{"title":"Salience and information avoidance in voluntary carbon offsetting decisions: Evidence from online experiments","authors":"Nicola Campigotto, Chiara Gioia, Matteo Ploner","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108577","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108577","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the behavioural drivers of voluntary carbon offsets, which allow individuals to reduce their emissions by funding environmental and energy projects. Despite the growth of the voluntary carbon market, the factors influencing these decisions remain under-researched. This study uses two incentivized online experiments to examine the role of information salience and information avoidance as determinants of offsetting behaviour. The results indicate that: (i) when carbon emissions are more saliently linked to consumption activities, contributions to offset programmes increase; (ii) individuals with a lower pro-environmental orientation tend to avoid information about their emissions, leading to lower contributions; and (iii) deliberate avoidance or pursuit of information can either reduce or increase contributions, respectively, compared to scenarios where information is either unavailable or provided by default.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 108577"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143645026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Public support for climate policies and its ideological predictors across countries of the Global North and Global South","authors":"Christian Bretter , Felix Schulz","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108603","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108603","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our understanding of public support for climate policies predominantly stems from studies in the Global North and a focus on isolated policy types. Here, we examine how public support for four different climate policy types and the effect of ideological explanatory variables on such support vary among countries of the Global North and Global South. We surveyed representative samples of each three Global Northern countries (Germany, UK, USA) and Global Southern countries (Brazil, China and South Africa) – among those the highest emitters on their respective continents, contributing to 49.3 % of global carbon emissions – resulting in a total sample of N = 11,964 individuals. While we found significant variations among countries, our results showed that public support across all policy types was stronger in the three Global Southern countries, compared to that of the three Global Northern countries. We also found that a positive association of trust in public institutions and a negative association of individualistic worldviews with policy support were stronger in Global Northern countries, compared to Global Southern countries, regardless of policy type. These findings suggest that ideologies play a more important role for policy support in the Global Northern countries, compared to the Global Southern countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 108603"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143642194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Carbon taxes in Europe do not hurt the poor: Evidence from existing taxation schemes","authors":"Michal Brzezinski, Monika Kaczan","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108585","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108585","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the distributional impacts of carbon taxes, traditionally examined through simulation studies on the regressivity of hypothetical tax scenarios. However, the dynamic influence of actually implemented carbon taxes on consumption/income poverty and inequality in a cross-country setting has been less scrutinised. This paper assesses the effect of carbon taxes introduced in the past three decades in 15 European countries on consumption shares of the lowest decile groups, poverty rates and inequality indices. The analysis shows that a $40/ton CO2 tax covering 30 % of emissions leads to a consumption share increase of up to 4 % for the bottom 20 % and 40 % of the population, a trend that persisted for five years post-implementation, particularly in nations that efficiently redistribute carbon tax revenues. This resulted in a modest reduction in consumption inequality over three years. In contrast, the impact of carbon taxes on income poverty and inequality is not statistically significant. These findings suggest that concerns about poverty and inequality due to carbon taxes can be mitigated by implementing a moderate tax combined with a strategically efficient revenue redistribution mechanism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 108585"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143642193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jonathan Cognard , Lucas Berard-Chenu , Yves Schaeffer , Hugues François
