Anne Sophie Dietrich , Valeria Carini , Giulia Vico , Riccardo Bommarco , Helena Hansson
{"title":"Changing the understanding of crop production: Integrating ecosystem services into the production function","authors":"Anne Sophie Dietrich , Valeria Carini , Giulia Vico , Riccardo Bommarco , Helena Hansson","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108526","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108526","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecosystem services, such as weed and pest regulation provided by biodiversity, are vital for sustainable crop production. However, the economic contributions of biodiversity are often overlooked in commercial markets due to the absence of market prices. This complicates quantification and comparison with physical capital, leading to poor economic decisions. To improve the economic understanding of crop production, we combine economic and ecological analyses and develop a structural production economic model that accounts for ecosystem services' contributions to crop yields. Our structural crop production function integrates both anthropogenic inputs and ecosystem services, quantifying production possibilities along a spectrum from input-intensive to ecosystem service-based management practices. The model explicitly depicts resource allocation decisions across labour, physical capital, and intermediate inputs. To mitigate and reverse biodiversity stressors in intensive agriculture, alternative management practices that maintain productivity while reducing reliance on polluting inputs are essential. We review and recommend economic and ecological indicators, ranging from ideal measurements to available proxies, for model estimation, addressing the trade-offs between accuracy, feasibility, and data collection costs. Our analysis emphasises the need for comprehensive information to operationalise the understanding of productivity and substitutability between ecosystem services and biodiversity-adverse inputs such as agrochemicals and energy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 108526"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143031442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The environment–economic growth trade-off: does support for environmental protection depend on its economic consequences?","authors":"Andrew McNeil, Lucy Barnes","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108522","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108522","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Belief in a trade-off between economic growth and environmental protection is an important feature of the politics of environmental policy. Yet the prevalence and consequences – for policy positions – of this belief are only indirectly examined in dominant treatments of public attitudes. We investigate belief in the existence of the trade-off directly. Those who believe more strongly in the trade-off express more moderate policy views. However, increasing belief in the existence of the trade-off via experimental manipulation yields null effects on policy positions. Appealing to the trade-off to justify prioritising growth may not provide a logical defense in the eyes of the public.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 108522"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143031445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Motivational levers for the preservation of an intergenerational common resource: An experiment","authors":"Ivan Ajdukovic , Eli Spiegelman , Angela Sutan","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108523","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108523","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Preserving natural resources for future generations lies at the heart of sustainable development practices, and is yet difficult to motivate for a self-interested present. We propose a laboratory experiment investigating collective motivations for resource conservation in intergenerational CPRs. We apply three behavioral levers. First, we generate intertemporal communities composed of members distributed across cohorts (V-Links). Second, we introduce a tax on overextraction that does not change material incentives but signals conditional cooperation intentions. Finally, we implement a savings technology that improves the resource's resilience to future extractive shocks. We draw on the philosophical literature of collective motivations, connecting extractors to social constructs larger than themselves. Empirically, we find that each lever succeeds in improving coordination in the CPR game. This is useful because it implies that intertemporal links can be replaced by direct conditional cooperation connections with the current generation or by the salience of the resource itself, both of which might be easier to establish. We also find that in the presence of the intertemporal link, the other levers are not necessary, which suggests, for policy, that targeting one lever might be more effective than trying to activate several.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 108523"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143031444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Why degrowth should be disentangled from the wellbeing economy","authors":"Hubert Buch-Hansen","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108532","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108532","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent times, degrowth has in various ways been linked to the notion of a wellbeing economy. The extent to which the two are compatible has however not been subject to much discussion. The present contribution contrasts the wellbeing economy and degrowth, finding that they differ markedly in their stances on economic growth, capitalism and the political. As regards economic growth and capitalism, the wellbeing economy discourse is characterised by deep ambivalence in that its proponents hold conflicting views or abstain from taking a clear position. Against this background, I make a case for disentangling degrowth from the wellbeing economy, to avoid severe confusion as to what degrowth stands for.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 108532"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143031443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reducing red-soil runoff from farmland provides heterogeneous economic benefits through coastal ecosystems","authors":"Kota Mameno , Takahiro Kubo , Takahiro Tsuge , Hiroya Yamano","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108527","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108527","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reducing red-soil runoff from farmland to the aquatic environment is beneficial in terms of increased coastal ecosystem services. However, the benefits of countermeasures on farmland to coastal ecosystem conservation remain unclear, thus hampering effective agricultural pollution management. To address this, we quantified the economic value of the countermeasures on farmland for coastal ecosystem conservation by using a choice experiment. We also analysed the heterogeneity of the value on the basis of the type of conserved coastal ecosystem service: fishery resources, biodiversity, recreational opportunity, and aesthetic landscape. We found that the value of a 1 % point reduction in red-soil runoff depended on the conservation-targeted coastal ecosystem services and the areas where the measures were implemented. Thus, the reduction rate of red-soil runoff influenced the prioritization of countermeasure targets and locations. In particular, the conservation of coastal biodiversity by reducing red-soil runoff was more appreciated than that of fishery resources when the soil runoff reduction rate exceeded 10 %. Similarly, a runoff reduction program in national parks can provide more social benefits than that in non-protected areas when the reduction rate exceeds 30 %. Our findings highlight the importance of considering land–sea interactions during policy development and message-framing in enhancing public support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 108527"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143031447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Carbon rotation ages and the offset measurement conundrum: An extended review","authors":"G. Cornelis van Kooten","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108530","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108530","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Faustmann-Hartman