{"title":"The EHDS Regulation: Health Data at the Crossroads of Patient Autonomy, Data Protection, and Innovation.","authors":"Elisabeth Steindl","doi":"10.1017/jme.2026.10284","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2026.10284","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digitalization and data-driven research are widely recognized as key drivers of innovation in healthcare, with the potential to improve clinical outcomes, accelerate research, and support evidence-based policymaking. Nevertheless, across jurisdictions, obstacles such as fragmented data governance, limited interoperability, and tensions between data protection and data reuse continue to hinder the effective use of health data. The Regulation on the European Health Data Space (Regulation (EU) 2025/327) represents a significant shift in EU health data governance. It seeks to create a single European market for health data by introducing harmonized rules, shared technical standards, and new institutional structures, while simultaneously reinforcing patients' rights, access to their data, and control over its use. This paper aims to provide a clear and systematic account of the Regulation for a broad international and interdisciplinary audience. It situates the legal piece within its broader political and legal context, highlighting the factors that shaped its design and providing a comprehensive analysis of its core concepts. Using the patient opt-out regime as a case study, the paper critically examines the enduring tensions between safeguarding fundamental rights, ensuring patient autonomy, and fostering innovation and economic objectives, all while accommodating national preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":50165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149018704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
James René Jolin, Jenean Docter, Benjamin A Barsky
{"title":"Fifty Years After <i>Estelle v. Gamble</i> - Where Does Carceral Health Law Go from Here?","authors":"James René Jolin, Jenean Docter, Benjamin A Barsky","doi":"10.1017/jme.2026.10273","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2026.10273","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fifty years ago, the US Supreme Court decided <i>Estelle v. Gamble</i> - a landmark case commonly known for establishing a duty on the government to provide health services to incarcerated people, whether before or after conviction. In this column, we offer a brief critical reappraisal of <i>Estelle</i> by reviewing its demanding legal standard and identifying a set of related litigation barriers that stymie the availability of relief in federal court. Given these constraints, we argue for a carceral health law paradigm that moves beyond the current, dominant focus on litigation. We use Medicaid law and policy as a case study to explore the potential and drawbacks of a broader administrative structure for carceral health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148963866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kim Thompson, Ryan Masotti, Kenneth Carter, Deepa Das Acevedo, Gerard Vong, Michael Winkler
{"title":"Restoring Trust in Health Care: Public Scholarship Based Certification of Key Opinion Leaders with Non-Profit Shared Academic-Patient Governance.","authors":"Kim Thompson, Ryan Masotti, Kenneth Carter, Deepa Das Acevedo, Gerard Vong, Michael Winkler","doi":"10.1017/jme.2026.10279","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2026.10279","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Collaboration between physician Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) and the health care industry accelerates the adoption of new therapies, but public awareness of industry payments and research linking such payments to prescribing behaviors has fueled a sharp decline in trust. Meanwhile, for-profit, industry-aligned credentialing programs have begun to define and train KOLs with little public accountability. Without independent alternatives, these models may entrench standards that serve corporate interests over the public good. We review the evolution of the KOL role, from early communication theory to its integration into pharmaceutical marketing and examine the rise of Public Scholarship (PS) as an academic movement grounded in beneficence, transparency, and civic accountability. From this analysis, we propose a Key Opinion Leader Public Scholarship Certification (KOL-PSC) program, governed jointly by academics and patient advocates, to align KOL influence with public interests. The KOL-PSC model includes a skills-based curriculum in ethical science communication, patient engagement, and conflict-of-interest management, culminating in a public-facing capstone project. Governance safeguards will ensure independence from commercial influence while offering industry the reputational benefits of working with certified experts. This voluntary, non-regulatory credential offers a proactive means to restore public trust in physician-industry collaboration, thereby benefitting patients, physicians, academia, and industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":50165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148963860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marlies Hesselman, Benjamin Mason Meier, Judith Bueno De Mesquita, Luciano Bottini Filho, Tsung-Ling Lee, Kriti Sharma, Sam Halabi, Monique van Cauwenberghe, Dominique Mollet, Gian Luca Burci
