Anne Sophie Dietrich, Valeria Carini, Giulia Vico, Riccardo Bommarco, Helena Hansson
{"title":"Changing the understanding of crop production: Integrating ecosystem services into the production function","authors":"Anne Sophie Dietrich, Valeria Carini, Giulia Vico, Riccardo Bommarco, Helena Hansson","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ecosystem services, such as weed and pest regulation provided by biodiversity, are vital for sustainable crop production. However, the economic contributions of biodiversity are often overlooked in commercial markets due to the absence of market prices. This complicates quantification and comparison with physical capital, leading to poor economic decisions. To improve the economic understanding of crop production, we combine economic and ecological analyses and develop a structural production economic model that accounts for ecosystem services' contributions to crop yields. Our structural crop production function integrates both anthropogenic inputs and ecosystem services, quantifying production possibilities along a spectrum from input-intensive to ecosystem service-based management practices. The model explicitly depicts resource allocation decisions across labour, physical capital, and intermediate inputs. To mitigate and reverse biodiversity stressors in intensive agriculture, alternative management practices that maintain productivity while reducing reliance on polluting inputs are essential. We review and recommend economic and ecological indicators, ranging from ideal measurements to available proxies, for model estimation, addressing the trade-offs between accuracy, feasibility, and data collection costs. Our analysis emphasises the need for comprehensive information to operationalise the understanding of productivity and substitutability between ecosystem services and biodiversity-adverse inputs such as agrochemicals and energy.","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ecosystem services, such as weed and pest regulation provided by biodiversity, are vital for sustainable crop production. However, the economic contributions of biodiversity are often overlooked in commercial markets due to the absence of market prices. This complicates quantification and comparison with physical capital, leading to poor economic decisions. To improve the economic understanding of crop production, we combine economic and ecological analyses and develop a structural production economic model that accounts for ecosystem services' contributions to crop yields. Our structural crop production function integrates both anthropogenic inputs and ecosystem services, quantifying production possibilities along a spectrum from input-intensive to ecosystem service-based management practices. The model explicitly depicts resource allocation decisions across labour, physical capital, and intermediate inputs. To mitigate and reverse biodiversity stressors in intensive agriculture, alternative management practices that maintain productivity while reducing reliance on polluting inputs are essential. We review and recommend economic and ecological indicators, ranging from ideal measurements to available proxies, for model estimation, addressing the trade-offs between accuracy, feasibility, and data collection costs. Our analysis emphasises the need for comprehensive information to operationalise the understanding of productivity and substitutability between ecosystem services and biodiversity-adverse inputs such as agrochemicals and energy.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership.
Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.