All primary ACLRs with full 24 months of follow-up data, without any previous surgery or any additional ligamentous interventions, were matched for major ACL risk factors, including gender, age, Tegner activity level (TAL), pivoting sports, and concomitant injuries. PROMs (Lysholm score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and TAL) and subsequent surgical interventions were registered after 6, 12, and 24 months postoperative. Binary logistic regression was used to assess the influence of graft type, age, preinjury TAL, gender, pivoting sports and concomitant interventions on the need to undergo subsequent surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 246 patients were included in the final analysis. Both groups did not differ regarding any preoperative patient demographics or intraoperative details. At final follow-up, no significant difference in mean Lysholm score (sQT: 90.8±10.6, bQT: 91.8±10.6, p= .46), median TAL (sQT: 6 [1-10], bQT: 6 [1-10], p= .53) and VAS for pain (sQT: 0.7±1.1, bQT: 0.7±1.2, p= .70) was reported between both groups. 70.3% (sQT-A: 70.7%, bQT: 69.9%, p= .89) of patients returned to or exceeded their preinjury activity level. In terms of revision ACLR, there was no statistically significant difference between bQT (3.3%) and sQT (4.1%). Similarly, no difference was observed in contralateral ACLR (bQT: 7.3% sQT: 11.4%). Regression analysis indicated that none of the studied factors, including the use of a patellar bone block, influenced subsequent surgery, revision ACLR, or contralateral ACLR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Harvesting an additional patellar bone block in quadriceps tendon ACL reconstruction does not seem to impact postoperative patient-reported outcomes, ACL revision- or contralateral ACL reconstruction rates.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3 - Cohort Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142115144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Overconstraint Associated With a Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Is Decreased by Using an Anterior Femoral Insertion Point in a Cadaveric Model.","authors":"Maximilian Sigloch, Christian Coppola, Romed Hoermann, Prisca Alt, Werner Schmoelz, Raul Mayr","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.041","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate tibiofemoral knee kinematics when shifting the femoral insertion point of the modified Lemaire lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) anterior to the lateral epicondyle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six fresh-frozen human knee joints were tested on a test bench in the following states: (1) native, (2) anterolateral insufficient, (3) original Lemaire (oLET; insertion point: 4 mm posterior and 8 mm proximal to the epicondyle), (4) anterior Lemaire (aLET; insertion point: 5 mm anterior and 5 mm proximal to the epicondyle). Internal tibial rotation was statically investigated under an internal tibial torque of 5 Nm in 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. Anterior translation was statically investigated during a simulated Lachman test with an anterior translational force of 98 N. Additionally, the range of internal tibial rotation and anterior translation were dynamically investigated by a simulated pivot-shift test. Tibiofemoral kinematics were measured using an optical 3D motion analysis system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The aLET showed an internal tibial rotation comparable to the native state for all tested flexion angles except 90° (0°: P = .201; 30°: P = .118; 60°: P = .126; 90°: P = .026). The oLET showed an internal tibial rotation below the values of the native state for all tested flexion angles indicating an overconstraint (0°: P = .003; 30°: P = .009; 60°: P = .029; 90°: P = .029). Direct comparisons between aLET and oLET showed a significantly decreased overconstraint at 0° and 30° of flexion (P = .001 and P = .003, respectively) when using the aLET. No differences in anterior translation and internal tibial rotation were found between the oLET and aLET during simulated Lachman and pivot-shift test (P > .05), approximating the native state.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An anteriorly shifted LET insertion point restored internal tibial rotation after anterolateral insufficiency to the native state while decreasing the overconstraint of internal tibial rotation induced by an LET using the originally described insertion point for small flexion angles ≤30°.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Using an LET insertion point anterior to the epicondyle was recently reported to lower the risk of tunnel interference and has now been shown to restore internal tibial rotation effectively in vitro in the course of the present study. Concerns of overconstraining internal tibial rotation are not diminished by this technique, but using an anterior insertion point helps to decrease overconstraint.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142037793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Currently Available Large Language Models Do Not Provide Musculoskeletal Treatment Recommendations That Are Concordant With Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.","authors":"Benedict U Nwachukwu, Nathan H Varady, Answorth A Allen, Joshua S Dines, David W Altchek, Riley J Williams, Kyle N Kunze","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.040","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.040","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Purpose: &lt;/strong&gt;To determine whether several leading, commercially available large language models (LLMs) provide treatment recommendations concordant with evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) developed by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;All CPGs concerning the management of rotator cuff tears (n = 33) and anterior cruciate ligament injuries (n = 15) were extracted from the AAOS. Treatment recommendations from Chat-Generative Pretrained Transformer version 4 (ChatGPT-4), Gemini, Mistral-7B, and Claude-3 were graded by 2 blinded physicians as being concordant, discordant, or indeterminate (i.e., neutral response without definitive recommendation) with respect to AAOS CPGs. The overall concordance between LLM and AAOS recommendations was quantified, and the comparative overall concordance of recommendations among the 4 LLMs was evaluated through the Fisher exact test.