Journal of Comparative Psychology最新文献_第10页

Mother-infant relationships and infant independence in wild Geoffroy's spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). 野生Geoffroy蜘蛛猴的母子关系和婴儿独立性。

IF 1.4 4区心理学

Journal of Comparative Psychology Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1037/com0000329

Ana Lucía Arbaiza-Bayona, Colleen M Schaffner, Germán Gutiérrez, Filippo Aureli

{"title":"Mother-infant relationships and infant independence in wild Geoffroy's spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi).","authors":"Ana Lucía Arbaiza-Bayona, Colleen M Schaffner, Germán Gutiérrez, Filippo Aureli","doi":"10.1037/com0000329","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000329","url":null,"abstract":"We studied mother-infant relationships and infant independence in wild Geoffroy's spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) during the first 3 years of infant life. We used 15-min focal sampling to collect data on mother-infant interactions and infant behavior in 12 mother-infant dyads in the Yucatan peninsula, Mexico. Data were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models. Newborns spent almost all their time in proximity and in contact with their mothers. The time infants spent within one-arm reach from the mother decreased with age, and the infant was primarily responsible for maintaining proximity. The time infants spent farther than 8 m from the mother, in independent locomotion, exploration, and proximity with group members other than the mother increased with age. We identified two developmental periods associated with critical milestones of infant independence: the first at 8 to 10 months when independent locomotion and exploration began, and the proportion of time in proximity with group members other than the mother increased and the second at 19 to 21 months when the mother's rejection started, maternal carrying ended and mother's help, in the form of bridging canopy gaps, peaked. Compared with other primate species of similar size, Ateles geoffroyi have an extended dependence period, which could be related to the cognitive and developmental challenges imposed by their socioecological characteristics. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"136 4","pages":"221-235"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10474444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Dominance in human (Homo sapiens) personality space and in hominoid phylogeny. 人类(智人)人格空间和类人猿系统发育中的支配地位。

IF 1.4 4区心理学

Journal of Comparative Psychology Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1037/com0000322

Alexander Weiss

{"title":"Dominance in human (Homo sapiens) personality space and in hominoid phylogeny.","authors":"Alexander Weiss","doi":"10.1037/com0000322","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000322","url":null,"abstract":"Unlike nonhuman primates, individual differences between humans in dominance do not appear as broad personality factors. This may be attributable to differences between the questionnaires used to study human and nonhuman primate personality. Alternatively, this may reflect differences in the organization of personality in humans and nonhuman primates. To determine which of these possibilities was most likely, 1,147 participants were recruited and asked to rate their personality and/or that of somebody else on the Hominoid Personality Questionnaire (HPQ), which has been used to study nonhuman primate personality. A large subset of these participants (~80%) also completed self- and/or rater reports of one of three questionnaires used to measure human personality. Exploratory factor analyses of HPQ rater report data yielded five factors. These factors correlated mostly in expected ways with scales from questionnaires used to study human personality. Exploratory factor analyses of HPQ self-report data yielded no clear number of factors and no consistent evidence with respect to the presence of a dominance factor. Subsequent analyses compared HPQ scales that represented dominance factors in chimpanzees, bonobos, mountain gorillas, and orangutans to scales derived from the Revised NEO Personality Inventory, including Fearless Dominance, which combined Neuroticism, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Extraversion facets, Emotional Stability (the inverse of Neuroticism), and Extraversion's Assertiveness facet. Fearless Dominance and Assertiveness were most like the great ape dominance factors. The absence of human dominance factors, therefore, appears to reflect present or past social conditions of our species. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"136 4","pages":"236-254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10531690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

What is simple is actually quite complex: A critical note on terminology in the domain of language and communication. 简单的东西实际上很复杂:语言和交流领域术语的关键注释。

IF 1.4 4区心理学

Journal of Comparative Psychology Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1037/com0000328

