Elena Krasovskaia, Jie Li, Miguel I. Gómez, Charles F. Nicholson, Christine M. Sauer
{"title":"Consumer Evaluation of Organic, Local, and Controlled-Environment Grown Lettuce: Evidence From an Experimental Auction in Two Study Sites","authors":"Elena Krasovskaia, Jie Li, Miguel I. Gómez, Charles F. Nicholson, Christine M. Sauer","doi":"10.1111/agec.70077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70077","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, controlled-environment agriculture (CEA) has been expanding rapidly in the United States. Whereas estimates of production costs and environmental performance of CEA production systems exist in the literature, information on consumer valuation of CEA-grown produce is limited. This paper examines consumer willingness to pay (WTP) for CEA-grown green leaf lettuce and lettuce with other attributes (local and organic), as well as the impact of the environmental performance information of these products on consumer WTP. We conducted an experimental laboratory auction in two study sites and found that consumers are largely indifferent between CEA-grown and field-grown lettuce but are willing to pay a price premium for local and organic lettuce. Our results on the effect of environmental performance information indicate that this information significantly influences consumer WTP for all evaluated lettuce, albeit in different directions. The environmental performance information increases consumer WTP for lettuce produced locally and decreases WTP for CEA-grown and organic lettuce. These findings provide important insights for policymakers and marketers and allow us to make inferences about consumer knowledge and awareness about CEA-grown, local and organic produce.</p>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/agec.70077","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Decentralization and Spatial (Mis-)Allocation of Irrigation Water","authors":"Sabyasachi Das, Souvik Dutta","doi":"10.1111/agec.70074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70074","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This paper examines the consequences of decentralization in the management of canal irrigation for spatial allocation of water and agricultural performance. Under centralized management, farmers closer to the canal tend to over-extract water, resulting in spatial misallocation. We test whether decentralization can improve spatial allocation of water by exploiting the differential timing of the constitution of locally elected canal management bodies (“Pani Panchayats”) in the state of Orissa, India, that decentralized its canal management. Using survey data and a heterogeneous treatment effect estimation strategy using farmer level fixed effects, we show that farming plots farther away from the canal received less water under centralized system, but longer exposure to decentralization significantly reduces spatial misallocation. Consequently, agricultural revenue and wealth (landholding) improve more for those farmers. The effect of decentralization is more pronounced in areas with high land inequality and lower in areas where plots are similarly sized across distance from canal. We find suggestive evidence that distant farmers’ ability to complain to local representatives is an important mechanism explaining our results.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146099428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Integrating Soil Natural Capital Into Production Frontiers of Ecosystem Services in Agriculture","authors":"Toho Hien, Serge Garcia, Christophe Schwartz","doi":"10.1111/agec.70076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70076","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Natural capital is a key element in the provision of soil ecosystem services (ES). However, most economic analyses of production lack an explicit integration of natural capital and its components. We develop a novel empirical approach that integrates soil natural capital into a multi-output production model using a distance function framework. By treating natural capital as a latent variable derived from biophysical soil indicators, we bridge the gap between stock-based and service-based approaches to ecosystem valuation, providing joint estimates of technical efficiency and ES provision in agriculture. Our empirical application uses data from a sample of farmers and detailed soil observations collected by the Observatoire Pérenne de l'Environnement (ANDRA, Grand-Est Region, France). We focus on two key ES provided by agricultural soils: biomass provision and climate regulation. Estimation results show that soil natural capital is a highly significant input in the distance function, and that omitting it leads to an underestimation of technical efficiency. We also find evidence of a trade-off between biomass production and climate regulation services.