New Ideas in Psychology最新文献_第4页

Making sense of the modularity debate 模块化辩论的意义

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101108

Jonathan Egeland

{"title":"Making sense of the modularity debate","authors":"Jonathan Egeland","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101108","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For several decades scientists and philosophers studying how the mind works have debated the issue of modularity. Their main disagreements concern the massive modularity hypothesis, according to which all (or most) of our cognitive mechanisms are modular in nature. Pietraszewski and Wertz (2022) have recently suggested that the modularity debate is based on a confusion about the levels of analysis at which the mind can be explained. This article argues that their position suffers from three major problems: (1) the argument is unsound, with untrue premises; (2) it glosses over important empirical issues; and (3) the guidelines it offers are not sufficient for avoiding future confusions. As these criticisms are developed, this article will provide a way of making sense of the modularity debate—with an eye for what really is at stake both conceptually and empirically—and, by identifying a false assumption often shared by proponents and opponents of the massive modularity hypothesis alike, it will sketch out some guidelines for moving the debate forward.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000369/pdfft?md5=fe86b4fd82e2841e1af691f00ef5651f&pid=1-s2.0-S0732118X24000369-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141541434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Refining the prevalence inflation hypothesis: Disentangling overinterpretation from self-fulfilling prophecies 完善普遍通货膨胀假说：将过度解读与自我实现的预言区分开来

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101106

Isaac L. Ahuvia

引用次数: 0

Researching causal relationships from the first-person perspective. An Expansion of the micro-phenomenological method 从第一人称视角研究因果关系。微观现象学方法的扩展

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101105

Terje Sparby

引用次数: 0

Allport, Aristotle and Aquinas: An interdisciplinary definition of personality 奥尔波特、亚里士多德和阿奎那：跨学科的人格定义

IF 2.6 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101096

Juan Pablo Rojas-Saffie , Nicolás García-Matte , Vicente Silva-Beyer

引用次数: 0

Using artworks to understand human memory and its neural mechanisms 利用艺术作品了解人类记忆及其神经机制

IF 2.6 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101095

Wei Liu , JinPeng Guo , Hongxiao Li

引用次数: 0

When sensitivity means strength: Distinguishing between soft and hard threats as part of the personality 当敏感意味着力量区分作为人格一部分的软威胁和硬威胁

IF 2.6 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101094

Marija Eterović

引用次数: 0

An active inference approach to interpersonal differences in depression 抑郁症人际差异的主动推理方法

IF 2.6 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101092

Lukas Kirchner , Anna-Lena Eckert , Max Berg , Dominik Endres , Benjamin Straube , Winfried Rief

{"title":"An active inference approach to interpersonal differences in depression","authors":"Lukas Kirchner , Anna-Lena Eckert , Max Berg , Dominik Endres , Benjamin Straube , Winfried Rief","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101092","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Depression is characterized by different distortions in interpersonal experience and behavior, ranging from social withdrawal to overt hostility. However, clinical psychological research has largely neglected the need for an integrative framework to operationalize these different phenomena and their dynamic change more accurately in depression. In this article, we draw on active inference theory, a comprehensive theory of perception, action, and learning, to provide a formal model explaining how variations in patients' internal belief-systems lead to differences in social experience and behavior. In this context, we assume that individuals cannot directly grasp the characteristics of their social environment. Instead, they must infer them indirectly from ambiguous social observations, which they themselves generate and alter through their actions. Differences in interpersonal experience and behavior arise from the interplay of patients’ prior expectations, their propensity to infer particular social states from certain observations, and their beliefs in their ability to influence these situations through specific actions. We then use concrete examples to demonstrate how future research can take our approach to identify systematic differences in interpersonal experiences and behaviors among depressed patients (or patient subgroups) and to investigate their changes in response to new social experiences. We also discuss potential applications of our approach in diagnosing and treating depression. This work is a move towards understanding the interpersonal aspects of depression in more detail, recognizing their importance in etiology, diagnosis, and treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101092"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000205/pdfft?md5=39e750ed89e78d021268cc41cf6935e0&pid=1-s2.0-S0732118X24000205-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140646861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Does mental toughness predict happiness over and above resilience, self-efficacy and grit? 在抗挫折能力、自我效能感和勇气之外，心理韧性能否预测幸福？

