Global PolicyPub Date : 2026-03-24Epub Date: 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70133
Yong Wook Lee
{"title":"Status Politics: The Changing Meanings and Practices of South Korea's Middle Power Diplomacy","authors":"Yong Wook Lee","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70133","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Why do some states engage in so-called middle power diplomacy? Conventional middle power scholarship does not adequately explain this question because the logical premise underlying its definition of “middle powers” is either inconsequential or circular. Building on theoretical insights from status politics, I argue that a state's pursuit of middle power diplomacy is inextricably linked to status considerations within the hierarchy of international standing. I offer a theoretical framework that captures the subjective and intersubjective dimensions of why and how a state formulates and reformulates middle power diplomacy in particular ways over time. Empirically, I examine the emergence and evolution of South Korea's middle power diplomacy over the past two decades. I show how the government's differing conceptions, understandings, and reflections of middle power diplomacy have informed, shaped, and transformed its diplomatic practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 S1","pages":"S84-S93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.70133","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147562229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global PolicyPub Date : 2026-01-13DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70122
Rory Todd, Lee Crawfurd, Rachel Bonnifield
{"title":"Toxic Lead Pigment Exports From Rich to Poor Countries","authors":"Rory Todd, Lee Crawfurd, Rachel Bonnifield","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70122","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70122","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lead poisoning affects one in three children globally, with large but neglected impacts on health and education. One important source of exposure is the use of lead as a pigment in the form of lead chromates, in paints, plastics, and even food. Lead chromates are toxic and safe alternatives exist: Its continued use is effectively prohibited in the European Union and the United Kingdom and is highly restricted in other high-income countries. In this paper, we present new data documenting the global trade in lead chromates. Exports are dominated by companies based in India, but we also show significant ongoing exports from high-income countries including the United States, Canada, and Spain, despite these countries placing bans or strong restrictions on use in their own territories. Many exports go to countries with low capacity to regulate its end use and prevent highly hazardous applications. While the harm posed by any particular shipment or actor depends on the end use of the exported lead chromates, which is not possible to determine, the volume of exports from rich to poor countries could be sufficient to poison hundreds of thousands of children. We conclude with recommendations to policymakers to end the detrimental and unnecessary use of lead chromates.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"157-167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.70122","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146680451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global PolicyPub Date : 2026-01-13DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70124
Emma Aisbett, Wenting Cheng, Ralf Steinhauser, Fiona Beck
{"title":"Should Green Industrial Policy Be Technology Neutral?","authors":"Emma Aisbett, Wenting Cheng, Ralf Steinhauser, Fiona Beck","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70124","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70124","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The central question of this paper is whether technology neutrality is, on balance, a helpful principle for green industrial policy (GIP). To answer this question, we first conduct a systematic literature review to understand what GIP is. We find that the term is most often used by authors in a neoclassical economic tradition and propose a definition that encapsulates the dominant elements of various definitions in this literature. Using a transdisciplinary approach, we turn to the question of technology neutrality in GIP. Considering a range of disciplinary perspectives and arguments, we conclude that the weight of argument and evidence lies strongly against de jure technology neutrality in GIP. Furthermore, the literature provides a range of alternative principles and approaches that can better address potential government failures in GIP and related policies. Finally, combining theoretical approaches and case-study evidence from the US Inflation Reduction Act and the European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, we provide potential explanations for why technology neutrality nonetheless remains a popular principle in GIP.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"107-121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147280087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global PolicyPub Date : 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70114
Kristinn Sv. Helgason
