Managing Multi-Institutional Jurisdiction in Cases of Research Misconduct.

IF 1.6 4区哲学 Q2 ETHICS

Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics Pub Date : 2025-04-28 DOI:10.1017/jme.2025.36

Leslie Thornton, Devin Cohen, Mark Barnes, Barbara E Bierer

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multi-institutional scientific research projects are increasingly common. Nevertheless, regulations and guidelines do not yet adequately address which entity should assume responsibility for research misconduct proceedings in multi-institutional research. This article explores the challenges of determining jurisdictional roles in research misconduct matters in collaborative science and proposes the application of a "jurisdictional interests test" as a framework for determining jurisdiction in multi-institutional research misconduct proceedings.

查看原文本刊更多论文

管理研究不端案件中的多机构管辖权。

多机构科研项目日益普遍。然而，条例和指导方针尚未充分说明哪个实体应该对多机构研究中的研究不端行为承担责任。本文探讨了在合作科学研究不端事项中确定管辖权角色的挑战，并提出应用“管辖权利益测试”作为确定多机构研究不端诉讼管辖权的框架。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 医学-医学：法

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

4.80%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Material published in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics (JLME) contributes to the educational mission of The American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, covering public health, health disparities, patient safety and quality of care, and biomedical science and research. It provides articles on such timely topics as health care quality and access, managed care, pain relief, genetics, child/maternal health, reproductive health, informed consent, assisted dying, ethics committees, HIV/AIDS, and public health. Symposium issues review significant policy developments, health law court decisions, and books.