Why Universities Should Make Misconduct Reports Public.

IF 1.7 4区哲学 Q2 ETHICS

Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics Pub Date : 2025-04-14 DOI:10.1017/jme.2025.39

Ivan Oransky, Adam Marcus

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reflects on the availability of a key document in the research integrity landscape: Reports of institutional and university misconduct investigations. It reviews how universities have typically responded to calls for disclosure, offers suggestions to mitigate concerns, and argues that the failure to release such reports creates a critical evidence gap. It closes with a call for disclosure of such reports as a default.

查看原文本刊更多论文

为什么大学应该公开不当行为报告。

本文反映了研究诚信领域的一个关键文件的可用性：机构和大学不当行为调查报告。它回顾了大学通常是如何回应披露呼吁的，提出了减轻担忧的建议，并认为未能发布此类报告造成了一个关键的证据缺口。报告最后呼吁将此类报告作为违约披露。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 医学-医学：法

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

4.80%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Material published in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics (JLME) contributes to the educational mission of The American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, covering public health, health disparities, patient safety and quality of care, and biomedical science and research. It provides articles on such timely topics as health care quality and access, managed care, pain relief, genetics, child/maternal health, reproductive health, informed consent, assisted dying, ethics committees, HIV/AIDS, and public health. Symposium issues review significant policy developments, health law court decisions, and books.