{"title":"Can the United Nations Avoid the Fate of the League of Nations?","authors":"Kristinn Sv. Helgason","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70114","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The United Nations is facing an uncertain future. The United States, the largest financial contributor to the UN since its inception in 1945, has regularly called for greater efficiency in the work of the Organization. However, these demands have invariably faced strong opposition from the many developing and other states that contribute little financial resources to the Organization. Over time, this political impasse has helped to legitimize suboptimal efficiency as the opportunity cost of doing business in the UN system. Yet, recent changes in the domestic political landscape in many advanced economies have rendered this longstanding compromise no longer feasible. This paper argues that short-term efforts to reduce costs are not likely to have a sustainable impact, as the large number of states that contribute little financial resources to the UN system will soon have renewed incentives to call for increased budgets rather than to institutionalize cost-effectiveness measures. Instead, states would be well-advised to focus on rule changes in areas such as governance and coordination structures and the selection of senior leaders and staff, as well as to articulate a new mission for the Organization.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"168-173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146256529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global PolicyPub Date : 2025-12-14DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70113
Kelan (Lilly) Lu, Glen Biglaiser, Lance Y. Hunter
{"title":"Terrorism and U.S. and Chinese Overseas Foreign Direct Investment in the Developing World","authors":"Kelan (Lilly) Lu, Glen Biglaiser, Lance Y. Hunter","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70113","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Much scholarship finds a negative but inconsistent statistical relationship between host-state terrorism and overseas foreign direct investment (FDI). However, empirical studies generally have not investigated terrorism in the context of Chinese overseas FDI. Comparing United States and Chinese overseas FDI for up to 107 developing countries from 2004–2018, and using a Two-Stage-Difference-in-Difference approach as well as a dynamic panel data analysis approach (i.e., the System General Method of Moments), we find a negative and at times statistically significant association between terrorism and U.S. FDI and a positive and frequently statistically significant relationship between terrorism and Chinese FDI, and this is true for both Chinese public and private investors. We argue that the U.S. and Chinese governments have different effects on overseas FDI, where the U.S. has a limited impact while China often encourages its firms to tolerate risk. Our research suggests that the nature of home governments affects the risk perception of their overseas investors.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"81-93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146256456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global PolicyPub Date : 2025-12-14DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70110
Rahul M. Lad, Ravindra G. Jaybhaye
{"title":"Contemporary Challenges and Relevance of the Transboundary River Management Regimes in South Asia","authors":"Rahul M. Lad, Ravindra G. Jaybhaye","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70110","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The presence of transboundary rivers is a prominent feature of South Asia. Major rivers such as the Ganga, Indus, and Brahmaputra traverse multiple countries, creating complex interdependencies among the riparian nations. However, the transboundary river basin governance mechanisms such as bilateral treaties remain inadequate to manage these resources amid emerging issues such as climate change, glacial retreat, water pollution, groundwater depletion, and rising irrigation demand. At the same time, these treaties remain critical instruments of regional cooperation and cannot be dismissed as obsolete. Against this backdrop, the study examines the relevance and effectiveness of existing bilateral treaties on shared rivers in addressing emerging challenges. A comparative analysis of the major treaties in South Asia reveals that transboundary river management mechanisms often lack critical provisions required to mitigate contemporary issues. Expanding populations, accelerated water withdrawal for irrigation, glacial melt, water pollution, and the over-extraction of water from shared aquifers are some of the pressing challenges that existing treaties do not sufficiently address. Finally, the study recommends incorporating provisions that consider these contemporary issues to enhance governance of transboundary rivers in South Asia effectively. By doing so, riparian countries can better manage shared water resources in South Asia.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"145-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147288276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global PolicyPub Date : 2025-12-14DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70118
Joscha Abels
{"title":"Private Network Realignment: State Strategies Versus Market-Driven Globalization in the Subsea Cable Network","authors":"Joscha Abels","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70118","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Much of the subsea cable network, which carries the vast majority of global internet traffic, is developed, owned, and operated by private corporations. In an era of growing global tensions, states have come to view these cables as critical to their interests. The article addresses the disconnect between statecraft-centric explanations and the market-driven development of global networks. It introduces the concept of private network realignment: Political interventions aimed at retroactively reshaping infrastructures and adjacent markets by influencing the decisions of private corporations. After decades of neoliberal globalization, networks are often organized around large corporations that drive their development. In reaction, states employ varied realignment strategies, the choice of which depends on their position in the network as well as that of relevant corporate actors. Empirically, the article examines two instructive, prototypical cases: the US–China conflict over the SeaMeWe-6 subsea cable system, and France's nationalization of Alcatel Submarine Networks. The findings highlight the uneven effectiveness of great power interventions, which opens up space for other highly connected powers to pursue autonomous network realignment strategies. The article contributes to contemporary debates on network competition, providing a perspective on how market dynamics and state strategizing intersect in the development of global networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"94-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.70118","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146256406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global PolicyPub Date : 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70121
