Cesifo Economic Studies最新文献_第4页

IF 1.3 4区经济学

Cesifo Economic Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/cesifo/ifac003

引用次数: 1

Opening-Up Trajectories and Economic Recovery: Lessons after the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic. 开放轨迹与经济复苏：COVID-19 大流行第一波后的经验教训》。

IF 1.3 4区经济学

Cesifo Economic Studies Pub Date : 2021-09-11 eCollection Date: 2021-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/cesifo/ifab010

Asli Demirgüç-Kunt, Michael Lokshin, Iván Torre

引用次数: 0

An Ex-Ante Assessment of the AGI: Firm-Level Evidence from Belgian Tax Return Data AGI的事前评估:来自比利时纳税申报数据的企业层面证据

IF 1.3 4区经济学

Cesifo Economic Studies Pub Date : 2021-08-21 DOI: 10.1093/cesifo/ifab007

Buyl P, Roggeman A, Verleyen I.

{"title":"An Ex-Ante Assessment of the AGI: Firm-Level Evidence from Belgian Tax Return Data","authors":"Buyl P, Roggeman A, Verleyen I.","doi":"10.1093/cesifo/ifab007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifab007","url":null,"abstract":"<span><div>Abstract</div>Using confidential tax return data, we provide a unique research setting in which the Belgian notional interest deduction (NID) is replaced by the Allowance for Growth and Investment (AGI) as it is proposed by the European Commission. Our results show that the AGI would be a more viable option from a budgetary view. From a company view, however, introducing an AGI system would increase the probability of a higher effective tax rate (ETR). Especially large companies would be harmed as they would face a 7.6 percentage point higher probability of an ETR increase compared with SMEs. Furthermore, we find that there is a positive relationship between the equity ratio and the increased ETR, which is stronger for large firms compared to SMEs. This is in line with previous studies stating that large firms adjusted more aggressively to the NID by increasing their equity ratio more heavily than SMEs. However, large firms still face an ETR that is on average 10.4 percentage points lower compared with SMEs, indicating that the AGI is insufficient to undo the unequal level playing field between large and small companies. (JEL codes: H21, G32, H25, K34).</span>","PeriodicalId":51748,"journal":{"name":"Cesifo Economic Studies","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2021-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138504594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Impact of Trade on Inequality: New Evidence of What, When, and Where 贸易对不平等的影响:关于什么、何时、何地的新证据

IF 1.3 4区经济学

Cesifo Economic Studies Pub Date : 2021-05-13 DOI: 10.1093/CESIFO/IFAB005

A. Siddique

{"title":"Impact of Trade on Inequality: New Evidence of What, When, and Where","authors":"A. Siddique","doi":"10.1093/CESIFO/IFAB005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/CESIFO/IFAB005","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The relationship between trade and inequality is complex, and the existing literature concludes that the impacts of trade on inequality are ambiguous. This article addresses this ambiguity and presents robust evidence that the effects of trade on inequality depend on economic development, when it occurred in recent decades, and their various measures. It proposes a novel identification strategy to solve for endogeneity problem in the literature by using trade as predicted by a gravity equation as an instrument for actual trade. It estimates the effect of both trade policies and trade volumes on inequality measured both before and after taxes and transfers. This article takes advantage of large and long panel data by conducting cross-examinations by economic development and economic history. The results show that international trade exacerbates inequality in the pre-taxes, but the effects disappear after taxes and transfers are adjusted; thus, it supports the compensation hypothesis. It increases inequality in rich economies while reducing it in poor economies, which confirms the standard Stolper and Samuelson theorem. Post-1991 trade experience was inequality increasing but pre-1991 trade was inequality decreasing; however, trade opening by reducing regulations, taxes, and tariffs was always inequality increasing. (JEL codes: D63, P33, and F63)","PeriodicalId":51748,"journal":{"name":"Cesifo Economic Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2021-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/CESIFO/IFAB005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44628811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

A Quantitative Assessment of the Net Wealth Tax: The Spanish Experience 净财富税的定量评估:西班牙的经验

IF 1.3 4区经济学

Cesifo Economic Studies Pub Date : 2021-04-12 DOI: 10.1093/CESIFO/IFAB004

J. Duran-Cabré, Alejandro Esteller Moré

引用次数: 2

Debt Managers’ Reaction to Sovereign Risk in the Euro Area: Evidence and Policy Implications 欧元区债务管理者对主权风险的反应:证据和政策含义

IF 1.3 4区经济学

Cesifo Economic Studies Pub Date : 2021-03-22 DOI: 10.1093/CESIFO/IFAB001

I. Arnold

引用次数: 2

Are Technology Shocks More Expansionary at the ZLB? ZLB的科技冲击是否更具扩张性?