Development and test of a dual-pathway model of personal and community factors driving new energy technology adoption - The case of V2G in three European countries
Nora Baumgartner , Daniel Sloot , Anne Günther , Ulf J.J. Hahnel
{"title":"Development and test of a dual-pathway model of personal and community factors driving new energy technology adoption - The case of V2G in three European countries","authors":"Nora Baumgartner , Daniel Sloot , Anne Günther , Ulf J.J. Hahnel","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the drivers that underpin the adoption of new energy technologies is key to fostering a successful energy transition. Increasingly, studies focus on non-economic factors but are often limited to personal motivations such as ecological values. While there is increasing recognition that community factors can be key for behavioral change, the role of these factors with regard to energy technology acceptance is so far not well understood. To address this gap, we propose a new theoretical model to explain adoption interest of innovative energy technologies, such as vehicle-to-grid technology. Our model comprises two levels and suggests that both a personal-motivation route and a community-motivation route can uniquely explain adoption interest. We further propose an interplay between personal and community factors. We test this model through an empirical study based on representative samples from three European countries (Germany, France, Switzerland, total <em>N</em> = 979). Our results support the notion that different motivational routes can drive adoption interest. In particular, we find that initiative membership predicted adoption interest directly and indirectly via personal norm. Finally, we test our model for differences between countries, finding evidence that community factors might differentially affect adoption interest across national contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 108514"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924004117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding the drivers that underpin the adoption of new energy technologies is key to fostering a successful energy transition. Increasingly, studies focus on non-economic factors but are often limited to personal motivations such as ecological values. While there is increasing recognition that community factors can be key for behavioral change, the role of these factors with regard to energy technology acceptance is so far not well understood. To address this gap, we propose a new theoretical model to explain adoption interest of innovative energy technologies, such as vehicle-to-grid technology. Our model comprises two levels and suggests that both a personal-motivation route and a community-motivation route can uniquely explain adoption interest. We further propose an interplay between personal and community factors. We test this model through an empirical study based on representative samples from three European countries (Germany, France, Switzerland, total N = 979). Our results support the notion that different motivational routes can drive adoption interest. In particular, we find that initiative membership predicted adoption interest directly and indirectly via personal norm. Finally, we test our model for differences between countries, finding evidence that community factors might differentially affect adoption interest across national contexts.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership.
Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.