法院调解合法性特征的专业视角

IF 0.7 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES
Eva Cathrine Lyngstad, Ingunn Skjesol
{"title":"法院调解合法性特征的专业视角","authors":"Eva Cathrine Lyngstad,&nbsp;Ingunn Skjesol","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Norway, court-based mediation involves judges, lawyers, and psychologists working as a mediation team to bring settlement and avoid litigation. This article reports from a qualitative study with twenty-two judges, psychologists, and lawyers from four district courts. The purpose was to identify the characteristics of custody mediation from their perspectives. Findings show that the professionals were concerned with four areas: (1) discovery, (2) structure, (3) expertise, and (4) authority. Findings are presented and then discussed in the context of literature on collaborative learning, legitimacy, and procedural justice. In this article, we integrate study results, Raz's theory of legitimacy, and Engström's activity systems framework to argue that legitimacy is realized through a co-configurative process that facilitates negotiating robust parenting agreements.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 1","pages":"138-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcre.12838","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Professional perspectives on characteristics of legitimacy in court-based mediation\",\"authors\":\"Eva Cathrine Lyngstad,&nbsp;Ingunn Skjesol\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fcre.12838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In Norway, court-based mediation involves judges, lawyers, and psychologists working as a mediation team to bring settlement and avoid litigation. This article reports from a qualitative study with twenty-two judges, psychologists, and lawyers from four district courts. The purpose was to identify the characteristics of custody mediation from their perspectives. Findings show that the professionals were concerned with four areas: (1) discovery, (2) structure, (3) expertise, and (4) authority. Findings are presented and then discussed in the context of literature on collaborative learning, legitimacy, and procedural justice. In this article, we integrate study results, Raz's theory of legitimacy, and Engström's activity systems framework to argue that legitimacy is realized through a co-configurative process that facilitates negotiating robust parenting agreements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Court Review\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"138-154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcre.12838\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Court Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12838\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在挪威,以法院为基础的调解包括法官、律师和心理学家组成一个调解小组,以达成和解并避免诉讼。本文对来自四个地区法院的22名法官、心理学家和律师进行了定性研究。目的是从他们的角度来识别监护调解的特点。研究结果表明,专业人员关注四个方面:(1)发现,(2)结构,(3)专业知识,(4)权威。研究结果被提出,然后在协作学习、合法性和程序正义的文献背景下进行讨论。在本文中,我们整合了研究结果、Raz的合法性理论和Engström的活动系统框架,认为合法性是通过一个共同配置的过程来实现的,这个过程有助于协商健全的养育协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Professional perspectives on characteristics of legitimacy in court-based mediation

Professional perspectives on characteristics of legitimacy in court-based mediation

In Norway, court-based mediation involves judges, lawyers, and psychologists working as a mediation team to bring settlement and avoid litigation. This article reports from a qualitative study with twenty-two judges, psychologists, and lawyers from four district courts. The purpose was to identify the characteristics of custody mediation from their perspectives. Findings show that the professionals were concerned with four areas: (1) discovery, (2) structure, (3) expertise, and (4) authority. Findings are presented and then discussed in the context of literature on collaborative learning, legitimacy, and procedural justice. In this article, we integrate study results, Raz's theory of legitimacy, and Engström's activity systems framework to argue that legitimacy is realized through a co-configurative process that facilitates negotiating robust parenting agreements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信