{"title":"前交叉韧带重建膝关节外侧关节外手术的适应症：国际共识声明的第一部分。","authors":"Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet, Alessandro Carrozzo, Adnan Saithna, Edoardo Monaco, Thais Dutra Vieira, Volker Musahl, Alan Getgood, Camilo Partezani Helito","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To define expert consensus on if and how lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs) should accompany anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to optimise outcomes in ACL-deficient knees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-five knee surgeons from 17 countries on five continents completed a three-round modified Delphi process. Twenty-one statements on patient selection for combined ACL reconstruction (ACLR) + LEAPs were graded on 5-point Likert scales; ≥75 % \"agree/strongly agree\" signified consensus. Strength of recommendation was ranked, and statements failing threshold were revised or discarded after discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One statement achieved unanimous agreement (100 %): it's strongly reccomendend to add a LEAP for active patients ≤25 years receiving hamstring-autograft ACLR to reduce graft failure. Strong consensus (≥90 %) supported LEAPs in primary ACLR when grade-3 pivot shift (97.9 %), knee hyperextension (97.9 %), skeletally immature status (79.5 %), revision ACLR (91.5 %), return to pivoting sports (93.2 %), active patients ≤25 years using non-hamstring grafts (90.7 %), grade-3 Lachman test (90 %), and when multiple relative risk factors coexist (statement #36, 97.1 %). Consensus (75-89.9 %) favoured LEAPs for chronic symptomatic ACL deficiency (86.1 %), posterior tibial slope >12° (85.7 %), and a history of contralateral ACL injury (88.9 %). Eight statements did not reach consensus regarding small-diameter autografts, female athletes, imaging signs of anterolateral injury (e.g., Segond fracture, lateral femoral-notch sign), and concomitant meniscal procedures. One statement on LEAPs with primary ACL repair was withdrawn because the project focused on reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>International experts strongly recommend adding a LEAP in young active patients undergoing hamstring-autograft ACLR and in cases of high-grade rotational or anterior laxity, knee hyperextension, revision surgery, or returning to pivoting sports. Unresolved issues include small graft size, female athletes, imaging-findings of rotational instability, and concurrent meniscal procedures, highlighting priorities for future research.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level V, Expert opinion.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indications for Lateral Extra-Articular Procedures in the ACL Reconstructed Knee: Part I of An International Consensus Statement.\",\"authors\":\"Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet, Alessandro Carrozzo, Adnan Saithna, Edoardo Monaco, Thais Dutra Vieira, Volker Musahl, Alan Getgood, Camilo Partezani Helito\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To define expert consensus on if and how lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs) should accompany anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to optimise outcomes in ACL-deficient knees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-five knee surgeons from 17 countries on five continents completed a three-round modified Delphi process. Twenty-one statements on patient selection for combined ACL reconstruction (ACLR) + LEAPs were graded on 5-point Likert scales; ≥75 % \\\"agree/strongly agree\\\" signified consensus. Strength of recommendation was ranked, and statements failing threshold were revised or discarded after discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One statement achieved unanimous agreement (100 %): it's strongly reccomendend to add a LEAP for active patients ≤25 years receiving hamstring-autograft ACLR to reduce graft failure. Strong consensus (≥90 %) supported LEAPs in primary ACLR when grade-3 pivot shift (97.9 %), knee hyperextension (97.9 %), skeletally immature status (79.5 %), revision ACLR (91.5 %), return to pivoting sports (93.2 %), active patients ≤25 years using non-hamstring grafts (90.7 %), grade-3 Lachman test (90 %), and when multiple relative risk factors coexist (statement #36, 97.1 %). Consensus (75-89.9 %) favoured LEAPs for chronic symptomatic ACL deficiency (86.1 %), posterior tibial slope >12° (85.7 %), and a history of contralateral ACL injury (88.9 %). Eight statements did not reach consensus regarding small-diameter autografts, female athletes, imaging signs of anterolateral injury (e.g., Segond fracture, lateral femoral-notch sign), and concomitant meniscal procedures. One statement on LEAPs with primary ACL repair was withdrawn because the project focused on reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>International experts strongly recommend adding a LEAP in young active patients undergoing hamstring-autograft ACLR and in cases of high-grade rotational or anterior laxity, knee hyperextension, revision surgery, or returning to pivoting sports. Unresolved issues include small graft size, female athletes, imaging-findings of rotational instability, and concurrent meniscal procedures, highlighting priorities for future research.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level V, Expert opinion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.012\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Indications for Lateral Extra-Articular Procedures in the ACL Reconstructed Knee: Part I of An International Consensus Statement.
Purpose: To define expert consensus on if and how lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs) should accompany anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to optimise outcomes in ACL-deficient knees.
Methods: Fifty-five knee surgeons from 17 countries on five continents completed a three-round modified Delphi process. Twenty-one statements on patient selection for combined ACL reconstruction (ACLR) + LEAPs were graded on 5-point Likert scales; ≥75 % "agree/strongly agree" signified consensus. Strength of recommendation was ranked, and statements failing threshold were revised or discarded after discussion.
Results: One statement achieved unanimous agreement (100 %): it's strongly reccomendend to add a LEAP for active patients ≤25 years receiving hamstring-autograft ACLR to reduce graft failure. Strong consensus (≥90 %) supported LEAPs in primary ACLR when grade-3 pivot shift (97.9 %), knee hyperextension (97.9 %), skeletally immature status (79.5 %), revision ACLR (91.5 %), return to pivoting sports (93.2 %), active patients ≤25 years using non-hamstring grafts (90.7 %), grade-3 Lachman test (90 %), and when multiple relative risk factors coexist (statement #36, 97.1 %). Consensus (75-89.9 %) favoured LEAPs for chronic symptomatic ACL deficiency (86.1 %), posterior tibial slope >12° (85.7 %), and a history of contralateral ACL injury (88.9 %). Eight statements did not reach consensus regarding small-diameter autografts, female athletes, imaging signs of anterolateral injury (e.g., Segond fracture, lateral femoral-notch sign), and concomitant meniscal procedures. One statement on LEAPs with primary ACL repair was withdrawn because the project focused on reconstruction.
Conclusions: International experts strongly recommend adding a LEAP in young active patients undergoing hamstring-autograft ACLR and in cases of high-grade rotational or anterior laxity, knee hyperextension, revision surgery, or returning to pivoting sports. Unresolved issues include small graft size, female athletes, imaging-findings of rotational instability, and concurrent meniscal procedures, highlighting priorities for future research.
期刊介绍：
Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
