Public Opinion Quarterly最新文献_第6页

Factors Associated with Interviewers' Evaluations of Respondents' Performance in Telephone Interviews: Behavior, Response Quality Indicators, and Characteristics of Respondents and Interviewers. 访问员对受访者在电话访问中的表现作出评价的相关因素：行为、回答质量指标以及受访者和访谈者的特征。

IF 2.9 1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-07-20 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad028

Dana Garbarski, Jennifer Dykema, Nora Cate Schaeffer, Cameron P Jones, Tiffany S Neman, Dorothy Farrar Edwards

{"title":"Factors Associated with Interviewers' Evaluations of Respondents' Performance in Telephone Interviews: Behavior, Response Quality Indicators, and Characteristics of Respondents and Interviewers.","authors":"Dana Garbarski, Jennifer Dykema, Nora Cate Schaeffer, Cameron P Jones, Tiffany S Neman, Dorothy Farrar Edwards","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfad028","DOIUrl":"10.1093/poq/nfad028","url":null,"abstract":"Interviewers' postinterview evaluations of respondents' performance (IEPs) are paradata, used to describe the quality of the data obtained from respondents. IEPs are driven by a combination of factors, including respondents' and interviewers' sociodemographic characteristics and what actually transpires during the interview. However, relatively few studies examine how IEPs are associated with features of the response process, including facets of the interviewer-respondent interaction and patterns of responding that index data quality. We examine whether features of the response process-various respondents' behaviors and response quality indicators-are associated with IEPs in a survey with a diverse set of respondents focused on barriers and facilitators to participating in medical research. We also examine whether there are differences in IEPs across respondents' and interviewers' sociodemographic characteristics. Our results show that both respondents' behaviors and response quality indicators predict IEPs, indicating that IEPs reflect what transpires in the interview. In addition, interviewers appear to approach the task of evaluating respondents with differing frameworks, as evidenced by the variation in IEPs attributable to interviewers and associations between IEPs and interviewers' gender. Further, IEPs were associated with respondents' education and ethnoracial identity, net of respondents' behaviors, response quality indicators, and sociodemographic characteristics of respondents and interviewers. Future research should continue to build on studies that examine the correlates of IEPs to better inform whether, when, and how to use IEPs as paradata about the quality of the data obtained.","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":"87 Suppl 1","pages":"480-506"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496573/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10252679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Disagreement Does Not Always Mean Division: Evidence from Five Decades of American Public Opinion 分歧并不总是意味着分裂：来自美国舆论五十年的证据

IF 3.4 1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-06-12 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad020

Stuart Perrett

{"title":"Disagreement Does Not Always Mean Division: Evidence from Five Decades of American Public Opinion","authors":"Stuart Perrett","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfad020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad020","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Are those things on which Americans most disagree the same things that divide liberals and conservatives or Democrats and Republicans? How has this changed over time? To answer these questions, I use 350 subjective items from five decades of the General Social Survey. Estimating disagreement with ordinal dispersion and using a novel measure of sorting by party and ideological identification, I find an increasing positive association between the two phenomena. In the 1970s, the likelihood that opinion on contentious items divided partisans was low. Since then, this probability has increased. Disagreement has been more consistently associated with higher levels of ideological sorting, though this relationship has also strengthened since the 1980s. I then ask which items and substantive domains have propelled the politicization of disagreement. I decompose the estimated coefficients between disagreement and sorting by item to quantify their contribution in each decade. I find that opinions from two domains play a large role throughout the period: public spending, and sexuality and abortion. Nevertheless, there is a great deal of heterogeneity within domains and over time. Though disagreement between Americans has increasingly sorted, a relatively small number of items drive this relationship in any one decade. Even among voters, a good proportion of disagreement remains unrelated to ideological or partisan divisions.","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47908538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Evaluating Pre-election Polling Estimates Using a New Measure of Non-ignorable Selection Bias. 用一种不可忽略的选择偏差的新方法评估选前民调估计。

IF 3.4 1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-06-08 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad018

