{"title":"Ambient Ozone and Planting Decision: Evidence From US Crop Acreage","authors":"Ziheng Liu","doi":"10.1111/agec.70029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70029","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study leverages the variation in upwind ozone as an arguably exogenous shock for identification and quantifies the impact of ambient ozone on planted acreage of corn and soybeans. Highlighting the importance of behavioral responses, this study finds that a one-additional ppb of average ambient ozone reduces subsequent plantings of corn and soybean acreage by 1.59%–1.97%. Such ozone-induced acreage shrinkage is partially achieved through acreage shifts to less-ozone-sensitive crops. My prediction results suggest that, when ozone concentrations are projected to fall, the expected rise in corn and soybean production by 2050 would be underestimated by 43.41%–49.72% without considering acreage adjustment.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"56 5","pages":"749-768"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145057769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Misconceptions on Food Date Labels and Consumer Welfare Implications","authors":"Xiaolei Li, Wuyang Hu, Qi Jiang, Jian Li, Ping Qing","doi":"10.1111/agec.70031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70031","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>When multiple food date label phrases are allowed, consumers may misinterpret these labels, causing inefficiency. Using data collected in China, we find considerable consumer misinterpretation even when only one type of food date label is permitted by regulation. Furthermore, consumer preference diverges according to their own interpretation of the label and depending on the type of food. Misinterpretation also leads to consumer welfare loss. Through a value of information (VOI) framework and when misinterpretation is taken into consideration, we show that changing a <i>Sell by</i> label to a <i>Not use if after</i> label generates the largest welfare gain. Our findings advise food manufacturers and policymakers on understanding consumer perspectives of food date labels and creating efficient labeling regulations given consumer misinterpretation.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"56 5","pages":"782-801"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145057915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Agricultural Economics and the Transformation Toward Sustainable Agri-Food Systems","authors":"Matin Qaim, Martin C. Parlasca","doi":"10.1111/agec.70023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70023","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Agri-food systems around the world are facing a sustainability crisis. Addressing the many interconnected issues requires fundamental transformations, moving beyond incremental improvements of various details toward broader and more profound systemic change. In this article, which is also the introduction to the ICAE 2024 Special Issue, we explore the role of our agricultural economics profession in shaping these transformation processes, examining how our discipline contributes to understanding agri-food system dynamics and identifying opportunities to enhance sustainability and resilience. We argue that agricultural economists can and should play a more central role in international agri-food systems research and policy initiatives by integrating multiple sustainability goals and metrics with rigorous economic analysis. Interdisciplinary cooperation with colleagues in agronomy, nutrition, environmental sciences, social and political sciences, and other relevant fields is necessary, as is the further development and use of data-driven approaches. However, equally important is maintaining strong theoretical foundations to develop hypotheses and understand behavioral mechanisms. Close exchange with nonacademic stakeholders at all system levels is key for policy relevance. We also provide an overview of the plenary papers presented at ICAE 2024 on various facets of agri-food system transformation and sustainable development.</p>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"56 3","pages":"327-335"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/agec.70023","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
William A. Masters, Jessica K. Wallingford, Anna W. Herforth, Yan Bai
{"title":"Measuring Food Access as Affordability of Least-Cost Healthy Diets Worldwide","authors":"William A. Masters, Jessica K. Wallingford, Anna W. Herforth, Yan Bai","doi":"10.1111/agec.70028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70028","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since 2020, the World Bank, FAO, and others have measured a population's access to sufficient nutritious food for an active and healthy life using a new metric known as the Cost and Affordability of a Healthy Diets (CoAHD). This new kind of data measures food access using market prices of the least expensive locally available items that would meet nutritional criteria adopted by national governments, as summarized in a Healthy Diet Basket (HDB) level of intake balanced among six complementary food groups: starchy staples, vegetables, fruits, fats and oils, animal source foods, and legumes, nuts and seeds. CoAHD reflects the definition of food security introduced during the World Food Summit of 1996, and complements the earlier measures of global food security notably Prevalence of Undernourishment (PoU) based on total national availability and intake distribution of calories, and the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES) based on survey data asking whether a household ran out of resources to acquire their usual diets. This paper briefly discusses the evolution of global food security measurement, then highlights updates to the methods used to compute CoAHD indicators and presents newly available CoAHD data obtained using this methodology and updated price data.</p>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"56 3","pages":"360-372"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/agec.70028","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Elinor Benami, Anne Carroll, Kent D. Messer, Wei Zhang, Michael Cecil
{"title":"Seeding Change: Growing Insights From Four Programs to Support Climate-Resilient Soil and Water Conservation in US Agriculture","authors":"Elinor Benami, Anne Carroll, Kent D. Messer, Wei Zhang, Michael Cecil","doi":"10.1111/agec.70034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70034","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The United States authorized unprecedented investments in agri-environmental programs in 2022, dedicating over $19 billion to soil and water conservation practices with climate mitigation and adaptation benefits. We examine historical funding patterns, new funding allocations, and evaluation approaches for these programs. Our analysis reveals four key findings: (1) Nearly 40% of prior conservation funding has supported climate-beneficial practices, with increasing shares reflecting growing producer demand; (2) Although enrollment of historically underserved producers (HUPs) has increased, variation across programs and higher contract non-completion rates among this group suggests enhanced pre- and post-enrollment support services could be valuable; (3) A shift toward partnership-style programs facilitate locally-tailored agreements and market linkages, potentially broadening producer participation while enabling more durable incentives for sustained practice adoption; (4) current evaluation approaches primarily focus on implementation metrics paired with biophysical modeling and could be strengthened through rigorous impact evaluation design. Promising techniques include conducting randomized experiments and integrating geospatial data with program records to assess the impacts on producer behavior as well as program outcomes over time and space. Such approaches can build evidence for strategic conservation finance and de-risk future investments for other types of financial services—accelerating transformation toward sustainable agri-food systems in the United States and beyond.