Limor Raviv, Louise R Peckre, Cedric Boeckx

{"title":"What is simple is actually quite complex: A critical note on terminology in the domain of language and communication.","authors":"Limor Raviv, Louise R Peckre, Cedric Boeckx","doi":"10.1037/com0000328","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000328","url":null,"abstract":"On the surface, the fields of animal communication and human linguistics have arrived at conflicting theories and conclusions with respect to the effect of social complexity on communicative complexity. For example, an increase in group size is argued to have opposite consequences on human versus animal communication systems: although an increase in human community size leads to some types of language simplification, an increase in animal group size leads to an increase in signal complexity. But do human and animal communication systems really show such a fundamental discrepancy? Our key message is that the tension between these two adjacent fields is the result of (a) a focus on different levels of analysis (namely, signal variation or grammar-like rules) and (b) an inconsistent use of terminology (namely, the terms \"simple\" and \"complex\"). By disentangling and clarifying these terms with respect to different measures of communicative complexity, we show that although animal and human communication systems indeed show some contradictory effects with respect to signal variability, they actually display essentially the same patterns with respect to grammar-like structure. This is despite the fact that the definitions of complexity and simplicity are actually aligned for signal variability, but diverge for grammatical structure. We conclude by advocating for the use of more objective and descriptive terms instead of terms such as \"complexity,\" which can be applied uniformly for human and animal communication systems-leading to comparable descriptions of findings across species and promoting a more productive dialogue between fields. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"136 4","pages":"215-220"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10839707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Supplemental Material for Same-Different Conceptualization in Dogs (Canis familiaris) 犬类同异概念化补充材料

IF 1.4 4区心理学

Journal of Comparative Psychology Pub Date : 2022-10-24 DOI: 10.1037/com0000332.supp

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for Investigation of Mirror-Self Recognition in Ravens (Corvus corax) 乌鸦(Corvus corax)镜像自我识别研究补充材料

IF 1.4 4区心理学

Journal of Comparative Psychology Pub Date : 2022-06-27 DOI: 10.1037/com0000319.supp

引用次数: 1

Sensitivity to line-of-sight in tolerant versus despotic macaques (Macaca sylvanus and Macaca mulatta). 宽容猕猴与专制猕猴(猕猴和猕猴)对视线的敏感性。

IF 1.4 4区心理学

Journal of Comparative Psychology Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI: 10.1037/com0000309

Rosemary Bettle, Alexandra G Rosati

{"title":"Sensitivity to line-of-sight in tolerant versus despotic macaques (Macaca sylvanus and Macaca mulatta).","authors":"Rosemary Bettle, Alexandra G Rosati","doi":"10.1037/com0000309","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000309","url":null,"abstract":"Complex social life is considered important to the evolution of cognition in primates. One key aspect of primate social interactions concerns the degree of competition that individuals face in their social group. To examine how social tolerance versus competition shapes social cognition, we experimentally assessed capacities for flexible gaze-following in more tolerant Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus) and compared to previous data from despotic rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Monkeys experienced one of two possible conditions. In the barrier condition, they observed an actor look upwards into an overheard barrier, so they could not directly see the target of the actor's gaze without reorienting. In the no barrier condition, they observed an actor look upwards without a barrier blocking her line-of-sight, so they could observe the target of the actor's gaze by also looking upwards. Both species (N = 58 Barbary macaques, 64 rhesus macaques) could flexibly modulate their gaze responses to account for the demonstrator's line of sight, looking up more often when no barrier was present, and this flexible modulation declined with age in both species. However, neither species preferentially approached to look inside the barrier when their view of the target location was obscured, although rhesus macaques approached more overall. This pattern suggests that both tolerant and despotic macaques exhibit similar capacities to track other's line of sight and do not preferentially reorient their bodies to observe what an actor looks at in this situation. This contrasts with other work indicating that competitive primates are especially adept at some aspects of theory of mind. Thus, it is important to understand both the similarities and differences in the social-cognitive abilities of primates with different social styles. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"136 2","pages":"93-104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9851130/pdf/nihms-1862451.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9110397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Testing the role of macaque social tolerance in ability to follow human eye gaze. 测试猕猴社会容忍度在跟随人眼注视能力中的作用。

IF 1.4 4区心理学

Journal of Comparative Psychology Pub Date : 2022-04-28 DOI: 10.1037/com0000317

T. Freeberg

{"title":"Testing the role of macaque social tolerance in ability to follow human eye gaze.","authors":"T. Freeberg","doi":"10.1037/com0000317","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000317","url":null,"abstract":"Comments on an article by R. Bettle and A. G. Rosati (see record 2022-45647-001). The testing of subjects' abilities to follow human eye gaze has been particularly well studied in nonhuman primates, and this is the question addressed by the Featured Article for this issue by Bettle and Rosati. As described in Bettle and Rosati, he competition hypothesis, stemming from the Machiavellian Intelligence Hypothesis, predicts that species that are more competitive and aggressive will exhibit greater ability to use cues like eye gaze. The tolerance hypothesis, conversely, predicts that species that are more tolerant and affiliative will exhibit greater ability to use these cues. Bettle and Rosati tested Barbary macaques with identical methods. Compared to rhesus macaques, Barbary macaques are relatively tolerant and highly affiliative. Importantly, the authors coded the video-recorded data blind and with high interobserver reliability. The authors found that Barbary macaques were also able to follow human eye gaze: Although roughly half the individuals looked up and followed human's eye gaze in the no barrier condition, only a third looked up in the barrier condition where they could not see what the human was looking at by doing so. These results were quite comparable to the earlier study conducted with rhesus macaques, suggesting that tolerant and less competitive species actually show similar skills. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72644720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Is economic risk proneness in young children (Homo sapiens) driven by exploratory behavior? A comparison with capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella). 幼儿(智人)的经济风险倾向是由探索行为驱动的吗?与卷尾猴(Sapajus apella)比较。

