Democracy, Trust, and Political Orientation: Disentangling Mechanisms Shaping Individuals' Vaccine Attitudes.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Marcello Antonini, Renu Singh, Alessia Melegaro, Aleksandra Torbica, Jeremy Keith Ward, Chiara Berardi, Katie Attwell, Adrian Kellner, Eli Feiring, Terje P Hagen, Mesfin Genie, Liubovė Murauskienė, Neil McGregor, Ana Rita Sequeira, Dongyue Yang, Francesco Paolucci
{"title":"Democracy, Trust, and Political Orientation: Disentangling Mechanisms Shaping Individuals' Vaccine Attitudes.","authors":"Marcello Antonini, Renu Singh, Alessia Melegaro, Aleksandra Torbica, Jeremy Keith Ward, Chiara Berardi, Katie Attwell, Adrian Kellner, Eli Feiring, Terje P Hagen, Mesfin Genie, Liubovė Murauskienė, Neil McGregor, Ana Rita Sequeira, Dongyue Yang, Francesco Paolucci","doi":"10.1215/03616878-12166725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>In recent decades, many countries experienced a reduction in the quality and functioning of democratic institutions and norms, accompanied by rising social distrust and opposing political views. The decline in vaccine confidence might be linked to these trends. This study explores the political factors influencing individual attitudes towards vaccination across 22 upper-middle-income and high-income countries, examining the interaction between political orientation, trust in public health authorities, and levels of democracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the VaxPref database, encompassing demographically representative data from 50,242 respondents collected between July 2022 and June 2023, our analysis operates on three levels: pooled sample, democracy groups, and country-specific analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that higher democracy scores generally correlated with lower levels of vaccine scepticism. People at the centre and on the right of the political spectrum expressed more scepticism towards vaccines overall. However, trust in public health authorities emerged as the determinant which explains the largest variation in vaccine attitudes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest a greater effectiveness of democratic systems in fostering vaccine confidence, and the need to depoliticise vaccination efforts. Building and maintaining trust in scientific information and technical expertise is critical. Blunt measures like vaccination mandates may not sustain long-term confidence, particularly in democratic contexts. Effective interventions should prioritise comprehensive school-based education to promote preventive health behaviours, coupled with trust-enhancing targeted communication strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-12166725","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: In recent decades, many countries experienced a reduction in the quality and functioning of democratic institutions and norms, accompanied by rising social distrust and opposing political views. The decline in vaccine confidence might be linked to these trends. This study explores the political factors influencing individual attitudes towards vaccination across 22 upper-middle-income and high-income countries, examining the interaction between political orientation, trust in public health authorities, and levels of democracy.

Methods: Using the VaxPref database, encompassing demographically representative data from 50,242 respondents collected between July 2022 and June 2023, our analysis operates on three levels: pooled sample, democracy groups, and country-specific analyses.

Results: We found that higher democracy scores generally correlated with lower levels of vaccine scepticism. People at the centre and on the right of the political spectrum expressed more scepticism towards vaccines overall. However, trust in public health authorities emerged as the determinant which explains the largest variation in vaccine attitudes.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest a greater effectiveness of democratic systems in fostering vaccine confidence, and the need to depoliticise vaccination efforts. Building and maintaining trust in scientific information and technical expertise is critical. Blunt measures like vaccination mandates may not sustain long-term confidence, particularly in democratic contexts. Effective interventions should prioritise comprehensive school-based education to promote preventive health behaviours, coupled with trust-enhancing targeted communication strategies.

民主、信任和政治取向:塑造个人疫苗态度的解开机制。
背景:近几十年来,许多国家经历了民主机构和规范的质量和功能下降,同时社会不信任和对立的政治观点也在增加。疫苗信心的下降可能与这些趋势有关。本研究探讨了影响22个中高收入和高收入国家个人对疫苗接种态度的政治因素,考察了政治取向、对公共卫生当局的信任和民主水平之间的相互作用。方法:使用VaxPref数据库,包括从2022年7月至2023年6月收集的50,242名受访者的人口代表性数据,我们的分析在三个层面上进行:汇集样本,民主团体和具体国家分析。结果:我们发现,较高的民主得分通常与较低的疫苗怀疑水平相关。总体而言,中间派和右翼人士对疫苗表达了更多的怀疑。然而,对公共卫生当局的信任成为解释疫苗态度差异最大的决定因素。结论:我们的研究结果表明,民主制度在培养疫苗信心方面更有效,需要将疫苗接种工作非政治化。建立和维持对科学信息和技术专长的信任至关重要。像强制接种疫苗这样的生硬措施可能无法维持长期的信心,尤其是在民主背景下。有效的干预措施应优先考虑以学校为基础的全面教育,以促进预防性健康行为,同时辅之以加强信任的有针对性的沟通战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leading journal in its field, and the primary source of communication across the many disciplines it serves, the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law focuses on the initiation, formulation, and implementation of health policy and analyzes the relations between government and health—past, present, and future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信