多元视角:25年来家事法庭的实证研究趋势与人口统计分析

IF 0.7 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES
April Harris-Britt, Suchika Siotia, Kelly Walk
{"title":"多元视角:25年来家事法庭的实证研究趋势与人口统计分析","authors":"April Harris-Britt,&nbsp;Suchika Siotia,&nbsp;Kelly Walk","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Family Court Review (FCR) stands as a premier, peer-reviewed journal in family law practice, providing a platform for practical, theoretical, and empirical articles. Anchored in core values of interdisciplinary collaboration and a commitment to the well-being of families, FCR fosters scholarly discourse aimed at facilitating efficient resolutions of family disputes. In line with these values, the current study conducted an examination of articles published from 1998 to 2023 to understand how issues of diversity have been addressed. The analysis revealed an underrepresentation of quantitative empirical studies compared to other research types that were published in the journal. Furthermore, only a small minority of the empirical studies included important demographic data about the sample and an even smaller percentage of studies incorporated issues of diversity into the conclusions or implications for future directions. Notably, there was a trend showing an increasing number of articles that include and focus on individual differences over the past 10 years. Findings advocate for a greater emphasis on including publications with empirical data and disclosed demographics to bolster the robustness and applicability of research findings. By accentuating the diversity elements present in research samples and discussing their implications, FCR can deepen the understanding of the potentially disparate challenges and needs of individuals from various cultural backgrounds, who are involved in family law processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 1","pages":"10-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcre.12836","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diverse perspectives: Empirical research trends and demographics in family court review the past 25 years\",\"authors\":\"April Harris-Britt,&nbsp;Suchika Siotia,&nbsp;Kelly Walk\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fcre.12836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Family Court Review (FCR) stands as a premier, peer-reviewed journal in family law practice, providing a platform for practical, theoretical, and empirical articles. Anchored in core values of interdisciplinary collaboration and a commitment to the well-being of families, FCR fosters scholarly discourse aimed at facilitating efficient resolutions of family disputes. In line with these values, the current study conducted an examination of articles published from 1998 to 2023 to understand how issues of diversity have been addressed. The analysis revealed an underrepresentation of quantitative empirical studies compared to other research types that were published in the journal. Furthermore, only a small minority of the empirical studies included important demographic data about the sample and an even smaller percentage of studies incorporated issues of diversity into the conclusions or implications for future directions. Notably, there was a trend showing an increasing number of articles that include and focus on individual differences over the past 10 years. Findings advocate for a greater emphasis on including publications with empirical data and disclosed demographics to bolster the robustness and applicability of research findings. By accentuating the diversity elements present in research samples and discussing their implications, FCR can deepen the understanding of the potentially disparate challenges and needs of individuals from various cultural backgrounds, who are involved in family law processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Court Review\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"10-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcre.12836\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Court Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

家事法庭评论(FCR)是家庭法实践中首屈一指的同行评议期刊,为实践、理论和实证文章提供了一个平台。FCR以跨学科合作的核心价值观和对家庭福祉的承诺为基础,促进旨在促进有效解决家庭纠纷的学术论述。根据这些价值观,目前的研究对1998年至2023年发表的文章进行了检查,以了解如何解决多样性问题。分析显示,与发表在该杂志上的其他研究类型相比,定量实证研究的代表性不足。此外,只有少数实证研究纳入了关于样本的重要人口统计数据,甚至更小比例的研究将多样性问题纳入结论或对未来方向的影响。值得注意的是,在过去的10年里,包含和关注个体差异的文章有越来越多的趋势。调查结果主张更强调包括具有经验数据和披露的人口统计数据的出版物,以增强研究结果的稳健性和适用性。通过强调研究样本中存在的多样性因素并讨论其含义,FCR可以加深对涉及家庭法过程的不同文化背景的个人的潜在不同挑战和需求的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Diverse perspectives: Empirical research trends and demographics in family court review the past 25 years

Diverse perspectives: Empirical research trends and demographics in family court review the past 25 years

Family Court Review (FCR) stands as a premier, peer-reviewed journal in family law practice, providing a platform for practical, theoretical, and empirical articles. Anchored in core values of interdisciplinary collaboration and a commitment to the well-being of families, FCR fosters scholarly discourse aimed at facilitating efficient resolutions of family disputes. In line with these values, the current study conducted an examination of articles published from 1998 to 2023 to understand how issues of diversity have been addressed. The analysis revealed an underrepresentation of quantitative empirical studies compared to other research types that were published in the journal. Furthermore, only a small minority of the empirical studies included important demographic data about the sample and an even smaller percentage of studies incorporated issues of diversity into the conclusions or implications for future directions. Notably, there was a trend showing an increasing number of articles that include and focus on individual differences over the past 10 years. Findings advocate for a greater emphasis on including publications with empirical data and disclosed demographics to bolster the robustness and applicability of research findings. By accentuating the diversity elements present in research samples and discussing their implications, FCR can deepen the understanding of the potentially disparate challenges and needs of individuals from various cultural backgrounds, who are involved in family law processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信