Family Court Review最新文献_第5页

Introduction to the special issue: LGBTQ+ issues in family law 特刊简介：家庭法中的 LGBTQ+ 问题

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12804

Rebecca M. Stahl, Lindsey Sank Davis

引用次数: 0

It's more than just beating teen pregnancy: Incentivizing comprehensive sex education programs in the United States 这不仅仅是解决少女怀孕问题：激励美国的全面性教育计划

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-07-07 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12812

Erin Cauley

引用次数: 0

July 2024 2024 年 7 月

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-07-07 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12814

Marsha Kline Pruett, Barbara A. Babb

引用次数: 0

Gender and orientation diversity in the family courts: A guide to terms and present issues 家事法庭中的性别和取向多样性：术语和当前问题指南

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12810

Nathaniel Currie, Sherri Simmons-Horton, Jack Burke, Rebecca Farley, Aydin Olson-Kennedy

引用次数: 0

Can online parent education meet the needs of the courts and improve the well-being of children? The critical roles of goal, program, and evidence alignment 在线家长教育能否满足法院的需求并改善儿童的福祉？目标、计划和证据一致性的关键作用

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12798

Karey L. O'Hara, Joi Hollis, Irwin N. Sandler

{"title":"Can online parent education meet the needs of the courts and improve the well-being of children? The critical roles of goal, program, and evidence alignment","authors":"Karey L. O'Hara, Joi Hollis, Irwin N. Sandler","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12798","DOIUrl":"10.1111/fcre.12798","url":null,"abstract":"Parent education in family courts can significantly impact children's well-being after divorce if programs are (1) widely accessible, (2) acceptable to parents, (3) feasible to implement by courts, and (4) have evidence of effectiveness in improving key outcomes for children. In light of recently raised concerns about whether court-ordered/court-mandated parent education is justified, to it is critical to identify effective parent education programs. Online parent education programs have the potential to be widely accessible, acceptable to parents and courts, and effectively promote children's well-being. However, few effective online parent education programs are being widely adopted by family courts. There is some controversy about whether online parent education meets the needs of family courts in being cost-effective programs that offer ways to hold parents accountable for their participation. We articulate the wide array of goals for parent education programs and present a framework to identify and select programs that meet specific goals. We discuss access, cost, evidence of effectiveness, acceptability, credibility, and compliance tracking. We highlight two online parent education programs to illustrate differences in contexts and goals and to show that online programs have great potential to be effective in accomplishing goals valued by the courts.","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"62 3","pages":"562-582"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141503513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Queering child welfare and juvenile justice: Recommendations for affirming LGBTQ+ youth 儿童福利和少年司法的同性恋化：关于肯定 LGBTQ+ 青年的建议

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12800

Wiston A. Rodriguez, Sheharyar Hussain, Kevin L. Nadal, D. R. Gina Sissoko, D' Andrah Almanzar, Dashawn Ealey, Emerson Tejeda

{"title":"Queering child welfare and juvenile justice: Recommendations for affirming LGBTQ+ youth","authors":"Wiston A. Rodriguez, Sheharyar Hussain, Kevin L. Nadal, D. R. Gina Sissoko, D' Andrah Almanzar, Dashawn Ealey, Emerson Tejeda","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12800","DOIUrl":"10.1111/fcre.12800","url":null,"abstract":"Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) people have historically been subjected to maltreatment across multiple environments and systems – including their homes, schools, neighborhoods, workplaces, healthcare facilities, and more. The criminal justice and child welfare systems were built on the foundations of cisnormativity and heteronormativity, making LGBTQ+ youth susceptible to systemic oppression and discrimination when compared to their youth counterparts. As such, this paper examines the unique experiences of LGBTQ+ youth in the juvenile and child welfare systems by discussing the systemic inequities and unique challenges that exist for this population – beginning with the risk factors that make them susceptible to exposure to both systems in general. Furthermore, we provide practical recommendations for legal and clinical professionals to better serve their LGBTQ+ youth clients – ranging from changes in policies and legislation, increased staff training, and strategies to create safe and inclusive environments for all youth.","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"62 3","pages":"653-665"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141503514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A collaborative approach to develop indigenous specific parenting education 以合作的方式开展针对本土的育儿教育