Chun-Young Park
{"title":"Active Yet Cautious: How Middle States Navigate Status in the Universal Periodic Review","authors":"Chun-Young Park","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70121","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70121","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines how states positioned in the middle of the international status hierarchy behave in the United Nations Universal Periodic Review (UPR). While the UPR was established as a cooperative mechanism to move away from confrontational naming and shaming, in practice it has become a reputational arena where states strategically calibrate their engagement. I argue that mid-status states pursue a logic of status–visibility optimization: They maximize participation to enhance recognition but issue only moderate recommendations to minimize reputational risks. Using original data of UPR recommendations and statistical analyses, the study finds that mid-status states are the most active participants but the least severe critics. This pattern produces what is called “vanilla victories,” which is visible but cautious performance that enhances the state's standing without significantly advancing human rights. These findings contribute to debates on status-seeking and international human rights institutions and highlight the limitations of the UPR as a mechanism for substantive rights protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"58-70"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.70121","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146256267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global PolicyPub Date : 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70116
Steffi Hamann
{"title":"Foreign Aid at a Crossroads: How Funding Cuts Reshape Global Development Cooperation","authors":"Steffi Hamann","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70116","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70116","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent aid budget reductions among major donor countries have reignited debates over the future of international development cooperation, with several commentators warning of an impending collapse of the aid sector. Engaging with historical and critical development literature on aid cycles, donor motives, and the evolution of Official Development Assistance, this paper addresses the question: Do these drastic funding cuts signal the demise of the international aid system? Through a historical-comparative analysis of past periods of aid expansion and retrenchment, it argues that while current disruptions are profound, they represent not an end but a driver for transformation within the aid sector. The paper shows that foreign aid has consistently adapted to geopolitical shifts, alternating between enthusiasm and disillusionment, and that today's crisis is catalyzing structural changes, including the restructuring of aid agencies, a diversification of financing sources beyond traditional donors, and emerging localized and specialized implementation strategies. These findings challenge the alarmist narratives by situating recent events within a historical pattern of adaptation, emphasizing that rather than heralding aid's demise, the present moment is spurring a new phase of evolution in the global aid landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"122-133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.70116","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146256268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global PolicyPub Date : 2025-11-25DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70112
Benjamin Vidmar, Felipe Krause
{"title":"Development Lending and Debt Discipline: The Political Economy of External Finance in Brazil","authors":"Benjamin Vidmar, Felipe Krause","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70112","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines Brazil's External Financing Commission (COFIEX), a centralized body that approves all public-sector external borrowing and exemplifies efforts in middle-income democracies to reconcile fiscal restraint with the demands of strategic public investment. Drawing on original analysis of project-level data from 1980 to 2022, the study shows that COFIEX has successfully enforced Brazil's conservative stance on external debt, maintaining public external debt below 10% of GDP through most of the past two decades. However, its capacity to act as a driver of development finance has been constrained by institutional risk aversion, rigid fiscal thresholds, and political incentives favoring highly visible infrastructure over less politically rewarding sectors such as sanitation. Despite these limitations, the article highlights COFIEX's important role in structuring Brazil's relationships with bilateral and multilateral lenders, whose technical expertise reduces project risk and can help crowd in private investment. The Brazilian experience underscores the trade-offs inherent in centralized debt governance under fiscal orthodoxy, illustrating how institutions like COFIEX prioritize fiscal stability even when developmental needs remain unmet. The article contributes to broader debates on global development finance, showing how institutional design and bureaucratic practice mediate the relationship between fiscal discipline and external investment in federal middle-income democracies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"134-144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.70112","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146256556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}