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Overall, 135 responses (70.3%) were concordant, 43 (22.4%) were indeterminate, and 14 (7.3%) were discordant. Inter-rater reliability for concordance classification was excellent (κ = 0.92). Concordance with AAOS CPGs was most frequently observed with ChatGPT-4 (n = 38, 79.2%) and least frequently observed with Mistral-7B (n = 28, 58.3%). Indeterminate recommendations were most frequently observed with Mistral-7B (n = 17, 35.4%) and least frequently observed with Claude-3 (n = 8, 6.7%). Discordant recommendations were most frequently observed with Gemini (n = 6, 12.5%) and least frequently observed with ChatGPT-4 (n = 1, 2.1%). Overall, no statistically significant difference in concordant recommendations was observed across LLMs (P = .12). Of all recommendations, only 20 (10.4%) were transparent and provided references with full bibliographic details or links to specific peer-reviewed content to support recommendations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Among leading commercially available LLMs, more than 1-in-4 recommendations concerning the evaluation and management of rotator cuff and anterior cruciate ligament injuries do not reflect current evidence-based CPGs. Although ChatGPT-4 showed the highest performance, clinically significant rates of recommendations without concordance or supporting evidence were observed. Only 10% of responses by LLMs were transparent, precluding users from fully interpreting the sources from which recommendations were provided.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Clinical relevance: &lt;/strong&gt;Although leading LLMs generally provide recommendations concordant with CPGs, a substantial error rate exists, and the proportion of recommendations that do not align with these CPGs suggests that LLMs are not trustworthy clinical support tools at this time. Each off-the-shelf, closed-source LLM has strengths and weaknesses. Future research should evaluate and compare multiple LLMs to avoid bias associated with narrow evaluation of few models as observed in the current lite","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142037790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Greater Postoperative Biceps Tendon Migration Following Biceps Tenodesis Correlates with Lower Patient Reported Outcomes Scores.","authors":"Brian Forsythe, Elyse J Berlinberg, Daanish Khazi-Syed, Harsh H Patel, Enrico M Forlenza, Kelechi R Okoroha, Brady T Williams, Adam B Yanke, Brian J Cole, Nikhil N Verma","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the relationship between tendon migration, as measured by radiostereometric analysis (RSA), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following biceps tenodesis (BT); to determine the likelihood of achieving clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) following BT; and to identify factors that impact CSO achievement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing arthroscopic suprapectoral or open subpectoral BT at a single, high-volume academic medical center were prospectively enrolled. A tantalum bead sutured to the tenodesis construct was utilized as a radio-opaque marker. Biceps tendon migration was measured on calibrated radiographs at 12 weeks postoperatively. PROMs (Constant-Murley score [Constant], Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation [SANE], and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systemic-Upper Extremity [PROMIS-UE]) were collected preoperatively and at ≥2 years follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 115 patients enrolled, 94 (82%) patients were included (median age=52 years and BMI=31.4 kg/m²). At a mean follow-up of 2.9 years, median Constant, SANE, and PROMIS-UE were 33 (interquartile range [IQR]=26-35), 90 (IQR=80-99), and 47 (IQR=42-58), respectively. Median tantalum bead migration was 6.5 mm (IQR 1.8-13.8). There was a significant correlation between migration and Constant (r² = 0.222, beta= -0.554, 95% CI -1.027- [-0.081], P=0.022), SANE (r² = 0.238, beta= -0.198, 95% CI -0.337 - [-0.058], P=0.006) and PROMIS-UE (r² = 0.233, beta= -0.406, 95% CI -0.707 - [-0.104], P=0.009). In univariable analysis, higher BMI was associated with achievement of substantial clinical benefit (SCB, unadj-OR=1.078, 95%CI 1.007-1.161, P=0.038). Greater bead migration was negatively associated with achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID, unadj-OR=0.969, 95% CI 0.943-0.993, P=0.014) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS, unadj-OR 0.965, 95% CI 0.937-0.989, P=0.008) on all 3 instruments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 1 cm-increase in tenodesed biceps tendon migration was associated with a decrease in Constant, SANE, and PROMIS-UE of 6, 2, and 4 points, respectively, at a mean of 2.9 years after surgery. Most patients achieved clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) for these PROMs by latest follow-up, and greater biceps tendon construct migration was negatively associated with the likelihood of CSO achievement.