{"title":"前交叉韧带重建膝关节外侧关节外手术的手术治疗和并发症：国际共识声明的第二部分。","authors":"Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet, Alessandro Carrozzo, Adnan Saithna, Edoardo Monaco, Thais Dutra Vieira, Volker Musahl, Alan Getgood, Camilo Partezani Helito","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To establish international expert consensus on surgical techniques, complications, and rehabilitation protocols for lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs) performed adjunctively with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-five knee surgeons from 17 countries on five continents completed a three-round modified Delphi process. In the final round, 16 statements on LEAP techniques and complications were scored on a 5-point Likert scale; ≥75 % \"agree/strongly agree\" constituted consensus. When appropriate, strength of recommendation was graded. Statements lacking support were revised until consensus or abandonment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six statements achieved unanimous consensus (100 %), two strong consensus (90-99.9 %), and three consensus (75-89.9 %); four were removed. Key technical recommendations were: (1) in iliotibial-band (ITB) procedures, the graft strip should pass beneath the lateral collateral ligament (LCL); (2) an anatomic technique is mandatory for anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR); and (3) no single LEAP is clinically superior to another. Unanimous agreement indicated that modern LEAPs do not increase lateral-compartment osteoarthritis risk, carry a low complication rate, and do not necessitate changes to rehabilitation or return-to-play timelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consensus defined core surgical principles and confirmed the safety of adding LEAPs to ACL reconstruction. When an ITB graft is used, it should be routed deep to the LCL and fixed between 0° and 60° of knee flexion under low tension. For ALLR, femoral fixation should be in full extension at a posterior-proximal point relative to the lateral epicondyle. Although no single LEAP proved superiority, adherence to these principles permits safe, effective surgery without altering standard rehabilitation or return-to-sport protocols and without increasing osteoarthritis risk.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level V, Expert consensus.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Treatment and Complications of Lateral Extra-Articular Procedures in the ACL reconstructed Knee: Part II of An International Consensus Statement.\",\"authors\":\"Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet, Alessandro Carrozzo, Adnan Saithna, Edoardo Monaco, Thais Dutra Vieira, Volker Musahl, Alan Getgood, Camilo Partezani Helito\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To establish international expert consensus on surgical techniques, complications, and rehabilitation protocols for lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs) performed adjunctively with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-five knee surgeons from 17 countries on five continents completed a three-round modified Delphi process. In the final round, 16 statements on LEAP techniques and complications were scored on a 5-point Likert scale; ≥75 % \\\"agree/strongly agree\\\" constituted consensus. When appropriate, strength of recommendation was graded. Statements lacking support were revised until consensus or abandonment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six statements achieved unanimous consensus (100 %), two strong consensus (90-99.9 %), and three consensus (75-89.9 %); four were removed. Key technical recommendations were: (1) in iliotibial-band (ITB) procedures, the graft strip should pass beneath the lateral collateral ligament (LCL); (2) an anatomic technique is mandatory for anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR); and (3) no single LEAP is clinically superior to another. Unanimous agreement indicated that modern LEAPs do not increase lateral-compartment osteoarthritis risk, carry a low complication rate, and do not necessitate changes to rehabilitation or return-to-play timelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consensus defined core surgical principles and confirmed the safety of adding LEAPs to ACL reconstruction. When an ITB graft is used, it should be routed deep to the LCL and fixed between 0° and 60° of knee flexion under low tension. For ALLR, femoral fixation should be in full extension at a posterior-proximal point relative to the lateral epicondyle. Although no single LEAP proved superiority, adherence to these principles permits safe, effective surgery without altering standard rehabilitation or return-to-sport protocols and without increasing osteoarthritis risk.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level V, Expert consensus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.013\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Surgical Treatment and Complications of Lateral Extra-Articular Procedures in the ACL reconstructed Knee: Part II of An International Consensus Statement.
Purpose: To establish international expert consensus on surgical techniques, complications, and rehabilitation protocols for lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs) performed adjunctively with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Methods: Fifty-five knee surgeons from 17 countries on five continents completed a three-round modified Delphi process. In the final round, 16 statements on LEAP techniques and complications were scored on a 5-point Likert scale; ≥75 % "agree/strongly agree" constituted consensus. When appropriate, strength of recommendation was graded. Statements lacking support were revised until consensus or abandonment.
Results: Six statements achieved unanimous consensus (100 %), two strong consensus (90-99.9 %), and three consensus (75-89.9 %); four were removed. Key technical recommendations were: (1) in iliotibial-band (ITB) procedures, the graft strip should pass beneath the lateral collateral ligament (LCL); (2) an anatomic technique is mandatory for anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR); and (3) no single LEAP is clinically superior to another. Unanimous agreement indicated that modern LEAPs do not increase lateral-compartment osteoarthritis risk, carry a low complication rate, and do not necessitate changes to rehabilitation or return-to-play timelines.
Conclusions: Consensus defined core surgical principles and confirmed the safety of adding LEAPs to ACL reconstruction. When an ITB graft is used, it should be routed deep to the LCL and fixed between 0° and 60° of knee flexion under low tension. For ALLR, femoral fixation should be in full extension at a posterior-proximal point relative to the lateral epicondyle. Although no single LEAP proved superiority, adherence to these principles permits safe, effective surgery without altering standard rehabilitation or return-to-sport protocols and without increasing osteoarthritis risk.
期刊介绍：
Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