IF 1.4 4区心理学

Journal of Comparative Psychology Pub Date : 2022-04-07 DOI: 10.1037/com0000314

Anthony Roig, H. Meunier, Eva Poulingue, Angélique Marty, R. Thouvarecq, J. Rivière

{"title":"Is economic risk proneness in young children (Homo sapiens) driven by exploratory behavior? A comparison with capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella).","authors":"Anthony Roig, H. Meunier, Eva Poulingue, Angélique Marty, R. Thouvarecq, J. Rivière","doi":"10.1037/com0000314","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000314","url":null,"abstract":"Economic risk proneness is displayed by human children and some nonhuman primate species. To explore the role of attraction toward the unknown and the unexpected in economic choices, 2.5-year-old children and capuchin monkeys were presented in Experiment 1 with a gambling task in which participants had to choose between 2 options, a secure option and a risky option characterized by an unexpected event. In contrast to capuchins, toddlers showed a strong preference for the risky option over the safe option. In Experiment 2, toddlers maintained their risky choices despite the increased salience of the safe option. In contrast to toddlers, capuchins preferentially chose the safe option in this second experiment. We argue that capuchins' risk aversion reflects an exploitation strategy of known and safe options. In human children, the attractiveness of uncertain reward appears to be linked to their novelty seeking. We argue that toddlers' risk proneness in the gain domain reflects an exploratory search strategy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73994503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Primate origins of corepresentation and cooperative flexibility: A comparative study with common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), brown capuchins (Sapajus apella), and Tonkean macaques (Macaca tonkeana). 灵长类动物共同表征和合作灵活性的起源:与普通狨猴(Callithrix jacchus)、棕色卷尾猴(Sapajus apella)和东京猕猴(Macaca tonkeana)的比较研究。

IF 1.4 4区心理学

Journal of Comparative Psychology Pub Date : 2022-04-07 DOI: 10.1037/com0000315

F. Miss, H. Meunier, Judith M Burkart

{"title":"Primate origins of corepresentation and cooperative flexibility: A comparative study with common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), brown capuchins (Sapajus apella), and Tonkean macaques (Macaca tonkeana).","authors":"F. Miss, H. Meunier, Judith M Burkart","doi":"10.1037/com0000315","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000315","url":null,"abstract":"Human joint action is generally facilitated by the tendency to represent not only one's own task and behavior but also the partner's. Yet, under some conditions, such as in the joint Simon task, corepresentation can cause interference and hampers, rather than facilitates, joint performance. A competent cooperator should thus also be able to flexibly inhibit corepresentation if that is conducive to cooperation success. To investigate the evolutionary origin of corepresentation, as well as the cooperative flexibility to inhibit it when necessary, we tested brown capuchins and Tonkean macaques in the joint Simon task and compared them with the previously tested marmosets. Corepresentation was present in all 3 species, but its strength and the cooperation success varied substantially. The cooperatively breeding marmosets showed the weakest corepresentation effect and, therefore, highest cooperation success, and they were the only ones to use mutual gaze when coordination with the partner was necessary. Cooperative flexibility was therefore not correlated with brain size but with the prevalence of cooperation in nature. This conclusion was corroborated by species differences in gazing patterns and suggests that the drivers of cooperative flexibility in humans were not solely cognitive. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"313 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77512412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Supplemental Material for Primate Origins of Corepresentation and Cooperative Flexibility: A Comparative Study With Common Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), Brown Capuchins (Sapajus apella), and Tonkean Macaques (Macaca tonkeana) 灵长类共同表征和合作灵活性起源的补充材料:普通狨猴(Callithrix jacchus)、棕色卷尾猴(Sapajus apella)和东京猕猴(Macaca tonkeana)的比较研究

IF 1.4 4区心理学

Journal of Comparative Psychology Pub Date : 2022-04-04 DOI: 10.1037/com0000315.supp

引用次数: 0