Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law最新文献_第2页

Self-Sourced Medication Abortion, Physician Authority, and the Contradictions of Abortion Care. 自主药物流产、医师权威与堕胎护理的矛盾。

IF 4.2 3区医学

Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.1215/03616878-10449932

Jennifer Karlin, Carole Joffe

引用次数: 2

State Courts, State Legislatures, and Setting Abortion Policy. 州法院，州立法机构和制定堕胎政策。

IF 4.2 3区医学

Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.1215/03616878-10449887

Jeong Hyun Kim, Anna Gunderson, Elizabeth Lane, Nichole M Bauer

{"title":"State Courts, State Legislatures, and Setting Abortion Policy.","authors":"Jeong Hyun Kim, Anna Gunderson, Elizabeth Lane, Nichole M Bauer","doi":"10.1215/03616878-10449887","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-10449887","url":null,"abstract":"On June 24, 2022, the US Supreme Court decided in Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization (597 U.S. (2022)) to overturn the constitutional right to abortion, a seismic shift in abortion policy that makes the states key battlegrounds in fights over abortion and broader reproductive rights. This article focuses on the role of state supreme courts in setting state abortion policies. Using an original data set of state court decisions surrounding abortion from the past 20 years, the authors investigate how two overarching factors affect state supreme court decision-making on abortion. First, they track how states' political environments affect the decisions courts make about access to abortion. Second, the authors consider the scope of the abortion policy considered by the courts. The authors find that the partisan makeup of state legislatures does not influence the direction of state supreme courts' rulings on abortion issues, but it does affect the scope of abortion regulation being considered by the courts. Additionally, they find that elected judges tend to be more responsive to constituent preferences when ruling on abortion policies. Overall, these findings illustrate the multifaceted dynamics involved in state supreme courts' rulings on abortion.","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":"48 4","pages":"569-592"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10211974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding the Disconnection between Perceptions of Abortion Acceptability and Support for Roe v. Wade among US Adults. 理解美国成年人对堕胎可接受性的看法与对罗诉韦德案的支持之间脱节的混合方法。

IF 4.2 3区医学

Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.1215/03616878-10449896

Beyza E Buyuker, Kathryn J LaRoche, Xiana Bueno, Kristen N Jozkowski, Brandon L Crawford, Ronna C Turner, Wen-Juo Lo

{"title":"A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding the Disconnection between Perceptions of Abortion Acceptability and Support for Roe v. Wade among US Adults.","authors":"Beyza E Buyuker, Kathryn J LaRoche, Xiana Bueno, Kristen N Jozkowski, Brandon L Crawford, Ronna C Turner, Wen-Juo Lo","doi":"10.1215/03616878-10449896","DOIUrl":"10.1215/03616878-10449896","url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between people's attitudes about abortion acceptability and the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade-two distinct but related issues-has not been rigorously explored. The authors used a mixed-methods approach for analyzing in-depth interviews to better understand how participants' feelings toward abortion acceptability are related to perceptions of whether abortion should be legal. The authors then assessed (1) correlations between abortion acceptability and different measures of support for Roe v. Wade, and (2) how the phrasing of survey items related to Roe v. Wade may evoke different responses via an online survey fielded in 2018. The study's qualitative results highlight that there is a disjuncture between people's moral feelings toward abortion and their attitudes toward abortion legality. The study's quantitative results further demonstrate that correlations between abortion acceptability and support for Roe v. Wade are moderate, and the differences in responses to the phrasing of survey items related to Roe v. Wade are moderated by knowledge. The authors recommend that when researchers develop survey items, they avoid ambiguities of abortion as a general construct, especially when public opinion measures on abortion are employed for research and the design of social and health policy and practice.","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":"48 4","pages":"649-678"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9843677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Undue Burdens: State Abortion Laws in the United States, 1994-2022. 过度负担：美国各州堕胎法，1994-2022年。

IF 4.2 3区医学

Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.1215/03616878-10449905

Louise Marie Roth, Jennifer Hyunkyung Lee

{"title":"Undue Burdens: State Abortion Laws in the United States, 1994-2022.","authors":"Louise Marie Roth, Jennifer Hyunkyung Lee","doi":"10.1215/03616878-10449905","DOIUrl":"10.1215/03616878-10449905","url":null,"abstract":"State laws have influenced access to abortion in the 50 years since Roe v. Wade. The 2022 Dobbs decision returned questions about the legality of abortion to the states, which increased the importance of state laws for abortion access. The objective of this study is to illustrate trends in abortion-restrictive and abortion-supportive state laws using a unique longitudinal database of reproductive health laws across the United States from 1994 to 2022. This study offers a descriptive analysis of historical trends in state-level pre-viability abortion bans, abortion method bans, efforts to dissuade abortion, TRAP (targeted regulation of abortion providers) laws, other laws that restrict reproductive choice, and laws that expand abortion access and support reproductive health. Data sources include state statutes (from Nexis Uni) and secondary sources. The data reveal that pre-viability bans, including gestation-based bans and total bans, became significantly more prevalent over time. Other abortion-restrictive laws increased from 1994 to 2022, but states also passed a growing number of laws that support reproductive health. Increasing polarization into abortion-restrictive and abortion-supportive states characterized the 1994-2022 period. These trends have implications for maternal and infant health and for racial/ethnic and income disparities.","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":"48 4","pages":"511-543"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9843675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Unlimited Discretion: How Unchecked Bureaucratic Discretion Can Threaten Abortion Availability. 无限制的自由裁量权:不受限制的官僚自由裁量权如何威胁堕胎的可用性。

