Practical Radiation Oncology最新文献

{"title":"Feasibility of Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Sparing Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer.","authors":"Samuel C Zhang, Katrina D Silos, Jordan O Gasho, Olivia Peony, Tayisiya Polishchuk, Latifeh Semaan, Bradley Stiehl, Behrooz Hakimian, Amin Mirhadi, Mitchell Kamrava, Christian Guthier, Andriana Nikolova, Elizabeth McKenzie, Jennifer Steers, Raymond H Mak, Katelyn M Atkins","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.05.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.05.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Efforts to mitigate radiation therapy (RT)-associated cardiotoxicity have focused on constraining mean heart dose. However, recent studies have shown greater predictive power with cardiac substructure dose metrics, such as the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery volume (V) receiving 15 Gy (V15Gy) ≥10%. Herein, we investigated the feasibility of LAD radiation sparing in contemporary intensity modulated RT (IMRT)/volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung cancer plans. Single institution retrospective analysis of 54 patients with locally advanced lung cancer treated with thoracic RT was conducted between February 2018 and August 2021. After excluding 33 (5 = non-IMRT/VMAT or intentionally LAD-optimized; 28 = LAD V15Gy <10%), 21 plans with LAD V15Gy ≥10% were identified for LAD reoptimization with intent to meet LAD V15Gy <10% while maintaining meeting organ at risk (OAR) metrics and target coverage with original plan parameters. Dosimetric variables were compared using paired t tests. Most patients (57.1%, 12/21) were treated with definitive RT, 8 of 21 patients (38.1%) with postoperative RT, and 1 with neoadjuvant RT. The median prescribed RT dose was 60 Gy (range, 50.4-66 Gy) in 30 fractions (range, 28-33 fractions). LAD reoptimized plans (vs original) led to significant reductions in mean LAD V15Gy (39.4% ± 13.9% vs 9.4% ± 13.0%; P < .001) and mean LAD dose (12.9 Gy ± 4.6 Gy vs 7.6 Gy ± 2.8 Gy; P < .001). Most (85.7%; 18/21) LAD reoptimized plans achieved LAD V15Gy <10%. There were no statistically significant differences in overall lung, esophageal, or spinal cord dose metrics. Only 1 reoptimization (1/21) exceeded an OAR constraint that was initially met in the original plan. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the feasibility of LAD-optimized lung cancer RT planning using the newly identified LAD V15Gy constraint. We observed that LAD V15Gy <10% is achievable in more than 85% of plans initially exceeding this constraint, with minimal dosimetric tradeoffs. Our results support the feasibility of routine incorporation of the LAD as an OAR in modern thoracic IMRT/VMAT planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141545538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Radiation Oncology Match in 2024: Reason for Optimism","authors":"James E. Bates MD ,&nbsp;Robert J. Amdur MD ,&nbsp;W. Robert Lee MD, MS, MEd","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.04.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.04.007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141472594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Locoregional Ablative Radiation Therapy for Patients With Breast Cancer Unsuitable for Surgical Resection","authors":"Daniel Moore-Palhares MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Hanbo Chen MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Benazir Mir Khan MD ,&nbsp;Claire McCann PhD ,&nbsp;Sandi Bosnic BA, MRT(T) ,&nbsp;Ezra Hahn MD ,&nbsp;Hany Soliman MD ,&nbsp;Gregory Czarnota MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Irene Karam MD ,&nbsp;Eileen Rakovitch MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Justin Lee MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Danny Vesprini MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2023.12.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prro.2023.12.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Patients with breast cancer who are unsuitable for surgical resection are typically managed with palliative systemic therapy alone. We report outcomes of 5-fraction ablative radiation therapy for nonresected breast cancers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>This is a retrospective analysis of an institutional registry of patients with breast cancer who were unsuitable for resection and underwent 35 to 40 Gy/5 fractions to the primary breast tumor or regional lymph nodes from 2014 to 2021. Primary outcomes were cumulative incidence of local failure and grade ≥3 toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>We reviewed 57 patients who received 61 treatment courses (median age of 81 years; range, 38-99). Unresectable tumor (10%), patient refusal (18%), medical inoperability (35%), and </span>metastatic disease<span> (37%) were the causes of not having surgery. Five patients (8%) had previously undergone adjuvant locoregional radiation therapy. Fifty-four percent (n = 33/61) of treatment courses targeted the breast only, 31% (n = 19/61) both the breast and lymph nodes, and 15% (n = 9/61) the lymph nodes only. Sixty-seven percent (n = 35/52) of the courses that targeted the breast were delivered with partial breast irradiation<span> and 33% (n = 17/52) with whole breast radiation therapy (median dose of 25 Gy in 5 fractions) ± simultaneous integrated boost to the primary tumor. Most primary tumors (65%, n = 34/52) and target lymph nodes (61%, n = 17/28) were treated with a dose of 35 Gy in 5 fractions. Most treatments (52%) were delivered with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Radiation therapy was delivered daily (20%), every other day (18%), twice weekly (36%), or weekly (26%). The 2-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 11.4% and grade≥3 toxicity was 15.1%. The grade ≥3 toxicity was 6.5% for IMRT treatments, versus 7.7% for non-IMRT treatments targeting partial breast or lymph nodes (hazard ratio, 1.13, </span></span></span><em>P</em> = .92), versus 38.9% for non-IMRT treatments targeting the entire breast (hazard ratio, 6.91, <em>P</em><span> = .023). All grade ≥3 toxicity cases were radiation dermatitis<span>. No cases of brachial plexopathy were observed.