Brady T West, Rebecca R Andridge

{"title":"Evaluating Pre-election Polling Estimates Using a New Measure of Non-ignorable Selection Bias.","authors":"Brady T West, Rebecca R Andridge","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfad018","DOIUrl":"10.1093/poq/nfad018","url":null,"abstract":"Among the numerous explanations that have been offered for recent errors in pre-election polls, selection bias due to non-ignorable partisan nonresponse bias, where the probability of responding to a poll is a function of the candidate preference that a poll is attempting to measure (even after conditioning on other relevant covariates used for weighting adjustments), has received relatively less focus in the academic literature. Under this type of selection mechanism, estimates of candidate preferences based on individual or aggregated polls may be subject to significant bias, even after standard weighting adjustments. Until recently, methods for measuring and adjusting for this type of non-ignorable selection bias have been unavailable. Fortunately, recent developments in the methodological literature have provided political researchers with easy-to-use measures of non-ignorable selection bias. In this study, we apply a new measure that has been developed specifically for estimated proportions to this challenging problem. We analyze data from 18 different pre-election polls: 9 different telephone polls conducted in 8 different states prior to the US presidential election in 2020, and nine different pre-election polls conducted either online or via telephone in Great Britain prior to the 2015 general election. We rigorously evaluate the ability of this new measure to detect and adjust for selection bias in estimates of the proportion of likely voters that will vote for a specific candidate, using official outcomes from each election as benchmarks and alternative data sources for estimating key characteristics of the likely voter populations in each context.","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":"87 Suppl 1","pages":"575-601"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496568/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10252236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Lewis A. Friedland, Dhavan V. Shah, Michael W. Wagner, Katherine J. Cramer, Chris Wells, and Jon Pevehouse. Battleground: Asymmetric Communication Ecologies and the Erosion of Civil Society in Wisconsin Lewis A.Friedland、Dhavan V.Shah、Michael W.Wagner、Katherine J.Cramer、Chris Wells和Jon Pevehouse。战场：不对称的传播生态与威斯康星州公民社会的侵蚀

IF 3.4 1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-05-27 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad022

B. K. Munis

引用次数: 4

Thomas R. Marshall. American Public Opinion and the Supreme Court, 1930–2020: A Representative Institution 托马斯·r·马歇尔。美国公众舆论与最高法院，1930-2020:一个代表性机构

IF 3.4 1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad024

Christopher D. Kromphardt

引用次数: 0

Manuscript Referees, 2022 《手稿参考》，2022

IF 3.4 1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad021

引用次数: 0

M. V. Hood III and Seth C. McKee. Rural Republican Realignment in the Modern South: The Untold Story M.V.胡德三世和赛斯C.麦基。现代南方乡村共和党重组：不为人知的故事

IF 3.4 1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad023

Zoe Nemerever

引用次数: 0

The Effects of Polarized Evaluations on Political Participation: Does Hating the Other Side Motivate Voters? 两极化评价对政治参与的影响:憎恨对方是否能激励选民?

IF 3.4 1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-05-12 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad012

Chloe Ahn, Diana C. Mutz

引用次数: 0

What They Have but Also Who They Are: Avarice, Elitism, and Public Support for Taxing the Rich 他们有什么，但也有他们是谁：贪婪、精英主义和公众对富人征税的支持

IF 3.4 1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-05-10 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad016

John V. Kane, Benjamin J. Newman

{"title":"What They Have but Also Who They Are: Avarice, Elitism, and Public Support for Taxing the Rich","authors":"John V. Kane, Benjamin J. Newman","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfad016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad016","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Scholarship evaluating public support for redistribution has emphasized that stereotypical perceptions of low-income people inform citizens’ willingness to redistribute wealth to the poor. Less understood, however, is the extent to which stereotypical perceptions of high-income people lead to greater willingness to raise taxes on high-income individuals. These perceptions likely involve resource-based considerations (i.e., what rich people have). However, following recent scholarship, perceptions of the wealthy may also involve more fundamental, trait-based considerations (i.e., who the rich are as people). In this Research Note, we isolate causal effects, utilizing conjoint experiments, of both resource-based and character-based attributes of the rich on support for taxing wealthy people. We find evidence that two character traits—avarice and elitism—significantly increase support for raising taxes on wealthy individuals, and this pattern appears to be the case even among groups generally opposed to redistribution (e.g., Republicans and conservatives). We conclude that, while resource-based considerations remain important, the scholarly literature on redistribution may also benefit from a deeper understanding of the trait-based foundations of public attitudes toward taxing the wealthy.","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45390479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Trends in Abortion Attitudes: From Roe to Dobbs 堕胎态度的趋势:从罗伊到多布斯

IF 3.4 1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-05-10 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad014

B. Norrander, C. Wilcox

引用次数: 1