New Ideas in Psychology最新文献_第3页

Me and my brand(s): Exploring the psychological resource exchange in consumer-brand relationships 我和我的品牌探索消费者与品牌关系中的心理资源交换

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101123

Wiktor Razmus

引用次数: 0

Can autoethnography enhance research in health psychology? 自述能促进健康心理学研究吗？

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101122

David Chun Yin Li

引用次数: 0

Partnering with AI for instrument development: Possibilities and pitfalls 与人工智能合作开发仪器：可能性与陷阱

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101121

Ronald A. Beghetto , Wendy Ross , Maciej Karwowski , Vlad P. Glăveanu

{"title":"Partnering with AI for instrument development: Possibilities and pitfalls","authors":"Ronald A. Beghetto , Wendy Ross , Maciej Karwowski , Vlad P. Glăveanu","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101121","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101121","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI), specifically large language models (LLMs), provide new possibilities for researchers to partner with AI when developing and refining psychological instruments. In this paper we demonstrate how LLMs, such as OpenAI's ChatGPT 4 model, might be used to support the development of new psychometric scales. Partnering with AI for the purpose of developing and refining instruments, however, comes with its share of potential pitfalls. We thereby discuss throughout the paper that instrument development and refinement start and end with human judgment and expertise. We open with two use-cases that describe how we used LLMs in the development and refinement of two new psychological instruments. Next, we discuss possibilities for where and how researchers can use LLMs in the process of instrument development more broadly, including considerations for maximizing the benefits of LLMs and addressing the potential hazards when working with LLMs. Finally, we close by offering initial suggestions for psychology researchers interested in partnering with LLMs in this capacity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142243448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Person-environment fit and social camouflaging in autism 自闭症患者的人与环境适应性和社交伪装

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-09-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101112

Jessica Klein, Sarah J. Macoun

{"title":"Person-environment fit and social camouflaging in autism","authors":"Jessica Klein, Sarah J. Macoun","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101112","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101112","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social camouflaging is a set of behaviours used by autistic people to conceal social differences. This paper provides an analysis of social camouflaging within the developmental context of autistic persons. We suggest that autistic people achieve person-environment fit with their social environment by using social camouflaging as an inauthentic form of trait expression whereby autistic traits are masked and neurotypical traits are displayed. The resulting consequences for autistic individuals may be interpersonally beneficial, but conversely intrapersonally detrimental, when considering existing theories or models of person-environment fit throughout development. The current paper explores this dichotomy and suggests implications for future social camouflaging research in autism, such as considering a broader developmental context through which to study the consequences of camouflaging. Clinical implications include an increased focus on reciprocity between autistic individuals and their social environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000400/pdfft?md5=2c10976839460cb2174a16c84ff76db9&pid=1-s2.0-S0732118X24000400-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142157740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Growth Mindset Scale: Aspects of reliability and validity of a new 8-item scale assessing growth mindset 成长心态量表：新的 8 项成长心态评估量表的信度和效度

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101111

Hermundur Sigmundsson , Monika Haga

{"title":"Growth Mindset Scale: Aspects of reliability and validity of a new 8-item scale assessing growth mindset","authors":"Hermundur Sigmundsson , Monika Haga","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101111","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101111","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this article, the psychometric properties of a new scale aimed at quantifying Growth Mindset are explored. Growth Mindset Scale is a quantitative measure which is context independent and simple to administer.</p><p>Growth Mindset Scale was tested on 723 participants between 16 and 85 years of age (mean age = 28.56, SD = 12.14), which allowed for the exploration of feasibility, internal consistency, and construct validity.</p><p>The results indicate that the growth mindset scale is applicable for the age studied (16–85). All individual item scores showed a positive correlation with the total score and ranged between 0.45 and 0.63. The Cronbach's alpha value was 0.83 for the standardized items. Pearson's correlation coefficient between the total score of the Growth Mindset Scale and the total score of Theories of intelligence scale was <em>r</em> = 0.168 (<em>p</em> < 0.001).</p><p>These encouraging results assure additional improvement of the growth mindset scale, involving normalization based on a larger, representative sample.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000394/pdfft?md5=915ddde2c88d3401d661e231c58313ee&pid=1-s2.0-S0732118X24000394-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142041011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

New insights into the contributions of playfulness to dealing with stress at work: Correlates of self- and peer-rated playfulness and coping strategies 游戏性对应对工作压力贡献的新见解：自我和同伴评价的游戏性与应对策略的相关性

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101109

Nancy Tandler , Stanley Schilling-Friedemann , Leslie D. Frazier , Rebekka Sendatzki , René T. Proyer