{"title":"Planetary Health: A Framework for Expanding the Boundaries of Global Health Law.","authors":"Marlies Hesselman, Benjamin Mason Meier, Judith Bueno De Mesquita, Luciano Bottini Filho, Tsung-Ling Lee, Kriti Sharma, Sam Halabi, Monique van Cauwenberghe, Dominique Mollet, Gian Luca Burci","doi":"10.1017/jme.2026.10263","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2026.10263","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines how the emerging framework of \"Planetary Health\" challenges us to reconsider the role and boundaries of global health law, for example by engaging with systems thinking, eco-centric perspectives, Indigenous knowledge, and newly emerging human rights. How does planetary health inspire novel thinking or new approaches around the conceptualization, design, implementation and/or interpretation of global health law and health-related rights, aiming to protect vital ecological foundations or determinants of health?</p>","PeriodicalId":50165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148833613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tom Ashfield, Lucy Victoria Naga, Brett Frischmann, David Jenkins, Adam Dixon, Michael Corley, Saverio Peter Borriello
{"title":"Antimicrobial effectiveness within a new paradigm of infrastructure.","authors":"Tom Ashfield, Lucy Victoria Naga, Brett Frischmann, David Jenkins, Adam Dixon, Michael Corley, Saverio Peter Borriello","doi":"10.1017/jme.2026.10275","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2026.10275","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimicrobials form the backbone of modern medicine and represent a foundational pillar of economic productivity. Overuse and misuse have led to a rising trend of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), depleting the efficacy of existing antimicrobials, necessitating conservation through stewardship and renewal through innovation. Poor global access exacerbates these challenges. We introduce the concept of antimicrobial effectiveness (AME) as a system in which antimicrobials are clinically and microbiologically efficacious against infectious pathogens and accessible for appropriate use. We frame AME as a global economic infrastructure, demonstrating its role as a key input to health, social, and economic outcomes and driver of positive spillovers. We investigate the balance between capacity constraints imposed by AMR and the benefits of maximizing non-discriminatory sharing of AME, exploring how a sustainable management approach comprised of infection prevention, universal access, stewardship, surveillance, and innovation can conserve AME. We explore economic mechanisms such as internalized healthcare overheads and hypothecated taxes to align contributions with benefits, ensuring that patients, hospitals, and businesses who rely on AME help to conserve it. Through identifying social value, patterns of payoffs, and downstream beneficiaries of AME, infrastructure framing provides a coherent axis to structure action, align incentives, and mobilize investment across sectors and scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":50165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148702569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supreme Court Impacts in Public Health Law: 2025-2026.","authors":"James G Hodge, Taylor Brown","doi":"10.1017/jme.2026.10272","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2026.10272","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In an increasingly contemptuous political environment as the nation prepared to celebrate its semisquicentennial on July 4, 2026, the US Supreme Court capped its 2025-2026 term, which included profound decisions on a series of cases raising significant controversies in health law and policy. As per and analyses below, major topics addressed by the Court this term include: (1) the scope and limits of presidential emergency authorities; (2) state debates over LGBTQ+ rights and discrimination in parental and sports-related settings; (3) First Amendment interests juxtaposed against states' rights to regulate medical professionals or require vaccinations; (4) expansion of Second Amendment rights to possess firearms; and (5) state-based product liability and other claims foreclosed via Congress.</p>","PeriodicalId":50165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148671059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Sufficiency of Disclosure in Medical AI Patents: Evidence from 865 Granted Patents Across the US, China, and the EU.","authors":"Ruyi Xiao, Jin Zhang","doi":"10.1017/jme.2026.10256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2026.10256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rise of health care AI raises concerns over whether patent disclosure supports reproducibility and legal validity. This study analyzes 865 granted medical AI patents (2015-2025) from the US, China, and the EU using a five-dimensional framework (algorithm transparency, training data accessibility, model reproducibility, result verifiability, and mathematical support) implemented through NLP-assisted expert scoring. Results suggest limited technical transparency; approximately 40% of patents score zero in at least two dimensions. Performance varies significantly: algorithm transparency is relatively strong (>60% score 2), while training data accessibility is less prevalent (4.6% score 2) and mathematical support is frequently omitted (39.4% score 0). Statistical testing indicates US patents significantly outperform Chinese patents (p < 0.001), while EU results remain exploratory (N = 31, mean 6.2). These patterns appear associated with institutional factors, strategic applicant behaviour, and technical complexity. Such limitations