Journal of Bioethical Inquiry最新文献_第9页

Lead Essay-Ethics in Geopolitical Conflicts: The First Casualty. 导论：地缘政治冲突中的伦理：首当其冲的受害者。

IF 1.8 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-025-10445-4

Paul A Komesaroff, Michael Ashby, Ian Kerridge

引用次数: 0

Retrospective Radiology Research: Do We Need Informed Patient Consent? 回顾性放射学研究：我们需要患者知情同意吗？

IF 1.8 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-19 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-024-10368-6

Yfke Ongena, Thomas C Kwee, Derya Yakar, Marieke Haan

{"title":"Retrospective Radiology Research: Do We Need Informed Patient Consent?","authors":"Yfke Ongena, Thomas C Kwee, Derya Yakar, Marieke Haan","doi":"10.1007/s11673-024-10368-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11673-024-10368-6","url":null,"abstract":"While knowledge of the population's view on the need for informed consent for retrospective radiology research may provide valuable insight into how an optimal balance can be achieved between patient rights versus an expedited advancement of radiology science, this is a topic that has been ignored in the literature so far. To investigate the view of the general population, survey data were collected from 2407 people representative of the Dutch population. The results indicate that for non-commercial institutions, especially hospitals (97.4 per cent), respondents agree with the retrospective use of imaging data, although they generally indicate that their explicit consent is required. However, most respondents (63.5 per cent) would never allow commercial firms to retrospectively use their imaging data. When including only respondents who completed the minimally required reading time of 12.3 s to understand the description about retrospective radiology research given in the survey (n = 770), almost all (98.9 per cent) mentioned to have no objections for their imaging data to be used by hospitals for retrospective research, with 57.9 per cent indicating their consent to be required and 41.0 per cent indicating that explicit patient consent to be unnecessary. We conclude that the general population permits retrospective radiology research by hospitals, and a substantial proportion indicates explicit patient consent to be unnecessary when understanding what retrospective radiology research entails. However, the general population's support for the unrestricted retrospective use of imaging data for research purposes without patient consent decreases for universities not linked to hospitals, other non-commercial institutions, government agencies, and particularly commercial firms.","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":"175-185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222269/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142001201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Notes from the Rock Bottom. 谷底笔记

IF 1.8 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-22 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-024-10353-z

Gila Svirsky

引用次数: 0

Genome Editing Dilemma: Navigating Dual-Use Potential and Charting the Path Forward. 基因组编辑的两难选择：探索双重用途的可能性并规划前进的道路。

IF 1.8 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-24 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-024-10358-8

Ana Ruxandra Badea, Oliver Feeney

{"title":"Genome Editing Dilemma: Navigating Dual-Use Potential and Charting the Path Forward.","authors":"Ana Ruxandra Badea, Oliver Feeney","doi":"10.1007/s11673-024-10358-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11673-024-10358-8","url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary genome editing techniques have made genomic intervention-from microorganism to human-more accessible, easier to use, and more accurate than previous methods. We argue that, notwithstanding its merits in treating and preventing disease in humans, genome editing represents a potential threat for domestic and international security, requiring an integrated approach in regulating, detecting, preventing, and mitigating the risk of its use for malicious purposes. Despite the global regulatory ambitions of the 2021 WHO framework, we see insufficient attention given to the future prospect of dual-use genomic technology. Drawing parallels with the nuclear field, we suggest tentative practical steps for a way forward in dealing with genome editing technologies, such as: 1) adapting national (bio)security and defence strategies to include genome editing as a possible threat (with conceivable WMD potential); 2) enhancing the international dialogue on genome editing and raising the issue at the highest level; 3) working towards a global, legally binding verification mechanism; 4) tracking genome editing technologies.","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":"101-110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222282/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141753270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Ethics that Fails to Regulate War, Ethics that Enhances War. 不能规范战争的道德，增强战争的道德。

IF 1.8 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-09 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-024-10395-3

