Family Court Review最新文献_第10页

Parent coordinators: Effective interventions in adolescent mental health 家长协调员：对青少年心理健康的有效干预

IF 0.8

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12721

Mindy Mitnick

引用次数: 0

Lowering the age of consent: Legal, ethical, and clinical implications of adolescent-directed therapy 降低同意年龄:青少年导向治疗的法律、伦理和临床意义

IF 0.8

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2023-06-08 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12722

Kathleen McNamara

引用次数: 0

July 2023 2023年7月

IF 0.8

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2023-06-08 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12724

Marsha Kline Pruett, Barbara A. Babb

引用次数: 0

The red herring of adolescent mental health 青少年心理健康的转移话题

IF 0.8

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2023-06-08 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12733

Jessica P. Greenwald O'Brien, Yael Osman, Danielle K. Sample

引用次数: 0

Comparing targeted intervention modalities for high conflict co-parents: A quasi-experimental study 比较高冲突父母的针对性干预方式:一项准实验研究

IF 0.8

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2023-06-07 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12737

Jennifer A. Dealy, B. S. Russell, J. L. Robinson

{"title":"Comparing targeted intervention modalities for high conflict co-parents: A quasi-experimental study","authors":"Jennifer A. Dealy, B. S. Russell, J. L. Robinson","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12737","DOIUrl":"10.1111/fcre.12737","url":null,"abstract":"High conflict co-parents engage in recurrent litigation that significantly strains the court system and exacerbates their conflict. Given barriers to their engagement in service delivery (e.g., level of conflict, transportation, child care), it is vital to evaluate targeted interventions and to examine different intervention modalities (e.g., online, hybrid). This study compared court involvement and rates of parental agreement among 178 high conflict cases that received a multi-component intervention, either in-person or in a hybrid version. Results demonstrated no significant differences between groups in the change in number of court negotiations, child-related issues, or court services from before to after-intervention completion or in the proportion of parenting cases who reached an agreement. Both versions demonstrated significant reductions in parents' court involvement from before to after-intervention completion. These findings suggest the need for future research to evaluate the comparative efficacy of hybrid programs and in-person programs for high conflict co-parents with greater methodological rigor in light of the current study's findings and limitations.","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"61 3","pages":"602-618"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47655133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

All hat and no cattle: How house bill 2926 paves the way for progress in the reinstatement of parental rights, but falls short of providing parents with an accessible resource 只有这些，没有牛:2926号众议院法案如何为恢复父母权利铺平了道路，但却没有为父母提供可获得的资源

IF 0.8

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2023-06-06 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12725

Heather Coffee

引用次数: 1

The development and pilot testing of a family treatment court best practices assessment: The model standards implementation scale 家庭治疗法院最佳做法评估的开发和试点测试:标准模型的实施规模

IF 0.8

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2023-06-06 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12739

Margaret H. Lloyd Sieger, Jessica Becker, Kelly Earles, Karin Thompson-Wise, Kaitlin Hagain

{"title":"The development and pilot testing of a family treatment court best practices assessment: The model standards implementation scale","authors":"Margaret H. Lloyd Sieger, Jessica Becker, Kelly Earles, Karin Thompson-Wise, Kaitlin Hagain","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12739","DOIUrl":"10.1111/fcre.12739","url":null,"abstract":"In 2019, the family treatment court (FTC) best practice standards (the Standards) were published to clarify attributes of FTC programs associated with superior child, parent, and family outcomes. The Standards cover the breadth of FTC operations including program structure and leadership, substance use treatment and complementary services, and behavioral responses to participants. This study aimed to develop an instrument (the Model Standards Implementation Scale; “MSIS”) that stakeholders can use to assess implementation of the Standards by individual FTCs. The MSIS balances usability with scientific validity. Interrater reliability (IRR), internal consistency, and several types of validity were assessed. Results indicated moderate to strong IRR, high internal consistency, mixed known groups validity depending on Standard, and high convergent and divergent validity. Initial findings suggest good validity and usability of the MSIS for evaluating FTC Standards' implementation. Notably, the process of using the tool functioned to educate FTC team members on the Standards. Although implementation of the MSIS is a resource-intensive process, the opportunity to receive constructive feedback proved to be an effective incentive for initial and subsequent participation in the evaluation among FTCs. Future research is needed to examine predictive validity, including association between Standards' implementation and family outcomes in FTCs.","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"61 3","pages":"586-601"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45544832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Attorneys, tell your clients to think before they post: Social media data may influence how evaluators view their parental fitness 律师们，告诉你的客户在发帖前要三思：社交媒体数据可能会影响评估者对父母健康状况的看法

IF 0.8

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2023-06-06 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12736

Ashley C. T. Jones, Ashley B. Batastini, Michael J. Vitacco, Rheanna L. Standridge, Sean B. Knuth

{"title":"Attorneys, tell your clients to think before they post: Social media data may influence how evaluators view their parental fitness","authors":"Ashley C. T. Jones, Ashley B. Batastini, Michael J. Vitacco, Rheanna L. Standridge, Sean B. Knuth","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12736","DOIUrl":"10.1111/fcre.12736","url":null,"abstract":"Information from social media is used in evaluations of parental fitness with some regularity. Yet, research is lacking on perceptions of this information and no research has examined how social media data impacts forensic evaluators' opinions related to parental fitness. This study compared forensic evaluators' perceptions of data trustworthiness, usefulness, and initial opinion of parental fitness in a fictitious case in which parental fitness was questioned. Perceptions of a parent's behavior were compared across two types of data in which it was presented (an Instagram post or a medical record note) and across genders of the parent (mother or father) being hypothetically evaluated. As hypothesized, information documented on social media was viewed more critically than information documented by a healthcare provider. Further, information primarily referencing the father in the case was viewed as less trustworthy than information referencing the mother, which appeared influenced by evaluators' identified self-reported sexist attitudes. Results suggest that family law attorneys, regardless of which parent they are representing, should advise their clients of the risks to using social media.","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"61 3","pages":"545-562"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48632203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

IF 0.8

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2023-06-04 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12738

Bruce M. Smyth, Jason L. Payne, Michelle Irving, Genevieve Heard

{"title":"Popular post-separation parenting smartphone apps: An evaluation","authors":"Bruce M. Smyth, Jason L. Payne, Michelle Irving, Genevieve Heard","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12738","DOIUrl":"10.1111/fcre.12738","url":null,"abstract":"In recent years a bewildering array of smartphone applications (“apps”) has emerged to support separated parents' communication. Post-separation parenting apps vary in cost and features; they typically comprise a messaging tool, shared calendar, expense tracker and a means to export records for legal purposes. A key challenge for separated parents and family law practitioners alike is knowing which apps or app feature(s) can work well for different family contexts, needs and budgets. The present study sought to evaluate nine popular post-separation parenting apps and their features using small-n Human–Computer Interaction methods. Mediators role-played high conflict ex-couples while completing a set of five common post-separation communication or organizational tasks. A cross-case analysis of ratings was conducted. We found that (a) many of the mediators changed their apparent enthusiasm for co-parenting apps once they had used the apps themselves; (b) all nine apps were rated somewhere between “Poor” to Fair’; and (c) features of some of the best-known apps were not rated as highly as some of the features of more recent, lesser-known apps.","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"61 3","pages":"563-585"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcre.12738","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44058702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Like bringing a knife to a gunfight: Why IRC Section 2036 is not the right weapon to combat abusive family limited partnerships 就像带刀去枪战:为什么IRC第2036条不是打击虐待家庭有限合伙企业的正确武器

IF 0.8

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12728

Nicholas J. Trotta

引用次数: 0