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146099425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Farmers’ Risk and Ambiguity Preferences and Fertilizer Use Behaviors: Experimental Evidence From Taihu Basin in China","authors":"Weiwen Zhang, Yingyi Jin, Bin Xu","doi":"10.1111/agec.70063","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70063","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Uncertainty in agricultural production often leads to excessive fertilizer use, a major contributor to agricultural non-point source pollution. This paper studies how farmers’ risk and ambiguity preferences impact their fertilizer use behaviors. We conduct the analysis based on a lab-in-the-field experiment in Taihu, China. The experiment results show that farmers are, on average, risk averse in the gain domain and risk seeking in the loss domain, while being ambiguity seeking in gains and ambiguity averse in losses. They tend to exhibit higher probability distortions—overweighting small probabilities and underweighting large probabilities—in ambiguous contexts. We find that ambiguity aversion has a stronger influence on chemical fertilizer use than risk aversion. Moreover, farmers who are reluctant to use organic fertilizers tend to underestimate the probability of potential benefits. Our results suggest that improving farmers’ cognitive ability could potentially reduce chemical fertilizer use, while increasing household income and expanding cropland size may facilitate the adoption of organic fertilizers.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146096635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Free From the Kitchen Fueled by Clean Energy: Women's Employment and Nutritional Benefits in Rural China","authors":"Hao Feng, Zhen Yan, H. Holly Wang","doi":"10.1111/agec.70075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70075","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The adoption of clean fuels has been associated with improvements in health and women's empowerment. However, the effects on women's labor market participation and family nutrition remain under-investigated. This study examines the impact of adopting clean fuels on rural women's labor market participation and family nutritional status using representative survey data from the China Health and Nutrition Survey. Our findings indicate that households’ use of clean fuels can promote female employment through two pathways as follows: improving health and reducing cooking time, which leads to an increase in their weekly labor supply by 0.9 days and daily working hours by nearly 1 h. Moreover, this gender-specific improvement in employment can more effectively enhance women's role in promoting household nutrition, as indicated by more diverse dietary patterns and higher protein intake. This study highlights a novel perspective that integrates domestic energy transition into broader sustainable development goals, particularly those related to health, nutrition, and gender equality.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dinara Alpysbayeva, Dana Bazarkulova, Kirsten de Beurs, Galiya Sagyndykova
{"title":"Impact of Climate Change on Labor Market Dynamics: Evidence From Kazakhstan","authors":"Dinara Alpysbayeva, Dana Bazarkulova, Kirsten de Beurs, Galiya Sagyndykova","doi":"10.1111/agec.70073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70073","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines how drought shocks affect formal employment in Kazakhstan. We combine remote sensing data on drought severity—the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI)—with quarterly firm-level administrative employment records from 2012 to 2022. We leverage a recently developed nonparametric difference-in-differences estimator to address treatment heterogeneity in timing and recurrence, a key challenge in studying climate shocks. Despite theoretical predictions of labor reallocation following agricultural productivity shocks, we find no statistically significant average effect of severe drought (PDSI ≤ −3) on formal agricultural employment. Small, short-lived adjustments in job destruction and reallocation are observed, but these effects are not persistent. We attribute this muted response to institutional factors that decouple climatic shocks from labor demand. Importantly, heterogeneity analysis reveals that employment responses depend more on drought duration than its intensity: Sustained multiperiod droughts lead to stronger employment and reallocation effects than shorter episodes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/agec.70073","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146099447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Weight Loss and Food Spending","authors":"Justin D. Bina, Ujjwol Paudel","doi":"10.1111/agec.70072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70072","url":null,"abstract":"<p>US consumers are increasingly focused on weight management. However, the economic impacts of this on the US food industry are not well understood. Thus, we estimate the effects of weight loss attempts on the consumption of and expenditures on a collection of 35 food groups. We obtain weight loss history and food consumption data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and Purchase to Plate Suite. Attempting weight loss is an endogenous choice and, as such, we use matching methods to reduce confounding. Matched samples and weights are used in lower-limit censored outcome models of food consumption and expenditures. Nationwide weight loss attempts yield increases in daily expenditures on non-citrus fruits, non-starchy vegetables, and tomatoes of $17.8 million. Daily, national expenditures on processed grain products and soft drinks decrease by $18.8 million and $7.3 million, respectively. Food manufacturers and retailers can use these results to develop business strategy and mitigate risks associated with changing consumer behavior related to weight management. These findings can also guide public health and nutrition policies, directly speaking to how the composition of diets changes as consumers attempt weight loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/agec.70072","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146096383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Manuel A. Hernandez, Francisco Ceballos, Maria Lucia Berrospi, Viviana M. E. Perego, Melissa Brown, Elena Mora Lopez