Alphonso Lingis, Paul Komesaroff

引用次数: 0

Is it Genocide? : Gaza, Ukraine, and Other Crimes Against Humanity. 是种族灭绝吗？：加沙、乌克兰和其他危害人类罪。

IF 1.8 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-024-10411-6

Paul James

引用次数: 0

Organ Markets, Options, and an Over-Inclusiveness Objection: On Rippon's Argument. 器官市场、选择权和过度包容的异议：关于里彭的论点。

IF 1.8 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-29 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-024-10363-x

J Damgaard Thaysen, J Sønderholm

{"title":"Organ Markets, Options, and an Over-Inclusiveness Objection: On Rippon's Argument.","authors":"J Damgaard Thaysen, J Sønderholm","doi":"10.1007/s11673-024-10363-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11673-024-10363-x","url":null,"abstract":"Human organs available for transplant are in short supply. One way to increase the supply of organs consists in legalizing a live donor market. Such a market is, however, controversial. This article is about an objection to live donor organ markets made by Simon Rippon. Rippon's objection is that the presence of a market option creates new social and legal pressures that harm the poor. Legalizing the option of selling your organs transforms into a harmful, and morally indefensible, social, and legal pressure to sell on the financially desperate. This article defends the conclusion that Rippon's argument fails as an objection to live donor organ markets. It fails because it has implausibly expansive implications about which markets are morally problematic. In short, Rippon's argument proves too much. Sections one and two introduce Rippon's argument. Sections three and four contain the argument against Rippon. The main argumentative move is that the features of an organ market that, according to Rippon, justify a ban on such a market are features that also characterize several other markets that are normally considered unproblematic, for example, markets where individuals sell their labour abroad in jobs that are dangerous. So, if an organ market should be legally impermissible, so should these labour markets. Section five considers several objections to the argument against Rippon. It is argued that these objections fail. Section six is a conclusion that sums up the findings of the article.","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":"95-100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222411/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142114352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Proposal for a UN Peace and Development Fund: A Possible Pathway for Political and Ethical Renewal in the Modern World. 联合国和平与发展基金的建议：现代世界政治和伦理复兴的可能途径。

IF 1.8 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-06 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-024-10367-7

Jeffrey D Sachs, Paul Komesaroff

引用次数: 0

Re-imagining and Remembering in Gaza: A Response to Spivak's Humanities Beyond the Disciplines: Imaginative Activism. 加沙的重新想象与记忆：对斯皮瓦克《学科之外的人文科学》的回应：想象的行动主义。

IF 1.5 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-24 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-024-10399-z

Rachel Busbridge

引用次数: 0

Amid Explosions in Gaza, The Silence from the Bioethics Community is Deafening. 在加沙的爆炸声中，生命伦理学界的沉默令人震耳欲聋。

IF 1.8 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-05 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-024-10364-w

Sualeha Shekhani, Aamir Jafarey

{"title":"Amid Explosions in Gaza, The Silence from the Bioethics Community is Deafening.","authors":"Sualeha Shekhani, Aamir Jafarey","doi":"10.1007/s11673-024-10364-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11673-024-10364-w","url":null,"abstract":"Bioethicists, through their writings, have been known to represent the conscience of the times. Speaking up against injustices, they have acted as moral compasses in the past. The events of October 7, 2023 and the resulting armed onslaught of Israeli forces on Gaza has created a huge humanitarian crisis. However, response of the global bioethics community appears muffled. In order to gain an objective insight, we conducted a scoping review of articles published on the current conflict in the top ten bioethics journals, as classified by Google metrics. Broadening this search, we included relevant grey literature and selected medical and global health journals in our review. All types of articles published from the initiation of the conflict to the end of March 2024 were included. Findings from our exercise highlight the paucity of articles published on this crisis. This apparent indifference towards the Gaza crisis can be explained either by reluctance by bioethicists to write on this issue or perhaps due to editorial restraints. We argue that bioethicists, instead of focusing on esoteric issues, have a greater moral responsibility to speak out against injustices in Gaza. Their silence amounts to complicity and erodes the very foundations of the discipline of bioethics.","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":"11-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141248815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0