{"title":"The state and expectations of interrater reliability in nonhuman personality research.","authors":"Alexander J Pritchard","doi":"10.1037/com0000439","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000439","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Establishing interobserver reliability is a key step for asserting concordance in personality ratings. Yet, typical measures of reliability-such as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs)-are not just reflective of whether raters agree on subject variation. Rather, ICC estimates can be influenced by a multitude of data qualities such that high reliability need not demonstrate validity. I explored what our expectations are for ICCs based on the state of published studies' estimates and based on simulations built upon the typical properties of Likert ratings used for nonhuman assessments. I relied on the nonhuman primate personality literature, assembling ICC(3, 1) estimates from 34 publications. I conducted Bayesian meta-analyses, which demonstrate that ICC(3, 1) estimates showed a posterior estimate of 0.31, but that items exhibited high variability. This variability showed concordance with the underlying traits and dimensions, as well as taxonomic distinctions. Simulations, however, demonstrated the complexities of using ICC estimates as a measure of reliability. Furthermore, the simulations showed that neat threshold cutoffs are of poor utility without consideration of the properties of the data and system, namely, the number of raters and subjects, as well as distributions of the item scores. I provide recommendations based on expectations of these data. Nonhuman primate ICC estimates show reasonable values relative to expectations of reasonable true subject variation, in line with repeatability estimations from behavior, physiology, and expectations from human individual differences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146168195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Does comparative cognition have a WEIRD problem?","authors":"Kristin Andrews, Susana Monsó","doi":"10.1037/com0000423","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000423","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We describe an as yet unidentified bias relevant to comparative cognition research: WEIRD-centrism. This bias leads us to take as the gold standard the practices, capacities, or concepts of WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic) humans, that is, humans who grew up in WEIRD societies and whose behavior has been shaped by the influence of WEIRD cultural norms and practices. We identify how the bias impacts the study of practices, capacities, and concepts, and offer two suggestions for mitigating the bias. The first is to use what we are calling a multibaseline approach, which involves starting with constructs that come not from our experiences as humans, but from our growing understanding of other species. The second is to make use of philosophical analysis and conceptual engineering, which includes identifying minimal concepts of psychological capacities as well as a dimensional approach that depicts the many ways in which a capacity can be instantiated. We hope that these tools will allow us to better understand the similarities and differences both within and between species. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"4-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144287137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Is it weird in here and does comparative cognition suffer from main-character syndrome?","authors":"Michael J Beran","doi":"10.1037/com0000443","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000443","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comparative cognition can make itself more relevant to those who care largely (or entirely) about humans by making itself less WEIRD and less focused on humans. That feels nonintuitive, I know, but psychology has long wanted to find itself at the table with the so-called \"hard\" sciences, and those sciences have already addressed their WEIRDness largely because they have not wanted humans to be the main character in their story. This cannot be the goal for psychological science to take humans out of it entirely, or should it be. However, there is a fertile middle ground between humans always being the central character and instead sometimes being a \"supporting\" character in proper comparative perspective or perhaps in some cases not being a character at all (e.g., for some evolutionary questions in which humans are too distantly related to be relevant to the study of certain phylogenetic or mechanistic questions of closely related species). This approach can facilitate greater appreciation for the need to study cognition across cultures and across species (as well as other potential sentient entities such as those emerging in artificial intelligence). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"140 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147625015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"No same-different concept or entropy stimulus control: Multiple-item array task performance in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and pigeons (Columba livia).","authors":"Sota Watanabe","doi":"10.1037/com0000416","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000416","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate same-different conceptualization in nonhuman animals, researchers have used the multiple-item array task (MIAT), which requires discriminating whether icons in an array are the same or different from one another. Although entropy-based explanations for MIAT performance have been influential, their validity is debatable. In Experiment 1, budgerigars and pigeons were trained to discriminate whether 16 icons were the same or different from one another. When the number of icons was reduced, the discrimination tendency of both species was correlated with the entropy value, replicating previous findings. Experiment 2 further supported this correlation by controlling for the number of icons and icon patterns. However, Experiment 3 revealed that when entropy was constant, the subjects judged different more frequently for arrays with more icons per pattern, which contradicts entropy-based predictions. Notably, the response patterns of the subjects in Experiment 3 were inconsistent with logical same-different judgments, suggesting that these animals perform the MIAT based on criteria distinct from those of same-different conceptualization. These findings challenge the validity of typical MIAT for examining same-different concepts in animals and indicate the need to develop more reliable alternative methods. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"11-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143733263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kateřina Motýlová, Ondřej Fišer, Petr Veselý, Michaela Syrová, Roman Fuchs