{"title":"New insights into the contributions of playfulness to dealing with stress at work: Correlates of self- and peer-rated playfulness and coping strategies","authors":"Nancy Tandler , Stanley Schilling-Friedemann , Leslie D. Frazier , Rebekka Sendatzki , René T. Proyer","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101109","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101109","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Playfulness is an individual difference variable that enables people to experience and (re)frame situations of everyday life as interesting, entertaining, and/or stimulating. This definition is consistent with a structural model that includes four different playfulness facets: other-directed, lighthearted, intellectual, and whimsical playfulness. In the work context, playfulness has been shown to be related with various outcomes such as innovative behavior or intrinsic goals. We tested adult playfulness' associations with coping strategies employed at work and whether these coping strategies help to transfer the expected association between playfulness and employees' life satisfaction. Study 1 (<em>N</em> = 185; nursery school trainees) provides support for our hypothesis that playfulness is associated with more positive and less negative coping strategies when being confronted with general and work-specific stress. Study 2 (<em>N</em> = 355; employees from various working fields) confirms our results from study 1 by demonstrating that playfulness is related to adaptively coping with work stress. Further, study 2 shows that some playfulness facets were positively related to life satisfaction and that these associations were transferred by coping less negatively with work stress and, to some degree, also by utilizing positive control strategies. Overall, our findings indicate that adults' playfulness is of importance for coping with stress at work and to further explain employees’ life-satisfaction. Directions for future research on playfulness in the work place are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000370/pdfft?md5=7b39049c766e51f8ec9f2a274a3925dc&pid=1-s2.0-S0732118X24000370-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141998479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The replication crisis as mere indicator of two fundamental misalignments: Methodological confirmation bias in hypothesis testing and anthropological oversimplification in theory-building 复制危机仅仅是两个基本失调的指标：假设检验中的方法论确认偏差和理论构建中的人类学过度简化

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101110

Julia Schnepf , Norbert Groeben

{"title":"The replication crisis as mere indicator of two fundamental misalignments: Methodological confirmation bias in hypothesis testing and anthropological oversimplification in theory-building","authors":"Julia Schnepf , Norbert Groeben","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101110","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101110","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Psychological research is currently in a phase of transition. The replication crisis has led to the introduction of a number of corrective measures such as preregistration, registered reports, open data and methods in order to make scientific knowledge in psychological science more reliable. In this article, we discuss why these tools remain superficial and provide rather a symptom treatment than a deeper treatment of the causes of the replication crisis. To this end, we address two central misalignments of current psychological research: Confirmation bias, in the sense of overweighting significant, hypothesis-confirming findings over negative ones, and the anthropological oversimplification of the human research subject. We conclude by providing indications of how a paradigm shift in psychological science research and publication practices can help to combat the causes of the replication crisis and poor scientific research practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000382/pdfft?md5=bcd1563df1855cd59470e6a23d9e3c8b&pid=1-s2.0-S0732118X24000382-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141945260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Critique of the standard model of moral injury 对道德伤害标准模式的批判

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101107

Christa Davis Acampora , Ditte Munch-Jurisic , Andrew Culbreth , Sarah Denne , Jacob Smith

{"title":"Critique of the standard model of moral injury","authors":"Christa Davis Acampora , Ditte Munch-Jurisic , Andrew Culbreth , Sarah Denne , Jacob Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101107","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101107","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article seeks to describe in general terms what has become the standard way of conceptualizing moral injury in the clinical psychological and psychiatric literature, which is the key source for applications of the concept in other domains. What we call “the standard model” draws on certain assumptions about beliefs, mental states, and emotions as well as an implicit theory of causation about how various forms of harm arise from certain experiences or “events” that violate persons’ moral beliefs and systems. Our analysis makes these assumptions more explicit and subjects them to critical scrutiny. In so doing, we survey the current literature and identify basic features of how moral injuries are defined, how they are thought to occur, and the forms of treatment or repair that appear to be indicated. We caution that it matters how moral experience is characterized and argue that an alternative understanding of what is the <em>moral</em> in moral injury is important for overcoming critical challenges to the standard model. Moreover, recently evolving approaches to moral repair could be more consistent with an alternative model. Our concluding suggestion is that a more robust account of the nature of moral experience and its relations to self-identity and social experience more generally could advance understanding of the etiology of moral injury and promote rehabilitation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000357/pdfft?md5=48f4ec2be9ea51674109f170978974c4&pid=1-s2.0-S0732118X24000357-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141777431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Making sense of the modularity debate 模块化辩论的意义

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101108

Jonathan Egeland

{"title":"Making sense of the modularity debate","authors":"Jonathan Egeland","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101108","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For several decades scientists and philosophers studying how the mind works have debated the issue of modularity. Their main disagreements concern the massive modularity hypothesis, according to which all (or most) of our cognitive mechanisms are modular in nature. Pietraszewski and Wertz (2022) have recently suggested that the modularity debate is based on a confusion about the levels of analysis at which the mind can be explained. This article argues that their position suffers from three major problems: (1) the argument is unsound, with untrue premises; (2) it glosses over important empirical issues; and (3) the guidelines it offers are not sufficient for avoiding future confusions. As these criticisms are developed, this article will provide a way of making sense of the modularity debate—with an eye for what really is at stake both conceptually and empirically—and, by identifying a false assumption often shared by proponents and opponents of the massive modularity hypothesis alike, it will sketch out some guidelines for moving the debate forward.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000369/pdfft?md5=fe86b4fd82e2841e1af691f00ef5651f&pid=1-s2.0-S0732118X24000369-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141541434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Refining the prevalence inflation hypothesis: Disentangling overinterpretation from self-fulfilling prophecies 完善普遍通货膨胀假说：将过度解读与自我实现的预言区分开来

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101106

Isaac L. Ahuvia

引用次数: 0