{"title":"神经刺激器和放射治疗:有风险吗?","authors":"Hanan Rida, Alexander Bennassi, Chahrazed Boukhobza, Fatima Zahra Bellefkih, Kamel Debbi, Yazid Belkacemi","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.09.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of neurostimulators has increased in recent decades. However, safety guidelines in patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) are lacking. We report 2 cases of pelvic RT for prostate cancer in patients with spinal cord neurostimulators. The implantable pulse generator was placed close to the irradiated volume in the gluteal region and received a median and maximal dose of 2.8 and 5.68 Gy, respectively for patient 1; and 3.65 and 5.15 Gy, respectively for patient 2. During and after RT, No dysfunction of the device was recorded. Based on the similarity with the cardiac implantable electric devices, we recommend similar safety procedures, this include the following: (i) a cumulative dose <5 Gy, (ii) avoiding neutron-producing RT, (iii) ensuring the implantable pulse generator positioning outside the direct beams, (iv) switching the device to \"off-mode\" during treatment delivery, and (v) in vivo verification in case of implantable pulse generator close to irradiation volume. The final decision should involve neurology specialist.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurostimulators and Radiation Therapy: Is There Any Risk?\",\"authors\":\"Hanan Rida, Alexander Bennassi, Chahrazed Boukhobza, Fatima Zahra Bellefkih, Kamel Debbi, Yazid Belkacemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prro.2024.09.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of neurostimulators has increased in recent decades. However, safety guidelines in patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) are lacking. We report 2 cases of pelvic RT for prostate cancer in patients with spinal cord neurostimulators. The implantable pulse generator was placed close to the irradiated volume in the gluteal region and received a median and maximal dose of 2.8 and 5.68 Gy, respectively for patient 1; and 3.65 and 5.15 Gy, respectively for patient 2. During and after RT, No dysfunction of the device was recorded. Based on the similarity with the cardiac implantable electric devices, we recommend similar safety procedures, this include the following: (i) a cumulative dose <5 Gy, (ii) avoiding neutron-producing RT, (iii) ensuring the implantable pulse generator positioning outside the direct beams, (iv) switching the device to \\\"off-mode\\\" during treatment delivery, and (v) in vivo verification in case of implantable pulse generator close to irradiation volume. The final decision should involve neurology specialist.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2024.09.013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2024.09.013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Neurostimulators and Radiation Therapy: Is There Any Risk?
The use of neurostimulators has increased in recent decades. However, safety guidelines in patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) are lacking. We report 2 cases of pelvic RT for prostate cancer in patients with spinal cord neurostimulators. The implantable pulse generator was placed close to the irradiated volume in the gluteal region and received a median and maximal dose of 2.8 and 5.68 Gy, respectively for patient 1; and 3.65 and 5.15 Gy, respectively for patient 2. During and after RT, No dysfunction of the device was recorded. Based on the similarity with the cardiac implantable electric devices, we recommend similar safety procedures, this include the following: (i) a cumulative dose <5 Gy, (ii) avoiding neutron-producing RT, (iii) ensuring the implantable pulse generator positioning outside the direct beams, (iv) switching the device to "off-mode" during treatment delivery, and (v) in vivo verification in case of implantable pulse generator close to irradiation volume. The final decision should involve neurology specialist.
期刊介绍:
The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes:
Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives
Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues
ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements
Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.