{"title":"Beware of my face: The role of facial configuration in predator recognition.","authors":"Kateřina Motýlová, Ondřej Fišer, Petr Veselý, Michaela Syrová, Roman Fuchs","doi":"10.1037/com0000417","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000417","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The composite perception of individual elements and their configurations on the face during its recognition, so-called holistic processing, has been demonstrated in humans and some animals. However, it is unknown whether similar processes apply, at least to some extent, to the recognition of ecologically relevant stimuli by birds. The important role of facial elements (hooked beak and conspicuous eye color) in recognizing avian predators has been repeatedly demonstrated. However, no attention has yet been paid to the importance of their configuration (i.e., the mutual position of the eyes and beak). We tested the ability of untrained wild great tits to recognize a dangerous predator with its eyes rotated by 90° around its beak (inline dummy) and by 180°around its beak (invert dummy) in an outdoor aviary experiment. A dummy of a sparrowhawk with its head devoid of eyes and beak (empty dummy) served as a behavioral baseline alongside dummies of an unmodified sparrowhawk and a pigeon (as a harmless control). The tits showed no more fear toward the empty dummy than they did toward the pigeon. Toward the invert dummy, the tits showed no less fear than toward the unmodified sparrowhawk. By contrast, in the case of the inline modification, their behavior can be interpreted as increased fear. Our results do not prove that tits use holistic processing in predator recognition, but sensitivity to the presence and configuration of facial elements in the predator's face suggests that this possibility should not be ruled out. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"22-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143995808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Vocal signals produced by the domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus) in highly motivating contexts.","authors":"Naila Fukimoto, Natalia Albuquerque, Carine Savalli","doi":"10.1037/com0000418","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000418","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motivation influences essential behaviors for survival and well-being, driven by internal and external factors. By observing behaviors, we can understand motivational needs, decision-making processes, and preferences. Food acquisition is a survival motivator that covers a great part of daily activities, in contrast, play behavior shares a common basis with predation and social interactions. In the domestic cat, vocalizations, particularly the meow, are an acoustic signal expressing motivational and emotional states and are correlated to specific contexts, especially in cat-human interactions. This study investigated how contexts influenced meowing under two motivational conditions: feeding and play. Employing the synchronous citizen science approach, 48 guardians interacted with their cats as the researcher remotely recorded procedures involving presenting a feeder or toy and restricting access for 60 s. During the restriction periods, the cats could see and smell but not reach the stimulus. The condition influenced the frequency of meowing: they meowed significantly more in the feeding condition than in the play condition, suggesting a link between meowing frequency and the motivational context of eating, a crucial survival context. The food presentation likely influenced their motivation to vocalize. During feeding restriction, cats exhibited a significantly higher gazing at the guardian and gazing while meowing, suggesting the potential use of bimodal signals (visual and vocal) to enhance communication. In the play restriction condition, higher contact behaviors indicated a physical response to regain access, highlighting the play's social and motivational aspects. These findings help clarify contexts that motivate cats' vocalizations, aiding our understanding of their vocal communication. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"71-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144056060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Dogs' (Canis familiaris) behavior on a social learning puzzle task is impacted by sex and demonstration but not oxytocin.","authors":"Erin Colbert-White, Matthew Q Maus, Alexa Tullis","doi":"10.1037/com0000421","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000421","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oxytocin's (OT's) influence on social behavior is highly complex and dependent upon context. Here, we addressed a gap in the literature on how OT impacts the learning process in a purely behavioral study. We conducted a 2 (OT, placebo) × 2 (demonstration, no demonstration) study in which dogs received 35 IU intranasal OT spray and demonstrations of how to solve a food puzzle. We tested subjects' levels of engagement with the puzzle as well as with three social partners-the experimenter, the helper, and the owner-both while the dogs were being introduced to the puzzle and while the dogs were allowed to engage with the puzzle. During the puzzle introduction, dogs that received a demonstration increased their gaze toward puzzle and experimenter, and decreased gaze toward their owner as compared to dogs that did not receive a demonstration. When allowed to