IF 4.2 3区医学

Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.1215/03616878-10449914

Orlaith Heymann, Danielle Bessett, Alison Norris, Jessie Hill, Danielle Czarnecki, Hillary J Gyuras, Meredith Pensak, Michelle L McGowan

{"title":"Unlimited Discretion: How Unchecked Bureaucratic Discretion Can Threaten Abortion Availability.","authors":"Orlaith Heymann, Danielle Bessett, Alison Norris, Jessie Hill, Danielle Czarnecki, Hillary J Gyuras, Meredith Pensak, Michelle L McGowan","doi":"10.1215/03616878-10449914","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-10449914","url":null,"abstract":"Previous research has assessed the impact of state regulations on abortion clinics and patients, but how bureaucrats implement them is less understood and is increasingly important as states arbitrate abortion regulation. The authors conducted a case study of how bureaucrats use discretion to implement state regulations on abortion, focusing on two abortion facilities in southwest Ohio from 2010 to 2022. Ohio abortion facilities are required to obtain a written transfer agreement, despite it offering no demonstrable health or safety benefits. The authors find that state requirements for obtaining variances-a process that allows abortion facilities to operate without a written transfer agreement-have become exceedingly difficult to comply with. The authors show how state statutes and administrative law have enabled bureaucrats to wield unlimited discretion and enforce arbitrary requirements. This unlimited bureaucratic discretion and accompanying administrative burden exacerbated clinic instability and threatened abortion availability in southwest Ohio for almost a decade. As implementation and interpretation of abortion policy is increasingly left to state bureaucrats and civil servants following the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision, how bureaucrats use discretion will influence clinic stability and abortion availability. The authors posit that unlimited bureaucratic discretion may exert greater influence on abortion availability across the nation as states scramble to clarify and implement policies after Dobbs.","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":"48 4","pages":"629-647"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9915510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

History and Politics of Medication Abortion in the United States and the Rise of Telemedicine and Self-Managed Abortion. 美国药物流产的历史和政治以及远程医疗和自我管理流产的兴起。

IF 4.2 3区医学

Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.1215/03616878-10449941

Carrie N Baker

{"title":"History and Politics of Medication Abortion in the United States and the Rise of Telemedicine and Self-Managed Abortion.","authors":"Carrie N Baker","doi":"10.1215/03616878-10449941","DOIUrl":"10.1215/03616878-10449941","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the decades-long campaign to increase access to abortion pills in the United States, including advocates' work to win US Food and Drug Administration approval of mifepristone and misoprostol for abortion, the continuing restrictions on mifepristone, and the multiple strategies advocates have pursued to challenge these restrictions, including lobbying the FDA to remove the restrictions, obtaining a limited research exemption from FDA restrictions, and suing the FDA during the COVID-19 pandemic. The article pays particular attention to the influence of research conducted on the safety and efficacy of medication abortion as well as research on the impact of increased availability of abortion pills through telemedicine during the pandemic. The article also addresses self-managed abortion, wherein people obtain and use mifepristone and/or misoprostol outside the formal health care system, and it documents the growing network of organizations providing logistical, medical, and legal support to people self-managing abortion. The article concludes with reflections on the role abortion pills might play in the post-Roe era amid increasingly divergent abortion access trends across different regions of the United States.","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":"48 4","pages":"485-510"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9843671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Activism for Abortion Rights and Access Is Global: What the United States Can Learn from the Rest of the World. 堕胎权利和堕胎机会的积极性是全球性的：美国可以从世界其他地方学到什么。

IF 4.2 3区医学

Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.1215/03616878-10449923

Anu Kumar

引用次数: 1

Introduction: The Politics of Abortion 50 Years after Roe. 引言:罗伊案50年后的堕胎政治。

IF 4.2 3区医学

Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.1215/03616878-10451382

Katrina Kimport, Rebecca Kreitzer

{"title":"Introduction: The Politics of Abortion 50 Years after Roe.","authors":"Katrina Kimport, Rebecca Kreitzer","doi":"10.1215/03616878-10451382","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-10451382","url":null,"abstract":"Abortion is central to the American political landscape and a common pregnancy outcome, yet research on abortion has been siloed and marginalized in the social sciences. In an empirical analysis, the authors found only 22 articles published in this century in the top economics, political science, and sociology journals. This special issue aims to bring abortion research into a more generalist space, challenging what the authors term \"the abortion research paradox,\" wherein abortion research is largely absent from prominent disciplinary social science journals but flourishes in interdisciplinary and specialized journals. After discussing the misconceptions that likely contribute to abortion research siloization and the implications of this siloization for abortion research as well as social science knowledge more generally, the authors introduce the articles in this special issue. Then, in a call for continued and expanded research on abortion, the introduction to this special issue closes by offering three guiding practices for abortion scholars-both those new to the topic and those deeply familiar with it-in the hopes of building an ever-richer body of literature on abortion politics, policy, and law. The need for such a robust literature is especially acute following the US Supreme Court's June 2022 overturning of the constitutional right to abortion.","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":"48 4","pages":"463-484"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10211975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Laboratories against Democracy: How National Parties Transformed State Politics 反民主实验室:国家政党如何改变国家政治

IF 4.2 3区医学

Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law Pub Date : 2023-07-07 DOI: 10.1215/03616878-10862202

Thad Kousser

引用次数: 4

Slouching toward MAGA 无精打采地走向MAGA

IF 4.2 3区医学

Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law Pub Date : 2023-07-07 DOI: 10.1215/03616878-10862173

Lawrence D. Brown

引用次数: 0