Family Court Review最新文献_第4页

The forgotten casualties of war: Preserving culture, identity, and the rights of the family after conflict 被遗忘的战争伤亡：在冲突后保护文化、身份和家庭权利

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12834

Kraig Puccia

引用次数: 0

Diverse perspectives: Empirical research trends and demographics in family court review the past 25 years 多元视角：25年来家事法庭的实证研究趋势与人口统计分析

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12836

April Harris-Britt, Suchika Siotia, Kelly Walk

{"title":"Diverse perspectives: Empirical research trends and demographics in family court review the past 25 years","authors":"April Harris-Britt, Suchika Siotia, Kelly Walk","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12836","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12836","url":null,"abstract":"Family Court Review (FCR) stands as a premier, peer-reviewed journal in family law practice, providing a platform for practical, theoretical, and empirical articles. Anchored in core values of interdisciplinary collaboration and a commitment to the well-being of families, FCR fosters scholarly discourse aimed at facilitating efficient resolutions of family disputes. In line with these values, the current study conducted an examination of articles published from 1998 to 2023 to understand how issues of diversity have been addressed. The analysis revealed an underrepresentation of quantitative empirical studies compared to other research types that were published in the journal. Furthermore, only a small minority of the empirical studies included important demographic data about the sample and an even smaller percentage of studies incorporated issues of diversity into the conclusions or implications for future directions. Notably, there was a trend showing an increasing number of articles that include and focus on individual differences over the past 10 years. Findings advocate for a greater emphasis on including publications with empirical data and disclosed demographics to bolster the robustness and applicability of research findings. By accentuating the diversity elements present in research samples and discussing their implications, FCR can deepen the understanding of the potentially disparate challenges and needs of individuals from various cultural backgrounds, who are involved in family law processes.","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 1","pages":"10-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcre.12836","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143248589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A house is more than a home: Why the law should discourage the shift to renting and the effects of the shift on nascent families 房子不仅仅是一个家：为什么法律应该阻止向租房的转变，以及这种转变对新生家庭的影响

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12835

Lucas Sabbagh

引用次数: 0

EDITORIAL NOTE by Barbara A. Babb and Marsha Kline Pruett Barbara A. Babb和Marsha Kline Pruett编者按

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12845

Barbara A. Babb, Marsha Kline Pruett

引用次数: 0

Understanding systemic factors that Lead to high conflict domestic disputes 了解导致高冲突家庭纠纷的系统性因素

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12841

Kelli Anderson, Katelyn Augugliaro

{"title":"Understanding systemic factors that Lead to high conflict domestic disputes","authors":"Kelli Anderson, Katelyn Augugliaro","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12841","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12841","url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to determine the systemic factors that contribute to custody disputes becoming high conflict domestic disputes (HCDs). In contrast to the large number of studies identifying interpersonal and intrapersonal factors related to the couple, few studies have identified how systemic factors could specifically contribute to HCDs. Systemic factors are those that are not caused by either party but exist due to the circumstances of the situation in which the couple finds themselves. These systemic factors can cause the relationship to fragment and can escalate any existing conflict that may exist. The purposes of this study were, therefore, to (1) explore perceptions about systemic factors and interventions that can cause conflicts to progress to HCDs in couples with children and (2) develop a conceptual framework and theory to explain how systemic factors can create barriers to conflict resolution and describe a process for how decreasing the impact of these systemic factor can decrease the potential for the development or continuation of HCDs in couples with children. Based on the responses of the participants, three concepts were specified: the adversarial nature of the court system, economic considerations, and socio-cultural influences.","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 1","pages":"155-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143248317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Professional perspectives on characteristics of legitimacy in court-based mediation 法院调解合法性特征的专业视角

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12838

Eva Cathrine Lyngstad, Ingunn Skjesol

引用次数: 0

The adoption of alternatives: Alternative justice in cases of compulsory adoption of children 采用替代办法：强制收养儿童案件中的替代司法

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12839

Shira Rosenberg-Lavi

{"title":"The adoption of alternatives: Alternative justice in cases of compulsory adoption of children","authors":"Shira Rosenberg-Lavi","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12839","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12839","url":null,"abstract":"Compulsory adoption of children is an extreme solution for caring for at-risk children or those who are neglected within their own family. Such proceedings are initiated by welfare authorities who file a claim for the Family Court to decide to terminate parental rights and declare the child eligible for adoption. The parents are judged and measured by the accepted cultural and gender standards, even though some of them are strangers to the society they live in. Those who criticize the adversarial legal system point to the blurring of particular dimensions in the lives of those whose cases are discussed in court. The purpose of this article is to present four principles of alternative justice, which are common to alternative law movements, as a theoretical basis for discussion in the decision-making process that may promote healing, balance power gaps, and improve relationships, and all in accordance with the unique aspects of each case. Each of the four principles will be demonstrated through a review of court rulings that dealt with compulsory adoptions of children in Israel, and which reflected the ideas inherent in those principles. The picture that emerges is that judges who act in the spirit of these principles, albeit unconsciously, improve the well-being of the parties and promote therapeutic solutions. Since these principles are universal, they can be applied elsewhere.","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 1","pages":"169-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143248247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Embracing Neurodivergence: Essential considerations in family law practice 接受神经分化：家庭法律实践中的基本考虑

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12840

Marianne Cottingham, Talia Spear

引用次数: 0

Making a case for race: Legal and psychological bases for considering ethnic and racial identity in parenting plan evaluations 为种族辩护：在育儿计划评估中考虑民族和种族身份的法律和心理基础

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12843

Chioma Ajoku

引用次数: 0

A call to action: Every family deserves active efforts. Keeping the black family together-active efforts as the standard for all removal and reunification efforts 呼吁行动起来：每个家庭都应积极努力。让黑人家庭团聚--积极努力是所有遣送和团聚工作的标准