engage with the puzzle, dogs that received a demonstration gazed more at the experimenter and opened more drawers compared to those receiving no demonstration, although the difference in their general puzzle interaction only trended toward significant. Moreover, more female than male dogs gazed at the experimenter during puzzle engagement, and there was a strong trend for more male than female dogs to solve the puzzle. Finally, results showed only a modest effect of OT on social partner-directed behaviors, including a possible sex-specific effect, and no impact of OT on social learning. The difficulty of the puzzle, identity of the social partner, and dogs' perceptions of the puzzle opening demonstration are discussed as possible contributing factors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"56-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144762349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jared R Towers, Ingrid N Visser, Vanessa Prigollini
{"title":"Testing the waters: Attempts by wild killer whales (Orcinus orca) to provision people (Homo sapiens).","authors":"Jared R Towers, Ingrid N Visser, Vanessa Prigollini","doi":"10.1037/com0000422","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000422","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Altruistic behaviors such as prey sharing are prosocial acts that can instigate and perpetuate various forms of reciprocity. Subsequent relationship dynamics provide a foundation for the evolution of societal norms and associated encephalization in social taxa, like primates and dolphins. Some cultures within these families benefit from interactions with other mammal species but accounts of any wild animals attempting to provision humans are extremely rare. In this article, we present 34 cases of both sexes and all age classes of killer whales (<i>Orcinus orca</i>) offering prey and other items to people who were on boats (<i>n</i> = 21), in the water (<i>n</i> = 11), and on shore (<i>n</i> = 2) in four oceans. A total of 18 species were offered-six fishes, five mammals, three invertebrates, two birds, one reptile, and one seaweed. In almost every case the whales awaited a human response before subsequently reacting. The occurrence of these events suggests a limited cost to exploratory behaviors in some populations of this species. We suggest these apparently nonrandom cases may be representative of interspecific generalized altruism. This behavior may represent some of the first accounts of any wild predator intentionally using prey and other items to directly explore human behavior and thus may highlight the evolutionary convergence of intellect between highest order primates and dolphins. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"45-55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144531190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Beatriz Felício, Beatriz Codogno, Carlene Gomes, Rafael Albuquerque, Patrícia Izar
{"title":"Touching faces: The active role of infant capuchin monkeys (Sapajus libidinosus) in their social development.","authors":"Beatriz Felício, Beatriz Codogno, Carlene Gomes, Rafael Albuquerque, Patrícia Izar","doi":"10.1037/com0000420","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000420","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Touch has a significant impact on the development of infant primates, but it is still understudied. Little is reported, for example, about the effect of infants' touch on their environment and social development. In this study, we sought to fill this gap by investigating the touch of capuchin monkey (<i>Sapajus libidinosus</i>) infants on the faces of other individuals in the group. We followed eight wild infants (four females and four males) across their first 3 years of life and assessed whether this behavior is part of the social repertoire and whether it facilitates facial recognition. We coded all social events of the infants in 127.3 hr of video recorded weekly from birth until 36 months, through daily focal sampling. We recorded motor patterns of the behavior, the context, the partner touched, and the partners' response to each infant face touching. We found that touching was always associated with affiliative contexts. Infant face touching of other group members was associated with lipsmacking and grooming, consistently involving visual contact and exploration of the face by the infant's hand. In this species, face touching also occurred in response to engagement initiated by the touched individual, potentially signaling reciprocity in affiliative interactions and serving as a pleasurable gesture. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"34-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144095946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Changes in temporal cues elicit rhythmic discrimination in rats (Rattus norvegicus).","authors":"Ferran Mayayo, Juan M Toro","doi":"10.1037/com0000412","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000412","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans are capable of recognizing the temporal organization of a rhythm by perceiving its metrical structure even when it is evoked only by temporal alterations. There is also plenty of data suggesting that several animal species can track different rhythmic cues. However, there is no clear evidence that nonhuman animals can extract metrical information from an auditory rhythm. To explore this issue, we familiarized rats (<i>Rattus norvegicus</i>) to auditory rhythmic sequences. We then tested them with novel sequences that presented temporal variations at the metrical, grouping, or tone duration level. We observed that the animals responded differently to the familiar versus the novel sequences, suggesting that temporal alterations are sufficient for the animals to discriminate between auditory rhythmic sequences. Likewise, the use of temporal accents could be relevant to provide metrical information, although it is still an open issue the extent to which the animals are able to induce meter from rhythmic sequences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"260-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143544530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}