IF 2.6 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101093

Helen St Clair-Thompson, Jessica London

{"title":"Does mental toughness predict happiness over and above resilience, self-efficacy and grit?","authors":"Helen St Clair-Thompson, Jessica London","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101093","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101093","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is conceptual overlap between mental toughness and resilience, self-efficacy, and grit, although few studies have empirically examined the overlap between them. In addition, little research has examined the extent to which there is an empirical advantage of using the mental toughness framework to predict outcomes of interest. The current study therefore explored the predictive validity of mental toughness, specifically in terms of the extent to which it predicts happiness over and above the cognate constructs of resilience, self-efficacy, and grit. Three hundred and sixty-seven participants completed measures of mental toughness, resilience, self-efficacy, grit, and happiness. The correlations between the variables were explored, and a hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to examine the extent to which mental toughness predicted happiness over and above resilience, self-efficacy, and grit. There were significant correlations between mental toughness, resilience, self-efficacy, and grit. When resilience, self-efficacy and grit were entered into the regression each of them was a significant predictor of happiness, but when mental toughness was added they were no longer significant predictors, with the commitment, control of emotion, control of life, confidence in abilities, and interpersonal confidence components of mental toughness being significant predictors. Therefore, despite conceptual overlap, if the aim of research or practice is to identify individuals at risk of poor wellbeing, then this aim is better met when using the construct of mental toughness. The role of mental toughness in happiness also suggests value in examining the impact of mental toughness interventions in the domain of wellbeing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101093"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000217/pdfft?md5=71d4adabaaa71a63f6ca2944cf7d7063&pid=1-s2.0-S0732118X24000217-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140646816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A theoretical analysis of the implications of self-determination theory in explaining the effectiveness of feedback-seeking behaviors and the seeker's reaction to feedback: A research agenda 对自我决定理论在解释寻求反馈行为的有效性和寻求者对反馈的反应方面的意义进行理论分析：研究议程

IF 2.6 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101091

Seyyed Babak Alavi

{"title":"A theoretical analysis of the implications of self-determination theory in explaining the effectiveness of feedback-seeking behaviors and the seeker's reaction to feedback: A research agenda","authors":"Seyyed Babak Alavi","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101091","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper proposes that Self-Determination Theory (SDT) has considerable potential for filling some crucial feedback-seeking behavior (FSB) literature gaps. Some key issues are theoretically addressed. First, the influence mechanism of FSB on performance improvement may be explained by the role of motivational factors introduced by this theory in forming positive feedback reactions and the quality of feedback received by the feedback seeker. Second, SDT can be used to explain the feedback seekers' subjective well-being during the FSB process, which is almost overlooked in the FSB literature despite its importance. Third, this paper also relates motivational self-regulation mechanisms to FSB dimensions (e.g., method, sign, type) beyond the popular dimension of FSB frequency analyzed in the literature. The paper also suggests that the quality of FSB, based on these dimensions, is related to the quality of the feedback-seeker's motivation. This paper presents avenues for future empirical studies on different aspects of FSB based on SDT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101091"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140621129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A new perspective on trends in psychology 心理学发展趋势的新视角

IF 2.6 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101078

Andrea Zagaria, Luigi Lombardi

{"title":"A new perspective on trends in psychology","authors":"Andrea Zagaria, Luigi Lombardi","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101078","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The current paper aimed to analyze quantitatively the trends of four major schools of thought in scientific Psychology (neuroscience, cognitivism, behaviorism, psychoanalysis) and their intersections, covering the period from 1979 to 2020. We utilized a rigorous methodology across three distinct sources: Mainstream Psychology (MP), Highly Influential Journal (HIJ), and non-English papers (NEP). Our findings align with previous research in two aspects: psychoanalysis and behaviorism have significantly declined, cognitivism remains a prominent trend. However, we deviate from prior studies by recognizing that neuroscience may be considered the most influential trend and that trends exhibit less linearity than previously assumed. We also acknowledge the significance of NEP, which manifest an independent pattern as compared to the other sources and that may reveal what happens in the “periphery” of Psychology. It is noteworthy that NEP demonstrated a still lively contribution from psychoanalysis. Our study also highlights the insularity and lack of cross-fertilization among psychological subdisciplines, despite the widespread claims to the contrary. It eventually supports the inference that scientific Psychology is a non-paradigmatic or pre-paradigmatic discipline, pointing out the dominance of applied psychology and confuting the notion of overarching \"grand theories\".</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101078"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000060/pdfft?md5=3d82c8fa3ccc288962716ed94dd2f5c9&pid=1-s2.0-S0732118X24000060-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140297057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0