{"title":"Snowmaking's slippery slope: The effect of mountain reservoirs on water demand","authors":"Jonathan Cognard , Lucas Berard-Chenu , Yves Schaeffer , Hugues François","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108586","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108586","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Snowmaking is the primary adaptation of winter tourism to climate change and requires increased water use in winter. However, water withdrawals during this period coincide with the mountain low-flow period, which can potentially cause conflicts with other human uses and ecosystems. To address concerns about water availability, the number of reservoirs is increasing. Ski lift operators promote these reservoirs as environmentally beneficial under their ‘ecological engagement’ commitments, arguing that they reduce the impact of snowmaking by shifting some water withdrawals to periods outside the low-flow season. In theory, mountain reservoirs should therefore support both economic activity and environmental sustainability. Using econometric analysis of data from 35 ski resorts across nine seasons, we show that reservoirs significantly increase water withdrawals during the low-flow period. By employing maximum likelihood estimation of fixed-effects dynamic panel data models, we find that a 1 % increase in reservoir capacity leads to a 0.28 % short-term increase in low-flow withdrawals (0.4 % in the long term), ceteris paribus. These findings inform ongoing discussions to ensure that current socio-economic decisions do not lead to future water use conflicts in mountain socio-ecological systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 108586"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143620331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Over-capitalization in fisheries with irreversible investment and factor substitution","authors":"Kira Lancker","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108584","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108584","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A major problem for common pool resource regulation, such as fisheries management, is over-capitalization following investment irreversibility. Understanding theoretical implications of capital as an irreversible investment input better could help to avoid over-capitalization. This article analyzes the case where irreversibly invested capital can be substituted by flexibly adaptable inputs such as labor and fuel in a CES production function. Using Hamiltonian derivation and numerical simulation, I compare investment under open access and under a social planner case across different levels of factor substitutability. For reasonably large ranges of parameter values, initial over-capitalization is stronger for weaker substitution possibilities. This is caused by differential open access investment incentives, in particular due to faster initial reduction in biomass. Despite lower initial over-capitalization, better substitution possibilities may lead to a lower minimum biomass during transition, threatening biological sustainability. Policy-makers therefore should be aware of these twofold impacts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 108584"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143620334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brice Kamguia , Sosson Tadadjeu , Hermann Ndoya , Ronald Djeunankan
{"title":"Assessing the nexus between industrialization and inclusive green growth in Africa. The critical role of energy efficiency","authors":"Brice Kamguia , Sosson Tadadjeu , Hermann Ndoya , Ronald Djeunankan","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108601","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108601","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The literature on the effects of industrialization shows that it boosts productivity, creates jobs, enhances workforce skills, and contributes to social stability. However, its effects on inclusive green growth are quite rare in the literature. This study endeavors to fill this research gap by proposing one of the first empirical analyses, linking industrialization and inclusive green growth in a sample of 42 African countries over the period 2000–2020. This study also examines whether energy efficiency can generate a positive synergy with industrialization to foster inclusive green growth in Africa. To this end, we develop an innovative assessment framework to measure Africa's inclusive green growth, covering three dimensions: economic, social, and ecological sustainability. Empirical analysis shows that industrialization reduces inclusive green growth. In addition, energy efficiency has a positive effect on inclusive green growth. Interestingly, energy efficiency mitigates the negative effect of industrialization on inclusive green growth. Based on these results, some economic policy implications are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 108601"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143609373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Mitigating climate vulnerability: the crop diversification effect","authors":"Marin Ferry , Jeanne de Montalembert","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108568","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108568","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Can adaptation strategies mitigate the impact of drought episodes on household food insecurity? Using longitudinal data on Malagasy rural households from 2011 to 2014 and a two-way fixed-effects model with an instrumental variable method to address endogeneity issues, this study demonstrates that crop diversification significantly reduces household food insecurity and provides mitigating benefits. Specifically, adding one additional crop reduces perceived food insecurity by 6%–8% and shortens the lean season by 20%–22% on average. Moreover, diversification helps alleviate the adverse effects of drought episodes, with cultivating 6 to 9 crops—particularly fruits and cereals—proving most effective. However, the effectiveness of diversification diminishes under severe drought conditions and varies across crop types.