may pose risks to enforceability and market development, highlighting the need for targeted disclosure improvements. This study contributes a replicable framework for translating legal standards into measurable indicators, providing cross-jurisdictional evidence to guide examination, litigation, and policy refinement in medical AI governance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147724173","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Syringe Services Program Legal Restrictions Are Counter to Public Health and the Experience of People Who Use Drugs.","authors":"Amy Lieberman, Corey Davis, Alison Newman","doi":"10.1017/jme.2026.10233","DOIUrl":"10.1017/jme.2026.10233","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug overdose and drug-related harm are major sources of preventable injury and death in the United States. The criminalization and stigmatization of people who use drugs continues to inform law and policy that is ineffective at preventing this harm. While harm reduction interventions such as syringe services programs (SSP) have been widely adopted, the laws that govern these programs often impose restrictions that make SSP operation more difficult and less effective. For example, 23 state permit SSPs to operate only if they receive authorization from state or local government officials, and 5 states continue to adhere to some version of a \"one for one\" exchange model. This article presents data on these and other state laws that impede the work of SSPs. It also highlights ways the experience and expertise of people who use drugs can be integrated into the creation and implementation of SSP operational models. Removing barriers to these life-saving programs is critical to decreasing drug-related harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":50165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","volume":"54 S1","pages":"49-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147693360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"It's Getting Hot Out There: The Need for and Development of Law and Policy Strategies to Reduce Health Risks of Extreme Heat.","authors":"Joanne Pérodin, Betsy Lawton, Caleb Smith","doi":"10.1017/jme.2026.10239","DOIUrl":"10.1017/jme.2026.10239","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The data is clear: Earth's temperature is on the rise, with the 10 most recent years being the hottest on record. Extreme heat is the number one weather-related killer in the United States. Laws and policies to protect individuals from the health hazards of extreme heat exposure are being contemplated across the nation at the federal, state, and local level. This paper aims to address the realities of extreme heat exposure and community needs during extreme heat. First, it will define important terms relevant to heat as used in climate science, occupational health, public health, and other fields. Second, it will describe heat exposure and needed protections for vulnerable populations, such as communities located in urban heat islands, those experiencing direct heat exposure in the workplace and those who lack access to cooling equipment at home. Last, the paper will explore law and policy approaches to address the health impacts of extreme heat, including a focused discussion of two different areas of the country: Florida and New York City.</p>","PeriodicalId":50165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","volume":"54 S1","pages":"40-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147693407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fallon Julia Cochlin, Regen Weber-Fares, Jami Crespo, William Sage, Cason Daniel Schmit
{"title":"Trust, Transparency, and the Fragile Promise of Data Governance in the Era of Modernization.","authors":"Fallon Julia Cochlin, Regen Weber-Fares, Jami Crespo, William Sage, Cason Daniel Schmit","doi":"10.1017/jme.2026.10234","DOIUrl":"10.1017/jme.2026.10234","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Public health data modernization in the United States has accelerated since COVID-19 exposed systemic weaknesses in fragmented data infrastructure and governance. Technical solutions have advanced, but legal and relational barriers still complicate data sharing across jurisdictions. Traditionally, interjurisdictional data sharing has relied on individually negotiated Data Use Agreements (DUAs), a process that is both resource-heavy and often opaque. To address this, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have proposed a Core DUA to standardize terms and reduce administrative burden. However, its success depends on trust - a fragile foundation increasingly strained by politicization, perceived lack of transparency, and controversial federal actions involving sensitive data. Jurisdictional concerns about compliance, security, and misuse underscore the need for governance frameworks that prioritize clarity, reciprocity, and accountability. Coercive approaches risk deepening fragmentation and undermining collaborative governance. Ultimately, modernization efforts will fail without supporting trust as the cornerstone of public health data governance. This article examines legal variation, transactional friction, and evolving jurisdictional perspectives to illuminate the critical role of trust in shaping the future of public health data systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":50165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","volume":"54 S1","pages":"10-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147693415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}