哪些信息能激发政策热情?老年美国人,ACA和Medicare。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Simon F Haeder
{"title":"哪些信息能激发政策热情?老年美国人,ACA和Medicare。","authors":"Simon F Haeder","doi":"10.1215/03616878-12166741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Target populations do not always recognize policy benefits. This may be particularly true when policy design, informational environment, or political conflict make a policy's benefits difficult to discern, which is the case for the Affordable Care Act (ACA). While many groups benefited from the ACA, attitudes of seniors, one important target population of the ACA, remain unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of 1,206 Americans age 65+ was fielded in the summer of 2021 to assess the effect of three informational treatments about the ACA's benefits including extending the life of the Medicare trust funds, filling the Medicare Part D donut hole, and reducing the number of uninsured on the ACA's favorability and attitudes about its future and party leadership on healthcare.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Priming individuals about the ACA's benefits improved its favorability, particularly for subgroups generally opposed to the ACA such as Republicans and those high in racial resentment. Attitude changes about the future of the ACA were limited to benefits directly focused on seniors. There were no broader spillover effects on attitudes about partisan healthcare leadership.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings have implications for research on the ACA, on policy feedback effects, on self-interest, and on priming effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Information Elicits Policy Enthusiasm? Older Americans, the ACA, and Medicare.\",\"authors\":\"Simon F Haeder\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/03616878-12166741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Target populations do not always recognize policy benefits. This may be particularly true when policy design, informational environment, or political conflict make a policy's benefits difficult to discern, which is the case for the Affordable Care Act (ACA). While many groups benefited from the ACA, attitudes of seniors, one important target population of the ACA, remain unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of 1,206 Americans age 65+ was fielded in the summer of 2021 to assess the effect of three informational treatments about the ACA's benefits including extending the life of the Medicare trust funds, filling the Medicare Part D donut hole, and reducing the number of uninsured on the ACA's favorability and attitudes about its future and party leadership on healthcare.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Priming individuals about the ACA's benefits improved its favorability, particularly for subgroups generally opposed to the ACA such as Republicans and those high in racial resentment. Attitude changes about the future of the ACA were limited to benefits directly focused on seniors. There were no broader spillover effects on attitudes about partisan healthcare leadership.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings have implications for research on the ACA, on policy feedback effects, on self-interest, and on priming effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-12166741\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-12166741","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目标人群并不总是认识到政策的好处。当政策设计、信息环境或政治冲突使一项政策的好处难以辨别时,这可能尤其正确,《平价医疗法案》(ACA)就是这种情况。虽然许多群体受益于ACA,但作为ACA的重要目标人群之一,老年人的态度仍未得到调查。方法:在2021年夏天,对1206名65岁以上的美国人进行了一项调查,以评估有关ACA福利的三种信息处理的影响,包括延长医疗保险信托基金的寿命,填补医疗保险D部分的甜甜圈洞,以及减少未参保人数对ACA的好感度和态度对其未来和党在医疗保健方面的领导。研究发现:向个人宣传ACA的好处提高了对ACA的好感度,尤其是对共和党人等普遍反对ACA的亚群体和那些高度种族怨恨的群体。对ACA未来的态度转变仅限于直接针对老年人的福利。对党派医疗保健领导的态度没有更广泛的溢出效应。结论:研究结果对ACA、政策反馈效应、自利效应和启动效应的研究具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Information Elicits Policy Enthusiasm? Older Americans, the ACA, and Medicare.

Context: Target populations do not always recognize policy benefits. This may be particularly true when policy design, informational environment, or political conflict make a policy's benefits difficult to discern, which is the case for the Affordable Care Act (ACA). While many groups benefited from the ACA, attitudes of seniors, one important target population of the ACA, remain unexplored.

Methods: A survey of 1,206 Americans age 65+ was fielded in the summer of 2021 to assess the effect of three informational treatments about the ACA's benefits including extending the life of the Medicare trust funds, filling the Medicare Part D donut hole, and reducing the number of uninsured on the ACA's favorability and attitudes about its future and party leadership on healthcare.

Findings: Priming individuals about the ACA's benefits improved its favorability, particularly for subgroups generally opposed to the ACA such as Republicans and those high in racial resentment. Attitude changes about the future of the ACA were limited to benefits directly focused on seniors. There were no broader spillover effects on attitudes about partisan healthcare leadership.

Conclusions: The findings have implications for research on the ACA, on policy feedback effects, on self-interest, and on priming effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leading journal in its field, and the primary source of communication across the many disciplines it serves, the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law focuses on the initiation, formulation, and implementation of health policy and analyzes the relations between government and health—past, present, and future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信