{"title":"Price and Volatility Transmission From International to Domestic Food and Fertilizer Markets in Central America","authors":"Manuel A. Hernandez, Francisco Ceballos, Maria Lucia Berrospi, Viviana M. E. Perego, Melissa Brown, Elena Mora Lopez","doi":"10.1111/agec.70071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70071","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent global shocks have triggered sharp spikes in international food and fertilizer prices, raising concerns about their domestic impacts. This study examines the extent to which international price levels and volatility are transmitted to domestic food and fertilizer markets in seven Central American countries. We follow a multivariate GARCH approach using monthly data over the period 2000–2024. While results vary by country and commodity, we find overall low to moderate elasticities of price transmission in levels, but a stronger degree of volatility transmission in the very short term (1-month). Interestingly, price transmission tends to strengthen after 3 months, whereas volatility transmission is more short-lived and appears to dissipate. The co-movement between international and domestic prices shows no apparent trend over time and lacks consistency across countries and commodities following major global events. Back-of-the-envelope simulations of higher international food and fertilizer prices suggest modest, though non-negligible, impacts on local consumer and producer welfare.</p>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/agec.70071","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146096397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yefan Nian, Zhifeng Gao, Rodolfo M. Nayga Jr, Yuning Zhao, Joanna Van Asselt
{"title":"Trade-Off Between Accuracy and Cognitive Burden: Influence of Stated Attribute Non-Attendance Questions on Participants' Choice Behaviors","authors":"Yefan Nian, Zhifeng Gao, Rodolfo M. Nayga Jr, Yuning Zhao, Joanna Van Asselt","doi":"10.1111/agec.70070","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70070","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Past studies have shown that asking stated attribute non-attendance (ANA) questions at the choice task level can improve the accuracy of revealing participants' ANA information in choice experiments (CEs). However, the impact of such questions on CE participants' underlying choice behaviors in subsequent choice tasks remains underexplored. This study assesses whether and to what extent stated ANA questions within CE choice task sequences introduce learning and fatigue effects by influencing participants' behaviors in CEs, including response time, preference elicitation, choice randomness, and willingness-to-pay (WTP). Using a between-subject design by assigning participants to one of three CEs with different types of stated ANA questions, we found that although choice task level stated ANA questions provided more accurate ANA information, they might lead to participants' longer response time, increased choice randomness, and altered WTP estimates with larger standard deviations, possibly due to increased cognitive burden for participants. Meanwhile, a single randomly placed stated ANA question could also influence CE participants' response time and preferences, but have minimal impact on choice randomness. Therefore, CE practitioners should carefully weigh the enhanced accuracy of ANA behavior measurement against potential disruptions to participants' choice behaviors when including stated ANA questions in CEs.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146193530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Influence of Climatic Changes on Farmers’ Participation in Biodiversity-Enhancing Agri-Environmental-Climate Schemes","authors":"Carina Ober, Fabian Frick, Johannes Sauer","doi":"10.1111/agec.70069","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70069","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biodiversity loss on agricultural land is progressing while European farmers’ participation in agri-environmental-climate schemes (AECS) is limited. Meanwhile, weather extremes are increasingly affecting agricultural production and, thus, land management decisions. Using a discrete choice experiment in Southern Germany, we explore determinants of farmer participation in biodiversity AECS. Management flexibility emerged as a key factor for scheme adoption. Farmers who experience negative impacts from climate change or have pessimistic expectations about future climatic conditions tend to invest less in non-productive AECS if they believe they have effective adaptation practices that support continued crop production. To ensure the transition to sustainable food production in the future, our results highlight the need to design and promote sustainable adaptation strategies to climate change in addition to AECS. Our results also highlight the need to consider different farm types, considering that forage farms seem less reactive to climatic changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/agec.70069","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146096395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}