Christine Bang, Eric Jutkowitz, Eduardo Caputo, Sherry X Yan, Htun Ja Mai, Ghid Kanaan, Tayler Leonard, Taylor Rickard, Thomas Trikalinos, James L Rudolph, Katherine Rieke
{"title":"Radiation Therapy for Heterotopic Ossification: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Christine Bang, Eric Jutkowitz, Eduardo Caputo, Sherry X Yan, Htun Ja Mai, Ghid Kanaan, Tayler Leonard, Taylor Rickard, Thomas Trikalinos, James L Rudolph, Katherine Rieke","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.10.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Heterotopic Ossification (HO) is a benign disorder characterized by ectopic bone formation in soft tissues that can lead to functional loss in patients. We conducted a systematic review of the evidence on the use of Radiation Therapy (RT) for the prevention or treatment of HO.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Literature searches were conducted using Medline (via PubMed), Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov to April 1<sub>,</sub> 2023. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free text terms relevant to HO and radiation therapy were used. In brief, eligible study participants were ≥18 years of age with heterotopic ossification and were treated with low-dose, external RT. Two reviewers selected relevant abstracts and abstracted full text data for analysis. The review followed the PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies evaluating the effect of RT for either the prevention or treatment of heterotopic ossification met the inclusion for evidence synthesis. Nine RCTs did not clearly report their methods and had medium risk of bias. The studies were conducted between 1988 and 2008 with follow-up ranging on average from three to 59 months post treatment. A total of 1530 participants were analyzed, and 566 were treated with RT following fracture fixation, total hip arthroplasty (THA), or total hip replacement (THR). In pooled data from eight RCTs, there was a non-significant but clinically meaningful reduction in the presence of heterotopic ossification at follow-up for patients who received RT vs. comparators (pooled OR = 0.47, 95% CI [0.19, 1.17]. There was minimal evidence of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review found a clinically, but not statistically, significant benefit of prophylactic RT for HO at follow up. These findings are tempered by a moderate risk of bias. While practice patterns vary, RT for HO prophylaxis, in high-risk patients, may have benefits that outweigh the risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2024.10.013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Heterotopic Ossification (HO) is a benign disorder characterized by ectopic bone formation in soft tissues that can lead to functional loss in patients. We conducted a systematic review of the evidence on the use of Radiation Therapy (RT) for the prevention or treatment of HO.
Methods and materials: Literature searches were conducted using Medline (via PubMed), Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov to April 1, 2023. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free text terms relevant to HO and radiation therapy were used. In brief, eligible study participants were ≥18 years of age with heterotopic ossification and were treated with low-dose, external RT. Two reviewers selected relevant abstracts and abstracted full text data for analysis. The review followed the PRISMA guidelines.
Results: Ten studies evaluating the effect of RT for either the prevention or treatment of heterotopic ossification met the inclusion for evidence synthesis. Nine RCTs did not clearly report their methods and had medium risk of bias. The studies were conducted between 1988 and 2008 with follow-up ranging on average from three to 59 months post treatment. A total of 1530 participants were analyzed, and 566 were treated with RT following fracture fixation, total hip arthroplasty (THA), or total hip replacement (THR). In pooled data from eight RCTs, there was a non-significant but clinically meaningful reduction in the presence of heterotopic ossification at follow-up for patients who received RT vs. comparators (pooled OR = 0.47, 95% CI [0.19, 1.17]. There was minimal evidence of adverse events.
Conclusion: This systematic review found a clinically, but not statistically, significant benefit of prophylactic RT for HO at follow up. These findings are tempered by a moderate risk of bias. While practice patterns vary, RT for HO prophylaxis, in high-risk patients, may have benefits that outweigh the risks.
期刊介绍:
The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes:
Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives
Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues
ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements
Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.