rotation age literature focuses on the commercial and amenity values of timber. Amenity values are a direct function of the volume on the stand at any time (Hartman) and/or the change in volume (carbon values). The rotation-age is extended to include concern that warming levels are a function of cumulative emissions, and, depending on timeframes, whether temporary storage in post-harvest wood product (PHWP) sinks influence the climate once re-emissions are considered. When carbon fluxes occur and how they are valued is important! If carbon values are discounted at the social rate of time preference, cumulative emissions are considered less important than they ought to be. The tension between the social rate of time preference and a rate used to discount the value of future carbon fluxes affects the optimal rotation age calculation. It creates a divergence between the socially and privately optimal rotation ages that is not accounted for by monetary discount rates or a carbon price, even though carbon pricing is regarded as the best means of correcting the climate externality. Results also indicate that forests should not be left unharvested for carbon benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 108530"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143031446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nora Baumgartner , Daniel Sloot , Anne Günther , Ulf J.J. Hahnel
{"title":"Development and test of a dual-pathway model of personal and community factors driving new energy technology adoption - The case of V2G in three European countries","authors":"Nora Baumgartner , Daniel Sloot , Anne Günther , Ulf J.J. Hahnel","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108514","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108514","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the drivers that underpin the adoption of new energy technologies is key to fostering a successful energy transition. Increasingly, studies focus on non-economic factors but are often limited to personal motivations such as ecological values. While there is increasing recognition that community factors can be key for behavioral change, the role of these factors with regard to energy technology acceptance is so far not well understood. To address this gap, we propose a new theoretical model to explain adoption interest of innovative energy technologies, such as vehicle-to-grid technology. Our model comprises two levels and suggests that both a personal-motivation route and a community-motivation route can uniquely explain adoption interest. We further propose an interplay between personal and community factors. We test this model through an empirical study based on representative samples from three European countries (Germany, France, Switzerland, total <em>N</em> = 979). Our results support the notion that different motivational routes can drive adoption interest. In particular, we find that initiative membership predicted adoption interest directly and indirectly via personal norm. Finally, we test our model for differences between countries, finding evidence that community factors might differentially affect adoption interest across national contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 108514"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143031448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From pastures to plates: The thorny path to achieving deforestation-free cattle from Brazil to European consumers","authors":"Matías Vaccarezza Sevilla , Gino Pedreira Lucchese , Torsten Krause , Gisele Garcia Alarcon","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108524","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108524","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The EU regulation on Deforestation-Free Products (EUDR) enacted in 2023 aims to reduce deforestation connected to commodities imported to the EU, including cattle products. In Brazil, the EUDR pressures the local cattle supply chain towards more sustainable production. However, the potential effects of the EUDR on reducing deforestation in this sector are unclear and require scrutiny. Drawing on the concept of Telecoupling, we investigate the challenges and potential impacts of implementing the EUDR in the Brazilian cattle supply chain. We interviewed 19 Brazilian stakeholders representing the private sector, NGOs, investigative journals, banks, and governmental institutions through semi-structured questionnaires complemented with secondary data analysis. Our findings reveal the extent to which historical challenges, such as the lack of law enforcement and low productivity persist, and the possible spillover effects, including market and production leakages. Additionally, the study shows how the EUDR may lead to potential negative impacts for small-scale ranchers. We highlight the need to implement a transparent and integrated public birth-to-slaughter traceability system for cattle in Brazil to guarantee the EUDR's effectiveness. If European and Brazilian governments, cattle producers, and meatpacking companies are not able to address these issues, EUDR's objective to reduce deforestation will be difficult to achieve.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 108524"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142989202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Decoupling economic growth from energy use: The role of energy intensity in an endogenous growth model","authors":"Tobias Bergmann , Matthias Kalkuhl","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108519","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108519","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We develop a theory of endogenous economic growth with explicit consideration of energy in the production process. Following basic thermodynamic considerations, energy is modeled as a (perfect) complement to machines. Long-run economic growth is driven by expanding product varieties. While energy flows on Earth are currently abundant, extrapolation of past consumption trends suggests that energy supply might be a binding constraint in a few centuries to millennia. We show that constant economic growth with bounded energy use is possible if the energy intensity of newly developed products declines at a constant, positive, and arbitrarily small rate. Hence, aggregate decoupling is possible even when no decoupling at the product level is possible. Aggregate decoupling is, however, not possible if there exists a strictly positive lower bound for the energy intensity of newly invented products. We further show that increasing energy prices decrease growth rates by reducing the incentive to innovate. Our results suggest that the energy intensity of structural change is decisive for future growth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 108519"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142989204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Enrico A.R. D’Ecclesiis , Eugenio Levi , Fabrizio Patriarca
{"title":"Exploring the multifaceted relationship between environmental attitudes and political voting","authors":"Enrico A.R. D’Ecclesiis , Eugenio Levi , Fabrizio Patriarca","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108518","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108518","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the intricate connection between various individual attitudes toward the environment and support for environmental political parties is essential. In this study, we use the 2016 climate change module from the European Social Survey, employing a wide range of individual features and a machine learning approach to explore this complex relationship. Our analysis reveals a decoupling between personal and political dimensions of pro-environmental attitudes. While pro-environmental sensitivity and climate change awareness primarily identify individuals engaged in ecologically-conscious personal behavior, they do not necessarily indicate support for eco-friendly policies. Furthermore, while sensitivity and engagement are associated with increased civic participation and less support for populist political parties, increased support for pro-environmental parties is primarily linked to policy support for eco-friendly initiatives. These findings emphasize the need for comprehensive strategies to garner support for environmental policies in both personal and political realms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 108518"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142989205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}