Family Court Review最新文献_第4页

Marriage as a hustle: The evolution of property law and the arrival of same-sex marriage in Cuba 婚姻是一种喧嚣：财产法的演变与古巴同性婚姻的到来

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12818

Libby Adler

引用次数: 0

That's amore?: Intimate partner femicide in Italy and the failures of the Italian legislature to prevent violence against women 这是爱吗？意大利亲密伴侣杀戮女性问题与意大利立法机构在预防暴力侵害妇女行为方面的失误

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12825

Deanna Cinquemani

引用次数: 0

Exploring litigation abuse in Ontario: An analysis of costs decisions 探索安大略省的诉讼滥用：费用裁决分析

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12819

Nicholas Bala, Ella Benedetti, Sydney Franzmann

{"title":"Exploring litigation abuse in Ontario: An analysis of costs decisions","authors":"Nicholas Bala, Ella Benedetti, Sydney Franzmann","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12819","DOIUrl":"10.1111/fcre.12819","url":null,"abstract":"Litigation abuse is a pattern of conduct that misuses the Family Court process in a way that could reasonably be expected to cause emotional or financial harm to the other party or their children which is greater than would occur with the proper use of the family justice process. Litigation abuse may be motivated by a perpetrator's desire to gain an unfair advantage in the litigation or to control a former partner, or may be the result of anger, vengeance, or mental health issues. Litigation abuse is a particular concern in cases of coercive controlling violence that may victimize women and their children, or in cases that involve parental alienation. Previous empirical research has mainly involved studies of women who report that they have been victims of litigation abuse, with one study focusing exclusively on male victims. No previous study has considered both men and women as possible victims (or perpetrators) of litigation abuse, or the perspectives of neutral professionals like judges for assessing whether there has been litigation abuse. This empirical research project is based on an analysis of Ontario Family Court decisions over a three-year period dealing with litigation costs, which under provincial law may be awarded at a higher level against a party whom the judge considers acted unreasonably, vexatiously or in bad faith during litigation (n = 222). Men were somewhat more likely to have engaged in litigation abuse than women (53% vs 47%). Self-represented litigants were roughly twice as likely to engage in litigation abuse, though most cases of litigation abuse involved parties with lawyers. Women were more likely be victims of litigation abuse in economic cases, while men were more likely to be victims of litigation abuse in cases focused on parenting.","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"62 4","pages":"936-961"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcre.12819","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142181905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

October 2024 芭芭拉-巴布的十月社论说明

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12824

Barbara A. Babb, Marsha Kline Pruett

引用次数: 0

Educating for change: A meta-analysis of education programs for separating and divorcing parents 教育促进变革：针对分居和离婚父母的教育计划荟萃分析

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12801

Michael A. Saini, Samantha Corrente

{"title":"Educating for change: A meta-analysis of education programs for separating and divorcing parents","authors":"Michael A. Saini, Samantha Corrente","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12801","DOIUrl":"10.1111/fcre.12801","url":null,"abstract":"Parent education programs have been designed explicitly for separated and divorced parents. These programs typically aim to help parents navigate the challenges of co-parenting, reduce their children's exposure to interparental conflict, and promote their children's well-being post-separation and divorce. Evaluating the effectiveness of parent education programs has been challenging, given the heterogeneity of formats, duration, and settings of these programs. This meta-analytic review aimed to complete a compressive search of relevant studies of parent education programs for separated and divorced parents. Among 40 studies, 103 treatment effects were included across education programs. The overall weighted standardized mean difference across all education programs was 0.24 (CI = 0.14, 0.34, Q = 1274.69, df: 97, p < 0.001, I2 = 0.96.7), but these small effects were not maintained at follow-up (ES 0.00, CI: −0.09, 0.09). Given the considerable heterogeneity across effect sizes, a meta-regression and multiple regressions were computed to assess the influence of moderator variables. This review provides further evidence of the effectiveness of parent education programs. Implications are provided to create evidence-based guidelines.","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"62 3","pages":"512-541"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcre.12801","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141779381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Raised by machines—Children's collection of information as a catalyst for the creation of AI complaisant consumers 机器养育--儿童收集信息催生人工智能消费者

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12813

Juliette Matchton

引用次数: 0

Access denied: Reducing pediatric firearm mortality with smart gun technology 拒绝访问：利用智能枪支技术降低儿科枪支死亡率

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12811

Kary E. Mihailides

引用次数: 0

LGBTQ+ affirming practices for family court professionals 针对家事法庭专业人员的 LGBTQ+ 平权做法

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12805

Rebecca M. Stahl

引用次数: 0

Identifying a typology of helpful post-divorce family assets: Implications for divorce education 确定离婚后有用家庭财产的类型：对离婚教育的影响

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12808

Jonathon J. Beckmeyer, Luke T. Russell

{"title":"Identifying a typology of helpful post-divorce family assets: Implications for divorce education","authors":"Jonathon J. Beckmeyer, Luke T. Russell","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12808","DOIUrl":"10.1111/fcre.12808","url":null,"abstract":"Divorce education programs seek to provide parents with information about various aspects of the divorce process, its consequences, and strategies for successful adjustment. Within those broad content areas, however, there are myriad of potential promotive-, protective-, and risk-factors that programs could address. Thus, divorce education programs could benefit from further guidance about the content areas divorcing parents may find the most helpful. In the present study we aimed to describe what divorced parents felt had helped their families throughout the divorce process. We did so to promote further alignment between divorce education program content and what parents have found helpful. Specifically, we identified a typology of helpful post-divorce family assets. Our findings suggest that though a plurality of divorcing parents benefit from a wide range of legal/professional, former spouse, and personal assets, the majority rely predominately upon their own parenting skills and resources, or perceive few beneficial assets to draw on. We contend divorce educators should consider incorporating further information on developing personal parenting skills or resources, and skillfully navigating legal or therapeutic systems, to further complement existing curricula.","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"62 3","pages":"455-473"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141609754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

LGBTQ+-affirming graduate education: Preparing and supporting future family court clinicians 支持 LGBTQ+ 的研究生教育：培养和支持未来的家事法庭临床医生

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12803

Lindsey Sank Davis, Emily E. Crain, McKenzie Sheridan

引用次数: 0