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV, retrospective case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142037791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"High Variability in Standardized Outcome Thresholds of Clinically Important Changes in Shoulder Instability Surgery: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Ignacio Pasqualini, Luciano A Rossi, Xuankang Pan, Patrick J Denard, John P Scanaliato, Jay M Levin, Jonathan F Dickens, Christopher S Klifto, Eoghan T Hurley","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine reported MCID and PASS values for PROMs following shoulder instability surgery and assess variability in published values depending on the surgery performed. Secondarily, our aims were to describe the methods used to derive MCID and PASS values in the published literature, including anchor-based, distribution-based, or other approaches, and to assess the frequency of MCID and PASS usage in studies on shoulder instability surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of MCID and PASS values following Bankart, Latarjet, and Remplissage procedures was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). The Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were queried from 1985 to 2023. Inclusion criteria included studies written in English, and studies reporting utilization MCID or PASS for patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) following Latarjet, Bankart, Remplissage approaches for shoulder instability surgery. Extracted data included study population characteristics, intervention characteristics, and outcomes of interest. Continuous data were described using median and range. Categorical variables, including PROMs reported and MCID/PASS methods, were described using percentages. As MCID is a patient-level metric and not a group-level metric, the authors validated that all included studies reported proportions (%) of subjects that met or exceeded the MCID.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 174 records were screened, and 8 studies were included in this review. MCID was the most widely utilized outcome threshold which was reported in all 8 studies, with only 2 studies reporting both the MCID and the PASS. The most widely studied PROMs were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) (range 5.65-9.6 for distribution MCID, 8.5 anchor MCID, 86 anchor PASS); Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) (range 11.4-12.4 distribution MCID, 82.5-87.5 anchor PASS); visual analog scale (VAS) (range 1.1-1.7 distribution MCID, 1.5-2.5 PASS); Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) (range 60.7-254.9 distribution MCID, 126.43 anchor MCID, 571-619.5 anchor PASS); and Rowe scores (range 5.6-8.4 distribution MCID, 9.7 anchor MCID). Notably, no studies reported on substantial clinical benefit (SCB) or maximal outcome improvement (MOI).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the wide array of available PROMs for assessing shoulder instability surgery outcomes, the availability of clinically significant outcome thresholds such as MCID and PASS remains relatively limited. While MCID has been the most frequently reported metric, there is considerable inter-study variability observed in their values.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Knowing the outcome thresholds such as MCID and PASS of the PROMs frequently used to evaluate the results of glenohumeral stabiliz","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142037792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparison of biological augmentation in rotator cuff repair using inflamed versus non-inflamed bursal tissue in rats.","authors":"A Z Zhang, A Ficklscherer, T R Niethammer, M Woiczinski, P Davies-Knorr, B M Holzapfel, P E Müller","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine how augmentation of a rotator cuff repair with inflamed versus non-inflamed bursal tissue affects tendon-to-bone healing in a rat model of rotator cuff repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>136 Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to an inflamed or non-inflamed bursal tissue application group. After detachment the supraspinatus tendon was re-attached with bursal tissue sewn onto the tendon-to-bone interface. The specimens were analysed biomechanically 6 and at 7 weeks and immunohistologically at 1 and at 7 weeks after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Immunohistological results showed no significant difference in the percentage of collagen type II in the tendon-to-bone interface at 1 (p = 0.97) and 7 weeks (p = 0.42) when utilising autologous non-inflamed bursal tissue in comparison to inflamed bursal tissue specimens. The inflamed bursa group also showed no significant difference in collagen I to III quotient (p= 0.14) after surgery in comparison to post-surgery non-inflamed bursa groups. Biomechanical assessment showed that tendon stiffness (p = 0.87 resp. p = 0.1) and the tendon viscoelasticity (p = 0.12 resp. p = 0.07) was the same after 6 and 7 weeks comparing inflamed bursa to the non-inflamed bursa group. There was no significant difference (p = 0.8 resp. p = 0.97) in load to failure between in both inflamed and non-inflamed bursa groups after 6 and 7 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Autologous inflamed bursal tissue derived from the Achilles bursa and implanted to the tendon-to-bone interface after rotator cuff repair facilitates the same histological and biomechanical healing response as using a non-inflamed bursa interposition in rats.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>During augmentation of a rotator cuff repair, it is irrelevant whether the bursa tissue is inflamed or not.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142037789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}