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Thirty-five to 40 Gy in 5 fractions is a safe and effective breast stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) regimen and may be an attractive option for patients who are not surgical candidates. Highly conformal techniques (ie, IMRT or partial breast irradiation) were associated with a reduced risk of toxicity and should be the preferred treatment approaches.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139051268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Highlights of the 65th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine","authors":"Sara L. Thrower PhD ,&nbsp;Brigid A. McDonald PhD ,&nbsp;Minsun Kim PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.01.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.01.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The 65th annual meeting of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine took place in July 2023 with a theme of “The Art of Science, The Science of Care.” We review a sample of the more than 1000 talks and 1600 posters, focusing on a few topics of interest. Recent legislative changes across the country regarding reproductive health care have led to questions about how these regulations may affect your practice. A fantastic multidisciplinary session addressed these issues with experts in the areas of legal, administration, physics, and medicine. Both the scientific sessions and vendor hall displayed a multitude of artificial intelligence-based solutions. Presenters from academia and industry discussed the latest technological advancements, along with the potential challenges of evaluating, implementing, and maintaining this new technology. Advancements in artificial intelligence have reduced the time required to contour and compute new plans, allowing adaptive radiation therapy (ART) to become mainstream. ART-specific treatment platforms, such as MR linacs and Ethos, streamline the ART workflow and make it accessible to most clinics. Presenters discussed the latest clinical applications of ART, and shared their experience with the workflows, commissioning, and training that has worked in their clinics. We hope this snapshot of American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2023 has piqued your interest and we will see you in Los Angeles in 2024.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140141153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Implementation of a Stereoscopic Camera System for Clinical Electron Simulation and Treatment Planning","authors":"Sameer Taneja PhD,&nbsp;David L. Barbee PhD,&nbsp;Richard F. Cohen MD,&nbsp;Martha Malin PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.01.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.01.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>A 3-dimensinal (3D) stereoscopic camera system developed by .decimal was commissioned and implemented into the clinic to improve the efficiency of clinical electron simulations. Capabilities of the camera allowed simulations to be moved from the treatment vault into any room with a flat surface that could accommodate patient positioning devices, eliminating the need for clinical patient setup timeslots on the treatment machine. This work describes the process used for these simulations and compares the treatment parameters determined by the system to those used in delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>The Decimal3D scanner workflow consisted of: scanning the patient surface; contouring the treatment area; determining gantry, couch, collimator, and source-to-surface distance (SSD) parameters for en face entry of the beam with sufficient clearance at the machine; and ordering custom electron cutouts when needed. Transparencies showing the projection of in-house library cutouts at various clinical SSDs were created to assist in choosing an appropriate library cutout. Data from 73 treatment sites were analyzed to evaluate the accuracy of the scanner-determined beam parameters for each treatment delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Clinical electron simulations for 73 treatment sites, predominately keloids, were transitioned out of the linear accelerator (LINAC) vault using the new workflow. For all patients, gantry, collimator, and couch parameters, along with SSD and cone size, were determined using the Decimal3D scanner with 57% of simulations using library cutouts. Tolerance tables for patient setup were updated to allow differences of 10, 20, and 5° for gantry, collimator, and couch, respectively. Approximately 7% of fractions (N = 181 total fractions) were set up outside of the tolerance table based on physician direction during treatment. This reflects physician preference to adjust the LINAC rather than patient position during treatment setup. No scanner-derived plan was untreatable because of cutout shape inaccuracy or clearance issues.