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12796

Kristine Heaney, Danielle Bergevin, Chelsea Kelly

{"title":"A collaborative approach to develop indigenous specific parenting education","authors":"Kristine Heaney, Danielle Bergevin, Chelsea Kelly","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12796","DOIUrl":"10.1111/fcre.12796","url":null,"abstract":"Discrimination against Indigenous peoples is ongoing and perpetuated by systemic structures such as Eurocentric educational systems that often require learners to suppress their Indigeneity and conform to the dominant culture. Previous attempts at incorporating Indigenous cultures and values into education have often perpetuated harmful and negative stereotypes to the detriment of Indigenous learners. Parenting education courses for separating or divorcing parents are designed to support emotional wellbeing and promote positive co-parenting relationships. While it is widely known that Indigenous worldviews vary from Western worldviews, there is little research on parenting education courses for Indigenous families and few culturally responsive programs designed for non-dominant cultures or offered in other languages. Walking in two worlds is a reality for Indigenous peoples; needing to conform to the dominant systems in society while also honoring their teachings and ways of being. This article describes how a parenting education course for Indigenous families was created by employing the principle of collaboration with full involvement of all participants resulting in a course that bridges the gap between two different worldviews.","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"62 3","pages":"583-604"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141503515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Rethinking utility in divorce education: Use of multi-program evaluation data to uncover markers of post-divorce adjustment 反思离婚教育的效用：利用多计划评估数据揭示离婚后适应的标志

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12807

Anthony J. Ferraro, Renée E. Wilkins-Clark, Jonathon J. Beckmeyer, Luke T. Russell, Andrew Stafford Brimhall, Melinda Stafford Markham

{"title":"Rethinking utility in divorce education: Use of multi-program evaluation data to uncover markers of post-divorce adjustment","authors":"Anthony J. Ferraro, Renée E. Wilkins-Clark, Jonathon J. Beckmeyer, Luke T. Russell, Andrew Stafford Brimhall, Melinda Stafford Markham","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12807","DOIUrl":"10.1111/fcre.12807","url":null,"abstract":"For children in the United States, family instability following parental relationship dissolution is common and efforts to promote effective post-divorce co-parenting arrangements have grown substantially in recent decades. To help families navigate transitions through the divorce process, most states require divorcing parents to complete divorce education programming. In the present study we used pre-post data from three divorce education programs (n = 1026 parents) to explore programmatic effects on self-reported adjustment, intentions to co-parent, and likelihood to relitigate, and attempt to determine mechanisms that may account for or explain those programmatic effects. Overall, we found support that these programs are able to impact perceived adjustment and co-parenting intentions. Specifically, we documented small, but significant, increases in perceived adjustment and that post-program adjustment was associated with greater intentions to engage in supportive co-parenting with former spouses. Further, co-parenting intentions were shaped by how useful parents found the programs with greater perceived utility being associated with more positive co-parenting intentions. The relitigation outcomes, however, were not associated with post-program adjustment or perceived program utility. Instead, they were primarily associated with pre-program experiences such as the quality of co-parenting prior to the program and whether an order of protection was present between co-parents.","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"62 3","pages":"493-511"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141503516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

LGBTIQ+ access to assisted reproductive treatment LGBTIQ+ 获得辅助生殖治疗的机会

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12806

Stephen Page

引用次数: 0

The effects of resolution method of child custody and support plans on parental well-being during the divorce process: Implications from and for divorce education 子女监护和抚养计划的解决方法对离婚过程中父母福祉的影响：离婚教育的启示

IF 0.7

Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12809

J. Scott Crapo, Joshua J. Turner, Brian J. Higginbotham, Kay Bradford

{"title":"The effects of resolution method of child custody and support plans on parental well-being during the divorce process: Implications from and for divorce education","authors":"J. Scott Crapo, Joshua J. Turner, Brian J. Higginbotham, Kay Bradford","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12809","DOIUrl":"10.1111/fcre.12809","url":null,"abstract":"The majority of research on the impact of divorce on parents, children, and families focuses on what occurs after the divorce has been finalized. However, data derived from divorce education programs present opportunities for research on the experience of parents during the divorce process. Guided by the divorce-stress-adjustment model, this study sought to understand how the divorce process impacts parental well-being by examining some of the most pressing child-related concerns divorcing parents have while going through a divorce. Specifically, we looked at how the approach parents took to resolve child-related issues (i.e., internally, through outside intervention, or unresolved) was related to the perceived fairness of child custody arrangements, parental concerns regarding how divorce impacts children, financial concerns, and their overall well-being. Perceived fairness of the child custody arrangement, concerns regarding how divorce impacts children, and financial concerns were associated with parental well-being, and also served as an indirect path through which approaches to resolve child-related issues impacted parental well-being. Understanding what parents think and feel during the divorce process, and how those thoughts and feelings are related to the actual steps to getting a divorce, could help inform divorce education typically administered as part of divorce proceedings.","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"62 3","pages":"474-492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141503518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0