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 108568"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143609372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Biases and nudges in the circular economy: A review","authors":"Luca Congiu , Enrico Botta , Mariangela Zoli","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108579","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108579","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The circular economy transition requires consumers to make efforts in their waste disposal behaviors by increasing waste sorting, repairing and reusing products, and reducing the amount of waste produced. The literature has identified several barriers to consumers’ adoption of these practices. In this article, we posit that such barriers can be ultimately linked to well-known decisional biases and proceed to offer a review. In doing so, we categorize biases into “cognitive”, referring to deviations from judgment and behavior that would be “correct” according to the rules of logic and mathematics, and “motivational”, encompassing judgment and behavior driven by desirability concerns. We also survey the existing behavioral policies addressing the identified biases, focusing on “nudges”, that is, interventions leveraging biases to improve welfare. In our review, we call attention to the importance of recognizing the relevant bias behind specific behaviors to identify the best interventions to implement. By offering a conceptual link between biases and circular economy practices, we also lay the groundwork for future experimental investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 108579"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143591911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Terese E. Venus , Oreoluwa Ola , Maria Alp , Nico Bätz , Maria Dolores Bejarano , Isabel Boavida , Maria Cristina Bruno , Roser Casas-Mulet , Mauro Carolli , Gabriele Chiogna , Marie-Pierre Gosselin , Jo H. Halleraker , Markus Noack , Diego Tonolla , Davide Vanzo , Daniel S. Hayes
{"title":"The power of hydropeaking: Trade-offs between flexible hydropower and river ecosystem services in Europe","authors":"Terese E. Venus , Oreoluwa Ola , Maria Alp , Nico Bätz , Maria Dolores Bejarano , Isabel Boavida , Maria Cristina Bruno , Roser Casas-Mulet , Mauro Carolli , Gabriele Chiogna , Marie-Pierre Gosselin , Jo H. Halleraker , Markus Noack , Diego Tonolla , Davide Vanzo , Daniel S. Hayes","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108583","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108583","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The operational practice of “hydropeaking” allows hydropower plants to cover peaks and deficits in energy demand, but it also impacts river ecosystems. The assessment of hydropeaking impacts plays an important role in safeguarding ecosystem services, but is challenging due to the relative importance of impacts at different sites. To compare impacts in hydropeaking rivers, we elicit expert judgment on the relative impacts of hydropeaking on river ecosystem services. Using the best-worst scaling (BWS) method, we compare the impact on the three categories of river ecosystem services (provisioning, regulating and cultural). Our respondents include 98 hydropower experts. Our analysis accounted for individual heterogeneity to assess how perceptions vary across regions, attitudes and representative river characteristics. We find trade-offs between provisioning and regulating services at the regional and local levels, which represents a key issue in dealing with climate change and ecosystem degradation. The best-affected services were water for power generation, raw materials, water for industrial activities and water for irrigation. The worst-affected services were fisheries and aquaculture, maintenance of population and habitat, and wild animals. Our results have implications for the safeguarding of river ecosystem services and the design of regulatory and incentive schemes for mitigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 108583"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143591909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hui Wang , Shasha Yu , Yafei Yang , Meiyue Wang , Peng Zhou
{"title":"Assessing carbon emissions along global supply chains from technology perspective: A network production decomposition analysis","authors":"Hui Wang , Shasha Yu , Yafei Yang , Meiyue Wang , Peng Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108582","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108582","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global supply chains (GSCs) have boosted economic development while reshaping CO<sub>2</sub> emissions patterns worldwide. Reducing emissions along GSCs is important to business operation and climate governance. As the productive and emission performances of production entities are largely determined by technology, assessing GSC emissions from a technology perspective is fundamental to GSC emissions management. However, a challenge is to properly model the role of technology in entities' emissions in a production network context. We propose a network production decomposition analysis (PDA) approach to resolve this problem. The model portrays organizational structure between entities along supply chains, the technical performance of which are further characterized. The network PDA model is therefore able to examine both the technological and structural impacts on GSC emissions in a unified framework. We apply the model to study GSC emissions for manufacturing and service industries in 2000–2020. It is found that the emission efficiency deterioration in GSCs and the shift of GSCs towards global south evidently raised CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Meanwhile, environmental technological improvements in GSCs of technology-intensive manufacturing and high-skilled services of global north and emerging economies contributed substantially to emissions mitigation. The results offer insights into formulating targeted measures to reduce emissions along GSCs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 108582"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143591910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}