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Clinical electron simulations were successfully transitioned out of the LINAC vault using the Decimal3D scanner without loss of setup accuracy, as measured through machine parameter determination and electron cutout shape.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139703930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evaluating an Academic Radiation Oncology Position","authors":"Nicholas G. Zaorsky MD, MS ,&nbsp;Daniel M. Trifiletti MD ,&nbsp;Neha Vapiwala MD","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.01.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.01.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>What are the factors that physicians could consider in an academic radiation oncology practice job offer? In this minireview, we discuss how prospective academic faculty could evaluate the “big 3” domains: (1) the compensation, including the direct and indirect payments; (2) the daily job, including aspects of the clinic, research, and education; and (3) the location, including geography, atmosphere, environment, and culture. If a prospective academic radiation oncologist believes that the academic practice is “great” in at least 2 of the 3 and “good” in the remaining 1, then they should likely sign the contract.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139708553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Practical Considerations for the Treatment of an Adrenal Metastasis With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy","authors":"James B. Yu MD, MHS ,&nbsp;David J. Grew MD ,&nbsp;Erin Sculley MMP ,&nbsp;Kathryn E. Hitchcock MD ,&nbsp;Minsun Kim PhD ,&nbsp;Simon S. Lo MD","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.02.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.02.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this paper is to summarize 3 methods for treating adrenal metastases with stereotactic body radiation therapy. This article is not meant to provide consensus guidelines but rather to present 4 practical examples of treatment techniques using different treatment platforms from 3 institutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140144603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"In Regard to Moore-Palhares et al","authors":"Jee Suk Chang MD, PhD,&nbsp;Mitchell Liu MD","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.01.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.01.010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141472587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Target Delineation in Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer After Flap Reconstruction","authors":"Xuguang Scott Chen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;David J. Sher MD ,&nbsp;Christopher Blake Sullivan MD ,&nbsp;Michael C. Repka MD ,&nbsp;Colette J. Shen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Bhisham Chera MD, FASTRO","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.04.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.04.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Delineation of the clinical target volume (CTV) after resection of head and neck cancer can be challenging, especially after flap reconstruction. The main area of contention is whether the entire flap should be included in the CTV. Several case series have reported marginal misses and intraflap failures when the entire flap was not routinely included in the CTV. On the other hand, available data have not convincingly demonstrated a detriment to long-term outcomes using intensity modulated radiotherapy after flap reconstruction. On the contrary, postoperative radiation can facilitate epilation and mucosalization of the flap tissue, reduce flap bulk, and improve long-term esthetic and functional outcomes. Therefore, our standard practice is to include the entire flap in the CTV. In certain scenarios, we may allow for a lower dose to part of flap distant from the resection bed than the flap-tumor bed junction, where recurrences are most likely. We provide three case vignettes describing such scenarios where sparing part of the flap, and more importantly, the nearby uninvolved native tissue, from high-dose radiation may be justified.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187985002400081X/pdfft?md5=bb4d2146c49c551d607a20f1b5db4b25&pid=1-s2.0-S187985002400081X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140766807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Salivary Duct and Epithelial Myoepithelial Salivary Carcinoma","authors":"Laura Freedman MD ,&nbsp;Beth Beadle MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Bhishamajit Chera MD ,&nbsp;Jaylou M. Velez Torres MD","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2023.12.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prro.2023.12.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Salivary gland cancers are rare in general and salivary duct carcinoma and epithelial myoepithelial carcinomas are rare subtypes. This topic discussion will review the characteristics of these uncommon cancers. Additionally, it will briefly discuss available guidelines for salivary cancers and summarize author opinions on the role of adjuvant radiation therapy for these cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139070702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}