</p>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"56 3","pages":"457-473"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/agec.70034","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Climate Resilient Development for Agriculture and Pathways for Gender Inclusivity","authors":"Sonia Akter","doi":"10.1111/agec.70040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70040","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study introduces a new concept and framework called Climate Resilient Development for Agriculture (CRDA) to serve as a roadmap for agricultural transformation in the face of climate change. It also explores how to address gender inequity in agriculture during this transformation process. Unlike Climate Resilient Agriculture (CRA), which focuses solely on adjusting farming practices to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and maintain agricultural production in the face of climate change, CRDA takes a more comprehensive approach by integrating a development perspective. Its goal is to leverage synergies among actions, programs, and policies to achieve climate change mitigation, adaptation, and sustainable development goals while also addressing climate change induced loss and damage in the agriculture sector. The CRDA framework outlines potential pathways leading to either high or low CRDA futures and emphasizes the importance of gender equity in its structure. Additionally, the study highlights the potential for actions under the CRDA framework to either exacerbate or mitigate gender disparities and proposes five key actions that can contribute to a gender-inclusive and climate-resilient future for the agriculture sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"56 3","pages":"446-456"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/agec.70040","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Healthy and Sustainable Diets in China and Their Global Implications","authors":"Yumei Zhang, Jingjing Wang, Shenggen Fan","doi":"10.1111/agec.70020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70020","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Current diets in China and worldwide are neither healthy nor sustainable. This paper addresses this challenge focusing on China, which has experienced a rapid dietary transition in recent decades. We investigate how China can improve both health and environmental outcomes by adopting healthy and sustainable diets through a literature review and a food system modeling exercise. We further analyze how policy interventions, including both supply- and consumer-side strategies, can promote the transition toward such diets. The findings provide valuable lessons for other countries facing comparable challenges.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"56 3","pages":"349-359"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Novel Approaches to Analyze Consumer Behavior and Policies to Promote Sustainable Consumption","authors":"Bhagyashree Katare, Xuejian Wang, Shuoli Zhao, Jacqueline Yenerall","doi":"10.1111/agec.70027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70027","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Technological advancements, such as online grocery shopping, have significantly transformed consumer retail environments and experiences. Effectively studying consumer behavior in these new environments requires the use of novel methodological approaches, which will also aid in developing interventions to encourage sustainable consumption. This paper begins by providing an overview of the current literature on novel approaches to analyzing consumer behavior, then provides an empirical application by examining consumer decision-making pathways within an online grocery shopping platform. Specifically, the paper focuses on exploring the consumers' digital footprints, such as page visits, product additions and removals, and interactions with information labels to identify patterns and interests in consumer responses to healthy and sustainable consumption. Findings highlight the potential benefits of integrating consumer search tracking data with environmental design to facilitate informed and conscious food choices.</p>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"56 3","pages":"512-525"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/agec.70027","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From Bargaining Power to Empowerment: Measuring the Unmeasurable","authors":"Agnes R. Quisumbing","doi":"10.1111/agec.70022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70022","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Measuring power is central to empirical work on intrahousehold and gender relations. This paper reviews how progress in the measurement of power within households has facilitated our understanding of household decision-making and creates new opportunities for programs and policy. Early efforts to test household models focused on measuring spousal bargaining power, usually in models featuring two decision-makers within the household. Proxy measures for bargaining power included age, education, assets, and “outside options” that could affect spouses’ threat points within marriage. Evidence rejecting the collective model of the household has influenced the design of policies and programs, notably conditional cash transfer programs. Efforts have since shifted to measuring empowerment, drawing on theories of agency and power. Since 2010, several measures of women's empowerment have been developed, including the Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI) and its variants. A distinct feature of the WEAI, like other counting-based measures, is its decomposability into its component indicators, which makes identifying sources of disempowerment possible. The WEAI indicators also embody jointness of decision-making or ownership, which better reflects actual decision-making within households compared to 2-person bargaining models. The paper concludes with suggestions for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"56 3","pages":"419-430"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/agec.70022","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Land Inequality, Farm Size, and Productivity: Insights From Peruvian Agriculture","authors":"Hernán Borrero","doi":"10.1111/agec.70036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70036","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This paper investigates the analogous land inequality and farm size-productivity relationships, focusing on agricultural total factor productivity (TFP) rather than partial productivity measures. Using a panel of 268 Peruvian districts over a 5-year period (2015–2019), I implement a system generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation framework, which adapts to the presumed data-generating process and structure of the panel while tackling the critical issue of simultaneity bias. The regression output supports both relationships, with a 0.6% increase in agricultural TFP for every one-percentage point reduction of the land Gini coefficient or a one-hectare decrease in average farm size. Moreover, an assessment of the potential impact of land quality heterogeneity and measurement error reveals that neither issue appears to bias the results. Finally, the role of rural reform is discussed, emphasizing the need to weigh the moral considerations of equal opportunity to land of the land-poor against the legitimate property rights of the land-rich on a case-by-case basis.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"56 5","pages":"839-849"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145057877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}